32 records – page 1 of 2.

Decision 51-UNNUMBERED

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2394
Applicant
Energy Resources Conservation Board
Application Number
000022 (HEARING)
Title
Plan for proration to market demand
Date
1951
Title
Plan for proration to market demand
Date
1951
Applicant
Energy Resources Conservation Board
Application Number
000022 (HEARING)
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Prorationing
Descriptors
Allowable production
Proration
Demand (economics)
Alberta
Notes
ERCB decision on hearing (likely Hearing 22) to consider plans for the proration to market demand; Hearing 22 heard in Calgary starting on 1950-10-23
Less detail

Decision 66-C

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2429
Applicant
TransCanada Pipelines Limited
Title
Decision on application by TransCanada Pipelines Limited, 1966 (gas removal)
Date
1966
Title
Decision on application by TransCanada Pipelines Limited, 1966 (gas removal)
Date
1966
Applicant
TransCanada Pipelines Limited
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Gas removal
Descriptors
Gas removal
Alberta
Demand (economics)
Gas reserve
Supply (economics)
Legal References
Gas Resources Preservation Act 1956
Notes
Also included in CA2AL-ER-3-D26/NO.50 - 68 Volume 5
Less detail

Decision 69-E

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2511
Applicant
Dome Petroleum Limited
Trans-Canada Grid of Alberta Ltd.
Title
Decision on application by Dome Petroleum Limited and Trans-Canada Grid of Alberta Ltd., 1969 (For permit authorizing the removal of propane from the province under the Gas Resources Preservation Act, 1956)
Date
1969
Title
Decision on application by Dome Petroleum Limited and Trans-Canada Grid of Alberta Ltd., 1969 (For permit authorizing the removal of propane from the province under the Gas Resources Preservation Act, 1956)
Date
1969
Applicant
Dome Petroleum Limited
Trans-Canada Grid of Alberta Ltd.
Hearing Panel
Govier GW
Manyluk AF
Millard V
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Propane removal
Descriptors
Propane removal
Alberta
Demand (economics)
Gas reserve
Propane
Supply (economics)
Legal References
Gas Resources Preservation Act 1956
Notes
ERCB report 69-E regarding a permit authorizing the removal of propane from the province.
Less detail

Decision 70-C

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2493
Applicant
Dome Petroleum Limited
Transcanada Gasproducts Ltd.
Application Number
5143
Title
Decision on application by Dome Petroleum Limited and Transcanada Gasproducts Ltd., 1970 (Propane removal under Gas Resources Preservation Act, 1956)
Date
1970
Title
Decision on application by Dome Petroleum Limited and Transcanada Gasproducts Ltd., 1970 (Propane removal under Gas Resources Preservation Act, 1956)
Date
1970
Applicant
Dome Petroleum Limited
Transcanada Gasproducts Ltd.
Application Number
5143
Hearing Panel
Manyluk AF
Millard V
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Propane removal
Descriptors
Propane removal
Gas removal
Alberta
Demand (economics)
Petrochemical industry
Propane
Reserve
Legal References
Gas Resources Preservation Act, 1956
Notes
ERCB report 70-C on application No. 5143 to amend permit DP 69-2 to increase the volume of propane that may be removed from the province; granted by approval 1153A; see also related report ERCB 69-E
Approval
Approved
Less detail

Decision 74-M

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2448
Applicant
Canadian Superior Oil Ltd.
Chevron Standard Limited
Gulf Oil Canada Limited
Hudson's Bay Oil and Gas Company Limited
Shell Canada Limited
Union Oil Company of Canada Limited
Imperial Oil Limited
Goliad Oil and Gas Company
Cigas Products Ltd.
Koch Oil Co. Ltd.
Application Number
6925
6930
6934
6941
7226
7237
Title
Decision on application by Canadian Superior Oil Ltd., Chevron Standard Limited, Gulf Oil Canada Limited, Hudson's Bay Oil And Gas Company Limited, Shell Canada Limited, Union Oil Company of Canada Limited, Imperial Oil Limited, Goliad Oil & Gas Company, Cigas Products Ltd., and Koch Oil Co. Ltd., 1974 (for removal of propane under the Gas Resources Preservation Act)
Date
1974
Title
Decision on application by Canadian Superior Oil Ltd., Chevron Standard Limited, Gulf Oil Canada Limited, Hudson's Bay Oil And Gas Company Limited, Shell Canada Limited, Union Oil Company of Canada Limited, Imperial Oil Limited, Goliad Oil & Gas Company, Cigas Products Ltd., and Koch Oil Co. Ltd., 1974 (for removal of propane under the Gas Resources Preservation Act)
Date
1974
Applicant
Canadian Superior Oil Ltd.
Chevron Standard Limited
Gulf Oil Canada Limited
Hudson's Bay Oil and Gas Company Limited
Shell Canada Limited
Union Oil Company of Canada Limited
Imperial Oil Limited
Goliad Oil and Gas Company
Cigas Products Ltd.
Koch Oil Co. Ltd.
Application Number
6925
6930
6934
6941
7226
7237
Hearing Panel
Govier GW
Millard V
Craig DR
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Propane removal
Descriptors
Propane removal
Supply (economics)
Demand (economics)
Legal References
Gas Resources Preservation Act
Notes
ERCB report 74-M on applications
Less detail

Decision 75-I

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2358
Applicant
Energy Resources Conservation Board
Application Number
7978
Title
Administrative practices respecting propane removal under the Gas Resources Preservation Act
Date
1975
Title
Administrative practices respecting propane removal under the Gas Resources Preservation Act
Date
1975
Applicant
Energy Resources Conservation Board
Application Number
7978
Hearing Panel
Millard V
Craig DR
DeSorcy GJ
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Propane removal
Descriptors
Procedure
Propane removal
Demand (economics)
ERCB 74-M
Gas demand
Propane
Supply (economics)
Legal References
Gas Resources Preservation Act
Notes
ERCB report 75-I on proceeding No. 7978 called by the Board to solicit input regarding questions and practices relating to propane removal; Board hearing (Millard/Craig/Desorcy) held 1974-10-08
Less detail

Decision 78-B

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2333
Applicant
Canadian Superior Oil Ltd.
Gulf Oil Canada Limited
Home Oil Company Limited
Hudson's Bay Oil and Gas Company Limited
Imperial Oil Limited
Mobil Oil Canada Ltd.
Pancanadian Gas Products Ltd.
Shell Canada Limited
Texaco Exploration Canada Ltd.
Union Oil Company of Canada Limited
Application Number
770350
770513
770684
770509
770681
770807
770816
Title
Decision on application by several companies, 1978 (removal of propane under the Gas Resources Preservation Act)
Date
1978
Title
Decision on application by several companies, 1978 (removal of propane under the Gas Resources Preservation Act)
Date
1978
Applicant
Canadian Superior Oil Ltd.
Gulf Oil Canada Limited
Home Oil Company Limited
Hudson's Bay Oil and Gas Company Limited
Imperial Oil Limited
Mobil Oil Canada Ltd.
Pancanadian Gas Products Ltd.
Shell Canada Limited
Texaco Exploration Canada Ltd.
Union Oil Company of Canada Limited
Application Number
770350
770513
770684
770509
770681
770807
770816
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Gas removal
Descriptors
Gas removal
Propane removal
Availability
Demand (economics)
Gas demand
Gas supply
Supply (economics)
Legal References
Gas Resources Preservation Act S4
Gas Resources Preservation Act S11
Notes
ERCB report 78-B on application No. 770681 by Canadian Superior, on No. 770356 by Gulf, on No. 770350 by Hudson's Bay, on No. 770807 by Mobil, on No. 770513 by Texaco and No. 770816 by Union each for a permit to remove propane from Alberta and on application No. 770684 by PanCanadian to amend its existing propane removal permit No. TG.72-1 and on No. 770509 by Shell to amend its permit no.SC75-1 and No. -- by Imperial to amend an existing permit, and No.-- by Home Oil to amend an existing permit; Board hearing 1977-10-12; adjourned to 1977-11-22/23 and 1978-01-04
Less detail

Decision 78-C

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2332
Applicant
Gulf Oil Canada Limited
Application Number
770220
Title
Decision on application by Gulf Oil Canada Limited, 1978 (Oil and Gas Conservation Act, section 42)
Date
1978
Title
Decision on application by Gulf Oil Canada Limited, 1978 (Oil and Gas Conservation Act, section 42)
Date
1978
Applicant
Gulf Oil Canada Limited
Application Number
770220
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Industrial development permit
Descriptors
Industrial development permit
Oil refinery
Edmonton area
Petroleum product
Butane
Crude oil
Demand (economics)
ERCB 77-C
ERCB 77-H
Marketing
Natural gas - fuel
Natural gas - raw material
NTS 83H
Pentanes plus - raw material
Raw material
Supply (economics)
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S42
Notes
ERCB report 78-C on application No. 770220 for an IDP authorizing use of crude oil, butanes and gas as feedstock & fuel and pentanes-plus as raw material and gas to manufacture refinery products (gasoline and diesel fuel) at its Edmonton refinery (section 5, TP.52, R.23, W4M); permit GOC 78-2
Less detail

Decision 78-F

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2349
Applicant
Dome Petroleum Limited
Application Number
770861
Title
Decision on application by Dome Petroleum Limited, 1978 (Removal of ethane under the Gas Resources Preservation Act)
Date
1978
Title
Decision on application by Dome Petroleum Limited, 1978 (Removal of ethane under the Gas Resources Preservation Act)
Date
1978
Applicant
Dome Petroleum Limited
Application Number
770861
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Ethane
Descriptors
Ethane
Gas removal
Availability
Demand (economics)
Gas demand
Gas reserve
Gas supply
Petrochemical industry
Price
Raw material
Supply (economics)
Surplus
Legal References
Gas Resources Preservation Act S4
Notes
ERCB Report 78-F on application no. 770861 for a permit to remove ethane from the province via Cochin Pipeline to be delivered to Columbia LNG Corp. in Green Springs, Ohio; Board hearing 1977-12-22/23; Permit no. DP 78-2
Less detail

Decision 79-03

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2093
Applicant
Alberta Energy Company Limited
Application Number
780619
Title
Decision on application by Alberta Energy Company Ltd., 1979 (industrial development permit to manufacture substitute natural gas)
Date
1979
Title
Decision on application by Alberta Energy Company Ltd., 1979 (industrial development permit to manufacture substitute natural gas)
Date
1979
Applicant
Alberta Energy Company Limited
Application Number
780619
Hearing Panel
Millard V
DeSorcy GJ
Goodman CJ
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Industrial development permit
Descriptors
Bruderheim area
Industrial development permit
Manufactured gas
Benefit cost analysis
Byproduct
Cost analysis
Demand (economics)
Efficiency
Natural gas - fuel
Natural gas - raw material
NTS 83H
Pentanes plus
Plant design
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S42
Notes
Decision 79-3 on application No. 780619 to construct a substitute natural gas plant near Bruderheim, to use byproduct from the Petalta benzene plant and natural gas as feedstock and fuel in the manufacture of the SNG; see related Decision 79-4 for Decision on gas removal application
Interveners
Alberta and Southern Gas Co. Ltd.
Alberta Gas Ethylene Company Ltd.
Amoco Canada Petroleum Company Ltd.
Canadian Western Natural Gas Company Limited
Northwestern Utilities Limited
Dome Petroleum Limited
Dow Chemical of Canada Ltd.
Gulf Canada Resources Inc.
Pan-Alberta Gas Ltd.
TransCanada PipeLines Limited
Turbo Resources Ltd.
Less detail

Decision 80-12

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2027
Applicant
Shell Canada Limited
Application Number
800229
Title
Decision on application by Shell Canada Limited, 1980 (industrial development permit synthetic crude oil refinery)
Date
1980
Title
Decision on application by Shell Canada Limited, 1980 (industrial development permit synthetic crude oil refinery)
Date
1980
Applicant
Shell Canada Limited
Application Number
800229
Hearing Panel
DeSorcy GJ
Bohme VE
Mink FJ
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Industrial development permit
Descriptors
Benzene
Butane
Industrial development permit
Manufactured crude oil
Oil refinery
Pentanes plus
Petroleum product
Propane
Scotford area
Demand (economics)
Economic analysis
Environmental impact
NTS 83H
Raw material
Socio-economic effect
Oil sands oil
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S42
Notes
Decision 80-12 on application No. 800229 to use synthetic crude oil, natural gas liquids & gas to manufacture refinery products, benzene, N-Hexane, propane, butanes & pentanes plus in a new refinery to be constructed near Scotford in TP.55, R.23, W4M and TP.56, R.21, W4M.
Interveners
Alberta Energy Company Limited
Chevron Standard Limited
Dome Petroleum Limited
Fort Saskatchewan Chamber of Commerce
Gulf Canada Limited
Hudson's Bay Oil and Gas Company Limited
Imperial Oil Limited
Turbo Resources Limited
Less detail

Decision 80-13

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2026
Applicant
Turbo Resources Limited
Application Number
800249
Title
Decision on application by Turbo Resources Limited, 1980 (industrial development permit for a southern Alberta refinery)
Date
1980
Title
Decision on application by Turbo Resources Limited, 1980 (industrial development permit for a southern Alberta refinery)
Date
1980
Applicant
Turbo Resources Limited
Application Number
800249
Hearing Panel
DeSorcy GJ
Bohme VE
Mink FJ
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Industrial development permit
Descriptors
Balzac area
Industrial development permit
Oil refinery
Petroleum product
Demand (economics)
Design criteria
Lubricating oil
Natural gas - fuel
NTS 82P
Raw material
Recycling
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S42
Notes
Decision 80-13 on application No. 800249 to use crude oil, pentanes plus and butanes as feedstock & gas as fuel in a refinery/waste lubricating oil recycling facility to be constructed near Balzac (section 1-26-29 W4M).
Interveners
Alberta Energy Company Limited
Chevron Standard Limited
Dome Petroleum Limited
Gulf Canada Limited
Imperial Oil Limited
Shell Canada Limited
Less detail

Decision 80-25

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2014
Applicant
Celanese Canada Inc.
Celanese Corporation
Application Number
800124
Title
Decision on application by Celanese Canada Inc. and Celanese Corporation, 1980 (use natural gas as feedstock and fuel to manufacture methanol at clover bar)
Date
1980
Title
Decision on application by Celanese Canada Inc. and Celanese Corporation, 1980 (use natural gas as feedstock and fuel to manufacture methanol at clover bar)
Date
1980
Applicant
Celanese Canada Inc.
Celanese Corporation
Application Number
800124
Hearing Panel
Millard V
Berkowitz N
Webber HJ
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Industrial development permit
Descriptors
Clover Bar area
Industrial development permit
Methanol
Benefit cost analysis
Demand (economics)
Economic analysis
Emergency procedure
Environmental impact
Marketing
Natural gas - fuel
Natural gas - raw material
NTS 83H
Safety
Supply (economics)
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S42
Notes
Decision on application to use natural gas as a raw material and fuel to produce methanol in a new unit to be constructed on its existing plant site at Clover Bar (section 17, TP.53, R.23, W4M)
Interveners
Alberta Gas Chemicals Ltd.
Alberta Gas Ethylene Company Ltd.
Association of Professional Engineers, Geologists and Geophysicists of Alberta
Chevron Standard Limited
Norcen Energy Resources Ltd.
R.K. Dixon Engineering Services Ltd.
Sultana Corporation
City of Medicine Hat
City of Edmonton
County of Strathmore
Less detail

Decision 80-28

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2011
Applicant
Gulf Canada Limited
Application Number
800593
Title
Decision on application by Gulf Canada Limited, 1980 (amendment to industrial development permit GOC 78-2 to expand Stratcona refinery)
Date
1980
Title
Decision on application by Gulf Canada Limited, 1980 (amendment to industrial development permit GOC 78-2 to expand Stratcona refinery)
Date
1980
Applicant
Gulf Canada Limited
Application Number
800593
Hearing Panel
DeSorcy GJ
Bohme VE
Strom NA
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Industrial development permit
Descriptors
Butane
Edmonton area
Industrial development permit
Oil refinery
Petroleum product
Propane
Demand (economics)
Expansion
Manufactured crude oil
Natural gas - fuel
Natural gas - raw material
NTS 83H
Pentanes plus
Raw material
Socio-economic effect
Supply (economics)
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S42
Notes
Decision 80-28 on application No. 800593 to amend existing IDP GOC 78-2 to expand Gulf Strathcona refinery and use crude oil, butanes, pentanes plus and gas as feedstock and fuel in the production of refinery products, propane and butanes; Board hearing 1980-10-28/29
Interveners
Chevron Canada Liimited
Husky Oil Operations Lt.d
Imperial Oil Limited
Turbo Resources Limited
Less detail

Decision 80-30

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2009
Applicant
Alberta Products Pipe Line Limited
Application Number
800440
Title
Decision on application by Alberta Products Pipe Line Ltd., 1980 (permit to construct a pipeline from Edmonton to Calgary)
Date
1980
Title
Decision on application by Alberta Products Pipe Line Ltd., 1980 (permit to construct a pipeline from Edmonton to Calgary)
Date
1980
Applicant
Alberta Products Pipe Line Limited
Application Number
800440
Hearing Panel
DeSorcy GJ
Strom NA
Evans RG
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Pipelines
Descriptors
Calgary area
Edmonton area
Petroleum product
Pipeline construction permit
Pipeline project
Product pipeline
Red Deer area
Capacity
Demand (economics)
Environmental impact
NTS 82P
NTS 83A
NTS 83H
Pipeline crossing
Pipeline design
Pipeline route
Right of way
Route selection
Supply (economics)
Transmission corridor
Transportation corridor
Notes
Decision 80-30 on application No. 800440 to construct a pipeline to transport gasolines, diesel fuel, aviation fuels, solvents, and heating oil from a pump station in Edmonton to existing facilities in Calgary (TP.23-53, 23-29, W4M); Board hearing 1980-09-23/26; see related Decisions 81-31 and 81-34 for Decisions on specific segments of route that were matters of concern
Interveners
County of Lacombe No. 14
Daines Farms Ltd.
Paul S. Seiferling
Battle River Regional Planning Commission
City of Edmonton
Turbo Resources Ltd.
Crows Nest Resources Ltd.
Daon Corporation
Less detail

Decision 80-A

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2328
Applicant
Calgary Power Ltd.
Application Number
780363
780589
Title
Decision on application by Calgary Power Ltd., 1980 500 KV transmission lines, Keephills - Ellerslie
Date
1980
Title
Decision on application by Calgary Power Ltd., 1980 500 KV transmission lines, Keephills - Ellerslie
Date
1980
Applicant
Calgary Power Ltd.
Application Number
780363
780589
Hearing Type
Utilities
Category
Transmission line
Descriptors
Edmonton area
Electric substation
Ellerslie area
High voltage
Lake Wabamun
Transmission line
Biological effect
Electric field
Electric power
Demand (economics)
Health
Locating
NTS 83G
NTS 83H
Route selection
Safety
Legal References
Hydro and Electric Energy Act S9
Hydro and Electric Energy Act S11
Hydro and Electric Energy Act S13
Hydro and Electric Energy Act S14
Hydro and Electric Energy Act S17
Notes
ERCB report 80-A on application No. 780363 and No. 780589 for permits to construct and operate two 500 KV transmission lines between Keephills generating station in Wabamun Lake area and proposed Ellerslie substation south of Edmonton (TP.50-52, R.23 W4M to R.5 W5M); Board hearing 1979-02-06 thru 1979-03-14 see also ERCB report 81-D for supplement to this Decision
Less detail

Decision 81-03

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2005
Applicant
Alberta Energy Company Limited
ESSO Chemical Canada
Shell Canada Limited
Nova, an Alberta Corporation
Application Number
800530
800733
Title
Decision on application by Alberta Energy Company Ltd. and Esso Chemical Canada and Shell Canada Limited and Nova, an Alberta Corporation, 1981 (styrene monomer production)
Date
1981
Title
Decision on application by Alberta Energy Company Ltd. and Esso Chemical Canada and Shell Canada Limited and Nova, an Alberta Corporation, 1981 (styrene monomer production)
Date
1981
Applicant
Alberta Energy Company Limited
ESSO Chemical Canada
Shell Canada Limited
Nova, an Alberta Corporation
Application Number
800530
800733
Hearing Panel
Berkowitz N
Bohme VE
Mink FJ
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Industrial development permit
Descriptors
Bruderheim area
Chemical plant
Fort Saskatchewan area
Industrial development permit
Styrene
Benefit cost analysis
Benzene
Demand (economics)
Economic analysis
Ethylene - raw material
Marketing
Natural gas - fuel
Natural gas - raw material
NTS 83H
Raw material
Socio-economic effect
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S42
Notes
Decision 81-3 on application No. 800530 by AEC/ESSO to use gas, benzene and ethylene to produce styrene monomer in plant to be located adjacent Shell/Husky Strathcona refinery (TP.55-56, R.21, W4M); Board hearing 1980-11-25/26
Interveners
C-I-L Inc.
The Alberta Gas Ethylene Company Ltd.
Less detail

Decision 81-16

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1992
Applicant
Nova, an Alberta Corporation
Shell Canada Limited
Application Number
800910
Title
Decision on application by Nova, an Alberta Corporation and Shell Canada Limited, 1981 (industrial development permit to manufacture polyethylene)
Date
1981
Title
Decision on application by Nova, an Alberta Corporation and Shell Canada Limited, 1981 (industrial development permit to manufacture polyethylene)
Date
1981
Applicant
Nova, an Alberta Corporation
Shell Canada Limited
Application Number
800910
Hearing Panel
DeSorcy GJ
Strom NA
Webber HJ
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Industrial development permit
Descriptors
Chemical plant
Ethylene homopolymer
Industrial development permit
Red Deer area
Demand (economics)
Economic analysis
Environmental impact
Ethylene - raw material
Land use
Locating
Marketing
Natural gas - fuel
Noise (sound)
NTS 83A
Plant location
Pollution
Socio-economic effect
Supply (economics)
Water quality
Water supply
Notes
Decision 81-16 on application No. 800910 to use ethylene as feedstock and gas as fuel to manufacture polyethylene at a LINEAR low-density polyethylene plant to be constructed on the site of Alberta gas ethylene'S existing ethylene plant east of Red Deer (TP.38-40, R.23-27, W4M).
Interveners
Preserve Agricultural Land
Alberta Institute of Agrologists Red Deer Branch
F.E.M. Farms
Hainsworth, J.W.
Federation of Alberta Naturalists Land Use Committee
Red Deer Regional Planning Commission
Dow Chemical of Canada Limited
Union Carbide Canada Limited
Alberta Energy Company Ltd.
Du Pont Canada Inc.
Esso Chemical Canada
Less detail

Decision 81-17

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1991
Applicant
Alberta Energy Company Limited
Dupont Canada Inc.
Application Number
801017
Title
Decision on application by Alberta Energy Company Ltd. and Dupont Canada Inc., 1981 (industrial development permit to manufacture polyethylene)
Date
1981
Title
Decision on application by Alberta Energy Company Ltd. and Dupont Canada Inc., 1981 (industrial development permit to manufacture polyethylene)
Date
1981
Applicant
Alberta Energy Company Limited
Dupont Canada Inc.
Application Number
801017
Hearing Panel
Millard V
Goodman CJ
Webber HJ
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Industrial development permit
Descriptors
Chemical plant
Ethylene homopolymer
Industrial development permit
Redwater area
Demand (economics)
Economic analysis
Ethylene - raw material
Locating
Marketing
Natural gas - fuel
NTS 83H
Plant location
Socio-economic effect
Supply (economics)
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S42
Notes
Decision 81-17 on application No. 801017 to use ethylene as feedstock and gas as fuel to manufacture polyethylene at a plant to be constructed near Redwater (TP.56, R.21-22, W4M); Board hearing 1981-07-07/08
Interveners
Alberta Gas Chemicals Ltd.
C-I-L Inc.
Trimac Limited
Town of Gibbons
Council of the Town of Redwater
Dow Chemical of Canada, Limited
Minchau, D.
Minchau, C.
Municipal District of Sturgeon No. 90
NOVA, AN ALBERTA CORPORATION
Shell Canada Limited
Smulski, K.
The Alberta Gas Ethylene Company Ltd.
Union Carbide Canada Limited
Less detail

Decision 81-22

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1986
Applicant
C.I.L. Inc.
Trimac Ltd.
Application Number
800908
Title
Decision on application by C.I.L. Inc. and Trimac Ltd., 1981 (industrial development permit to manufacture polyethylene)
Date
1981
Title
Decision on application by C.I.L. Inc. and Trimac Ltd., 1981 (industrial development permit to manufacture polyethylene)
Date
1981
Applicant
C.I.L. Inc.
Trimac Ltd.
Application Number
800908
Hearing Panel
Berkowitz N
Goodman CJ
Strom NA
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Industrial development permit
Descriptors
Chemical plant
Edmonton area
Ethylene homopolymer
Industrial development permit
Benefit cost analysis
Demand (economics)
Economic analysis
Ethylene - raw material
Marketing
Natural gas - fuel
NTS 83H
Socio-economic effect
Supply (economics)
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S42
Notes
Decision 81-22 on application No. 800908 to use ethylene as feedstock and gas as fuel to manufacture polyethylene in a new plant to be constructed on site of applicant's existing plant site in Edmonton (section 36-52-24 W4M).
Interveners
Alberta Energy Company Ltd.
Esso Chemical of Canada
Du Pont Canada Inc.
The Alberta Gas Ethylene Company Ltd.
Less detail

32 records – page 1 of 2.