17 records – page 1 of 1.

Decision 68-02

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2402
Applicant
Hudson's Bay Oil and Gas Company Limited
Pan American Petroleum Corporation
Canadian Fina Oil Limited
Application Number
2903
Title
Decision on application by Hudson's Bay Oil And Gas Company Limited, Pan American Petroleum Corporation, and Canadian Fina Oil Limited, 1968 (cycling of the Windfall D-3A pool with partial pressure depletion)
Date
1968
Title
Decision on application by Hudson's Bay Oil And Gas Company Limited, Pan American Petroleum Corporation, and Canadian Fina Oil Limited, 1968 (cycling of the Windfall D-3A pool with partial pressure depletion)
Date
1968
Applicant
Hudson's Bay Oil and Gas Company Limited
Pan American Petroleum Corporation
Canadian Fina Oil Limited
Application Number
2903
Hearing Panel
Govier GW
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Enhanced recovery
Descriptors
Gas cycling
Sweep efficiency
Replacing
Retrograde condensation
Vaporization
Diffusion
Recovery
Notes
Decision on application permitting cycling operations in the Windfall D-3A pool and requesting further studies and laboratory experiments to resolve certain matters
Less detail

Decision 73-15

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2196
Applicant
Mobil Oil Canada Ltd.
Application Number
6622
Title
Decision on application by Mobil Oil Canada Ltd., 1973 (exemption from the sulphur guidelines Wimborne gas plant)
Date
1973
Title
Decision on application by Mobil Oil Canada Ltd., 1973 (exemption from the sulphur guidelines Wimborne gas plant)
Date
1973
Applicant
Mobil Oil Canada Ltd.
Application Number
6622
Hearing Panel
DeSorcy GJ
Larbalestier PD
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Gas processing
Descriptors
Gas processing plant
Sulphur recovery
Efficiency
Notes
Decision 73-15 on application No. 6622 for exemption from sulphur recovery guidelines for Wimborne gas plant; approval 1464A
Less detail

Decision 76-E

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2383
Applicant
Alberta Gas Chemicals Limited
Application Number
8744
Title
Decision on application by Alberta Gas Chemicals Ltd., 1976 (Oil and Gas Conservation Act, section 42)
Date
1976
Title
Decision on application by Alberta Gas Chemicals Ltd., 1976 (Oil and Gas Conservation Act, section 42)
Date
1976
Applicant
Alberta Gas Chemicals Limited
Application Number
8744
Hearing Panel
Millard V
Berkowitz N
DeSorcy GJ
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Industrial development permit
Descriptors
Chemical plant
Industrial development permit
Medicine Hat area
ETHANOL
Benefit cost analysis
Capitalized cost
Economic analysis
Efficiency
Gas supply
Marketing
Natural gas - fuel
Natural gas - raw material
NTS 72E
Raw material
Socio-economic effect
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S42
Notes
ERCB report 76-E on application No. 8744 to use gas as raw material and fuel to produce methanol in a plant to be constructed near Medicine Hat (permit AGC 77-1); Board hearing 1976-01-28/29
Less detail

Decision 78-H

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2347
Applicant
Canada Cement Lafarge Ltd.
Application Number
780056
Title
Decision on application by Canada Cement Lafarge Ltd., 1978 (Oil and Gas Conservation Act, section 42)
Date
1978
Title
Decision on application by Canada Cement Lafarge Ltd., 1978 (Oil and Gas Conservation Act, section 42)
Date
1978
Applicant
Canada Cement Lafarge Ltd.
Application Number
780056
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Industrial development permit
Descriptors
Cement
Cement plant
Exshaw area
Industrial development permit
Coal - fuel
Economic analysis
Efficiency
Environmental impact
Expansion
Forecasting
Natural gas - fuel
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S42
Notes
ERCB report 78-H on application No. 780056 to use natural gas as fuel to manufacture cement in an expansion of its existing plant at Exshaw; permit No. CC 78-1
Less detail

Decision 79-03

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2093
Applicant
Alberta Energy Company Limited
Application Number
780619
Title
Decision on application by Alberta Energy Company Ltd., 1979 (industrial development permit to manufacture substitute natural gas)
Date
1979
Title
Decision on application by Alberta Energy Company Ltd., 1979 (industrial development permit to manufacture substitute natural gas)
Date
1979
Applicant
Alberta Energy Company Limited
Application Number
780619
Hearing Panel
Millard V
DeSorcy GJ
Goodman CJ
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Industrial development permit
Descriptors
Bruderheim area
Industrial development permit
Manufactured gas
Benefit cost analysis
Byproduct
Cost analysis
Demand (economics)
Efficiency
Natural gas - fuel
Natural gas - raw material
NTS 83H
Pentanes plus
Plant design
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S42
Notes
Decision 79-3 on application No. 780619 to construct a substitute natural gas plant near Bruderheim, to use byproduct from the Petalta benzene plant and natural gas as feedstock and fuel in the manufacture of the SNG; see related Decision 79-4 for Decision on gas removal application
Interveners
Alberta and Southern Gas Co. Ltd.
Alberta Gas Ethylene Company Ltd.
Amoco Canada Petroleum Company Ltd.
Canadian Western Natural Gas Company Limited
Northwestern Utilities Limited
Dome Petroleum Limited
Dow Chemical of Canada Ltd.
Gulf Canada Resources Inc.
Pan-Alberta Gas Ltd.
TransCanada PipeLines Limited
Turbo Resources Ltd.
Less detail

Decision 80-02

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2036
Applicant
ESSO Resources Canada Limited
Application Number
790377
Title
Decision on application by Esso Resources Canada Limited, 1980 (enhanced recovery by carbon dioxide miscible flood Judy Creek Beaverhill Lake A pool)
Date
1980
Title
Decision on application by Esso Resources Canada Limited, 1980 (enhanced recovery by carbon dioxide miscible flood Judy Creek Beaverhill Lake A pool)
Date
1980
Applicant
ESSO Resources Canada Limited
Application Number
790377
Hearing Panel
DeSorcy GJ
Strom NA
Bray JA
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Enhanced recovery
Descriptors
Carbon dioxide flooding
Enhanced recovery scheme
Judy Creek field
Miscible displacement
Beaverhill Lake Fm
Development drilling
Economic analysis
Monitoring
NTS 83J
Oil saturation
Reservoir model
Sweep efficiency
Tertiary recovery
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S38
Notes
Decision 80-2 on application No. 790377 for approval of a CO2 miscible flood scheme to enhance recovery of oil from Judy Creek Beaverhill Lake A pool (TP.63-64, R.10-11, W5M).
Interveners
Amoco Canada Petroleum Company Ltd.
Gulf Canada Resources Inc.
Less detail

Decision 81-02

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2006
Applicant
Dome Petroleum Limited
Application Number
790732
Title
Decision on application by Dome Petroleum Limited, 1981 (Enhanced recovery by ethane enriched miscible flood - Caroline Viking A pool)
Date
1981
Title
Decision on application by Dome Petroleum Limited, 1981 (Enhanced recovery by ethane enriched miscible flood - Caroline Viking A pool)
Date
1981
Applicant
Dome Petroleum Limited
Application Number
790732
Hearing Panel
Bray JA
Keushnig HR
Stafford GH
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Enhanced recovery
Descriptors
Caroline field
Enhanced recovery scheme
Miscible displacement
Depletion
Design criteria
Gas saturation
Injection pressure
Monitoring
NTS 82O
NTS 83B
Oil recovery
Reservoir characteristic
Reservoir performance
Sweep efficiency
Viking Fm
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S38
Notes
Decision 81-2 (with unnumbered Examiners report attached) on application No. 790732 for an ethane enriched miscible gas flood scheme in a portion of the Caroline Viking A pool (TP.33-36, R. 3-7, W5M).
Interveners
Amoco Canada Petroleum Company Ltd.
Hudson's Bay Oil and Gas Company Limited
Wintershall Oil of Canada Ltd.
Less detail

Decision 81-05

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2003
Applicant
Chevron Standard Limited
Application Number
800163
Title
Decision on application by Chevron Standard Limited, 1981 (enhanced recovery Westpem Nisku A)
Date
1981
Title
Decision on application by Chevron Standard Limited, 1981 (enhanced recovery Westpem Nisku A)
Date
1981
Applicant
Chevron Standard Limited
Application Number
800163
Hearing Panel
DeSorcy GJ
Strom NA
Mink FJ
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Enhanced recovery
Descriptors
Enhanced recovery scheme
Miscible displacement
Waterflooding
Westpem field
Coning
Economic analysis
IL-79-24
Nisku Fm
NTS 83G
Oil recovery
Petroleum conservation
Reservoir characteristic
Reservoir model
Sweep efficiency
Notes
Decision 81-5 on application No. 800163 for enhanced recovery scheme by water injection in the WestPem Nisku A pool (TP.50, R.12, W5M).
Interveners
Amoco Canada Petroleum Limited
Less detail

Decision 83-19

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2295
Applicant
ESSO Resources Canada Limited
Application Number
830246
Title
Decision on application by Esso Resources Canada Limited, 1983 (hydrocarbon miscible flood, Judy Creek Beaverhill Lake A Pool)
Date
1983
Title
Decision on application by Esso Resources Canada Limited, 1983 (hydrocarbon miscible flood, Judy Creek Beaverhill Lake A Pool)
Date
1983
Applicant
ESSO Resources Canada Limited
Application Number
830246
Hearing Panel
DeSorcy GJ
Strom NA
Antonio HA
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Enhanced recovery
Descriptors
Enhanced recovery scheme
Judy Creek field
Miscible displacement
Beaverhill Lake Fm
Development well
Injection well
NTS 83J
Oil recovery
Oil saturation
Reservoir characteristic
Reservoir model
Reservoir performance
Sweep efficiency
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S26
Notes
Decision D83-19 on application No. 830246 by ESSO resources to implement a hydrocarbon miscible flood in the Judy Creek Beaverhill Lake (BHL) A pool (TP.63-64, R.10-11, W5M); Board hearing 1983-07-19/20
Interveners
Amoco Canada Petroleum Company Ltd.
Home Oil Company Ltd.
Chevron Canada Resources Limited
Dome Petroleum Limited
Gulf Canada Resources Inc.
Mobil Oil Canada Ltd.
Shell Canada Resources Limited
Less detail

Decision 83-26

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2271
Applicant
Home Oil Company Limited
Application Number
830674
Title
Decision on application by Home Oil Company Limited, 1983 (hydrocarbon miscible flooe, Swan Hills Beaverhill Lake A&B pool unit no. 1)
Date
1983
Title
Decision on application by Home Oil Company Limited, 1983 (hydrocarbon miscible flooe, Swan Hills Beaverhill Lake A&B pool unit no. 1)
Date
1983
Applicant
Home Oil Company Limited
Application Number
830674
Hearing Panel
DeSorcy GJ
Strom NA
Mink FJ
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Enhanced recovery
Descriptors
Enhanced recovery scheme
Miscible displacement
Swan Hills field
Beaverhill Lake Fm
Design criteria
Development well
Economic analysis
Injection well
Monitoring
NTS 83J
Oil recovery
Oil saturation
Recovery factor
Reservoir model
Sweep efficiency
Unitized field
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S26
Notes
Decision D83-26 on application No. 830674 to implement a hydrocarbon miscible flood in the Swan Hills Beaverhill Lake A&B pool unit No. 1 (TP.66-68, R.9-11, W5M).
Interveners
Amoco Canada Petroleum Company Limited
Esso Resources Canada Limited
Gulf Canada Resources Inc.
Texaco Canada Resources Ltd.
Less detail

Decision 92-B

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision24
Applicant
Energy Resources Conservation Board
Title
Review of the operation of Nova's Pipeline system : issues and recommendations
Date
1992
Title
Review of the operation of Nova's Pipeline system : issues and recommendations
Date
1992
Applicant
Energy Resources Conservation Board
Hearing Type
Utilities
Category
Pipelines
Descriptors
Business operation
Gas pipeline
Gas price
Gas transmission industry
Industry and State
Pipeline transportation
Efficiency
Operating condition
Performance
Recommendation
Regulation
Notes
ERCB report 92-B on review of the operation of the provincial gas transmission system of Nova Corporation, carried out at the request of the Minister of Energy
Less detail

Decision 2000-80

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision3313
Applicant
Nova Gas Transmission Ltd.
Application Number
2000349
file no. 1606-01
Title
Decision 2000-80 : Nova Gas Transmission Ltd. application for 2001 interim rates, tolls and charges
Date
2000
Title
Decision 2000-80 : Nova Gas Transmission Ltd. application for 2001 interim rates, tolls and charges
Date
2000
Applicant
Nova Gas Transmission Ltd.
Application Number
2000349
file no. 1606-01
Hearing Panel
Bietz BF
Dilay JD
Rahnama F
Hearing Type
Board
Utilities
Category
Pipeline system rate
Descriptors
Cost efficiency incentive settlement
Decision D2000-06
Government hearing
Gas price
Interim rate
Negotiated settlement
NOVA pipeline system
Pipeline toll
Revenue requirement method
Legal References
Gas Utilities Act S51
Public Utilities Board Act S52
Notes
EUB decision on application by NOVA for approval of interim rates, tolls and charges for service effective January 1, 2001, submitting that its current tolls were based on a revenue requirement determined under the provisions of the Cost Efficiency Incentive Settlement as approved by Board Order U96119. It stated that interim rates were now required because CEIS expires on December 31, 2000.
Approval
Approved
Less detail

Decision 2001-44

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision3332
Applicant
Nova Gas Transmission Ltd.
Application Number
2001076
file no. 1606-02
Title
Decision 2001-44 : Nova Gas Transmission Ltd. application for approval of the Alberta System Rate Settlement for 2001 - 2002
Date
2001
Title
Decision 2001-44 : Nova Gas Transmission Ltd. application for approval of the Alberta System Rate Settlement for 2001 - 2002
Date
2001
Applicant
Nova Gas Transmission Ltd.
Application Number
2001076
file no. 1606-02
Hearing Panel
Bietz BF
Dilay JD
Rahnama F
Hearing Type
Board
Utilities
Category
Pipeline system rate
Gas pricing
Descriptors
Alberta system rate settlement
Cost efficiency incentive settlement
Decision D2000-06
Decision D2000-80
Government hearing
Gas price
Interim rate
Negotiated settlement
NOVA pipeline system
Pipeline toll
Revenue requirement method
Legal References
Gas Utilities Act Part 3
Notes
EUB decision on application by NOVA for approval of the Alberta Rate System Setllement for January 1, 2001 to December 31, 2002 (the Settlement) and for approval of the final rates, tolls and charges determined in accordance with the Settlement for services performed by NGTL .
Approval
Approved
Less detail

Decision E74-(p.019)

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1817
Applicant
Western Decalta Petroleum Ltd.
Application Number
7135
Title
Examiners report on application by Western Decalta Petroleum Ltd., 1974 (exemption from sulphur recovery guidelines Turner Valley gas processing plant)
Date
1974
Title
Examiners report on application by Western Decalta Petroleum Ltd., 1974 (exemption from sulphur recovery guidelines Turner Valley gas processing plant)
Date
1974
Applicant
Western Decalta Petroleum Ltd.
Application Number
7135
Hearing Panel
DeSorcy GJ
Evans RG
Hearing Type
Examiners
Category
Gas processing
Descriptors
Sulphur recovery
Gas processing plant
Turner Valley field
Sour gas
Efficiency
Environmental impact
Air quality
Emission
Notes
ERCB Examiners report on application No. 7135 to exempt Turner Valley gas processing plant from sulpher recovery guidelines set out in Board information letter No. IL71-29.
Interveners
Foulger, J.
Lansdell, G.
Davidson, D.
Walpole, D.
Allen, J.R.
Hills, P.
Mayes, G.
Bartee, B.
Fluter, D.
Less detail

Decision E76-(p.001)

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision95
Applicant
Energy Resources Conservation Board
Title
Examiners report on inquiry into the operation of the Aquitaine Rainbow gas processing plant, 1976
Date
1976
Title
Examiners report on inquiry into the operation of the Aquitaine Rainbow gas processing plant, 1976
Date
1976
Applicant
Energy Resources Conservation Board
Hearing Type
Examiners
Category
Gas processing
Descriptors
Gas processing plant
Rainbow field
Sour gas
Sulphur recovery
Efficiency
Gas conservation
Gas flaring
IL-71-29
Operating condition
Violation
Inquiry
Notes
ERCB Examiners report on proceeding No. 268 to inquire into the operation of the Aquitaine Rainbow gas processing plant and the causes, effects and remedial measures to be taken with respect to the apparent failure of the operator to meet minimum sulphur recovery requirements specified by approval No. 1554; Examiners inquiry 76-01-07
Less detail

Decision E79-(p.071)

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1773
Applicant
Great Northern Oil Limited
Application Number
780690
Title
Examiners report on application by Great Northern Oil Limited, 1979 (enhanced recovery by water injection Wildmere Lloydminster A pool)
Date
1979
Title
Examiners report on application by Great Northern Oil Limited, 1979 (enhanced recovery by water injection Wildmere Lloydminster A pool)
Date
1979
Applicant
Great Northern Oil Limited
Application Number
780690
Hearing Panel
Evans RG
Berndtsson NG
Pearson DG
Hearing Type
Examiners
Category
Enhanced recovery
Descriptors
Enhanced recovery scheme
Waterflooding
Wildmere field
Gas liquid ratio
Injection well
Lloydminster Fm
NTS 73E
Oil recovery
Pressure maintenance
Sweep efficiency
Well pattern
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S38
Notes
ERCB Examiners report on application No. 780690 for water flood pressure maintenance scheme for enhancement of oil recovery from part of the Wildmere Lloydminster A pool (TP.47, R.5, W4M); approval No. 2812
Interveners
Husky Oil Operations, Limited
Less detail

Decision Memorandum of Decision 1987-01-20

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision233
Applicant
Sulpetro Limited
Application Number
850272
Title
Memorandum of Decision on notice of motion by Sulpetro Limited, 1987
Date
1987
Title
Memorandum of Decision on notice of motion by Sulpetro Limited, 1987
Date
1987
Applicant
Sulpetro Limited
Application Number
850272
Hearing Type
Prehearing
Category
Gas processing
Descriptors
Elmworth field
Energy development
Ethane
Gas processing plant
Efficiency
Procedure
Notes
Memorandum of Decision on application No. 850272 dated 1985-03-07 for approval to implement design modifications at its Elmworth gas processing plant to allow operation at an increased gas through-put rate and an increased ethane recovery efficiency; Board meeting held 1987-01-20
Interveners
Alberta Gas Ethylene Company Ltd.
Williamson HD
Dome Petroleum Limited
Hall RJ
Dow Chemical Canada Inc.
Union Carbide Ethylene Oxide/Glycol Company
C.I.L. Inc.
Novacor Chemicals Inc
Neufeld RA
Canadian Hunter Exploration Ltd.
Mackie J
Esso Resources Canada Limited
Davies DG
Amoco Canada Petroleum Company Ltd.
Arnason DG
Gulf Canada Corporation
Gandar DJ
Scurry-Rainbow Oil Limited
Perrin RM
Less detail

17 records – page 1 of 1.