99 records – page 1 of 5.

Decision 77-01

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2147
Applicant
General Crude Oil Company Northern
Application Number
9414
9415
9840
Title
Decision on application by General Crude Oil Company Northern, 1977 (gas processing and pipeline construction Teepee Creek-Sexsmith areas)
Date
1977
Title
Decision on application by General Crude Oil Company Northern, 1977 (gas processing and pipeline construction Teepee Creek-Sexsmith areas)
Date
1977
Applicant
General Crude Oil Company Northern
Application Number
9414
9415
9840
Hearing Panel
Webber HJ
Bellows LA
Strom NA
Hearing Type
Examiners
Category
Pipelines
Descriptors
Gas pipeline
Gas processing plant
Sour gas
Teepee field
Air quality
Emergency procedure
Environmental impact
Gas flaring
Monitoring
NTS 83M
Socio-economic effect
Safety
Sulphur dioxide
Notes
Decision 77-1 on application No. 9414, No. 9415 and No. 9840 to construct a sour gas plant in section 2-74-4 W6M and to construct secondary lines to transport sour gas from points in LSD 10-21-73-3 W6M and LSD 6-26-73-4 W6M to the plant site and to construct a secondary line to transport sour gas from a point in LSD 10-12-74-6 W6M to the plant site.
Interveners
Peace River Regional Planning
County of Grande Prairie
Smith, D.
Hollingworth, N.
Less detail

Decision 77-04

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2144
Applicant
IPEX Oil and Gas Ltd.
Application Number
9980
Title
Decision on application by IPEX Oil and Gas Ltd., 1977 (licence to drill a well in LS 14-36-26-1 W5M Crossfield and Airdrie areas)
Date
1977
Title
Decision on application by IPEX Oil and Gas Ltd., 1977 (licence to drill a well in LS 14-36-26-1 W5M Crossfield and Airdrie areas)
Date
1977
Applicant
IPEX Oil and Gas Ltd.
Application Number
9980
Hearing Panel
Craig DR
Millard V
DeSorcy GJ
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Well licence
Descriptors
Airdrie area
Sour gas
Well licence
Emergency procedure
Gas producing
Gas well
Hydrogen sulphide
Isopach map
Land use
Locating
NTS 82O
Safety
Turner Valley Fm
Urban development
Notes
Decision 77-4 on application No. 9980 to drill the well, Ipex Czar et al Cross 14-36-26-1 (W5M), to produce gas from Elkton member of the Turner Valley formation; Board hearing 1977-02-23/24
Interveners
Town of Airdrie
Nu-West Development Corporation
Calgary Regional Planning Commission
Cooper, G.S.
Cirrus Land Corporation Ltd.
Location
14-36-026-01W5
Less detail

Decision 77-08

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2140
Applicant
Petrogas Processing Ltd.
Application Number
9483
9484
Title
Decision on application by Petrogas Processing Ltd., 1977 (resumption' of operation of secondary lines for the transmission of sour gas, fuel gas, formation water, lean glycol, rich glycol and tracing water)
Date
1977
Title
Decision on application by Petrogas Processing Ltd., 1977 (resumption' of operation of secondary lines for the transmission of sour gas, fuel gas, formation water, lean glycol, rich glycol and tracing water)
Date
1977
Applicant
Petrogas Processing Ltd.
Application Number
9483
9484
Hearing Panel
Craig DR
Millard V
DeSorcy GJ
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Pipelines
Descriptors
Fuel gas pipeline
Gas pipeline
Sour gas
Emergency procedure
NTS 82P
Pipeline route
Safety
Urban development
Legal References
Pipeline Act
Notes
Decision 77-8 on application No. 9483 to resume operation of pipelines (all in TP.24, R.24-29, W4M) to transport sour gas and to transport sweet fuel gas, formation water, lean glycol, rich glycol and tracing water and on application No. 9494 to install dual emergency shutdown valves at 3 locations.
Interveners
Garden Heights community residents
Argyle Holdings Ltd.
Hillcrest Investments Ltd.
Parkland Drywall Ltd.
All Investments Ltd.
Ark Holdings Ltd.
Law Investments Ltd.
Rideau Investments Ltd.
Olympic Construction Co. Ltd.
City of Calgary
Less detail

Decision 77-14

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2134
Applicant
Shell Canada Resources Limited
Application Number
770189
Title
Decision report 77-14: Inquiry report on uncontrolled flow Shell 35 Waterton 12-9-3-30 W4, Waterton Pincher Creek area
Date
1977
Title
Decision report 77-14: Inquiry report on uncontrolled flow Shell 35 Waterton 12-9-3-30 W4, Waterton Pincher Creek area
Date
1977
Applicant
Shell Canada Resources Limited
Application Number
770189
Hearing Panel
Craig DR
Bohme VE
Hearing Type
Examiners
Category
Inquiry - Blowout
Descriptors
Blowout (well)
Pincher Creek area
Sour gas
Waterton area
Blowout control
Case history
Emergency procedure
Emission
Hydrogen sulphide
NTS 82H
Safety
Inquiry
Notes
ERCB inquiry report 77-14 on proceeding No. 770189 to inquire into the cause and events relating to an uncontrolled flow of sour gas from the well Shell 35 Waterton 12-9-3-30W4 on 28 February and 1 March 1977; Board inquiry 1977-03-16; also bound in 1977 Examiners reports starting on P.79
Interveners
Alberta Disaster Services
Huntley, J.
Tweedie, J.
Newton, G.
Municipal District of Pincher Creek
Oldman River Regional Planning Commission
Can-Tex Drilling and Exploration Ltd.
Less detail

Decision 78-02

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2118
Applicant
BP Exploration Canada Limited
Application Number
770629
Title
Decision on application by BP Exploration Canada Limited, 1978 (licence to drill a well in the Chestermere Lake area)
Date
1978
Title
Decision on application by BP Exploration Canada Limited, 1978 (licence to drill a well in the Chestermere Lake area)
Date
1978
Applicant
BP Exploration Canada Limited
Application Number
770629
Hearing Panel
Millard V
DeSorcy GJ
Manyluk AF
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Well licence
Descriptors
Chestermere Lake area
Well licence
Blowout preventer
Casing (well)
Contamination
Elkton Fm
Emergency procedure
Environmental impact
Geologic interpretation
Land value
Locating
NTS 82P
Oil producing
Residential building
Safety
Water pollution
Notes
Decision 78-2 on application No. 770629 for a licence to drill a well in LSD 6-15-24-28 W4M to evaluate and obtain production from the Elkton FM; Board hearing 1977-10-06; adjourned to 1977-11-09
Interveners
The Summer Village of Chestermere Leake
Comport Industries Ltd.
Argyle Management Ltd.
Scott, J.
Scott, C.
Anderson, G.
Location
06-15-024-28W4
Less detail

Decision 78-04

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2116
Applicant
Gulf Oil Canada Limited
Application Number
770991
Title
Decision on inquiry into uncontrolled discharge of sour gas Gulf Oil Canada Limited secondary line licence 7293 in the Alix area, 1978
Date
1978
Title
Decision on inquiry into uncontrolled discharge of sour gas Gulf Oil Canada Limited secondary line licence 7293 in the Alix area, 1978
Date
1978
Applicant
Gulf Oil Canada Limited
Application Number
770991
Hearing Panel
DeSorcy GJ
Bohme VE
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Inquiry - Pipelines
Descriptors
Gas pipeline
Pipeline accident
Pipeline leak
Sour gas
Atmospheric diffusion
Death
Emergency procedure
Evacuation
Hydrogen sulphide
NTS 83A
Pipeline safety
Safety
Inquiry
Notes
Decision on proceeding No. 770991 on pipeline rupture in LSD 1-23-39-23 W4M on pipeline that transmits sour gas from Clive central battery to Gulf Nevis gas plant resulting in an uncontrolled discharge of sour gas at the break location; Public inquiry
Interveners
Quintana Exploration Co.
Hazen and Babb Drilling Consultants Ltd.
Love's Oilfield Construction
Schmidt Drilling
Less detail

Decision 78-08

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2112
Applicant
Amoco Canada Petroleum Company Limited
Application Number
780023
Title
Decision on inquiry into uncontrolled flow from the well Amoco Pacific Brazr 7-10-48-12 W5M in the Lodgepole Drayton Valley area, 1978
Date
1978
Title
Decision on inquiry into uncontrolled flow from the well Amoco Pacific Brazr 7-10-48-12 W5M in the Lodgepole Drayton Valley area, 1978
Date
1978
Applicant
Amoco Canada Petroleum Company Limited
Application Number
780023
Hearing Panel
DeSorcy GJ
Bohme VE
Kupchanko EE
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Inquiry - Blowout
Descriptors
Blowout (well)
Blowout control
Drayton Valley area
Lodgepole blowout
Sour gas
Well killing
Air pollution
Case history
Inquiry
Emergency procedure
Emission
Environmental impact
Health
Hydrogen sulphide
NTS 83G
Procedure
Safety
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S8.137
Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S8.142
Notes
Decision 78-8 on proceeding No. 780023 to investigate an uncontrolled flow of sour gas from a well in LSD 7-10-48-12 W5M during a period from 1977-12-06 to 1978-01-02; Board inquiry 1978-02-22/23
Interveners
Alberta Disaster Services
Pacific Petroleum Ltd.
S&T Drilling (Northern) Ltd.
Less detail

Decision 78-10

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2110
Applicant
Dome Petroleum Limited
Application Number
780017
Title
Decision on application by Dome Petroleum Limited, 1978 (Construct a pipeline from Waterton to Cochran)
Date
1978
Title
Decision on application by Dome Petroleum Limited, 1978 (Construct a pipeline from Waterton to Cochran)
Date
1978
Applicant
Dome Petroleum Limited
Application Number
780017
Hearing Panel
Millard V
Bohme VE
Goodman CJ
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Pipelines
Descriptors
Cochrane area
Ethane
Liquefied petroleum gas
Pipeline construction permit
Product pipeline
Waterton area
Emergency procedure
Environmental impact
Land reclamation
Land use
NTS 82G
NTS 82J
NTS 82O
Pipeline design
Pipeline route
Right of way
Route selection
Safety
Transmission corridor
Legal References
Pipeline Act
Notes
Decision 78-10 on application No. 780017 to construct a pipeline to transmit ethane, propane, butane, and pentanes plus from Shell Waterton gas plant in LSD 1-24-4-1 W5M to the Alberta natural gas extraction plant in LSD 10-16-26-4 W5M near Cochrane.
Interveners
The Alberta Gas Trunk Line Company
Amoco Canada Petroleum Company Limited
Foothills Pipe Lines (Alta.) Limited
Hudson's Bay Oil and Gas cjompany Limited
Harvie, D.S.
LePatourel, J.
LePatourel, E.
Meston, G.R.
Harper-Penner Group
Rowland Family
Gardner, H.R.
Less detail

Decision 80-01

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2037
Applicant
Texasgulf Inc.
Application Number
780293
780647
780646
780276
790591
780275
Title
Decision on application by Texasgulf Inc., 1980 (licence to drill a well and permits to construct or resume operation of five pipelines in the Okotoks area)
Date
1980
Title
Decision on application by Texasgulf Inc., 1980 (licence to drill a well and permits to construct or resume operation of five pipelines in the Okotoks area)
Date
1980
Applicant
Texasgulf Inc.
Application Number
780293
780647
780646
780276
790591
780275
Hearing Panel
DeSorcy GJ
Goodman CJ
Bellows LA
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Pipelines
Descriptors
Fuel gas pipeline
Gas pipeline
Okotoks area
Okotoks field
Pipeline construction permit
Sour gas
Well licence
Crossfield Fm
Emergency procedure
Environmental impact
ID-79-02
Gas well
Land value
NTS 82I
Pipeline route
Right of way
Safety
Notes
Decision 80-1 on application No. 780293 to drill a well in LSD 11-1-22-29 W4M to evaluate & obtain production down to Crossfield FM, No. 780647 for pipeline to transport sour gas, No. 780646 for fuel gas pipeline, No. 780276 for pipeline to transport sour gas, No. 790591 for fuel gas pipeline and No. 780275 to resume operation of pipeline to transport sour gas.
Interveners
Carman, D.K.
Klaver, K.
Klaver, Mrs.
Heschl, B.
Heschl, Mrs.
Uragi, K.
Less detail

Decision 80-06

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2033
Applicant
Amerada Minerals Corporation of Canada Limited
Application Number
800242
Title
Decision on application by Amerada Minerals Corporation of Canada Ltd., 1980 (permit to construct a pipeline Chestermere-Okotoks area)
Date
1980
Title
Decision on application by Amerada Minerals Corporation of Canada Ltd., 1980 (permit to construct a pipeline Chestermere-Okotoks area)
Date
1980
Applicant
Amerada Minerals Corporation of Canada Limited
Application Number
800242
Hearing Panel
DeSorcy GJ
Goodman CJ
Bellows LA
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Pipelines
Descriptors
Gas pipeline
Gathering line
Okotoks area
Pipeline construction permit
Sour gas
Emergency procedure
Encroachment
ID-79-02
Gas producing
Lease drainage
Locating
NTS 82I
Pipeline design
Pipeline route
Safety
Safety equipment
Legal References
Pipeline Act
Notes
Decision 80-6 on application No. 780242 to construct secondary pipeline to transport sour natural gas from existing wells in 22-28 W4M and 22-29 W4M to an existing gathering system; Board hearing 1979-06-19, 1980-01-15, 1980-03-04/05
Interveners
Schang, R. E.
Schang, D.L.
Schang, E.
Schang, M.
Pottinger, J.R.
Marshall, G.
Marshall, J.
Uragi, Mr.
Uragi, Mrs.
Ollerenshaw, Mr.
Shamash, Mr.
Deplaedt Holdings Ltd.
Klaver, Mr.
Klaver, Mrs.
Bowview Developers
Bridgewater, H.
Bridgewater, J.
Bridgewater Livestock Company Ltd.
Carman, Mr.
Carman, Mrs.
Soutzo, A.
Soutzo, C.
Less detail

Decision 80-25

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2014
Applicant
Celanese Canada Inc.
Celanese Corporation
Application Number
800124
Title
Decision on application by Celanese Canada Inc. and Celanese Corporation, 1980 (use natural gas as feedstock and fuel to manufacture methanol at clover bar)
Date
1980
Title
Decision on application by Celanese Canada Inc. and Celanese Corporation, 1980 (use natural gas as feedstock and fuel to manufacture methanol at clover bar)
Date
1980
Applicant
Celanese Canada Inc.
Celanese Corporation
Application Number
800124
Hearing Panel
Millard V
Berkowitz N
Webber HJ
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Industrial development permit
Descriptors
Clover Bar area
Industrial development permit
Methanol
Benefit cost analysis
Demand (economics)
Economic analysis
Emergency procedure
Environmental impact
Marketing
Natural gas - fuel
Natural gas - raw material
NTS 83H
Safety
Supply (economics)
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S42
Notes
Decision on application to use natural gas as a raw material and fuel to produce methanol in a new unit to be constructed on its existing plant site at Clover Bar (section 17, TP.53, R.23, W4M)
Interveners
Alberta Gas Chemicals Ltd.
Alberta Gas Ethylene Company Ltd.
Association of Professional Engineers, Geologists and Geophysicists of Alberta
Chevron Standard Limited
Norcen Energy Resources Ltd.
R.K. Dixon Engineering Services Ltd.
Sultana Corporation
City of Medicine Hat
City of Edmonton
County of Strathmore
Less detail

Decision 82-10

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1137
Applicant
Shell Canada Resources Limited
Application Number
811017
Title
Examiners report on application by Shell Canada Resources Limited, 1982 (to reinstate well licence No. 90576 to drill a well, Shell 21 unit 1 JumpW 11-30-26-6 in the Jumping Pound west field)
Date
1982
Title
Examiners report on application by Shell Canada Resources Limited, 1982 (to reinstate well licence No. 90576 to drill a well, Shell 21 unit 1 JumpW 11-30-26-6 in the Jumping Pound west field)
Date
1982
Applicant
Shell Canada Resources Limited
Application Number
811017
Hearing Panel
Warne GA
Stafford GH
Remmer WG
Hearing Type
Examiners
Category
Well licence
Descriptors
Jumping Pound west field
Sour gas
Well licence
Deliverability
Drilling cost
Emergency procedure
Environmental impact
Locating
Producing equipment
Safety
Target area
Legal References
Energy Resources Conservation Act S41
Notes
ERCB Examiners report E82-10 on application No. 811017 for reinstatement of well licence No. 90576 to drill the well Shell 21 unit 1 Jumpw 11-30-26-6 from surface location in LSD 5-30-26-6 W5 to obtain gas production from Mississippian Turner Valley FM.
Interveners
Robinson, D.J.
Less detail

Decision 82-12

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2066
Applicant
ESSO Resources Canada Limited
Application Number
810520
Title
Decision on application by Esso Resources Canada Limited, 1982 (Quirk Creek gas processing plant)
Date
1982
Title
Decision on application by Esso Resources Canada Limited, 1982 (Quirk Creek gas processing plant)
Date
1982
Applicant
ESSO Resources Canada Limited
Application Number
810520
Hearing Panel
Millard V
Strom NA
Evans RG
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Gas processing
Descriptors
Gas processing plant
Moose field
Quirk Creek plant
Sour gas
Whiskey field
Air pollution
Air quality
Emergency procedure
Emission
Environmental impact
ID-80-02
IL-71-29
IL-80-24
Expansion
Hydrogen sulphide
Injection
Monitoring
NTS 82J
Pollution control
Procedure
Sulphur dioxide
Sulphur recovery
Underground
Waste disposal
Water pollution
Legal References
Energy Resources Conservation Act S2
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S4
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S26
Notes
Decision 82-12 on application No. 810520 to utilize spare plant capacity to process sour gas reserves from Moose and Whiskey fields at the Quirk Creek gas plant located in the south half of section 4-21-4 W5M; Board hearing 1981-11-04/05/06/23/24/25/26 and 1981-12-14/15/16/17/18 and 1982-01-05/06; see also related Decision D82-3 on Jumping Pound gas plant and ERCB report 82-E for Decisions on related pipeline applications by Shell and Decision D83-8 for local interveners cost awards; see also related report 82-D
Interveners
Shell Canada Resources Limited
Hanen, Z.
Rumsey Ranches
Russell, A.
Canadian Wildlife Federation
Wolf, R.E.
Less detail

Decision 82-17

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2061
Applicant
Gulf Canada Resources Inc.
Application Number
811041
820204
820205
Title
Decision on application by Gulf Canada Resources Inc., 1982 (sour gas, fuel gas and saltwater disposal pipelines Shaw-Mountain Park areas)
Date
1982
Title
Decision on application by Gulf Canada Resources Inc., 1982 (sour gas, fuel gas and saltwater disposal pipelines Shaw-Mountain Park areas)
Date
1982
Applicant
Gulf Canada Resources Inc.
Application Number
811041
820204
820205
Hearing Panel
DeSorcy GJ
Bohme VE
Strom NA
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Pipelines
Descriptors
Fuel gas pipeline
Gas pipeline
Mountain Park field
Pipeline construction permit
Shaw field
Sour gas
Waste water
Water pipeline
Coal lease
Coal preparation plant
Emergency procedure
Energy development
Environmental impact
Locating
NTS 83F
Pipeline design
Pipeline route
Route selection
Safety
Legal References
Pipeline Act
Notes
Decision 82-17 on application No. 811041, No. 820204 and No. 820205 to construct pipelines to transport sour gas from three wells in Shaw field and four wells in Mountain Park field to a central compressor station in LSD 2-28-48-21 W5M and from proposed compressor to Gulf's Robb plant, and to transport fuel gas from plant to compressor station & line heaters on sour gas gathering system, and to transport sour produced water from plant to water disposal well (TP.47-49, R.19-22, W5M).
Interveners
Mercoal Minerals Ltd.
Less detail

Decision 82-19

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2059
Applicant
Mitchell Energy Corporation
Application Number
820260
820261
Title
Decision on application by Mitchell Energy Corporation, 1982 (reinstatement of well licence and permit to construct pipelines in the Okotoks area)
Date
1982
Title
Decision on application by Mitchell Energy Corporation, 1982 (reinstatement of well licence and permit to construct pipelines in the Okotoks area)
Date
1982
Applicant
Mitchell Energy Corporation
Application Number
820260
820261
Hearing Panel
DeSorcy GJ
Goodman CJ
Bellows LA
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Pipelines
Descriptors
Fuel gas pipeline
Gas pipeline
Okotoks area
Okotoks field
Pipeline construction permit
Sour gas
Well licence
Blowout preventer
Directional drilling
Drilling cost
Emergency procedure
Energy development
Environmental impact
Equity
ID-81-03
IL-81-07
Gas producing
Gas reserve
Gas well
Hydrogen sulphide
Land use
Land value
Lease drainage
Locating
NTS 82I
Pipeline route
Safety
Urban development
Legal References
Energy Resources Conservation Act S41
Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S2.020
Pipeline Act
Notes
Decision 82-19 on application No. 820260 to reinstate well licence 92961 to drill well in LSD 11-30-20-28 W4M to obtain sour gas production from Crossfield member of Wabamun GP and No. 820261 for permits to construct pipelines to transport sour gas and fuel gas in the area; Board hearing 1982-04-27/28
Interveners
Payne, L.H.
deVries, D.
Rio Frio Ranch Ltd.
Sallenbach, O.
Less detail

Decision 82-23

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2055
Applicant
Gulf Canada Resources Inc.
Application Number
820283
Title
Decision on application by Gulf Canada Resources Inc., 1982 (well licence to drill an exploratory well Millarville area)
Date
1982
Title
Decision on application by Gulf Canada Resources Inc., 1982 (well licence to drill an exploratory well Millarville area)
Date
1982
Applicant
Gulf Canada Resources Inc.
Application Number
820283
Hearing Panel
DeSorcy GJ
Bohme VE
Brushett ER
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Well licence
Descriptors
Sour gas
Well licence
Community relations
Contamination
Drilling fluid
Drilling program
Drilling Waste disposal
Emergency procedure
Environmental impact
ID-81-03
Exploratory well
Gas well
Safety
Waste disposal
Water supply
Water well
Legal References
EUB Rules of Practice
Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S2.020
Notes
Decision 82-23 on application No. 820283 to drill the proposed well Gulf et al Millarville 6-32-22-4 directionally from a surface location in LSD 14-29-22-4 W5M.
Interveners
Rusticana Estates,Echo Hill and surrounding area residents
Canadian Wildlife Federation
Location
06-32-022-04W5
14-29-022-04W5
Less detail

Decision 82-32

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1120
Applicant
Voyager Petroleums Limited
Application Number
820693
Title
Examiners report on application by Voyager Petroleums Limited, 1982 (gas processing plant Killam north field)
Date
1982
Title
Examiners report on application by Voyager Petroleums Limited, 1982 (gas processing plant Killam north field)
Date
1982
Applicant
Voyager Petroleums Limited
Application Number
820693
Hearing Panel
Edgecombe RW
Pearson DG
Remmer WG
Hearing Type
Examiners
Category
Gas processing
Descriptors
Gas processing plant
Killam north field
Sour gas
Contamination
Emergency procedure
Environmental impact
Flare
Gathering line
Groundwater
Iron sponge process
NTS 73D
Pipeline corrosion
Safety
Waste disposal
Water pollution
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S26
Notes
ERCB Examiners report E82-32 on application No. 820693 to construct & operate a gas sweetening facility at Voyager's compressor station located in the SW quarter of section 5-45-12 W4M.
Interveners
Wylie, D.
Bricker, L.
Bricker, Mrs.
Less detail

Decision 82-38

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2041
Applicant
Shell Canada Resources Limited
Gulf Canada Resources Inc.
Application Number
810543
810606
810376
810377
Title
Decision on application by Shell Canada Resources Limited and Gulf Canada Resources Inc., 1982 (gas plant approval amendments and pipeline permits Pincher Creek area)
Date
1982
Title
Decision on application by Shell Canada Resources Limited and Gulf Canada Resources Inc., 1982 (gas plant approval amendments and pipeline permits Pincher Creek area)
Date
1982
Applicant
Shell Canada Resources Limited
Gulf Canada Resources Inc.
Application Number
810543
810606
810376
810377
Hearing Panel
Millard V
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Pipelines
Descriptors
Gas pipeline
Gas processing plant
Lookout Butte field
Pincher Creek field
Pincher Creek gas plant
Pipeline construction permit
Sour gas
Waterton area
Waterton gas plant
Abandonment
Economic analysis
Emergency procedure
Emission
Environmental impact
ID-81-03
Gas conservation
Land reclamation
Land use
Monitoring
NTS 82H
Pipeline design
Safety
Shutdown
Site survey
Sulphur dioxide
Sulphur recovery
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S26
Pipeline Act
Notes
Decision D82-38 on application No. 810543 by Gulf to shut down its Pincher Creek gas plant, No. 810606 by Shell to allow its Waterton plant to process Pincher Creek and Lookout Butte gas and No. 810376 and 810377 by Gulf for pipelines from Pincher Creek plant to Waterton plant (all in TP.4, R.29-30, W4M).
Interveners
Oldman River Regional Planning Commission
Municipal District of Pincher Creek No. 9
Town of Pincher Creek
Pincher Creek Economic Development Committee
Hedenstrom, J.
Less detail

Decision 82-39

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2040
Applicant
Amoco Canada Petroleum Company Limited
Application Number
820308
Title
Decision on application by Amoco Canada Petroleum Company Ltd., 1982 (approval of a solution gas processing plant St. Albert area)
Date
1982
Title
Decision on application by Amoco Canada Petroleum Company Ltd., 1982 (approval of a solution gas processing plant St. Albert area)
Date
1982
Applicant
Amoco Canada Petroleum Company Limited
Application Number
820308
Hearing Panel
DeSorcy GJ
Bohme VE
Brushett ER
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Gas processing
Descriptors
Gas processing plant
Morinville field
Sour gas
St. Albert area
St. Albert-Big Lake field
Air quality
Atmospheric diffusion
Dissolved gas
Emergency procedure
Emission
Environmental impact
Flare
Gas conservation
Health
Hydrogen sulphide
Land use
Locating
NTS 83H
Plant location
Safety
Sulphur dioxide
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S26
Notes
Decision 82-39 on application No. 820308 to process sour solution gas from three batteries in the St. Albert-Big Lake field & Morinville field at an existing battery site in LSD 14-36-53-26 W4M; Board hearing 1982-10-06/07
Interveners
Silver Chief Community Gas Plant Committee
Genstar Land Development
Municipal District of Sturgeon No. 90
Helenslea Acres
Less detail

Decision 83-04

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1201
Applicant
Citadel Resources Ltd.
Scion Petroleum Engineering Limited
Application Number
820763
Title
Examiners report on application by Citadel Resources Ltd., 1983 (sour gas processing plant Sundre area)
Date
1983
Title
Examiners report on application by Citadel Resources Ltd., 1983 (sour gas processing plant Sundre area)
Date
1983
Applicant
Citadel Resources Ltd.
Scion Petroleum Engineering Limited
Application Number
820763
Hearing Panel
Homeniuk TF
Mazurek LA
Nichol JR
Hearing Type
Examiners
Category
Gas processing
Descriptors
Gas processing plant
Sour gas
Sundre area
Air pollution
Air quality
Design criteria
Emergency procedure
Emission
Health
Locating
Monitoring
Noise (sound)
NTS 82O
Plant location
Safety
Sulphur dioxide
Truck
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S26
Notes
Examiners report E83-4 on application No. 820763 by Scion Petroleum & Gildex Ltd. on behalf of Citadel for approval to construct a sour gas processing plant in LSD 13-20-33-5 W5M; Examiners hearing 1982-10-27 adjourned to 1982-11-25
Interveners
Residents in the County of Mountainview
Alberda, R.
Less detail

99 records – page 1 of 5.