13 records – page 1 of 1.

Decision 84-05

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1969
Applicant
Energy Resources Conservation Board
Application Number
830007
Title
Decision report 84-05: Lodgepole blowout Inquiry - phase 2: sour gas well blowouts in Alberta: their causes, and actions required to minimize their future occurrence
Date
1984
Title
Decision report 84-05: Lodgepole blowout Inquiry - phase 2: sour gas well blowouts in Alberta: their causes, and actions required to minimize their future occurrence
Date
1984
Applicant
Energy Resources Conservation Board
Application Number
830007
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Inquiry - Blowout
Descriptors
Blowout (well)
Drilling (well)
Lodgepole blowout
Sour gas
Alberta
Blowout preventer
Cost analysis
Drilling problem
Emergency procedure
Inspecting
Insurance
Recommendation
Regulation
Safety
Training
Well classification
Notes
Decision D84-5 on phase 2 of proceeding No. 830007; see Decision No. D84-9 for phase 1 report
Interveners
F. G. Bercha and Associates Limited Confer Consulting Ltd. Shaw K. L. Energy Resources Conservation Board
Pembina Area Sour Gas Exposures Committee
Sams C.
Canadian Association of Oilwell Drilling Contractors
Canadian Petroleum Association
Independent Petroleum Association of Canada
Sabey D. 0.
Canterra Energy Ltd.
Dome Petroleum Limited
Gulf Canada Resources Inc.
Petro-Canada Inc.
Shell Canada Resources Limited
Alberta Government Departments
Amoco Canada Petroleum Company Ltd.
Bercha FG
Griffin BJ
Macdonald RI
Engbloom GM
Shaw KL
Remmer WG
May EF
McFarlane BE
Bissett KR
Whitelock C
Sams C
Grigg PC
Rath H
Parker IM
Maciej H
Elser WA
Farries JK
Sawotin WH
Lewis D
Reid R
Thomas RL
Strain HJ
Wichert A
Demosky LD
Belczewski DS
Smith FC
Wallace AE
McGrath RT
Brown KC
Roeske WE
Tilbe JR
Piaskoski J
Straub B
Murray AS
Less detail

Decision 90-16

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision78
Applicant
Ranchmen's Resources Ltd.
Application Number
901312
Title
Decision 90-16 : Ranchmen's Resources Ltd.: Application to review well licence, Knopcik field
Date
1990
Title
Decision 90-16 : Ranchmen's Resources Ltd.: Application to review well licence, Knopcik field
Date
1990
Applicant
Ranchmen's Resources Ltd.
Application Number
901312
Hearing Panel
Morin EJ
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Well licence
Descriptors
Well licence
Knopcik field
Drilling (well)
Emergency procedure
Environmental impact
ID-90-01
Gas producing
Doig Fm
Halfway Fm
NTS 83M
Procedure
Sour gas
Well completion
Notes
Decision D90-16 on application No. 901312 to licence the proposed well (Ranchmens et al Knopcik 7-19-74-11 W6M) to obtain production from the Doig FM; the application was routinely processed by Board staff and well licence no.0144089 was issued 1990-05-07; after the well was drilled and cased, but before completion and testing, adjacent landowners expressed concerns to Board staff at the Grande Prairie office; upon notification of the situation, Ranchmen's suspended the well pending completion of a review.
Interveners
Boonstra, R.L.
Ludwig, W.A.
Ludwig, B.D.
Ludwig, F.
Location
07-19-074-11W6
Less detail

Decision 99-26

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision3112
Applicant
Startech Energy Inc.
Application Number
1027549
Title
Decision 99-26: Startech Energy Inc. application to drill a noncritical level-1 sour gas well, Turner Valley field
Date
1999
Title
Decision 99-26: Startech Energy Inc. application to drill a noncritical level-1 sour gas well, Turner Valley field
Date
1999
Applicant
Startech Energy Inc.
Application Number
1027549
Hearing Panel
Dilay JD
McGee TM
Waisman DD
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Environment/Pollution
Descriptors
Airborne waste
Drilling (well)
Government hearing
NTS 82J
Site survey
Sour gas
Turner Valley Fm
Well licence
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S2.020
Notes
EUB Decision D99-26 on application no. 1027549 re Startech Energy's application to drill a noncritical sour gas well accessing the Turner Valley Formation from a bottomhole location of Lsd 7, Sec 5, Twp 21, Rg 3, W5M.
Board hearing 1999-04-13/16
Interveners
Whiskey Hills Owners Alliance (WHOA)
Greenwood R
Worthington N
Jacobsen H
Nelson D
Heffring M
Mason M
Johnson K
Gibson T
Gecko Management Consultants
Clissold R
Leahey DM
Soules C
Dudley W
Kerluke J
Kerluke S
Steen P
Knott L
Seaborn J
Hoyle J
Hoyle C
Lambert T
Approval
Approved
Location
07-05-021-03W5
Less detail

Decision 2000-02

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision3151
Applicant
Bonavista Petroleum Ltd.
Application Number
1039898
1039899
1039900
Title
Examiner report on application by Bonavista Petroleum Ltd. Application to Drill Two Sweet Gas Wells and to Install and Operate a Sweet Gas Pipeline, Blood and Magrath Areas
Date
2000
Title
Examiner report on application by Bonavista Petroleum Ltd. Application to Drill Two Sweet Gas Wells and to Install and Operate a Sweet Gas Pipeline, Blood and Magrath Areas
Date
2000
Applicant
Bonavista Petroleum Ltd.
Application Number
1039898
1039899
1039900
Hearing Panel
Willard RJ
Pesta TJ
Hill CD
Hearing Type
Examiners
Category
Well licence
Descriptors
Blood field
Drilling (well)
Magrath Area
NTS 72L
NTS 82H
Well licence
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S2.020
Pipeline Act Part 4
Notes
Examiner report E2000-02 on applications no. 1039898-9900 by Bonavista Petroleum Ltd. requesting approval to directionally drill a sweet gas well from a surface location at Lsd 16 Sec 15 Twp 6 Rge 21 W4M (16-22 well, 16-15 well) and pursuant to Part 4 of the Pipeline Act, to construct 0.94 km of pipeline to transport sweet natural gas from the 16-15 well to an exisiting pipeline.
Interveners
Galbreath TT
Spence H
Thiessen JH
Anderson TS
Hinman P
Meldrum D
Pioneer Land Service Ltd.
Approval
Approved
Approved with conditions
Conditions
Bonavista must submit an amended well survey plan reflecting the exact amended surface location of the well before it commences.
Location
16-15-006-21W4
Less detail

Decision 2000-06

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision3228
Applicant
Regent Resources Ltd.
Application Number
1044287
1064453
Title
Examiner report on application by Regent Resources Ltd. Application for a Pipeline Permit and Review of a Well Licence, LSD 14-17-3-8W4M, Pendant D'Oreille field
Date
2000
Title
Examiner report on application by Regent Resources Ltd. Application for a Pipeline Permit and Review of a Well Licence, LSD 14-17-3-8W4M, Pendant D'Oreille field
Date
2000
Applicant
Regent Resources Ltd.
Application Number
1044287
1064453
Hearing Panel
Langlo CA
Knox HW
Fairgrieve DB
Hearing Type
Examiners
Category
Well licence
Descriptors
Bow Island Fm
Drilling (well)
Gas pipeline
NTS 72E
Pipeline construction
Legal References
Energy Resources Conservation Act S29
Energy Resources Conservation Act S43
Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S2.02
Pipeline Act Part 4
Notes
Examiner report E2000-06 on application by Regent for license to drill a sweet gas well at LSD 15 Sec 17 Twp 3 Rge8 W4M to obtain production from Bow Is. Fm and Sunburst Sand.
Interveners
Harty DE
Harty JG
Approval
Approved
Location
15-17-003-08W4
Less detail

Decision 2000-49

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision3230
Applicant
Avalanche Energy Ltd.
Application Number
1040201
1041048
1041629
1042292
Title
Decision 2000-49: Avalanche Energy Limited application for a holding, reduced spacing and review of licences, Keoma/Entice Area
Date
2000
Title
Decision 2000-49: Avalanche Energy Limited application for a holding, reduced spacing and review of licences, Keoma/Entice Area
Date
2000
Applicant
Avalanche Energy Ltd.
Application Number
1040201
1041048
1041629
1042292
Hearing Panel
McGee TM
Miller GJ
Remmer WG
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Well licence
Descriptors
Belly River Gp
Drilling spacing unit
Drilling (well)
Edmonton Gp
NTS 82P
Well licence
Legal References
Energy Resources Conservation Act S29
Notes
Decision on application to obtain approval for a holding and reduced well spacing, seeking to drill to a density of two wells per pool section for the production of sweet natural gas from the Edmonton and Belly River Groups; also applied to drill three sweet natural gas wells in the Keoma/Entice area.
Interveners
Fitch GS
Secord R
Stewart G
Peterson T
Delainey D
Delainey K
Freeman J
Mawer M
Haessner-Mawner R
Proc J
Proc S
Picard D
van Olm TMMM
Norman G
Irvin R
Brown B
Haarmann M
Carnegie D
Plumecke E
Approval
Approved
Approved with conditions
Conditions
Must provide a pressure monitoring program for the Stewart/Patterson water well. Must also provide appropriate documentation of its internal procedures re compliance with EUB regulations concerning public consultation, etc.
Less detail

Decision 2001-01

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision3327
Applicant
Husky Oil Operations Limited
Application Number
1056355
1059607
Title
Examiner report on application by Husky Oil Operations Limited applications for well licences and pipeline permits, Provost field
Date
2001
Title
Examiner report on application by Husky Oil Operations Limited applications for well licences and pipeline permits, Provost field
Date
2001
Applicant
Husky Oil Operations Limited
Application Number
1056355
1059607
Hearing Panel
Larder D
Paulson RL
Vandenbeld MP
Hearing Type
Examiners
Category
Well licence
Descriptors
Cummings Fm
Drilling (well)
NTS 73D
Pipeline construction
Provost field
Well licence
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S2.020
Pipeline Act Part 4
Notes
Examiner report on application by Husky to drill five level-1 noncritical sour gas wells at Section 11, Twn 36, Rg 3 W4M with the objective of producing sour oil from the Cummings Member. The application also included a request to construct and operate approx. 1.5 km of pipeline to transport products both to and from the proposed pad site.
Interveners
Mouly B
Spencer E
Roberts T
Korol JR
Korchinski ML
Kloberdanz J
Special Areas Board (SAB)
Approval
Approved with conditions
Conditions
Three of the five wells applied for were recommended for approval, while the two at bottomhole locations 6C and 11A were recommended for denial.
Location
##-11-036-03W4
Less detail

Decision 2005-09

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision3932
Applicant
Provident Energy Ltd.
Application Number
1322457
Title
Decision 2005-009: Provident Energy Ltd. application for a change in pool designation
Date
2004
Title
Decision 2005-009: Provident Energy Ltd. application for a change in pool designation
Date
2004
Applicant
Provident Energy Ltd.
Application Number
1322457
Hearing Panel
Hill CD
Willard RJ
Elsner W
Hearing Type
Examiners
Category
Pool designation
Descriptors
Decision D1995-10
Drilling well
Gilby field
Jurassic
NTS 83B
Pool designation
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S33
Interveners
Progress Energy Ltd.
Saltman P
Lewis M
Hayes B
ARR Resources Ltd.
Rallison A
Reinson G
Approval
Approved
Location
11-27-040-01W5
##-34-040-01W5
03-34-040-01W5
Less detail

Decision 2005-52

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision3993
Applicant
Bow Valley Energy Ltd.
Application Number
1390850
Title
Decision 2005-052: Bow Valley Energy Ltd. application for a well licence Mikwan field
Date
2005
Title
Decision 2005-052: Bow Valley Energy Ltd. application for a well licence Mikwan field
Date
2005
Applicant
Bow Valley Energy Ltd.
Application Number
1390850
Hearing Panel
Miller GJ
Remmer WG
Rahnama F
Hearing Type
No Hearing
Category
Well licence
Descriptors
Drilling (well)
Emergency procedure
Hydrogen sulphide
Mikwan field
NTS 83A
Sour gas
Well licence
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S2.020
Notes
Application withdrawn
Interveners
Warner P
Warner S
Approval
Withdrawn
Less detail

Decision 2006-40

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision4146
Applicant
EnCana Corporation
Application Number
1431956
1431968
Title
Decision 2006-040 EnCana Corporation: Applications for well licences Westerose Field
Date
2006
Title
Decision 2006-040 EnCana Corporation: Applications for well licences Westerose Field
Date
2006
Applicant
EnCana Corporation
Application Number
1431956
1431968
Hearing Panel
Nichol JR
Dilay JD
Houlihan RN
Hearing Type
Board
No Hearing
Category
Well licence
Descriptors
Drilling (Well)
Edmonton Gp
Gas producing
Hoadley area
Horseshoe Canyon Fm
Hydrogen sulphide
Sour gas
Well licence
Westerose field
Legal References
EUB Rules of Practice
Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations
Notes
EUB approved EnCana's request for a withdrawal of both applications.
Interveners
Lohmann D
Lohmann B
Rottmerhusen (Family)
Approval
Approved
Location
06-33-044-03W5
Less detail

Decision 2006-94

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision4178
Applicant
EnCana Corporation
Application Number
1465895
Title
Decision 2006-094 : EnCana Corporation Section 40 review request of well licence no. 0355025, Ensign Field
Date
2006
Title
Decision 2006-094 : EnCana Corporation Section 40 review request of well licence no. 0355025, Ensign Field
Date
2006
Applicant
EnCana Corporation
Application Number
1465895
Hearing Panel
Nichol JR
McGee TM
Clark RC
Hearing Type
Board
No Hearing
Category
Well licence
Descriptors
Drilling (Well)
Gas producing
Well licence
Legal References
Energy Resources Conservation Act S40
Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S25
Notes
EUB approved EnCana's request for a withdrawal of both applications.
Interveners
Graff L
Graff B
Graff D
Approval
Withdrawn
Location
08-18-016-25W4
Less detail

Decision 2006-102

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision4182
Applicant
EnCana Corporation
Application Number
1393397
Title
Decision 2006-102: EnCana Corporation applications for licences for 15 wells, a pipeline, and a compressor addition, Wimborne and Twining Fields
Date
2006
Title
Decision 2006-102: EnCana Corporation applications for licences for 15 wells, a pipeline, and a compressor addition, Wimborne and Twining Fields
Date
2006
Applicant
EnCana Corporation
Application Number
1393397
Hearing Panel
McCrank MN
Dilay JD
Miller GJ
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Well licence
Pipelines
Descriptors
Battle Fm
Bearpaw Fm
Compressor station
Directive 027
Dispute resolution
Drilling (Well)
Gas processing plant
Groundwater
Horseshoe Canyon Fm
NTS 83P
Paskapoo Fm
Pipeline
Pipeline construction
Scollard Fm
Twining Field
Well licence
Water pollution
Whitemud Fm
Wimborne Field
Legal References
Pipeline Act Part 4
Interveners
Hoppins K
Doering G
Niemi K
Howard L
Approval
Approved with conditions
Conditions
APPENDIX 1 SUMMARY OF COMMITMENTS AND CONDITIONS COMMITMENTS BY ENCANA
Test all water wells within 400 m, 11 additional wells located between 400 m and 880 m, some springs in the area, and all high-yield water wells present within 1000 m of an EnCana well. CONDITIONS
Measure the pressure between the tubing and casing annulus above the zones being fractured, note and explain any increased pressures, and report the findings to the EUB within five days of the fracturing operation.
Install a groundwater monitoring well in the deepest aquifer immediately above the Battle Formation within 50 m of the EnCana well that has the shallowest surface casing depth. The water quality is to be determined prior to fracturing operations, and the water level is to be monitored continuously, commencing immediately prior to and continuing during and after fracturing operations, until the level has stabilized. The water quality testing is to be conducted in accordance with Alberta Environment’s Standard for Baseline Water-Well Testing for Coalbed Methane/Natural Gas in Coal Operations, April 2006. The results of this monitoring are to be reported to the Board and interveners within 30 days. Thereafter, monitoring will be done on a yearly basis and reported by December 1 of each year. This condition will be reviewed after the findings of the Shallow Fracturing Technical Committee are released or a period of five years.
Ensure the noise level at EnCana’s facility remains within 25 dBA as measured at the Bauer residence under summertime conditions, as outlined in Table 3 of the Faszer Farquarson report, and within the EUB’s PSLs at all other times. Alternatively, EnCana could comply by demonstrating that the facility, when operating under the above conditions, is not audible above the ambient sound level, or Mr. D. Bauer could agree that the noise from the facility is acceptable under conditions that the resident believes represents a worst-case scenario.
Less detail

Decision E62-(p.223)

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision918
Applicant
United Canso Oil and Gas Ltd.
Application Number
1041
Title
Examiners report on application by United Canso Oil and Gas Ltd., 1962 (for a direction that, because of local topographic conditions, the area to be used as a factor in determining the production allowable for any wells in the Pakowki Lake area shall be the area of their respective spacing unit
Date
1962
Title
Examiners report on application by United Canso Oil and Gas Ltd., 1962 (for a direction that, because of local topographic conditions, the area to be used as a factor in determining the production allowable for any wells in the Pakowki Lake area shall be the area of their respective spacing unit
Date
1962
Applicant
United Canso Oil and Gas Ltd.
Application Number
1041
Hearing Panel
Goodall DP
Stabback JG
Hearing Type
Examiners
Category
Spacing
Descriptors
Drilling spacing unit
Pakowki Lake field
NTS 72E
Drilling (well)
Notes
Examiners report on application requesting relief of target area restrictions because the soft, wet, unconsolidated soil on the bottom of Pakowki Lake causes a large number of problems.
Less detail

13 records – page 1 of 1.