23 records – page 1 of 2.

Decision 74-T

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2438
Applicant
Energy Resources Conservation Board
Application Number
N/A
Title
Guide for the planning, conducting and reporting of subsurface pressure tests
Date
1974
Title
Guide for the planning, conducting and reporting of subsurface pressure tests
Date
1974
Applicant
Energy Resources Conservation Board
Application Number
N/A
Hearing Panel
N/A
Hearing Type
N/A
Category
Pressure maintenance
Descriptors
Pressure measuring
Well pressure
Evaluation
Standardization
Design criteria
Notes
ERCB report 74-T superseded by ERCB Guide G-2 entitled "Planning, conducting and reporting subsurface pressure tests"
Less detail

Decision 76-02

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2160
Applicant
Dome Petroleum Limited
Canadian Utilities Limited
Application Number
8856
Title
Decision on application by Dome Petroleum Limited and Canadian Utilities Limited, 1976 (Processing plant on the Northwestern Utilities Limited pipeline system)
Date
1976
Title
Decision on application by Dome Petroleum Limited and Canadian Utilities Limited, 1976 (Processing plant on the Northwestern Utilities Limited pipeline system)
Date
1976
Applicant
Dome Petroleum Limited
Canadian Utilities Limited
Application Number
8856
Hearing Panel
Millard V
Craig DR
DeSorcy GJ
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Gas processing
Descriptors
Edmonton area
Gas processing plant
Design criteria
Environmental impact
ID-73-01
Ethane
Expansion
Liquefied petroleum gas
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S38
Notes
Decision and addendum on application to expand the Edmonton liquid gas (straddle plant located on the NUL pipeline system within the southern boundary of the City of Edmonton (section 4-52-24 W4M)
Interveners
Alberta and Southern Gas Co. Ltd.
Amoco Canada Petroleum Company Limited
Alldritt Development Limited
Qualico Development Limited
Willowbrook Homes (1964) Ltd.
Canadian Industries Limited
Carma Developers Ltd.
City of Edmonton
Dow Chemical of Canada Limited
Gulf Oil Canada Limited
Imperial Oil Limited
PanCanadian Gas Products Limited
Texaco Exploration Canada Limited
The Alberta Ethylene Company Limited
Less detail

Decision 79-16

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2080
Applicant
Calgary Power Ltd.
Application Number
790279
Title
Decision on application by Calgary Power Ltd., 1979 (Keephills power plant units 1 and 2 amendment report)
Date
1979
Title
Decision on application by Calgary Power Ltd., 1979 (Keephills power plant units 1 and 2 amendment report)
Date
1979
Applicant
Calgary Power Ltd.
Application Number
790279
Hearing Panel
Millard V
Goodman CJ
Warne GA
Hearing Type
Board
Utilities
Category
Electric power
Descriptors
Electric power project
Keephills power project
Thermal power plant
Coal reserve
Conflict
Cooling
Cooling system
Design criteria
Land reclamation
NTS 83G
Pipeline
Plant design
Reservoir
Revision
Waste heat
Water treating
Legal References
Hydro and Electric Energy Act S7
Hydro and Electric Energy Act S14
Notes
Decision 79-16 on application No. 790279 to amend approval No. HE 7852 for changes in layout and design of Keephills thermal power plant relating to cooling pond, circulating water intake & discharge canals, raw water storage pond, make-up & blowdown pipelines, rail access & other associated facilities (TP.51-52, R.3-4, W5M); Board hearing 1979-07-13/19 and 1979-08-30; see earlier Decisions ERCB report 77-AA and Decision 78-12
Interveners
Quigg, A.
Quigg, R.
Trans World Oil and Gas Ltd.
Porter Ranches Limited
Ewashko, J.
Less detail

Decision 80-13

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2026
Applicant
Turbo Resources Limited
Application Number
800249
Title
Decision on application by Turbo Resources Limited, 1980 (industrial development permit for a southern Alberta refinery)
Date
1980
Title
Decision on application by Turbo Resources Limited, 1980 (industrial development permit for a southern Alberta refinery)
Date
1980
Applicant
Turbo Resources Limited
Application Number
800249
Hearing Panel
DeSorcy GJ
Bohme VE
Mink FJ
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Industrial development permit
Descriptors
Balzac area
Industrial development permit
Oil refinery
Petroleum product
Demand (economics)
Design criteria
Lubricating oil
Natural gas - fuel
NTS 82P
Raw material
Recycling
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S42
Notes
Decision 80-13 on application No. 800249 to use crude oil, pentanes plus and butanes as feedstock & gas as fuel in a refinery/waste lubricating oil recycling facility to be constructed near Balzac (section 1-26-29 W4M).
Interveners
Alberta Energy Company Limited
Chevron Standard Limited
Dome Petroleum Limited
Gulf Canada Limited
Imperial Oil Limited
Shell Canada Limited
Less detail

Decision 81-02

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2006
Applicant
Dome Petroleum Limited
Application Number
790732
Title
Decision on application by Dome Petroleum Limited, 1981 (Enhanced recovery by ethane enriched miscible flood - Caroline Viking A pool)
Date
1981
Title
Decision on application by Dome Petroleum Limited, 1981 (Enhanced recovery by ethane enriched miscible flood - Caroline Viking A pool)
Date
1981
Applicant
Dome Petroleum Limited
Application Number
790732
Hearing Panel
Bray JA
Keushnig HR
Stafford GH
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Enhanced recovery
Descriptors
Caroline field
Enhanced recovery scheme
Miscible displacement
Depletion
Design criteria
Gas saturation
Injection pressure
Monitoring
NTS 82O
NTS 83B
Oil recovery
Reservoir characteristic
Reservoir performance
Sweep efficiency
Viking Fm
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S38
Notes
Decision 81-2 (with unnumbered Examiners report attached) on application No. 790732 for an ethane enriched miscible gas flood scheme in a portion of the Caroline Viking A pool (TP.33-36, R. 3-7, W5M).
Interveners
Amoco Canada Petroleum Company Ltd.
Hudson's Bay Oil and Gas Company Limited
Wintershall Oil of Canada Ltd.
Less detail

Decision 81-08

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1759
Applicant
Rampart Resources Ltd.
Scion Petroleum Engineering Limited
Application Number
800784
Title
Examiners report on application by Rampart Resources Ltd., 1981 (sweet gas plant Joffre field)
Date
1981
Title
Examiners report on application by Rampart Resources Ltd., 1981 (sweet gas plant Joffre field)
Date
1981
Applicant
Rampart Resources Ltd.
Scion Petroleum Engineering Limited
Application Number
800784
Hearing Panel
Evans RG
Mazurek LA
Yu JNG
Hearing Type
Examiners
Category
Gas processing
Descriptors
Gas processing plant
Joffre field
Design criteria
Environmental impact
Flare
Gas conservation
Land value
Liquefied natural gas
Noise (sound)
NTS 83A
Petroleum conservation
Pollution
Storage facility
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S38
Notes
ERCB Examiners report No. E81-8 on application No. 800784 by SCION on behalf of RAMPART to construct and operate a gas processing plant to process sweet gas in LSD 10-18-38-26 W4M.
Interveners
Allen, S.J.
Less detail

Decision 81-10

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1998
Applicant
Alberta Gas Ethylene Company Limited
Application Number
800853
Title
Decision on application by Alberta Gas Ethylene Company Ltd., 1981 (industrial development permit to manufacture ethylene)
Date
1981
Title
Decision on application by Alberta Gas Ethylene Company Ltd., 1981 (industrial development permit to manufacture ethylene)
Date
1981
Applicant
Alberta Gas Ethylene Company Limited
Application Number
800853
Hearing Panel
DeSorcy GJ
Strom NA
Webber HJ
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Industrial development permit
Descriptors
Chemical plant
Ethylene
Industrial development permit
Red Deer area
Air quality
Benefit cost analysis
Design criteria
Emission
Environmental impact
Ethane
Ethane - raw material
Forecasting
Land use
Marketing
Natural gas - fuel
Noise (sound)
NTS 83A
Pollution
Raw material
Socio-economic effect
Supply (economics)
Water
Water quality
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S42
Notes
Decision 81-10 on application No. 800853 to use ethane as feedstock and natural gas as fuel to manufacture ethylene in plant to be constructed (unit 3) adjacent to present facilities (units 1&2) near Joffre (TP.38, R.25, W4M); Board hearing 1981-04-07/08
Interveners
Preserve Agricultural Land
Red Deer Regional Planning Commission
Hainsworth, B.W.
Chessor, D.
Alberta Energy Company Ltd.
Esso Chemical Canada
Du Pont Canada Inc.
Dow Chemical of Canada Limited
NOVA, AN ALBERTA CORPORATION
Shell Canada Limited
Union Carbide Canada Limited
Dome Petroleum Limited
Esso Resources Canada Limited
Gulf Canada Resources Inc.
Hudson's Bay Oil and Gas Company Limited
Sulpetro Limited
Texaco Canada Resources Ltd.
Less detail

Decision 81-12

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1755
Applicant
Gulf Canada Resources Inc.
Application Number
801035
Title
Examiners report on application by Gulf Canada Resources Inc., 1981 (gas processing - west Drumheller field)
Date
1981
Title
Examiners report on application by Gulf Canada Resources Inc., 1981 (gas processing - west Drumheller field)
Date
1981
Applicant
Gulf Canada Resources Inc.
Application Number
801035
Hearing Panel
Bellows LA
Brushett ER
Pearson DG
Hearing Type
Examiners
Category
Gas processing
Descriptors
Gas processing plant
Sour gas
West Drumheller field
Design criteria
Dissolved gas
Emission
Environmental impact
Flare
Gas conservation
Locating
NTS 82P
Sulphur dioxide
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S38
Notes
ERCB Examiners report no.E81-12 on application No. 801035 to construct and operate a sour gas processing plant southwest of the Town of Munson in LSD 12-1-30-21 W4M.
Interveners
Cartlow Holding Ltd.
Bramorin Holding Ltd.
Horst Bramm
Witral Holding Ltd.
Dome Petroleum Limited
Less detail

Decision 81-24

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1742
Applicant
Norcen Energy Resources Ltd.
Application Number
810447
Title
Examiners report on application by Norcen Energy Resources Ltd., 1981 (gas compressor station Fort Saskatchewan field)
Date
1981
Title
Examiners report on application by Norcen Energy Resources Ltd., 1981 (gas compressor station Fort Saskatchewan field)
Date
1981
Applicant
Norcen Energy Resources Ltd.
Application Number
810447
Hearing Panel
Wolff WH
Allman RJ
Dilay JD
Hearing Type
Examiners
Category
Enhanced recovery
Descriptors
Compressor station
Fort Saskatchewan field
Gas pipeline
Gathering line
Deliverability
Design criteria
Environmental impact
ID-80-02
Gas recovery
Locating
Noise (sound)
NTS 83H
Pipeline design
Pollution
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S7.001
Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S7.002
Notes
ERCB Examiners report E81-24 on application No. 810447 to construct and operate a compressor station in LSD 9-28-54-22 W4M to serve an existing gas gathering system in the Fort Saskatchewan field.
Interveners
Pierce, M.
Less detail

Decision 82-15|82-15 Addendum

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2063
Applicant
Canterra Energy Ltd.
Gulf Canada Resources Inc.
Application Number
810650
810849
Title
Decision on application by Canterra Energy Ltd. and Gulf Canada Resources Inc., 1982 (Ram River gas processing plant and Strachan gas processing plant) (and addendum)
Date
1982
Title
Decision on application by Canterra Energy Ltd. and Gulf Canada Resources Inc., 1982 (Ram River gas processing plant and Strachan gas processing plant) (and addendum)
Date
1982
Applicant
Canterra Energy Ltd.
Gulf Canada Resources Inc.
Application Number
810650
810849
Hearing Panel
Millard V
Strom NA
Evans RG
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Gas processing
Descriptors
Blackstone field
Brazeau River field
Chedderville field
Gas processing plant
Hanlan field
Ricinus field
Sour gas
Stolberg field
Strachan field
Capacity
Citizen participation
Design criteria
Desulphurization
Emission
Energy development
Environmental impact
IL-80-24
Expansion
NTS 82O
NTS 83B
NTS 83C
Revision
Sulfreen process
Sulphur dioxide
Sulphur recovery
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S26
Notes
Decision 82-15 and addendum on application No. 810650 by Canterra (formerly Aquitaine) to amend approval No. 2820 to include additional fields and increase sulphur recovery for its Ram River gas plant located in section 2-37-10 W5M and on application No. 810849 by Gulf to amend approval No. 3351 to include additional fields and increase sulphur recovery for its Strachan gas plant located in section 35-37-9 W5M; Board hearing 1982-04-26/27 & 1982-05-03/04/05/06; see Decision D82-2 for related pipeline applications
Interveners
Rocky Veterinary Clinic Ltd.
Federation of Alberta Naturalists
The Alberta Fish and Game Association
Public Advisory Committee to the Environment Council of Alberta
Red Deer Fish and Game Association
Less detail

Decision 82-29

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2049
Applicant
Energy Resources Conservation Board
Biewag Energy Resources Ltd.
Application Number
820498
Title
Decision on application by Biewag Energy Resources Ltd., 1982 (industrial development permit for manufacture of methanol from gas)
Date
1982
Title
Decision on application by Biewag Energy Resources Ltd., 1982 (industrial development permit for manufacture of methanol from gas)
Date
1982
Applicant
Energy Resources Conservation Board
Biewag Energy Resources Ltd.
Application Number
820498
Hearing Panel
Millard V
Berkowitz N
Strom NA
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Industrial development permit
Descriptors
Chemical plant
Industrial development permit
Methanol
Redwater area
Design criteria
Economic analysis
Environmental impact
Marketing
Natural gas - fuel
Natural gas - raw material
NTS 83H
NTS 83I
Socio-economic effect
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S30
Notes
Decision 82-29 on application No. 820498 to use natural gas as raw material and fuel to produce fuel-grade methanol at a plant to be constructed in County Lamont in section 22-58-19 W4M; Board hearing 1982-07-20/21
Interveners
The Village of Waskatenau
R.O.M. Construction Ltd.
Celanese Canada Inc.
Novacor Chemicals Ltd.
Alberta Gas Chemicals Ltd.
Krill, E.
Ocelot Industries Ltd.
Less detail

Decision 82-31

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2048
Applicant
City of Edmonton
Edmonton Power
Application Number
810899
Title
Decision on application by City of Edmonton (Edmonton Power), 1982 (240/14.4 KV substation Castle Downs)
Date
1982
Title
Decision on application by City of Edmonton (Edmonton Power), 1982 (240/14.4 KV substation Castle Downs)
Date
1982
Applicant
City of Edmonton
Edmonton Power
Application Number
810899
Hearing Panel
Goodman CJ
Evans RG
Homeniuk TF
Hearing Type
Board
Utilities
Category
Electric power
Descriptors
Edmonton area
Electric substation
Capacity
Cost analysis
Design criteria
Electric power demand
Environmental impact
Locating
NTS 83H
Power system interconnection
Safety
Urban development
Legal References
Hydro and Electric Energy Act S12
Hydro and Electric Energy Act S14
Hydro and Electric Energy Act S17
Notes
Decision 82-31 on application 810899 to construct & operate a 240/14.4 KV substation in the Castle Downs area of the City of Edmonton and to connect proposed substation to TransAlta Utilities 240-KV transmission line CP 920L (section 33-53-24 W4M); Board hearing 1982-06-24/25
Interveners
Homestead Holdings
Less detail

Decision 83-04

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1201
Applicant
Citadel Resources Ltd.
Scion Petroleum Engineering Limited
Application Number
820763
Title
Examiners report on application by Citadel Resources Ltd., 1983 (sour gas processing plant Sundre area)
Date
1983
Title
Examiners report on application by Citadel Resources Ltd., 1983 (sour gas processing plant Sundre area)
Date
1983
Applicant
Citadel Resources Ltd.
Scion Petroleum Engineering Limited
Application Number
820763
Hearing Panel
Homeniuk TF
Mazurek LA
Nichol JR
Hearing Type
Examiners
Category
Gas processing
Descriptors
Gas processing plant
Sour gas
Sundre area
Air pollution
Air quality
Design criteria
Emergency procedure
Emission
Health
Locating
Monitoring
Noise (sound)
NTS 82O
Plant location
Safety
Sulphur dioxide
Truck
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S26
Notes
Examiners report E83-4 on application No. 820763 by Scion Petroleum & Gildex Ltd. on behalf of Citadel for approval to construct a sour gas processing plant in LSD 13-20-33-5 W5M; Examiners hearing 1982-10-27 adjourned to 1982-11-25
Interveners
Residents in the County of Mountainview
Alberda, R.
Less detail

Decision 83-14

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1191
Applicant
City of Edmonton
Application Number
810932
830684
Title
Examiners report on application by the City of Edmonton, 1983 (500- KV transmission lines Genesee area)
Date
1983
Title
Examiners report on application by the City of Edmonton, 1983 (500- KV transmission lines Genesee area)
Date
1983
Applicant
City of Edmonton
Application Number
810932
830684
Hearing Type
Utilities
Category
Transmission line
Descriptors
Electric substation
Genesee power plant
High voltage
Transmission line
Design criteria
NTS 83G
Legal References
Hydro and Electric Energy Act S9
Hydro and Electric Energy Act S11
Hydro and Electric Energy Act S14
Notes
ERCB Examiners report E83-14 on application No. 810932 and No. 830684 (addendum to Examiners report E83-11) for permit, licence, and Order to construct, interconnect and operate Edmonton Power's proposed 500-KV substation and switchboard
Less detail

Decision 83-17

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2316
Applicant
ICG Resources Ltd.
Canadian Occidental Petroleum Ltd.
Petrogas Processing Ltd.
Application Number
830165
830166
830167
830460
830461
830488
830489
Title
Decision on application by ICG Resources Ltd., 1983 (to drill well and construct pipelines in Crossfield Airdrie area); Decision on application by Canadian Occidental Petroleum Ltd., 1983 (special drilling spacing unit and licence to drill a well in Crossfield Airdrie area); Decision on application by Petrogas Processing Ltd., 1983 (to construct two pipelines in Crossfiled Airdrie area) 1983
Date
1983
Title
Decision on application by ICG Resources Ltd., 1983 (to drill well and construct pipelines in Crossfield Airdrie area); Decision on application by Canadian Occidental Petroleum Ltd., 1983 (special drilling spacing unit and licence to drill a well in Crossfield Airdrie area); Decision on application by Petrogas Processing Ltd., 1983 (to construct two pipelines in Crossfiled Airdrie area) 1983
Date
1983
Applicant
ICG Resources Ltd.
Canadian Occidental Petroleum Ltd.
Petrogas Processing Ltd.
Application Number
830165
830166
830167
830460
830461
830488
830489
Hearing Panel
DeSorcy GJ
Strom NA
Bellows LA
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Well licence
Descriptors
Crossfield Airdrie area
Crossfield East field
Drilling spacing unit
Fuel gas pipeline
Gas pipeline
Gathering line
Pipeline construction permit
Sour gas
Well licence
Blowout control
Blowout preventer
Design criteria
Emergency procedure
Equity
ID-81-03
ID-OG-76-02
Gas producing
Geologic interpretation
Hydrogen sulphide
NTS 82O
NTS 82P
Pipeline route
Route selection
Safety
Target area
Wabamun Gp
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S2.020
Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S4.020
Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S4.050
Pipeline Act
Notes
Decision on application No. 830167 by ICG to drill a well on application No. 830165 by ICG to construct sweet fule gas pipeline to the well, on application No. 830166 by ICG to construct sour gas pipeline to tie well into existing Canoxy gas gathering system on application No. 830461 by Canoxy for a special drilling spacing unit and on application No. 830460 by Canoxy to drill a well, on application No. 830488 by Petrogas for sour gas pipeline proposed well to existing Canoxy gathering system and application No. 830489 by Petrogas to construct sweet fuel gas pipeline to the well sites (all in TP.27, R.28 W4 to R.1 W5)
Interveners
Austin Exploration Ltd.
Associated Engineering Services Ltd.
Fletcher, A.T.
Fletcher, H.
Less detail

Decision 83-26

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2271
Applicant
Home Oil Company Limited
Application Number
830674
Title
Decision on application by Home Oil Company Limited, 1983 (hydrocarbon miscible flooe, Swan Hills Beaverhill Lake A&B pool unit no. 1)
Date
1983
Title
Decision on application by Home Oil Company Limited, 1983 (hydrocarbon miscible flooe, Swan Hills Beaverhill Lake A&B pool unit no. 1)
Date
1983
Applicant
Home Oil Company Limited
Application Number
830674
Hearing Panel
DeSorcy GJ
Strom NA
Mink FJ
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Enhanced recovery
Descriptors
Enhanced recovery scheme
Miscible displacement
Swan Hills field
Beaverhill Lake Fm
Design criteria
Development well
Economic analysis
Injection well
Monitoring
NTS 83J
Oil recovery
Oil saturation
Recovery factor
Reservoir model
Sweep efficiency
Unitized field
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S26
Notes
Decision D83-26 on application No. 830674 to implement a hydrocarbon miscible flood in the Swan Hills Beaverhill Lake A&B pool unit No. 1 (TP.66-68, R.9-11, W5M).
Interveners
Amoco Canada Petroleum Company Limited
Esso Resources Canada Limited
Gulf Canada Resources Inc.
Texaco Canada Resources Ltd.
Less detail

Decision 83-A

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2466
Applicant
McLeod River Coal Ltd.
Application Number
820294
Title
Decision on application by McLeod River Coal Ltd., 1983 (McLeod River coal project, Hinton)
Date
1983
Title
Decision on application by McLeod River Coal Ltd., 1983 (McLeod River coal project, Hinton)
Date
1983
Applicant
McLeod River Coal Ltd.
Application Number
820294
Hearing Panel
Berkowitz N
Strom NA
Mink FJ
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Coal
Descriptors
Coal mine
Coal preparation plant
Coal project
Coalspur coal field
Hinton area
McLeod River coal project
Surface mining
Air quality
Bituminous coal
Capitalized cost
Coal reserve
Cost analysis
Design criteria
Drainage
Dust control
Economic analysis
Employment
Environment protection
Environmental impact
Groundwater
Land reclamation
Land use
Manpower
Marketing
Mine design
NTS 83F
Open pit mining
Operating cost
Overburden ratio
Railroad
Reforestation
Socio-economic effect
Soil conservation
Tailings
Tailings - storage
Terminal facility
Thermal coal
Transportation corridor
Waste disposal
Water quality
Legal References
Coal Conservation Act S10
Coal Conservation Act S23
Notes
ERCB report D83-A on application No. 820294 to develop a surface coal mine in TP.49-51, R.21-23, W5 to extract high volatile C bituminous coal from NW portion of Coalspur coal field and to construct a coal processing plant in TP.51-52, R23-24, W5; Board hearing 1982-08-24/25/26/27
Less detail

Decision 83-C

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2435
Applicant
Mercoal Minerals Ltd.
Application Number
820385
Title
Decision on application by Mercoal Minerals Ltd., 1983 (Mercoal coal project)
Date
1983
Title
Decision on application by Mercoal Minerals Ltd., 1983 (Mercoal coal project)
Date
1983
Applicant
Mercoal Minerals Ltd.
Application Number
820385
Hearing Panel
Berkowitz N
Strom NA
Mink FJ
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Coal
Descriptors
Alberta Coal Branch
Coal mine
Coal preparation plant
Coal project
Hinton area
Mercoal coal project
Surface mining
Air quality
Benefit cost analysis
Bituminous coal
Coal reserve
Coalspur coal field
Cost analysis
Design criteria
Dust control
Economic analysis
Employment
Environmental impact
Land reclamation
Land use
Mine design
Marketing
NTS 83F
Open pit mining
Overburden ratio
Reforestation
Socio-economic effect
Tailings
Tailings - storage
Thermal coal
Waste disposal
Water quality
Water supply
Legal References
Coal Conservation Act S10
Coal Conservation Act S23
Notes
ERCB report D83-C on application No. 820385 to develop a surface coal mine to produce high volatile C bituminous coal and to construct a coal processing plant, to be located in TP.47-49, R.20-23, W5; Board hearing 1982-11-02/03/04
Less detail

Decision 84-17

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1844
Applicant
Northwestern Utilities Limited
Application Number
840193
Title
Decision on application by Northwestern Utilities Limited, 1984 (pipeline upgrading at road crossings, County of Lac St. Anne)
Date
1984
Title
Decision on application by Northwestern Utilities Limited, 1984 (pipeline upgrading at road crossings, County of Lac St. Anne)
Date
1984
Applicant
Northwestern Utilities Limited
Application Number
840193
Hearing Panel
Bohme VE
Goodman CJ
Evans RG
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Pipelines
Descriptors
Gas pipeline
Pipeline construction permit
Pipeline crossing
Design criteria
Pipeline design
Legal References
Pipeline Act S40
Pipeline Act S41
Notes
Decision D84-17 on application No. 840193 for approval to upgrade gas transmission pipeline at road crossings in the County of Lac ST. Anne in section 29-57-3 W5M and section 25-57-1 W5M.
Interveners
County of Lac St. Anne
Less detail

Decision 85-19

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1494
Applicant
Canadian Occidental Petroleum Ltd.
Application Number
850199
850200
850201
850202
850203
850204
Title
Decision on application by Canadian Occidental Petroleum Ltd., 1985 (to construct sour gas, fuel gas, produced water and sales gas pipeline systems)
Date
1985
Title
Decision on application by Canadian Occidental Petroleum Ltd., 1985 (to construct sour gas, fuel gas, produced water and sales gas pipeline systems)
Date
1985
Applicant
Canadian Occidental Petroleum Ltd.
Application Number
850199
850200
850201
850202
850203
850204
Hearing Panel
Millard V
Goodman CJ
Evans RG
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Pipelines
Descriptors
Gas pipeline
Mazeppa area
Okotoks area
Pipeline construction permit
Sour gas
Waste water
Water pipeline
Corrosion control
Design criteria
Emergency procedure
Land reclamation
Monitoring
NTS 82I
Pipeline construction
Pipeline design
Pipeline route
Route selection
Safety
Safety equipment
Notes
Decision D85-19 on application No. 850199 to 850204 inclusive by Cdn Oxy to allow it to construct pipelines in Mazeppa area to facilitate recovery of raw gas for processing through the Mazeppa gas plant, to transport sweet natural gas for distribution and to transport produced water to a disposal well (TP.18-20, R.28, W4M).
Interveners
Randle Farms Ltd.
Fred Randle Farms Ltd.
Randle, P.
Broughton, O.J.
Less detail

23 records – page 1 of 2.