81 records – page 1 of 5.

Decision 74-07

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2183
Applicant
Alberta Power Limited
Application Number
7775
Title
Decision on application by Alberta Power Ltd., 1974 (Jasper power plant)
Date
1974
Title
Decision on application by Alberta Power Ltd., 1974 (Jasper power plant)
Date
1974
Applicant
Alberta Power Limited
Application Number
7775
Hearing Panel
Millard V
Strong JI
DeSorcy GJ
Hearing Type
Board
Utilities
Category
Electric power
Descriptors
Jasper National Park area
Thermal power plant
Economic analysis
Environmental impact
Reliability
Notes
Decision 74-7 on application No. 7775 to construct and operate a power plant within Jasper National Park; approval No. HE 7406 and Order No. Misc HE 7505
Less detail

Decision 75-03

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2175
Applicant
Great Plains Development Company of Canada Ltd.
Application Number
7976
Title
Decision on application by Great Plains Development Company Of Canada Ltd., 1975 (declaration f the Candel Minnehik-Buck Lake gas plant as a common processor and of the Minnehik-Buck Lake gathering system as a common carrier)
Date
1975
Title
Decision on application by Great Plains Development Company Of Canada Ltd., 1975 (declaration f the Candel Minnehik-Buck Lake gas plant as a common processor and of the Minnehik-Buck Lake gathering system as a common carrier)
Date
1975
Applicant
Great Plains Development Company of Canada Ltd.
Application Number
7976
Hearing Panel
Govier GW
Craig DR
Millard V
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Common carrier
Common processor
Descriptors
Common carrier
Common processor
Minnehik-Buck Lake field
Capacity
Cost analysis
Economic analysis
Gas pipeline
Gas producing
Lease drainage
NTS 83B
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S49
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S54
Notes
Decision 75-3 on application No. 7976 to declare the Candel Minnehik-Buck Lake gas plant as a common processor and the Minnehik-Buck Lake gathering system as common carrier; Order No. Misc 7505
Interveners
CanDel Oil
Less detail

Decision 75-04

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2174
Applicant
Alberta Power Limited
Calgary Power Ltd.
Application Number
7759
7966
7992
7996
Title
Decision on application by Alberta Power Ltd. and Calgary Power Ltd. , 1975 (Conklin power plant and electric distribution system)
Date
1975
Title
Decision on application by Alberta Power Ltd. and Calgary Power Ltd. , 1975 (Conklin power plant and electric distribution system)
Date
1975
Applicant
Alberta Power Limited
Calgary Power Ltd.
Application Number
7759
7966
7992
7996
Hearing Panel
Millard V
Strong JI
DeSorcy GJ
Hearing Type
Board
Utilities
Category
Electric power
Descriptors
Electric power distribution
Electric power project
Service area
Thermal power plant
Transmission line
Cost analysis
Diesel fuel
Economic analysis
NTS 73M
Legal References
Hydro and Electric Energy Act S7
Hydro and Electric Energy Act S20
Hydro and Electric Energy Act S23
Notes
Decision 75-4 on application No. 7759 and 7966 by Alberta Power and on application No. 7992 and 7996 by Calgary power both to construct & operate a small diesel power plant and an electric distribution system in the settlement of Conklin and for an alteration to their service areas to include the Conklin area.
Less detail

Decision 75-F

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2362
Applicant
PanCanadian Petroleum Limited
Alberta Ammonia Limited
Application Number
8009
7907
Title
Decision on application by PanCanadian Petroleum Limited, 1975 (ammonia plant near Brooks) and Decision on application by Alberta Ammonia Ltd., 1975 (ammonia plant near Raymond)
Date
1975
Title
Decision on application by PanCanadian Petroleum Limited, 1975 (ammonia plant near Brooks) and Decision on application by Alberta Ammonia Ltd., 1975 (ammonia plant near Raymond)
Date
1975
Applicant
PanCanadian Petroleum Limited
Alberta Ammonia Limited
Application Number
8009
7907
Hearing Panel
Govier GW
Millard V
DeSorcy GJ
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Industrial development permit
Descriptors
Ammonia
Brooks area
Chemical plant
Fertilizer
Industrial development permit
Petrochemical industry
Raymond area
Alberta
Benefit cost analysis
Economic analysis
Environmental impact
Fuel consumption
Gas consumption
Natural gas - fuel
Natural gas - raw material
NTS 72L
NTS 82H
Socio-economic effect
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S42
Notes
ERCB report 75-F on application No. 8009 (Alberta ammonia) to use gas as raw material and fuel to produce anhydrous ammonia in plant near Raymond (request for Order-in-Council withdrawn) and on application No. 7907 (PanCanadian) to use gas as raw material and fuel to produce anhydrous ammonia in plant near Brooks (application withdrawn); Board hearing 1974-09-30, 1974-10-01/02/16; see also ERCB report 75-FA for supplementary information.
Less detail

Decision 75-FA

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2361
Applicant
PanCanadian Petroleum Limited
Alberta Ammonia Limited
Application Number
8009
7907
Title
Decision on application by PanCanadian Petroleum Limited, 1975 (ammonia plant Decision on application by Alberta Ammonia Ltd. (ammonia plant near Raymond) (section 42 of the Oil and Gas Conservation Act)
Date
1975
Title
Decision on application by PanCanadian Petroleum Limited, 1975 (ammonia plant Decision on application by Alberta Ammonia Ltd. (ammonia plant near Raymond) (section 42 of the Oil and Gas Conservation Act)
Date
1975
Applicant
PanCanadian Petroleum Limited
Alberta Ammonia Limited
Application Number
8009
7907
Hearing Panel
N/A
Hearing Type
N/A
Category
Industrial development permit
Descriptors
Ammonia
Brooks area
Chemical plant
Fertilizer
Industrial development permit
Petrochemical industry
Raymond area
Alberta
Benefit cost analysis
Economic analysis
Environmental impact
Fuel consumption
Gas consumption
Natural gas - fuel
Natural gas - raw material
NTS 72L
NTS 82H
Socio-economic effect
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S42
Notes
ERCB report 75-FA supplementing ERCB report 75-F
Less detail

Decision 75-G

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2360
Applicant
Canadian Fertilizers Limited
Application Number
8162
Title
Decision on application by Canadian Fertilizers Limited, 1975 (Oil and Gas Conservation Act, Section 42 for ammonia plant at Medicine Hat)
Date
1975
Title
Decision on application by Canadian Fertilizers Limited, 1975 (Oil and Gas Conservation Act, Section 42 for ammonia plant at Medicine Hat)
Date
1975
Applicant
Canadian Fertilizers Limited
Application Number
8162
Hearing Panel
Govier GW
Millard V
DeSorcy GJ
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Industrial development permit
Descriptors
Ammonia
Chemical plant
Fertilizer
Industrial development permit
Medicine Hat area
Petrochemical industry
Urea
Alberta
Benefit cost analysis
Economic analysis
Environmental impact
ERCB 75-F
ID-74-01
Fuel consumption
Gas consumption
Natural gas - fuel
Natural gas - raw material
NTS 72L
Socio-economic effect
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S42
Notes
ERCB report 75-G on application No. 8162 to use gas as a raw material and fuel to produce ammonia in plant at Medicine Hat (section 14-13-6 W4); Board hearing 1974-12-16/17/18; permit No. CFL 75-1
Less detail

Decision 75-H

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2359
Applicant
Home Oil Company Limited
Alminex Limited
Application Number
7688
Title
Decision on application by Home Oil Company Limited and Alminex Limited, 1975 (Oil and Gas Conservation Act, Part 8)
Date
1975
Title
Decision on application by Home Oil Company Limited and Alminex Limited, 1975 (Oil and Gas Conservation Act, Part 8)
Date
1975
Applicant
Home Oil Company Limited
Alminex Limited
Application Number
7688
Hearing Panel
Govier GW
Craig DR
Millard V
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Oil sands
Descriptors
Athabasca oil sands
Oil mining
Oil sands oil recovery
Oil sands project
Alberta
Economic analysis
Manufactured crude oil
NTS 74E
Pollution control
Sulphur recovery
Surface mining
Tailings
Oil sands reserve
Waste disposal
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act Part 8
Notes
ERCB report 75-H on application No. 7688 for approval of an oil sands processing plant on lease 30 in TP.94, R.8-11, W4; Board hearing 1974-06-26/27/28
Less detail

Decision 75-K

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2356
Applicant
Luscar Sterco Ltd.
Application Number
8494
Title
Decision on application by Luscar Sterco Ltd., 1975 (Coal Conservation Act parts 4 and 5)
Date
1975
Title
Decision on application by Luscar Sterco Ltd., 1975 (Coal Conservation Act parts 4 and 5)
Date
1975
Applicant
Luscar Sterco Ltd.
Application Number
8494
Hearing Panel
Govier GW
Craig DR
Berkowitz N
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Coal
Descriptors
Coal mine
Coal preparation plant
Coal project
Coal Valley Mine (Luscar)
Alberta
Coal reserve
Coalspur coal field
Economic analysis
Edson area
Engineering geology
Environmental impact
Hinton area
Land reclamation
Mining engineering
NTS 83F
Open pit mining
Pollution control
Reclamation
Slope stability
Socio-economic impact assessment
Structural geology
Surface mining
Thermal coal
Legal References
Coal Conservation Act S10
Coal Conservation Act S11
Coal Conservation Act S23
Notes
ERCB report 75-K on application No. 8494 to develop mine site, commence mining operations in 3 open pits mines and construct and operate coal processing plant, all in the vicinity of Coal Valley, TP.47, R.19-20, W5.
Less detail

Decision 75-M

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2354
Applicant
Energy Resources Conservation Board
Application Number
N/A
Title
Prospects for coal gasification in Alberta
Date
1975
Title
Prospects for coal gasification in Alberta
Date
1975
Applicant
Energy Resources Conservation Board
Application Number
N/A
Hearing Panel
N/A
Hearing Type
N/A
Category
Coal
Descriptors
Coal gasification
Energy conversion
Alberta
Ammonia
Coal
Coal reserve
Economic analysis
Fischer Tropsch synthesis
In situ
Koppers-Totzek coal gasification
Liquid fuel
Manufactured gas
Methanol
Petrochemical
Notes
ERCB report 75-M
Less detail

Decision 75-N

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2353
Applicant
Alberta Gas Ethylene Company Limited
Dupont of Canada Limited
Dow Chemical of Canada Limited
Canadian Industries Limited
Application Number
8491
8514
8549
8554
Title
Decision on application by Alberta Gas Ethylene Company Ltd., Dupont of Canada Limited, Dow Chemical Of Canada Limited and Canadian Industries Limited, 1975 (Oil and Gas Conservation Act, section 42)
Date
1975
Title
Decision on application by Alberta Gas Ethylene Company Ltd., Dupont of Canada Limited, Dow Chemical Of Canada Limited and Canadian Industries Limited, 1975 (Oil and Gas Conservation Act, section 42)
Date
1975
Applicant
Alberta Gas Ethylene Company Limited
Dupont of Canada Limited
Dow Chemical of Canada Limited
Canadian Industries Limited
Application Number
8491
8514
8549
8554
Hearing Panel
Govier GW
Millard V
DeSorcy GJ
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Industrial development permit
Descriptors
Chemical plant
Chloroethylene
Dichloroethane
Ethylene
Fort Saskatchewan area
Industrial development permit
Joffre area
Polymer
Red Deer area
Redwater area
Alberta
Chlorine - raw material
Economic analysis
Environmental impact
Ethane - raw material
Ethylene - raw material
Natural gas - fuel
NTS 83A
NTS 83H
Socio-economic effect
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S42
Notes
ERCB report 75-N on application No. 8491 (A.G.E.) to use ethane and gas as fuel and raw material to produce ethylene near Red Deer (A.G.E. unit 1) (permit No. age 76-1) and on application No. 8514 (Dupont) to use gas as fuel in production of high density polyethylene near Red Deer (application withdrawn) and on application No. 8549 (Dow) to use gas as fuel in vinyl chloride monomer plant near Fort Saskatchewan (permit no.DCC 76-1) and on application No. 8554 (CIL) to use gas as fuel in a low density polyethylene plant near Redwater (application withdrawn); Board hearing (age & Dupont); 1975-06-18/19/20 Board hearing (Dow & CIL) 1975-07-09.
Less detail

Decision 76-E

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2383
Applicant
Alberta Gas Chemicals Limited
Application Number
8744
Title
Decision on application by Alberta Gas Chemicals Ltd., 1976 (Oil and Gas Conservation Act, section 42)
Date
1976
Title
Decision on application by Alberta Gas Chemicals Ltd., 1976 (Oil and Gas Conservation Act, section 42)
Date
1976
Applicant
Alberta Gas Chemicals Limited
Application Number
8744
Hearing Panel
Millard V
Berkowitz N
DeSorcy GJ
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Industrial development permit
Descriptors
Chemical plant
Industrial development permit
Medicine Hat area
ETHANOL
Benefit cost analysis
Capitalized cost
Economic analysis
Efficiency
Gas supply
Marketing
Natural gas - fuel
Natural gas - raw material
NTS 72E
Raw material
Socio-economic effect
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S42
Notes
ERCB report 76-E on application No. 8744 to use gas as raw material and fuel to produce methanol in a plant to be constructed near Medicine Hat (permit AGC 77-1); Board hearing 1976-01-28/29
Less detail

Decision 76-I

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2379
Applicant
Dow Chemical of Canada Limited
Application Number
9493
Title
Decision on application by Dow Chemical Of Canada Limited, 1976 (Oil and Gas Conservation Act, section 42)
Date
1976
Title
Decision on application by Dow Chemical Of Canada Limited, 1976 (Oil and Gas Conservation Act, section 42)
Date
1976
Applicant
Dow Chemical of Canada Limited
Application Number
9493
Hearing Panel
Millard V
Hearing Type
Board
No Hearing
Category
Industrial development permit
Descriptors
Chemical plant
Chlorine
Fort Saskatchewan area
Industrial development permit
Sodium hydroxide
Economic analysis
Fuel consumption
Gas consumption
Natural gas - fuel
NTS 83H
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S42
Notes
ERCB report 76-I on application No. 9493 for an industrial development permit authorizing the use of natural gas as fuel in the production of chlorine and caustic soda in an existing plant in the Dow complex at Fort Saskatchewan that would be expanded to increase capacity; no hearing; see also report 76-G for Decision on power plant for the complex.
Less detail

Decision 77-24

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2124
Applicant
Syncrude Canada Ltd.
Title
Decision 77-24: Coke utilization study - Syncrude Canada Ltd.
Date
1977
Title
Decision 77-24: Coke utilization study - Syncrude Canada Ltd.
Date
1977
Applicant
Syncrude Canada Ltd.
Hearing Type
Utilities
Category
Oil sands
Descriptors
Bitumen
Coke
Fluid coking
Fuel
Mildred Lake project
Cost analysis
Economic analysis
Electric power generation
Gasification
Utilization
Notes
Decision 77-24 giving the Board's assessment of Syncrude submission entitled "Evaluation of options for utilizing by-product fluid coke Syncrude Mildred Lake project". report submitted as a result of a condition on approval HE 7313 (on application No. 6888); see also report ERCB 73-K-HE-OG
Less detail

Decision 77-27

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2121
Applicant
Aquitaine Company of Canada Limited
Amerada Minerals Corporation of Canada Limited
Application Number
770164
770340
770341
770342
Title
Decision on application by Aquitaine Company of Canada Ltd. and Amerada Minerals Corporation of Canada Ltd., 1977 (gas processing plant and pipelines in the Stolberg area)
Date
1977
Title
Decision on application by Aquitaine Company of Canada Ltd. and Amerada Minerals Corporation of Canada Ltd., 1977 (gas processing plant and pipelines in the Stolberg area)
Date
1977
Applicant
Aquitaine Company of Canada Limited
Amerada Minerals Corporation of Canada Limited
Application Number
770164
770340
770341
770342
Hearing Panel
Millard V
DeSorcy GJ
Bohme VE
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Pipelines
Descriptors
Fuel gas pipeline
Gas pipeline
Gas processing plant
Pipeline construction permit
Stolberg field
Sour gas
Conservation
Economic analysis
Energy development
Environmental impact
Gas reserve
NTS 83B
NTS 83C
Legal References
Pipeline Act
Notes
Decision 77-27 on application No. 770164 by Amerada to construct a sour gas processing plant in LSD 2-8-41-13 (W5) and on application No. 770340 by Aquitaine to construct a pipeline to transport sour gas and on application No. 770341 by Aquitaine to construct a pipeline to transport condensate both from a point in LSD 2-3-41-14 W5 to a point in LSD 11-2-37-10 W4 and on application No. 770342 by Aquitaine to construct a pipeline to transport fuel gas from the Ram River plant (LSD 11-2-37-10 W5) to a dehydration plant in LSD 2-3-41-14 W5; Board hearing 1977-09-20/21
Interveners
Mobil Oil Canada Ltd.
Chevron Standard Limited
Bearcat Exploration Ltd.
Cree Lake Mining Ltd.
The Alberta Gas Trunk Line Company Limited
Gulf Oil Canada Limited
BP Exploration Canada Limited
Less detail

Decision 77-C

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2373
Applicant
Alberta Energy Company Limited
Hudson's Bay Oil and Gas Company Limited
Mitsubishi Petrochemical Company Limited
Mitsubishi Corporation
Petalta Project (Petrochemicals Alberta Project)
Alberta Gas Trunk Line Company Limited
Dow Chemical of Canada Limited
Alberta Gas Chemicals Limited
Application Number
9070
8911
Title
Decision on application by Petalta Project (Alberta Energy Company Ltd, Hudson's Bay Oil And Gas Company Limited, Mitsubishi Petrochemical Company Limited, and Mitsubishi Corporation), 1977 (benzene plant) and Decision on application by Alberta Gas Trunk Line, Dow Chemical Of Canada Limited and Alberta Gas Chemicals Ltd., 1977 (benzene plant)
Date
1977
Title
Decision on application by Petalta Project (Alberta Energy Company Ltd, Hudson's Bay Oil And Gas Company Limited, Mitsubishi Petrochemical Company Limited, and Mitsubishi Corporation), 1977 (benzene plant) and Decision on application by Alberta Gas Trunk Line, Dow Chemical Of Canada Limited and Alberta Gas Chemicals Ltd., 1977 (benzene plant)
Date
1977
Applicant
Alberta Energy Company Limited
Hudson's Bay Oil and Gas Company Limited
Mitsubishi Petrochemical Company Limited
Mitsubishi Corporation
Petalta Project (Petrochemicals Alberta Project)
Alberta Gas Trunk Line Company Limited
Dow Chemical of Canada Limited
Alberta Gas Chemicals Limited
Application Number
9070
8911
Hearing Panel
Craig DR
Berkowitz N
DeSorcy GJ
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Industrial development permit
Descriptors
Benzene
Bruderheim area
Chemical plant
Fort Saskatchewan area
Industrial development permit
Petalta Project (Petrochemicals Alberta Project)
Benefit cost analysis
Economic analysis
NTS 83H
Pentanes plus - fuel
Pentanes plus - raw material
Socio-economic effect
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S42
Notes
ERCB report 77-C on application No. 9070 by AEC et al (Petalta) for a plant to be located near Fort Saskatchewan to convert pentanes plus to benzene and liquid byproducts and on application No. 8911 by AGTL et al for a plant to be constructed near Bruderheim to convert pentanes plus to benzene and liquid byproduct (including gasoline or diesel fuel); Board hearing (Petalta project APP # 9070) 1976-06-15/16 and 1976-07-05; Board hearing (AGTL Bruderheim APP # 8911) 1977-07-06/07/08/09
Less detail

Decision 77-H

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2368
Applicant
Turbo Resources Limited
Application Number
770040
Title
Decision on application by Turbo Resources Limited, 1977 (Oil and Gas Conservation Act, section 42)
Date
1977
Title
Decision on application by Turbo Resources Limited, 1977 (Oil and Gas Conservation Act, section 42)
Date
1977
Applicant
Turbo Resources Limited
Application Number
770040
Hearing Panel
Millard V
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Industrial development permit
Descriptors
Benzene
Chemical plant
Edmonton area
Gas
Industrial development permit
Naphtha
Petroleum product
Toluene
Crude oil - raw material
Economic analysis
ERCB 77-C
NTS 83H
Pentanes plus - raw material
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S42
Notes
ERCB report 77-H on application No. 770040 (application subsequently withdrawn) for an IDP to use crude oil and pentanes plus to manufacture benzene-toluene (BT) naptha, motor gasoline, recycled lube oils and other by-products in a plant to be constructed 3 miles east of Edmonton; Board hearing 1977-05-04/05
Less detail

Decision 78-05

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2115
Applicant
Energy Resources Conservation Board
Application Number
9750X
Title
Decision on proceeding on spacing and target area requirements for oil and gas wells drilled in the province of Alberta, 1978
Date
1978
Title
Decision on proceeding on spacing and target area requirements for oil and gas wells drilled in the province of Alberta, 1978
Date
1978
Applicant
Energy Resources Conservation Board
Application Number
9750X
Hearing Panel
Craig DR
Millard V
DeSorcy GJ
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Spacing
Descriptors
Drilling spacing unit
Land use
Target area
Well spacing
Agricultural land
Alberta
Citizen participation
Communication
Community relations
Economic analysis
Environmental impact
Gas well
History
Oil well
Procedure
Regulation
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S4.030
Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S15.060
Notes
Decision on proceeding No. 9750X to consider representations from agricultural groups on the need to amend the present well spacing and target area requirements
Less detail

Decision 78-12

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2108
Applicant
Calgary Power Ltd.
Application Number
770891
Title
Decision on application by Calgary Power Ltd., 1978 (approval to construct and operate an ash lagoon for disposing ash at the Keephills power plant)
Date
1978
Title
Decision on application by Calgary Power Ltd., 1978 (approval to construct and operate an ash lagoon for disposing ash at the Keephills power plant)
Date
1978
Applicant
Calgary Power Ltd.
Application Number
770891
Hearing Panel
Millard V
Berkowitz N
Goodman CJ
Solodzuk W
Hearing Type
Board
Utilities
Category
Electric power
Descriptors
Ash
Electric power project
Keephills power project
Settling pond
Waste disposal
Cost analysis
Economic analysis
Environmental impact
Groundwater
NTS 83G
Reclamation
Legal References
Energy Resources Conservation Act S40
Hydro and Electric Energy Act S7
Notes
Decision 78-12 on application No. 770891 to develop a recirculating water slurry system and ash lagoon for disposing of ash at the Keephills power plant (TP.51-52, R.3-4, W5M).
Interveners
Committee on Keephills Environment
Less detail

Decision 78-22

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2098
Applicant
Calgary Power Ltd.
Application Number
780314
Title
Decision on application by Calgary Power Ltd., 1978 (extension of mine permit area c 76-64 for Wabamun area)
Date
1978
Title
Decision on application by Calgary Power Ltd., 1978 (extension of mine permit area c 76-64 for Wabamun area)
Date
1978
Applicant
Calgary Power Ltd.
Application Number
780314
Hearing Panel
Berkowitz N
Bohme VE
Hearing Type
Board
Utilities
Category
Coal
Descriptors
Coal mine
Coal project
Surface mining
Whitewood mine
Coal reserve
Economic analysis
Expansion
Land use
NTS 83G
Open pit mining
Thermal coal
Wabamun power plant
Legal References
Coal Conservation Act
Notes
Decision 78-22 on application No. 780314 to amend permit C 76-64 to allow for a westward extension of the Whitewood mine site permit boundary comprising sections 18, 19, & 30 of TP.53, R.4, W5M.
Interveners
Brascan Resources Limited
Groves, M.L.
Bamber, S.R.
Bamber, H.
MacDonald, J.
Morrison, N.D.
Jones, G.
Veitch, J.T.
Approval
Denied
Less detail

Decision 78-A

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2335
Applicant
Celanese Canada Limited
Application Number
770700
Title
Decision on application by Celanese Canada Limited, 1978 (Oil And Gas Conservation Act, section 42)
Date
1978
Title
Decision on application by Celanese Canada Limited, 1978 (Oil And Gas Conservation Act, section 42)
Date
1978
Applicant
Celanese Canada Limited
Application Number
770700
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Industrial development permit
Descriptors
Chemical plant
Clover Bar area
Industrial development permit
Vinyl acetate
Acetic acid
Benefit cost analysis
Cost analysis
Economic analysis
ERCB 76-B
ERCB 74-W
Ethylene - raw material
Natural gas - fuel
NTS 83H
Raw material
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S42
Notes
ERCB report 78-A on application No. 770700 to use ethylene and acetic acid as raw material and gas as fuel to produce vinyl acetate monomer in a plant to be constructed on celanese existing plant site at Clover BAR (section 17, TP.53, R.23 W4M); permit No. CCL 78-1
Less detail

81 records – page 1 of 5.