Narrow Results By
Applicant
- 693040 Alberta Limited 1
- ATCO Pipelines 1
- Alberta Ammonia Limited 2
- Alberta Association of Municipal Districts and Counties 1
- Alberta Energy Company Limited 4
- Alberta Federation of REA's Limited 1
- Alberta Gas Chemicals Limited 2
- Alberta Gas Ethylene Company Limited 1
- Alberta Gas Trunk Line Company Limited 2
- Alberta Power Limited 6
- Alberta Urban Municipalities Association 1
- Alberta. Dept. of the Environment 3
Decision 75-03
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2175
- Applicant
- Great Plains Development Company of Canada Ltd.
- Application Number
- 7976
- Title
- Decision on application by Great Plains Development Company Of Canada Ltd., 1975 (declaration f the Candel Minnehik-Buck Lake gas plant as a common processor and of the Minnehik-Buck Lake gathering system as a common carrier)
- Date
- 1975
- Title
- Decision on application by Great Plains Development Company Of Canada Ltd., 1975 (declaration f the Candel Minnehik-Buck Lake gas plant as a common processor and of the Minnehik-Buck Lake gathering system as a common carrier)
- Date
- 1975
- Application Number
- 7976
- Hearing Panel
- Govier GW
- Craig DR
- Millard V
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Category
- Common carrier
- Common processor
- Descriptors
- Common carrier
- Common processor
- Minnehik-Buck Lake field
- Capacity
- Cost analysis
- Economic analysis
- Gas pipeline
- Gas producing
- Lease drainage
- NTS 83B
- Legal References
- Oil and Gas Conservation Act S49
- Oil and Gas Conservation Act S54
- Notes
- Decision 75-3 on application No. 7976 to declare the Candel Minnehik-Buck Lake gas plant as a common processor and the Minnehik-Buck Lake gathering system as common carrier; Order No. Misc 7505
- Interveners
- CanDel Oil
Decision 75-04
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2174
- Applicant
- Alberta Power Limited
- Calgary Power Ltd.
- Application Number
- 7759
- 7966
- 7992
- 7996
- Title
- Decision on application by Alberta Power Ltd. and Calgary Power Ltd. , 1975 (Conklin power plant and electric distribution system)
- Date
- 1975
- Title
- Decision on application by Alberta Power Ltd. and Calgary Power Ltd. , 1975 (Conklin power plant and electric distribution system)
- Date
- 1975
- Applicant
- Alberta Power Limited
- Calgary Power Ltd.
- Application Number
- 7759
- 7966
- 7992
- 7996
- Hearing Panel
- Millard V
- Strong JI
- DeSorcy GJ
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Utilities
- Category
- Electric power
- Descriptors
- Electric power distribution
- Electric power project
- Service area
- Thermal power plant
- Transmission line
- Cost analysis
- Diesel fuel
- Economic analysis
- NTS 73M
- Legal References
- Hydro and Electric Energy Act S7
- Hydro and Electric Energy Act S20
- Hydro and Electric Energy Act S23
- Notes
- Decision 75-4 on application No. 7759 and 7966 by Alberta Power and on application No. 7992 and 7996 by Calgary power both to construct & operate a small diesel power plant and an electric distribution system in the settlement of Conklin and for an alteration to their service areas to include the Conklin area.
Decision 75-F
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2362
- Applicant
- PanCanadian Petroleum Limited
- Alberta Ammonia Limited
- Application Number
- 8009
- 7907
- Title
- Decision on application by PanCanadian Petroleum Limited, 1975 (ammonia plant near Brooks) and Decision on application by Alberta Ammonia Ltd., 1975 (ammonia plant near Raymond)
- Date
- 1975
- Title
- Decision on application by PanCanadian Petroleum Limited, 1975 (ammonia plant near Brooks) and Decision on application by Alberta Ammonia Ltd., 1975 (ammonia plant near Raymond)
- Date
- 1975
- Application Number
- 8009
- 7907
- Hearing Panel
- Govier GW
- Millard V
- DeSorcy GJ
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Category
- Industrial development permit
- Descriptors
- Ammonia
- Brooks area
- Chemical plant
- Fertilizer
- Industrial development permit
- Petrochemical industry
- Raymond area
- Alberta
- Benefit cost analysis
- Economic analysis
- Environmental impact
- Fuel consumption
- Gas consumption
- Natural gas - fuel
- Natural gas - raw material
- NTS 72L
- NTS 82H
- Socio-economic effect
- Legal References
- Oil and Gas Conservation Act S42
- Notes
- ERCB report 75-F on application No. 8009 (Alberta ammonia) to use gas as raw material and fuel to produce anhydrous ammonia in plant near Raymond (request for Order-in-Council withdrawn) and on application No. 7907 (PanCanadian) to use gas as raw material and fuel to produce anhydrous ammonia in plant near Brooks (application withdrawn); Board hearing 1974-09-30, 1974-10-01/02/16; see also ERCB report 75-FA for supplementary information.
Decision 75-FA
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2361
- Applicant
- PanCanadian Petroleum Limited
- Alberta Ammonia Limited
- Application Number
- 8009
- 7907
- Title
- Decision on application by PanCanadian Petroleum Limited, 1975 (ammonia plant Decision on application by Alberta Ammonia Ltd. (ammonia plant near Raymond) (section 42 of the Oil and Gas Conservation Act)
- Date
- 1975
- Title
- Decision on application by PanCanadian Petroleum Limited, 1975 (ammonia plant Decision on application by Alberta Ammonia Ltd. (ammonia plant near Raymond) (section 42 of the Oil and Gas Conservation Act)
- Date
- 1975
- Application Number
- 8009
- 7907
- Hearing Panel
- N/A
- Hearing Type
- N/A
- Category
- Industrial development permit
- Descriptors
- Ammonia
- Brooks area
- Chemical plant
- Fertilizer
- Industrial development permit
- Petrochemical industry
- Raymond area
- Alberta
- Benefit cost analysis
- Economic analysis
- Environmental impact
- Fuel consumption
- Gas consumption
- Natural gas - fuel
- Natural gas - raw material
- NTS 72L
- NTS 82H
- Socio-economic effect
- Legal References
- Oil and Gas Conservation Act S42
- Notes
- ERCB report 75-FA supplementing ERCB report 75-F
Decision 75-G
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2360
- Applicant
- Canadian Fertilizers Limited
- Application Number
- 8162
- Title
- Decision on application by Canadian Fertilizers Limited, 1975 (Oil and Gas Conservation Act, Section 42 for ammonia plant at Medicine Hat)
- Date
- 1975
- Title
- Decision on application by Canadian Fertilizers Limited, 1975 (Oil and Gas Conservation Act, Section 42 for ammonia plant at Medicine Hat)
- Date
- 1975
- Applicant
- Canadian Fertilizers Limited
- Application Number
- 8162
- Hearing Panel
- Govier GW
- Millard V
- DeSorcy GJ
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Category
- Industrial development permit
- Descriptors
- Ammonia
- Chemical plant
- Fertilizer
- Industrial development permit
- Medicine Hat area
- Petrochemical industry
- Urea
- Alberta
- Benefit cost analysis
- Economic analysis
- Environmental impact
- ERCB 75-F
- ID-74-01
- Fuel consumption
- Gas consumption
- Natural gas - fuel
- Natural gas - raw material
- NTS 72L
- Socio-economic effect
- Legal References
- Oil and Gas Conservation Act S42
- Notes
- ERCB report 75-G on application No. 8162 to use gas as a raw material and fuel to produce ammonia in plant at Medicine Hat (section 14-13-6 W4); Board hearing 1974-12-16/17/18; permit No. CFL 75-1
Decision 76-E
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2383
- Applicant
- Alberta Gas Chemicals Limited
- Application Number
- 8744
- Title
- Decision on application by Alberta Gas Chemicals Ltd., 1976 (Oil and Gas Conservation Act, section 42)
- Date
- 1976
- Title
- Decision on application by Alberta Gas Chemicals Ltd., 1976 (Oil and Gas Conservation Act, section 42)
- Date
- 1976
- Applicant
- Alberta Gas Chemicals Limited
- Application Number
- 8744
- Hearing Panel
- Millard V
- Berkowitz N
- DeSorcy GJ
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Category
- Industrial development permit
- Descriptors
- Chemical plant
- Industrial development permit
- Medicine Hat area
- ETHANOL
- Benefit cost analysis
- Capitalized cost
- Economic analysis
- Efficiency
- Gas supply
- Marketing
- Natural gas - fuel
- Natural gas - raw material
- NTS 72E
- Raw material
- Socio-economic effect
- Legal References
- Oil and Gas Conservation Act S42
- Notes
- ERCB report 76-E on application No. 8744 to use gas as raw material and fuel to produce methanol in a plant to be constructed near Medicine Hat (permit AGC 77-1); Board hearing 1976-01-28/29
Decision 77-24
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2124
- Applicant
- Syncrude Canada Ltd.
- Title
- Decision 77-24: Coke utilization study - Syncrude Canada Ltd.
- Date
- 1977
- Title
- Decision 77-24: Coke utilization study - Syncrude Canada Ltd.
- Date
- 1977
- Applicant
- Syncrude Canada Ltd.
- Hearing Type
- Utilities
- Category
- Oil sands
- Descriptors
- Bitumen
- Coke
- Fluid coking
- Fuel
- Mildred Lake project
- Cost analysis
- Economic analysis
- Electric power generation
- Gasification
- Utilization
- Notes
- Decision 77-24 giving the Board's assessment of Syncrude submission entitled "Evaluation of options for utilizing by-product fluid coke Syncrude Mildred Lake project". report submitted as a result of a condition on approval HE 7313 (on application No. 6888); see also report ERCB 73-K-HE-OG
Decision 77-C
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2373
- Applicant
- Alberta Energy Company Limited
- Hudson's Bay Oil and Gas Company Limited
- Mitsubishi Petrochemical Company Limited
- Mitsubishi Corporation
- Petalta Project (Petrochemicals Alberta Project)
- Alberta Gas Trunk Line Company Limited
- Dow Chemical of Canada Limited
- Alberta Gas Chemicals Limited
- Application Number
- 9070
- 8911
- Title
- Decision on application by Petalta Project (Alberta Energy Company Ltd, Hudson's Bay Oil And Gas Company Limited, Mitsubishi Petrochemical Company Limited, and Mitsubishi Corporation), 1977 (benzene plant) and Decision on application by Alberta Gas Trunk Line, Dow Chemical Of Canada Limited and Alberta Gas Chemicals Ltd., 1977 (benzene plant)
- Date
- 1977
- Title
- Decision on application by Petalta Project (Alberta Energy Company Ltd, Hudson's Bay Oil And Gas Company Limited, Mitsubishi Petrochemical Company Limited, and Mitsubishi Corporation), 1977 (benzene plant) and Decision on application by Alberta Gas Trunk Line, Dow Chemical Of Canada Limited and Alberta Gas Chemicals Ltd., 1977 (benzene plant)
- Date
- 1977
- Applicant
- Alberta Energy Company Limited
- Hudson's Bay Oil and Gas Company Limited
- Mitsubishi Petrochemical Company Limited
- Mitsubishi Corporation
- Petalta Project (Petrochemicals Alberta Project)
- Alberta Gas Trunk Line Company Limited
- Dow Chemical of Canada Limited
- Alberta Gas Chemicals Limited
- Application Number
- 9070
- 8911
- Hearing Panel
- Craig DR
- Berkowitz N
- DeSorcy GJ
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Category
- Industrial development permit
- Descriptors
- Benzene
- Bruderheim area
- Chemical plant
- Fort Saskatchewan area
- Industrial development permit
- Petalta Project (Petrochemicals Alberta Project)
- Benefit cost analysis
- Economic analysis
- NTS 83H
- Pentanes plus - fuel
- Pentanes plus - raw material
- Socio-economic effect
- Legal References
- Oil and Gas Conservation Act S42
- Notes
- ERCB report 77-C on application No. 9070 by AEC et al (Petalta) for a plant to be located near Fort Saskatchewan to convert pentanes plus to benzene and liquid byproducts and on application No. 8911 by AGTL et al for a plant to be constructed near Bruderheim to convert pentanes plus to benzene and liquid byproduct (including gasoline or diesel fuel); Board hearing (Petalta project APP # 9070) 1976-06-15/16 and 1976-07-05; Board hearing (AGTL Bruderheim APP # 8911) 1977-07-06/07/08/09
Decision 78-12
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2108
- Applicant
- Calgary Power Ltd.
- Application Number
- 770891
- Title
- Decision on application by Calgary Power Ltd., 1978 (approval to construct and operate an ash lagoon for disposing ash at the Keephills power plant)
- Date
- 1978
- Title
- Decision on application by Calgary Power Ltd., 1978 (approval to construct and operate an ash lagoon for disposing ash at the Keephills power plant)
- Date
- 1978
- Applicant
- Calgary Power Ltd.
- Application Number
- 770891
- Hearing Panel
- Millard V
- Berkowitz N
- Goodman CJ
- Solodzuk W
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Utilities
- Category
- Electric power
- Descriptors
- Ash
- Electric power project
- Keephills power project
- Settling pond
- Waste disposal
- Cost analysis
- Economic analysis
- Environmental impact
- Groundwater
- NTS 83G
- Reclamation
- Legal References
- Energy Resources Conservation Act S40
- Hydro and Electric Energy Act S7
- Notes
- Decision 78-12 on application No. 770891 to develop a recirculating water slurry system and ash lagoon for disposing of ash at the Keephills power plant (TP.51-52, R.3-4, W5M).
- Interveners
- Committee on Keephills Environment
Decision 78-18
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2102
- Applicant
- Star-Key Mines Ltd.
- Application Number
- 780160
- Title
- Decision on application by Star-Key Mines Ltd., 1978 (amendment of mining system and opening of three new entries of mine No. 1626 St. Albert area)
- Date
- 1978
- Title
- Decision on application by Star-Key Mines Ltd., 1978 (amendment of mining system and opening of three new entries of mine No. 1626 St. Albert area)
- Date
- 1978
- Applicant
- Star-Key Mines Ltd.
- Application Number
- 780160
- Hearing Panel
- Strom NA
- Duncan NJ
- Jenkins D
- Harrington D
- Hearing Type
- Examiners
- Category
- Coal
- Descriptors
- Coal mine
- Coal project
- St. Albert area
- Underground mining
- Benefit cost analysis
- Coal reserve
- Edmonton Fm
- Environmental impact
- Land reclamation
- Longwall mining
- Mine design
- NTS 83H
- Subsidence
- Truck
- Water quality
- Notes
- Decision 78-18 on application No. 780160 to amend permit No. C 76-70 to change present underground mining system for Star-Key mine (No. 1626) including 3 new entrances to underground workings (TP.54-55, R.24-25, W4M); Examiners hearing 1978-06-14/22
- Interveners
- The City of St. Albert
- The Consumer Association of Canada (Alta.)
Decision 78-23
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2097
- Applicant
- Petrochemicals Alberta Project
- Application Number
- 780591
- Title
- Decision on application by Petrochemicals Alberta Project, 1978 (amendment of industrial development permit No. PAP 78-1)
- Date
- 1978
- Title
- Decision on application by Petrochemicals Alberta Project, 1978 (amendment of industrial development permit No. PAP 78-1)
- Date
- 1978
- Applicant
- Petrochemicals Alberta Project
- Application Number
- 780591
- Hearing Panel
- N/A
- Hearing Type
- N/A
- No Hearing
- Category
- Industrial development permit
- Descriptors
- Benzene
- Chemical plant
- Fort Saskatchewan area
- Industrial development permit
- Benefit cost analysis
- Natural gas - raw material
- NTS 83G
- Pentanes plus - raw material
- Revision
- Legal References
- Oil and Gas Conservation Act S42
- Notes
- Decision 78-23 on application No. 780591 to amend IDP No. PAP 78-1 to decrease use of pentanes plus as raw material and increase use of natural gas as raw material; no hearing; see also related ERCB reports 77-C and 77-H
Decision 78-24
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2096
- Applicant
- Alberta Gas Trunk Line Company Limited
- Application Number
- 770806
- Title
- Decision on application by Alberta Gas Trunk Line Company Limited, 1978 (construct a pipeline in the Peace River area)
- Date
- 1978
- Title
- Decision on application by Alberta Gas Trunk Line Company Limited, 1978 (construct a pipeline in the Peace River area)
- Date
- 1978
- Applicant
- Alberta Gas Trunk Line Company Limited
- Application Number
- 770806
- Hearing Panel
- Millard V
- DeSorcy GJ
- Bohme VE
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Category
- Pipelines
- Descriptors
- Gas pipeline
- Peace River area
- Pipeline construction permit
- Cost analysis
- Deliverability
- Gas reserve
- NTS 84C
- NTS 84D
- NTS 84E
- Pipeline design
- Pipeline route
- Notes
- Decision (and interim decision dated 1978-01-12) on application to construct 125.4 miles of 30 inch pipeline to transmit natural gas from LSD 13-35-101-3 W6M to LSD 5-23-81-26 W5M (Peace River loop)
- Interveners
- Canadian Petroleum Association
- Independent Petroleum Association of Canada
- Mesa Petroleum Company
- Municipal District of Peace No.135
- Pan-Alberta Gas Ltd.
- Shell Canada Resources Ltd.
- TransCanada Pipelines Limited
Decision 78-A
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2335
- Applicant
- Celanese Canada Limited
- Application Number
- 770700
- Title
- Decision on application by Celanese Canada Limited, 1978 (Oil And Gas Conservation Act, section 42)
- Date
- 1978
- Title
- Decision on application by Celanese Canada Limited, 1978 (Oil And Gas Conservation Act, section 42)
- Date
- 1978
- Applicant
- Celanese Canada Limited
- Application Number
- 770700
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Category
- Industrial development permit
- Descriptors
- Chemical plant
- Clover Bar area
- Industrial development permit
- Vinyl acetate
- Acetic acid
- Benefit cost analysis
- Cost analysis
- Economic analysis
- ERCB 76-B
- ERCB 74-W
- Ethylene - raw material
- Natural gas - fuel
- NTS 83H
- Raw material
- Legal References
- Oil and Gas Conservation Act S42
- Notes
- ERCB report 78-A on application No. 770700 to use ethylene and acetic acid as raw material and gas as fuel to produce vinyl acetate monomer in a plant to be constructed on celanese existing plant site at Clover BAR (section 17, TP.53, R.23 W4M); permit No. CCL 78-1
Decision 78-AA
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2334
- Applicant
- Forestburg Collieries Limited
- Alberta. Dept. of the Environment
- Application Number
- 9903
- Title
- Decision on application by Forestburg Collieries Limited, 1978 (permit to develop and a licence to commence mining operations at a mine site near Halkirk)
- Date
- 1978
- Title
- Decision on application by Forestburg Collieries Limited, 1978 (permit to develop and a licence to commence mining operations at a mine site near Halkirk)
- Date
- 1978
- Application Number
- 9903
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Category
- Coal
- Descriptors
- Coal mine
- Coal project
- Forestburg South mine project
- Surface mining
- Benefit cost analysis
- Bituminous coal
- Coal reserve
- Environmental impact
- Land reclamation
- Mine design
- Mine safety
- NTS 83A
- Overburden ratio
- Reclamation
- Socio-economic effect
- Soil conservation
- Water quality
- Legal References
- Coal Conservation Act S10
- Coal Conservation Act S11
- Notes
- ERCB report 78-AA on application No. 9903 to develop and operate coal mine of the south SIDE of the Battle River (TP.39-40, R.15-16, W4M) to replace coal production from the DIPLOMAT mine site No. 1578 to ensure an ADEQUATE supply for APL'S generating station; Board hearing 1978-01-24/25 permit No. C 78-12 licence No. C 78-13
Decision 79-03
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2093
- Applicant
- Alberta Energy Company Limited
- Application Number
- 780619
- Title
- Decision on application by Alberta Energy Company Ltd., 1979 (industrial development permit to manufacture substitute natural gas)
- Date
- 1979
- Title
- Decision on application by Alberta Energy Company Ltd., 1979 (industrial development permit to manufacture substitute natural gas)
- Date
- 1979
- Applicant
- Alberta Energy Company Limited
- Application Number
- 780619
- Hearing Panel
- Millard V
- DeSorcy GJ
- Goodman CJ
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Category
- Industrial development permit
- Descriptors
- Bruderheim area
- Industrial development permit
- Manufactured gas
- Benefit cost analysis
- Byproduct
- Cost analysis
- Demand (economics)
- Efficiency
- Natural gas - fuel
- Natural gas - raw material
- NTS 83H
- Pentanes plus
- Plant design
- Legal References
- Oil and Gas Conservation Act S42
- Notes
- Decision 79-3 on application No. 780619 to construct a substitute natural gas plant near Bruderheim, to use byproduct from the Petalta benzene plant and natural gas as feedstock and fuel in the manufacture of the SNG; see related Decision 79-4 for Decision on gas removal application
- Interveners
- Alberta and Southern Gas Co. Ltd.
- Alberta Gas Ethylene Company Ltd.
- Amoco Canada Petroleum Company Ltd.
- Canadian Western Natural Gas Company Limited
- Northwestern Utilities Limited
- Dome Petroleum Limited
- Dow Chemical of Canada Ltd.
- Gulf Canada Resources Inc.
- Pan-Alberta Gas Ltd.
- TransCanada PipeLines Limited
- Turbo Resources Ltd.
Decision 79-A
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2344
- Applicant
- Great Canadian Oil Sands Limited
- Application Number
- 780318
- Title
- Decision on application by Great Canadian Oil Sands Limited, 1979 (Oil and Gas Conservation Act, part 8)
- Date
- 1979
- Title
- Decision on application by Great Canadian Oil Sands Limited, 1979 (Oil and Gas Conservation Act, part 8)
- Date
- 1979
- Applicant
- Great Canadian Oil Sands Limited
- Application Number
- 780318
- Hearing Panel
- Bohme VE
- Evans RG
- Kupchanko EE
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Category
- Oil sands
- Descriptors
- Great Canadian Oil Sands
- Oil mining
- Suncor plant
- Oil sands oil recovery
- Oil sands project
- Air quality
- Athabasca River
- Benefit cost analysis
- Delayed coking
- Effluent
- Emission
- Environmental impact
- Expansion
- Material balance
- Mine design
- NTS 74E
- Open pit mining
- Overburden ratio
- Plant design
- Pollution control
- Recovery factor
- Socio-economic effect
- Sulphur dioxide
- Sulphur recovery
- Surface mining
- Upgrading
- Waste disposal
- Water quality
- Legal References
- Oil and Gas Conservation Act S43
- Notes
- ERCB report 79-A on application No. 780318 to amend approval No. 1944 to modify and expand existing facilities located in TP.92-93, R.10, W4M; Board hearing 1979-01-30/31
Decision 79-AA
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2391
- Applicant
- Alberta. Dept. of the Environment
- Alberta Power Limited
- Forestburg Collieries Limited
- Manalta Coal Ltd.
- Edmonton Power
- Application Number
- 9759
- 770364
- 780041
- 780024
- Title
- Decision on application by Alberta Power Ltd., Forestburg Collieries Limited and Manalta Coal Ltd., 1979 (Sheerness mine and the construction and operation of proposed Sheerness thermal power plant) and on application by Edmonton Power Ltd., 1979 (Genesee thermal power plant and Genesee mine)
- Date
- 1979
- Title
- Decision on application by Alberta Power Ltd., Forestburg Collieries Limited and Manalta Coal Ltd., 1979 (Sheerness mine and the construction and operation of proposed Sheerness thermal power plant) and on application by Edmonton Power Ltd., 1979 (Genesee thermal power plant and Genesee mine)
- Date
- 1979
- Applicant
- Alberta. Dept. of the Environment
- Alberta Power Limited
- Forestburg Collieries Limited
- Manalta Coal Ltd.
- Edmonton Power
- Application Number
- 9759
- 770364
- 780041
- 780024
- Hearing Panel
- Berkowitz N
- DeSorcy GJ
- Goodman CJ
- Thiessen HW
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Utilities
- Category
- Coal
- Descriptors
- Coal mine
- Coal project
- Electric power project
- Genesee mine
- Genesee power plant
- Roselyn mine
- Sheerness mine
- Sheerness power plant
- Thermal power plant
- Alberta
- Benefit cost analysis
- Capacity
- Coal - fuel
- Comparison
- Cooling system
- Cost analysis
- Electric power demand
- Environmental impact
- Locating
- Mine design
- NTS 72M
- NTS 83G
- Planning
- Plant design
- Socio-economic effect
- Legal References
- Coal Conservation Act S10
- Coal Conservation Act S21
- Hydro and Electric Energy Act S7
- Hydro and Electric Energy Act S14
- Notes
- ERCB Report 79-AA (with separate addendum) on application No. 9759 by Alberta Power for plant near Sheerness and connection to its electric system, application No. 770364 by Forestburg to develop a mine site near Sheerness to supply proposed Power Plant, application No, 780041 by Manalta to extend Roselyn mine (Mine No. 443) at Sheerness to supply part of coal for proposed Sheerness power plant (Sheerness in TP.24-31, R.11-16, W4M) and on application No. 780024 by Edmonton Power thermal power plant at Genesee and mine site at Genesee to supply coal to fuel the plant (TP.48-51, R.1-4, W5M); See also ERCB Report 82-C for decision on later application by Edmonton Power to advance the commissioning dates for Genesee plant; Board hearing on Sheerness 1978-05-16/17/18/19; Board hearing on Genesee 1978-07-25/26/27/28 & 1978-08-02/03/04
- Interveners
- Alberta Power Limited
- McDermid, N
- Provost, K
- Frey, JR
- Leahy, DM
- Griffing, TC
- Kolisnyk, Z
- Manalta Coal Ltd.
- Forsyth, GR
- McKinnon, S
- Chapel, GD
- Shaneman, M
- Portigal, L
- Eeglon, T
- Morgan, JR
- Forestburg Collieries Limited
- Parr, R
- Morris, JE
- Engler, RF
- Robbins, GH
- Haddock, JK
- Bowman, PM
- McAllister, RE
- Electric Utilities Planning Council (EUPC)
- Ferguson, T
- Chorel, MJ
- Reed, WA
- Beckett, WJ
- Fleury, D
- Shinyei, F
- Hosie, W
- Desarkar, A
- Calgary Power Ltd.
- Sabey, DO
- Kay, HM
- Fraser, WL
- Barry, EJ
- Scheaffer, HG
- Crowe, TW
- Friend, A
- Williams, MM
- City of Edmonton
- Smith, P
- Kyte, EF
- Department of Municipal Affairs Special Areas Board
- Duff, AR
- Unifarm Region Eleven
- Gordon, H
- Williams, CK
- Price, RH
- Anderson, D
- Brown, V
- Cambell, C
- Hutton, LC
- Bull Pound Breeders' Co-operative Ltd.
- Lenfesty, Ma
- McEwen, MO
- Hartzler, C
- T.G. Cattle Company Limited
- Gateman, J
- Cattle, TG
- Department of Environment staff
- Defir, J
- Harrington, DG
- Lupul, S
- Deagle, C
- Edmonton Power
- Patterson, M
- Pettican, A
- Sadesky, A
- Keller, A
- Warren, K
- Pelletier, D
- Prostebby, J
- Clark, D
- De, M
- Visman, J
- Gilchrist, G
- Majury, A
- Stutz, C
- Croft, B
- Lamb, A
- Gill, D
- Stewart, R
- MacDougall, T
- Dusel, F
- Brocke, L
- Reeves, B
- Warburg and District Chamber of Commerce
- Siega, L
- Village of Warburg
- Zotzman, E
- Town of Drayton Valley
- Welsh, MC
- McKay, A
- McKay, R
- Osbak, E
- Save-Tomorrow-Oppose Pollution (S.T.O.P.)
- Poulin, J
- Paschen, J
- Royen, L
- McGaffey, P
- Wighton, D
- Town of Hanna
- Dookie, SS
- Sierra Club of Alberta
- Kariel, P
- Genesee Agricultural Protection Society (G.A.P.S.)
- Skermer, R
- Liba, Z
- Koebernick, W
- Mertz, W
- Koebernick, E
- Liba, L
- Group of Concerned Genesee and Area Citizens
- Lorincz, S
- Fritz, C
- Lawrence, KC
- Unifarm
- Falconberg, H
- Bell, S
- Smith, R
- County of Leduc
- Warburg Coal Company
- Christian Farmers Federation
- Vanderschaaf, Mr
Decision 79-E
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2340
- Applicant
- ESSO Resources Canada Limited
- Application Number
- 770866
- Title
- Decision on application by Esso Resources Canada Limited, 1979 (Oil and Gas Conservation Act, Section 43 and Coal Conservation Act, Section 27)
- Date
- 1979
- Title
- Decision on application by Esso Resources Canada Limited, 1979 (Oil and Gas Conservation Act, Section 43 and Coal Conservation Act, Section 27)
- Date
- 1979
- Applicant
- ESSO Resources Canada Limited
- Application Number
- 770866
- Hearing Panel
- DeSorcy GJ
- Berkowitz N
- Bohme VE
- Solodzuk W
- Isbister WD
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Category
- Oil sands
- Descriptors
- Cold Lake area
- Cold Lake heavy oil project
- Heavy oil project
- Steam injection
- Oil sands project
- Thermal recovery
- Viscous oil recovery
- Benefit cost analysis
- Bituminous deposit
- Coal - fuel
- Environmental impact
- IL-OG-74-05
- Flexicoking
- Industrial development permit
- Manufactured crude oil
- Material balance
- Natural gas - fuel
- NTS 73L
- Recovery factor
- Reserve
- Socio-economic effect
- Upgrading
- Waste disposal
- Waste water
- Water supply
- Well spacing
- Legal References
- Coal Conservation Act S27
- Oil and Gas Conservation Act S43
- Notes
- ERCB Report 79-E on application no. 770866 to produce and upgrade crude bitumen and for an industrial development permit to use coal as a fuel for the project (TP.64-65, R.3-4, W4M); Board hearing 1978-09-05 adjourned to 1978-12-04 through 1978-12-20 and 1979-01-03 through 1979-01-08 and 1979-05-29/30/31; Report 81-C on application (Application no. 800664) to change makeup fuel and ERCB Decision D83-21 for later application (No. 830620) for phased development of the project
Decision 79-H
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2337
- Applicant
- Alsands Project Group
- Application Number
- 780724
- 790191
- Title
- Decision on application by Alsands project group, 1979 (oil sands surface mining and upgrading scheme) Alsands Fort Mcmurray project
- Date
- 1979
- Title
- Decision on application by Alsands project group, 1979 (oil sands surface mining and upgrading scheme) Alsands Fort Mcmurray project
- Date
- 1979
- Applicant
- Alsands Project Group
- Application Number
- 780724
- 790191
- Hearing Panel
- Berkowitz N
- Strom NA
- Kupchanko EE
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Utilities
- Category
- Oil sands
- Descriptors
- Alsands project
- Electric power project
- Oil mining
- Oil sands oil recovery
- Oil sands project
- Benefit cost analysis
- Dragline
- Drainage
- Electric power plant
- Environmental impact
- Fluid coking
- Gasification
- Hot water process
- Industrial waste
- Land reclamation
- McMurray Fm
- Mine design
- Municipality
- NTS 74E
- Reclamation
- Regional planning
- Socio-economic effect
- Surface mining
- Tailings
- Oil sands reserve
- Upgrading
- Waste disposal
- Waste water
- Legal References
- Hydro and Electric Energy Act S7
- Hydro and Electric Energy Act S14
- Oil and Gas Conservation Act S43
- Notes
- ERCB report 79-H on application No. 780724 for oil sands surface mining and upgrading scheme (TP.95-96, R.9-11, W4M) and on application No. 790191 for associated power plan; Board hearing 1979-06-19 thru 1979-07-05; addenda - Jan. 7, 1980 attached; see earlier related Decision ERCB report 74-H
Decision 80-10
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2029
- Applicant
- Town of Sundre
- Application Number
- 800359
- Title
- Decision on application by Town of Sundre, 1980 (relocation of a pipeline)
- Date
- 1980
- Title
- Decision on application by Town of Sundre, 1980 (relocation of a pipeline)
- Date
- 1980
- Applicant
- Town of Sundre
- Application Number
- 800359
- Hearing Panel
- Goodman CJ
- Strom NA
- Bellows LA
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Category
- Pipelines
- Descriptors
- Gas pipeline
- Pipeline route
- Relocation
- Sundre area
- Cost analysis
- Encroachment
- NTS 82O
- Regional planning
- Right of way
- Urban development
- Legal References
- Pipeline Act S34
- Notes
- Decision 80-10 on application No. 800359 to have Board Order the relocation of a pipeline owned by Alberta Gas Trunk Line located in section 33-32-5 W5M and section 4-33-5 W5M so as not to affect future development of the Town of Sundre under its annexation plan.
- Interveners
- The Alberta Gas Trunk Line Company Limited
- EMA Holdings Ltd.
- Alberta and Southern Gas Co. Ltd.
- Newall, A.P.