Narrow Results By
Applicant
- Alberta Energy Company Limited 1
- Alberta Gas Chemicals Limited 1
- Canada Cement Lafarge Ltd. 1
- Canadian Fina Oil Limited 1
- Chevron Standard Limited 1
- Dome Petroleum Limited 1
- ESSO Resources Canada Limited 2
- Energy Resources Conservation Board 2
- Great Northern Oil Limited 1
- Home Oil Company Limited 1
- Hudson's Bay Oil and Gas Company Limited 1
- Mobil Oil Canada Ltd. 1
Decision 68-02
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2402
- Applicant
- Hudson's Bay Oil and Gas Company Limited
- Pan American Petroleum Corporation
- Canadian Fina Oil Limited
- Application Number
- 2903
- Title
- Decision on application by Hudson's Bay Oil And Gas Company Limited, Pan American Petroleum Corporation, and Canadian Fina Oil Limited, 1968 (cycling of the Windfall D-3A pool with partial pressure depletion)
- Date
- 1968
- Title
- Decision on application by Hudson's Bay Oil And Gas Company Limited, Pan American Petroleum Corporation, and Canadian Fina Oil Limited, 1968 (cycling of the Windfall D-3A pool with partial pressure depletion)
- Date
- 1968
- Applicant
- Hudson's Bay Oil and Gas Company Limited
- Pan American Petroleum Corporation
- Canadian Fina Oil Limited
- Application Number
- 2903
- Hearing Panel
- Govier GW
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Category
- Enhanced recovery
- Descriptors
- Gas cycling
- Sweep efficiency
- Replacing
- Retrograde condensation
- Vaporization
- Diffusion
- Recovery
- Notes
- Decision on application permitting cycling operations in the Windfall D-3A pool and requesting further studies and laboratory experiments to resolve certain matters
Decision 73-15
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2196
- Applicant
- Mobil Oil Canada Ltd.
- Application Number
- 6622
- Title
- Decision on application by Mobil Oil Canada Ltd., 1973 (exemption from the sulphur guidelines Wimborne gas plant)
- Date
- 1973
- Title
- Decision on application by Mobil Oil Canada Ltd., 1973 (exemption from the sulphur guidelines Wimborne gas plant)
- Date
- 1973
- Applicant
- Mobil Oil Canada Ltd.
- Application Number
- 6622
- Hearing Panel
- DeSorcy GJ
- Larbalestier PD
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Category
- Gas processing
- Descriptors
- Gas processing plant
- Sulphur recovery
- Efficiency
- Notes
- Decision 73-15 on application No. 6622 for exemption from sulphur recovery guidelines for Wimborne gas plant; approval 1464A
Decision 76-E
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2383
- Applicant
- Alberta Gas Chemicals Limited
- Application Number
- 8744
- Title
- Decision on application by Alberta Gas Chemicals Ltd., 1976 (Oil and Gas Conservation Act, section 42)
- Date
- 1976
- Title
- Decision on application by Alberta Gas Chemicals Ltd., 1976 (Oil and Gas Conservation Act, section 42)
- Date
- 1976
- Applicant
- Alberta Gas Chemicals Limited
- Application Number
- 8744
- Hearing Panel
- Millard V
- Berkowitz N
- DeSorcy GJ
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Category
- Industrial development permit
- Descriptors
- Chemical plant
- Industrial development permit
- Medicine Hat area
- ETHANOL
- Benefit cost analysis
- Capitalized cost
- Economic analysis
- Efficiency
- Gas supply
- Marketing
- Natural gas - fuel
- Natural gas - raw material
- NTS 72E
- Raw material
- Socio-economic effect
- Legal References
- Oil and Gas Conservation Act S42
- Notes
- ERCB report 76-E on application No. 8744 to use gas as raw material and fuel to produce methanol in a plant to be constructed near Medicine Hat (permit AGC 77-1); Board hearing 1976-01-28/29
Decision 78-H
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2347
- Applicant
- Canada Cement Lafarge Ltd.
- Application Number
- 780056
- Title
- Decision on application by Canada Cement Lafarge Ltd., 1978 (Oil and Gas Conservation Act, section 42)
- Date
- 1978
- Title
- Decision on application by Canada Cement Lafarge Ltd., 1978 (Oil and Gas Conservation Act, section 42)
- Date
- 1978
- Applicant
- Canada Cement Lafarge Ltd.
- Application Number
- 780056
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Category
- Industrial development permit
- Descriptors
- Cement
- Cement plant
- Exshaw area
- Industrial development permit
- Coal - fuel
- Economic analysis
- Efficiency
- Environmental impact
- Expansion
- Forecasting
- Natural gas - fuel
- Legal References
- Oil and Gas Conservation Act S42
- Notes
- ERCB report 78-H on application No. 780056 to use natural gas as fuel to manufacture cement in an expansion of its existing plant at Exshaw; permit No. CC 78-1
Decision 79-03
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2093
- Applicant
- Alberta Energy Company Limited
- Application Number
- 780619
- Title
- Decision on application by Alberta Energy Company Ltd., 1979 (industrial development permit to manufacture substitute natural gas)
- Date
- 1979
- Title
- Decision on application by Alberta Energy Company Ltd., 1979 (industrial development permit to manufacture substitute natural gas)
- Date
- 1979
- Applicant
- Alberta Energy Company Limited
- Application Number
- 780619
- Hearing Panel
- Millard V
- DeSorcy GJ
- Goodman CJ
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Category
- Industrial development permit
- Descriptors
- Bruderheim area
- Industrial development permit
- Manufactured gas
- Benefit cost analysis
- Byproduct
- Cost analysis
- Demand (economics)
- Efficiency
- Natural gas - fuel
- Natural gas - raw material
- NTS 83H
- Pentanes plus
- Plant design
- Legal References
- Oil and Gas Conservation Act S42
- Notes
- Decision 79-3 on application No. 780619 to construct a substitute natural gas plant near Bruderheim, to use byproduct from the Petalta benzene plant and natural gas as feedstock and fuel in the manufacture of the SNG; see related Decision 79-4 for Decision on gas removal application
- Interveners
- Alberta and Southern Gas Co. Ltd.
- Alberta Gas Ethylene Company Ltd.
- Amoco Canada Petroleum Company Ltd.
- Canadian Western Natural Gas Company Limited
- Northwestern Utilities Limited
- Dome Petroleum Limited
- Dow Chemical of Canada Ltd.
- Gulf Canada Resources Inc.
- Pan-Alberta Gas Ltd.
- TransCanada PipeLines Limited
- Turbo Resources Ltd.
Decision 80-02
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2036
- Applicant
- ESSO Resources Canada Limited
- Application Number
- 790377
- Title
- Decision on application by Esso Resources Canada Limited, 1980 (enhanced recovery by carbon dioxide miscible flood Judy Creek Beaverhill Lake A pool)
- Date
- 1980
- Title
- Decision on application by Esso Resources Canada Limited, 1980 (enhanced recovery by carbon dioxide miscible flood Judy Creek Beaverhill Lake A pool)
- Date
- 1980
- Applicant
- ESSO Resources Canada Limited
- Application Number
- 790377
- Hearing Panel
- DeSorcy GJ
- Strom NA
- Bray JA
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Category
- Enhanced recovery
- Descriptors
- Carbon dioxide flooding
- Enhanced recovery scheme
- Judy Creek field
- Miscible displacement
- Beaverhill Lake Fm
- Development drilling
- Economic analysis
- Monitoring
- NTS 83J
- Oil saturation
- Reservoir model
- Sweep efficiency
- Tertiary recovery
- Legal References
- Oil and Gas Conservation Act S38
- Notes
- Decision 80-2 on application No. 790377 for approval of a CO2 miscible flood scheme to enhance recovery of oil from Judy Creek Beaverhill Lake A pool (TP.63-64, R.10-11, W5M).
- Interveners
- Amoco Canada Petroleum Company Ltd.
- Gulf Canada Resources Inc.
Decision 81-02
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2006
- Applicant
- Dome Petroleum Limited
- Application Number
- 790732
- Title
- Decision on application by Dome Petroleum Limited, 1981 (Enhanced recovery by ethane enriched miscible flood - Caroline Viking A pool)
- Date
- 1981
- Title
- Decision on application by Dome Petroleum Limited, 1981 (Enhanced recovery by ethane enriched miscible flood - Caroline Viking A pool)
- Date
- 1981
- Applicant
- Dome Petroleum Limited
- Application Number
- 790732
- Hearing Panel
- Bray JA
- Keushnig HR
- Stafford GH
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Category
- Enhanced recovery
- Descriptors
- Caroline field
- Enhanced recovery scheme
- Miscible displacement
- Depletion
- Design criteria
- Gas saturation
- Injection pressure
- Monitoring
- NTS 82O
- NTS 83B
- Oil recovery
- Reservoir characteristic
- Reservoir performance
- Sweep efficiency
- Viking Fm
- Legal References
- Oil and Gas Conservation Act S38
- Notes
- Decision 81-2 (with unnumbered Examiners report attached) on application No. 790732 for an ethane enriched miscible gas flood scheme in a portion of the Caroline Viking A pool (TP.33-36, R. 3-7, W5M).
- Interveners
- Amoco Canada Petroleum Company Ltd.
- Hudson's Bay Oil and Gas Company Limited
- Wintershall Oil of Canada Ltd.
Decision 81-05
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2003
- Applicant
- Chevron Standard Limited
- Application Number
- 800163
- Title
- Decision on application by Chevron Standard Limited, 1981 (enhanced recovery Westpem Nisku A)
- Date
- 1981
- Title
- Decision on application by Chevron Standard Limited, 1981 (enhanced recovery Westpem Nisku A)
- Date
- 1981
- Applicant
- Chevron Standard Limited
- Application Number
- 800163
- Hearing Panel
- DeSorcy GJ
- Strom NA
- Mink FJ
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Category
- Enhanced recovery
- Descriptors
- Enhanced recovery scheme
- Miscible displacement
- Waterflooding
- Westpem field
- Coning
- Economic analysis
- IL-79-24
- Nisku Fm
- NTS 83G
- Oil recovery
- Petroleum conservation
- Reservoir characteristic
- Reservoir model
- Sweep efficiency
- Notes
- Decision 81-5 on application No. 800163 for enhanced recovery scheme by water injection in the WestPem Nisku A pool (TP.50, R.12, W5M).
- Interveners
- Amoco Canada Petroleum Limited
Decision 83-19
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2295
- Applicant
- ESSO Resources Canada Limited
- Application Number
- 830246
- Title
- Decision on application by Esso Resources Canada Limited, 1983 (hydrocarbon miscible flood, Judy Creek Beaverhill Lake A Pool)
- Date
- 1983
- Title
- Decision on application by Esso Resources Canada Limited, 1983 (hydrocarbon miscible flood, Judy Creek Beaverhill Lake A Pool)
- Date
- 1983
- Applicant
- ESSO Resources Canada Limited
- Application Number
- 830246
- Hearing Panel
- DeSorcy GJ
- Strom NA
- Antonio HA
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Category
- Enhanced recovery
- Descriptors
- Enhanced recovery scheme
- Judy Creek field
- Miscible displacement
- Beaverhill Lake Fm
- Development well
- Injection well
- NTS 83J
- Oil recovery
- Oil saturation
- Reservoir characteristic
- Reservoir model
- Reservoir performance
- Sweep efficiency
- Legal References
- Oil and Gas Conservation Act S26
- Notes
- Decision D83-19 on application No. 830246 by ESSO resources to implement a hydrocarbon miscible flood in the Judy Creek Beaverhill Lake (BHL) A pool (TP.63-64, R.10-11, W5M); Board hearing 1983-07-19/20
- Interveners
- Amoco Canada Petroleum Company Ltd.
- Home Oil Company Ltd.
- Chevron Canada Resources Limited
- Dome Petroleum Limited
- Gulf Canada Resources Inc.
- Mobil Oil Canada Ltd.
- Shell Canada Resources Limited
Decision 83-26
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2271
- Applicant
- Home Oil Company Limited
- Application Number
- 830674
- Title
- Decision on application by Home Oil Company Limited, 1983 (hydrocarbon miscible flooe, Swan Hills Beaverhill Lake A&B pool unit no. 1)
- Date
- 1983
- Title
- Decision on application by Home Oil Company Limited, 1983 (hydrocarbon miscible flooe, Swan Hills Beaverhill Lake A&B pool unit no. 1)
- Date
- 1983
- Applicant
- Home Oil Company Limited
- Application Number
- 830674
- Hearing Panel
- DeSorcy GJ
- Strom NA
- Mink FJ
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Category
- Enhanced recovery
- Descriptors
- Enhanced recovery scheme
- Miscible displacement
- Swan Hills field
- Beaverhill Lake Fm
- Design criteria
- Development well
- Economic analysis
- Injection well
- Monitoring
- NTS 83J
- Oil recovery
- Oil saturation
- Recovery factor
- Reservoir model
- Sweep efficiency
- Unitized field
- Legal References
- Oil and Gas Conservation Act S26
- Notes
- Decision D83-26 on application No. 830674 to implement a hydrocarbon miscible flood in the Swan Hills Beaverhill Lake A&B pool unit No. 1 (TP.66-68, R.9-11, W5M).
- Interveners
- Amoco Canada Petroleum Company Limited
- Esso Resources Canada Limited
- Gulf Canada Resources Inc.
- Texaco Canada Resources Ltd.
Decision 92-B
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision24
- Applicant
- Energy Resources Conservation Board
- Title
- Review of the operation of Nova's Pipeline system : issues and recommendations
- Date
- 1992
- Title
- Review of the operation of Nova's Pipeline system : issues and recommendations
- Date
- 1992
- Applicant
- Energy Resources Conservation Board
- Hearing Type
- Utilities
- Category
- Pipelines
- Descriptors
- Business operation
- Gas pipeline
- Gas price
- Gas transmission industry
- Industry and State
- Pipeline transportation
- Efficiency
- Operating condition
- Performance
- Recommendation
- Regulation
- Notes
- ERCB report 92-B on review of the operation of the provincial gas transmission system of Nova Corporation, carried out at the request of the Minister of Energy
Decision 2000-80
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision3313
- Applicant
- Nova Gas Transmission Ltd.
- Application Number
- 2000349
- file no. 1606-01
- Title
- Decision 2000-80 : Nova Gas Transmission Ltd. application for 2001 interim rates, tolls and charges
- Date
- 2000
- Title
- Decision 2000-80 : Nova Gas Transmission Ltd. application for 2001 interim rates, tolls and charges
- Date
- 2000
- Applicant
- Nova Gas Transmission Ltd.
- Application Number
- 2000349
- file no. 1606-01
- Hearing Panel
- Bietz BF
- Dilay JD
- Rahnama F
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Utilities
- Category
- Pipeline system rate
- Descriptors
- Cost efficiency incentive settlement
- Decision D2000-06
- Government hearing
- Gas price
- Interim rate
- Negotiated settlement
- NOVA pipeline system
- Pipeline toll
- Revenue requirement method
- Legal References
- Gas Utilities Act S51
- Public Utilities Board Act S52
- Notes
- EUB decision on application by NOVA for approval of interim rates, tolls and charges for service effective January 1, 2001, submitting that its current tolls were based on a revenue requirement determined under the provisions of the Cost Efficiency Incentive Settlement as approved by Board Order U96119. It stated that interim rates were now required because CEIS expires on December 31, 2000.
- Approval
- Approved
Decision 2001-44
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision3332
- Applicant
- Nova Gas Transmission Ltd.
- Application Number
- 2001076
- file no. 1606-02
- Title
- Decision 2001-44 : Nova Gas Transmission Ltd. application for approval of the Alberta System Rate Settlement for 2001 - 2002
- Date
- 2001
- Title
- Decision 2001-44 : Nova Gas Transmission Ltd. application for approval of the Alberta System Rate Settlement for 2001 - 2002
- Date
- 2001
- Applicant
- Nova Gas Transmission Ltd.
- Application Number
- 2001076
- file no. 1606-02
- Hearing Panel
- Bietz BF
- Dilay JD
- Rahnama F
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Utilities
- Category
- Pipeline system rate
- Gas pricing
- Descriptors
- Alberta system rate settlement
- Cost efficiency incentive settlement
- Decision D2000-06
- Decision D2000-80
- Government hearing
- Gas price
- Interim rate
- Negotiated settlement
- NOVA pipeline system
- Pipeline toll
- Revenue requirement method
- Legal References
- Gas Utilities Act Part 3
- Notes
- EUB decision on application by NOVA for approval of the Alberta Rate System Setllement for January 1, 2001 to December 31, 2002 (the Settlement) and for approval of the final rates, tolls and charges determined in accordance with the Settlement for services performed by NGTL .
- Approval
- Approved
Decision E74-(p.019)
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1817
- Applicant
- Western Decalta Petroleum Ltd.
- Application Number
- 7135
- Title
- Examiners report on application by Western Decalta Petroleum Ltd., 1974 (exemption from sulphur recovery guidelines Turner Valley gas processing plant)
- Date
- 1974
- Title
- Examiners report on application by Western Decalta Petroleum Ltd., 1974 (exemption from sulphur recovery guidelines Turner Valley gas processing plant)
- Date
- 1974
- Applicant
- Western Decalta Petroleum Ltd.
- Application Number
- 7135
- Hearing Panel
- DeSorcy GJ
- Evans RG
- Hearing Type
- Examiners
- Category
- Gas processing
- Descriptors
- Sulphur recovery
- Gas processing plant
- Turner Valley field
- Sour gas
- Efficiency
- Environmental impact
- Air quality
- Emission
- Notes
- ERCB Examiners report on application No. 7135 to exempt Turner Valley gas processing plant from sulpher recovery guidelines set out in Board information letter No. IL71-29.
- Interveners
- Foulger, J.
- Lansdell, G.
- Davidson, D.
- Walpole, D.
- Allen, J.R.
- Hills, P.
- Mayes, G.
- Bartee, B.
- Fluter, D.
Decision E76-(p.001)
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision95
- Applicant
- Energy Resources Conservation Board
- Title
- Examiners report on inquiry into the operation of the Aquitaine Rainbow gas processing plant, 1976
- Date
- 1976
- Title
- Examiners report on inquiry into the operation of the Aquitaine Rainbow gas processing plant, 1976
- Date
- 1976
- Applicant
- Energy Resources Conservation Board
- Hearing Type
- Examiners
- Category
- Gas processing
- Descriptors
- Gas processing plant
- Rainbow field
- Sour gas
- Sulphur recovery
- Efficiency
- Gas conservation
- Gas flaring
- IL-71-29
- Operating condition
- Violation
- Inquiry
- Notes
- ERCB Examiners report on proceeding No. 268 to inquire into the operation of the Aquitaine Rainbow gas processing plant and the causes, effects and remedial measures to be taken with respect to the apparent failure of the operator to meet minimum sulphur recovery requirements specified by approval No. 1554; Examiners inquiry 76-01-07
Decision E79-(p.071)
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1773
- Applicant
- Great Northern Oil Limited
- Application Number
- 780690
- Title
- Examiners report on application by Great Northern Oil Limited, 1979 (enhanced recovery by water injection Wildmere Lloydminster A pool)
- Date
- 1979
- Title
- Examiners report on application by Great Northern Oil Limited, 1979 (enhanced recovery by water injection Wildmere Lloydminster A pool)
- Date
- 1979
- Applicant
- Great Northern Oil Limited
- Application Number
- 780690
- Hearing Panel
- Evans RG
- Berndtsson NG
- Pearson DG
- Hearing Type
- Examiners
- Category
- Enhanced recovery
- Descriptors
- Enhanced recovery scheme
- Waterflooding
- Wildmere field
- Gas liquid ratio
- Injection well
- Lloydminster Fm
- NTS 73E
- Oil recovery
- Pressure maintenance
- Sweep efficiency
- Well pattern
- Legal References
- Oil and Gas Conservation Act S38
- Notes
- ERCB Examiners report on application No. 780690 for water flood pressure maintenance scheme for enhancement of oil recovery from part of the Wildmere Lloydminster A pool (TP.47, R.5, W4M); approval No. 2812
- Interveners
- Husky Oil Operations, Limited
Decision Memorandum of Decision 1987-01-20
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision233
- Applicant
- Sulpetro Limited
- Application Number
- 850272
- Title
- Memorandum of Decision on notice of motion by Sulpetro Limited, 1987
- Date
- 1987
- Title
- Memorandum of Decision on notice of motion by Sulpetro Limited, 1987
- Date
- 1987
- Applicant
- Sulpetro Limited
- Application Number
- 850272
- Hearing Type
- Prehearing
- Category
- Gas processing
- Notes
- Memorandum of Decision on application No. 850272 dated 1985-03-07 for approval to implement design modifications at its Elmworth gas processing plant to allow operation at an increased gas through-put rate and an increased ethane recovery efficiency; Board meeting held 1987-01-20
- Interveners
- Alberta Gas Ethylene Company Ltd.
- Williamson HD
- Dome Petroleum Limited
- Hall RJ
- Dow Chemical Canada Inc.
- Union Carbide Ethylene Oxide/Glycol Company
- C.I.L. Inc.
- Novacor Chemicals Inc
- Neufeld RA
- Canadian Hunter Exploration Ltd.
- Mackie J
- Esso Resources Canada Limited
- Davies DG
- Amoco Canada Petroleum Company Ltd.
- Arnason DG
- Gulf Canada Corporation
- Gandar DJ
- Scurry-Rainbow Oil Limited
- Perrin RM