Narrow Results By
Applicant
- Canadian 88 Energy Corp. 1
- ConocoPhillips Canada Resources Corp. 1
- Consolidated Pipe Lines Company. 1
- Dome Petroleum Limited 1
- Dynegy Canada Inc. 3
- Energy Resources Conservation Board 1
- Gulf Canada Resources Inc. 1
- Koch Exploration Canada Ltd. 1
- Maxwell Oil and Gas Ltd. 1
- Murphy Oil Company Limited. 1
- Norcen Energy Resources Ltd. 1
- PanCanadian Petroleum Limited 1
Decision 78-05
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2115
- Applicant
- Energy Resources Conservation Board
- Application Number
- 9750X
- Title
- Decision on proceeding on spacing and target area requirements for oil and gas wells drilled in the province of Alberta, 1978
- Date
- 1978
- Title
- Decision on proceeding on spacing and target area requirements for oil and gas wells drilled in the province of Alberta, 1978
- Date
- 1978
- Applicant
- Energy Resources Conservation Board
- Application Number
- 9750X
- Hearing Panel
- Craig DR
- Millard V
- DeSorcy GJ
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Category
- Spacing
- Descriptors
- Drilling spacing unit
- Land use
- Target area
- Well spacing
- Agricultural land
- Alberta
- Citizen participation
- Communication
- Community relations
- Economic analysis
- Environmental impact
- Gas well
- History
- Oil well
- Procedure
- Regulation
- Legal References
- Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S4.030
- Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S15.060
- Notes
- Decision on proceeding No. 9750X to consider representations from agricultural groups on the need to amend the present well spacing and target area requirements
Decision 81-36
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1731
- Applicant
- Norcen Energy Resources Ltd.
- Application Number
- 810534
- 810649
- Title
- Examiners report on application by Norcen Energy Resources Ltd., 1981 (gas processing plant Joarcam field)
- Date
- 1981
- Title
- Examiners report on application by Norcen Energy Resources Ltd., 1981 (gas processing plant Joarcam field)
- Date
- 1981
- Applicant
- Norcen Energy Resources Ltd.
- Application Number
- 810534
- 810649
- Hearing Panel
- Pearson DG
- Brushett ER
- Nichol JR
- Hearing Type
- Examiners
- Category
- Gas processing
- Descriptors
- Gas processing plant
- Joarcam field
- Battery
- Community relations
- Dissolved gas
- Emission
- Environmental impact
- Gas conservation
- Locating
- Noise (sound)
- NTS 83H
- Pollution
- Legal References
- Oil and Gas Conservation Act S38
- Notes
- ERCB Examiners report No. E81-36 on application No. 810534 to construct & operate plant in LSD 8-14-5--22 W4M approved under approval No. 3302 (application No. 800887) and on proceeding No. 810649 initiated by the Board to reconsider approval No. 3302; Examiners' hearing 81-09-28/29/30
- Interveners
- Hansen, S.A.
- Hansen, H.J.
- Otto, R.L.
- Otto, A.D.
- Knopp, A.J.
- Knopp, B.
- Ogoniski, B.
Decision 82-23
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2055
- Applicant
- Gulf Canada Resources Inc.
- Application Number
- 820283
- Title
- Decision on application by Gulf Canada Resources Inc., 1982 (well licence to drill an exploratory well Millarville area)
- Date
- 1982
- Title
- Decision on application by Gulf Canada Resources Inc., 1982 (well licence to drill an exploratory well Millarville area)
- Date
- 1982
- Applicant
- Gulf Canada Resources Inc.
- Application Number
- 820283
- Hearing Panel
- DeSorcy GJ
- Bohme VE
- Brushett ER
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Category
- Well licence
- Descriptors
- Sour gas
- Well licence
- Community relations
- Contamination
- Drilling fluid
- Drilling program
- Drilling Waste disposal
- Emergency procedure
- Environmental impact
- ID-81-03
- Exploratory well
- Gas well
- Safety
- Waste disposal
- Water supply
- Water well
- Legal References
- EUB Rules of Practice
- Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S2.020
- Notes
- Decision 82-23 on application No. 820283 to drill the proposed well Gulf et al Millarville 6-32-22-4 directionally from a surface location in LSD 14-29-22-4 W5M.
- Interveners
- Rusticana Estates,Echo Hill and surrounding area residents
- Canadian Wildlife Federation
- Location
- 06-32-022-04W5
- 14-29-022-04W5
Decision 83-20
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1185
- Applicant
- Consolidated Pipe Lines Company.
- Application Number
- 830141
- Title
- Examiners report on application by Consolidated Pipe Lines Company, 1983 (gas processing plant Claresholm field)
- Date
- 1983
- Title
- Examiners report on application by Consolidated Pipe Lines Company, 1983 (gas processing plant Claresholm field)
- Date
- 1983
- Applicant
- Consolidated Pipe Lines Company.
- Application Number
- 830141
- Hearing Panel
- Morin EJ
- Brushett ER
- Fox EG
- Hearing Type
- Examiners
- Category
- Gas processing
- Descriptors
- Claresholm field
- Gas processing plant
- Sour gas
- Air quality
- Community relations
- Disposal well
- Dissolved gas
- Emission
- Environmental impact
- Flare
- Gas conservation
- Health
- Hydrogen sulphide
- Monitoring
- NTS 82I
- Sulphur dioxide
- Sulphur recovery
- Legal References
- Oil and Gas Conservation Act S26
- Notes
- ERCB Examiners report E83-20 on application No. 830141 to construct and operate a sour gas processing plant at an existing well located in LSD 6-30-12-25 W4M; Examiners hearing 1983-09-06, 1983-10-12/13
- Interveners
- Drummond Oil & Gas Ltd.
- Town of Claresholm
- Oldman River Regional Planning Commission
- East Claresholm Clean Air Association
- Willow Creek Surface Rights Society
- M.G. Mulholland Farms Ltd.
- Berg, V.
- Berg, D.
- Darch, O.
- Darch, D.
- Deering, V.
- Everl, D.
- Eberl, F.
- Finley, D.
- Kruszewski, D.
- Kruszewski, S.
- Laing, A.
- Laing, G.
- Opp, F.
- Opp, D.
- Prusky, M.
- Roemmele Farms Ltd.
- Ulrich, H.
- Weerstra, M.
Decision 85-06
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1686
- Applicant
- Dome Petroleum Limited
- Application Number
- 840739
- Title
- Decision on application by Dome Petroleum Limited, 1985 (Experimental in situ scheme Lindbergh sector)
- Date
- 1985
- Title
- Decision on application by Dome Petroleum Limited, 1985 (Experimental in situ scheme Lindbergh sector)
- Date
- 1985
- Applicant
- Dome Petroleum Limited
- Application Number
- 840739
- Hearing Panel
- DeSorcy GJ
- Strom NA
- Bellows LA
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Category
- Oil sands
- Descriptors
- Cyclic steam injection
- Elk Point area
- In situ
- Lindbergh area
- Steam injection
- Oil sands oil recovery
- Oil sands project
- Thermal recovery
- Air quality
- Community relations
- Cummings Fm
- Emission
- Environmental impact
- Land value
- Monitoring
- Noise (sound)
- NTS 73E
- Pilot scale
- Pollution
- Safety
- Well spacing
- Legal References
- Oil Sands Conservation Act S10
- Notes
- Decision D85-6 on application No. 840739 for approval to develop a 16 well cyclic steam experimental project in the Cummings zone of the Cold Lake Wabiskaw-McMurray oil sands deposit (section 10-56-6 W4M); resulted in approval No. 4448
- Interveners
- Yaremkevich, D.
- Kadutski, D.
- Elk Point Surface Rights Association
- Group of Elk Point-Lindbergh Area Residents
- Town of Elk Point
- County of Vermillion River
- County of St.Paul
Decision 85-07
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1685
- Applicant
- PanCanadian Petroleum Limited
- Application Number
- 840736
- 840986
- Title
- Decision on application by PanCanadian Petroleum Limited, 1985 (reduced well spacing and cleaning plant Lindbergh sector)
- Date
- 1985
- Title
- Decision on application by PanCanadian Petroleum Limited, 1985 (reduced well spacing and cleaning plant Lindbergh sector)
- Date
- 1985
- Applicant
- PanCanadian Petroleum Limited
- Application Number
- 840736
- 840986
- Hearing Panel
- DeSorcy GJ
- Strom NA
- Bellows LA
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Category
- Spacing
- Descriptors
- Drilling spacing unit
- In situ
- Industrial plant
- Lindbergh area
- Oil sands oil recovery
- Oil sands project
- Thermal recovery
- Bitumen
- Cleaning
- Community relations
- Contamination
- Cummings Fm
- Directional well
- Environmental impact
- Groundwater
- Monitoring
- Noise (sound)
- NTS 73E
- Oil pipeline
- Solid hydrocarbon
- Transportation
- Truck
- Water disposal
- Well spacing
- Legal References
- Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S7.001
- Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S7.002
- Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S4.030
- Notes
- Decision D85-7 on application No. 840736 and No. 840986 to reduce well spacing for primary recovery from Cummings zone-Cold Lake-Wabiskaw-McMurray oil sands deposit and to construct and operate a cleaning plant to handle hydrocarbon production trucked from various PanCanadian wells (in section 3-56-6 W4M); Board hearing 84-12-11/12; resulted in Order No. Misc 8501
- Interveners
- Amoco Canada Petroleum Company Ltd.
- Shymkiw, J.
- Shymkiw, Mrs.J.
- Shymkiw, H.
- Shymikiw, Mrs.H.
- Kozicky, C.
- Kozicky, Mrs.C.
- Elk Point Surface Rights Association
- Group of Elk Point-Lindbergh Area Residents
- Town of Elk Point
- County of St. Paul
Decision 85-20
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision828
- Applicant
- Koch Exploration Canada Ltd.
- Application Number
- 841220
- Title
- Examiner report on application by Koch Exploration Canada Ltd., 1985 (experimental oil sands project Beaverdam sector)
- Date
- 1985
- Title
- Examiner report on application by Koch Exploration Canada Ltd., 1985 (experimental oil sands project Beaverdam sector)
- Date
- 1985
- Applicant
- Koch Exploration Canada Ltd.
- Application Number
- 841220
- Hearing Panel
- Homeniuk TF
- Lillo HO
- Nichol JR
- Hearing Type
- Examiners
- Category
- Oil sands
- Descriptors
- Cyclic steam injection
- In situ
- Steam injection
- Oil sands oil recovery
- Oil sands project
- Thermal recovery
- Community relations
- Disposal well
- Emission
- Environmental impact
- Grand Rapids Fm
- Injection well
- Locating
- Noise (sound)
- NTS 73L
- Pilot scale
- Safety
- Legal References
- Oil Sands Conservation Act S10
- Notes
- ERCB Examiners report E85-20 on application No. 841220 to expand existing experimental cyclic steam project in the west half of section 19-61-4 W4M for recovery of bitumen from Cold Lake upper Grand Rapids oil sands deposit.
- Interveners
- Beaunoyer, L.
- Beaunoyer, D.
- Bonny Glen Farms, Limited
- Campeau, L.
- Suncor Inc.
Decision 85-36
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision983
- Applicant
- Murphy Oil Company Limited.
- Application Number
- 841338
- Title
- Decision on application by Murphy Oil Company Limited, 1985 (commercial oil sands project phase 1, Lindbergh sector)
- Date
- 1985
- Title
- Decision on application by Murphy Oil Company Limited, 1985 (commercial oil sands project phase 1, Lindbergh sector)
- Date
- 1985
- Applicant
- Murphy Oil Company Limited.
- Application Number
- 841338
- Hearing Panel
- DeSorcy GJ
- Bellows LA
- Strom NA
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Category
- Oil sands
- Descriptors
- Cyclic steam injection
- Elk Point area
- In situ
- Lindbergh area
- Lindbergh thermal recovery project
- Steam injection
- Oil sands oil recovery
- Oil sands project
- Thermal recovery
- Agricultural land
- Air quality
- Community relations
- Directional well
- Drilling fluid
- Drilling Waste disposal
- Electric power distribution
- Environmental impact
- Land reclamation
- NTS 73L
- Recovery factor
- Right of way
- Transmission corridor
- Waste disposal
- Water supply
- Legal References
- Oil Sands Conservation Act S10
- Notes
- Decision D85-36 on application No. 841338 for approval in principle of the Lindbergh thermal recovery project (being an expansion of an experimental scheme operating in section 13-58-5 W4M) and to construct and operate phase 1 to recover crude bitumen from the Cold Lake oil sands deposits using a cyclic steam stimulation recovery technique; Board hearing 1985-06-18 and 1985-07-03/04/05
- Interveners
- Opanavicius, A.
- Elk Point Surface Rights Association
- Elizabeth Metis Settlement Association No.9 and Federation of Metis Settlements
- Town of Elk Point
- Dome Petroleum Limited
- Alberta Municipal Affairs
Decision 87-08
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision218
- Applicant
- Shell Canada Limited
- Application Number
- 861525
- 870045
- 870046
- 870047
- Title
- Decision on application by Shell Canada Limited, 1987 (approval of the transportation and processing of high hydrogen sulphide sour gas reserves in the Caroline field and area, Bearberry demonstration project)
- Date
- 1987
- Title
- Decision on application by Shell Canada Limited, 1987 (approval of the transportation and processing of high hydrogen sulphide sour gas reserves in the Caroline field and area, Bearberry demonstration project)
- Date
- 1987
- Applicant
- Shell Canada Limited
- Application Number
- 861525
- 870045
- 870046
- 870047
- Hearing Panel
- Strom NA
- Bellows LA
- Fox EG
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Category
- Gas processing
- Descriptors
- Caroline field
- Caroline gas project
- Gas pipeline
- Gas processing plant
- Gathering line
- Pipeline construction permit
- Sour gas
- Sulphur
- Sulphur recovery
- Community relations
- Design criteria
- Emission
- Environmental impact
- IL-80-24
- Locating
- NTS 82O
- Phase behavior
- Pilot scale
- Plant design
- Safety
- Sulphur content
- Transportation system
- Truck
- Legal References
- Oil and Gas Conservation Act S26
- Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S15.050
- Notes
- Decision D87-8 on application No. 861525, 870045, 870046, and 870047 for a demonstration project to improve sulfur recovery; the project is to last five years and is designed to establish the technical and economic feasibility of commercial development.
- Interveners
- Bauman, L.
- Bauman, J.
- Newsham, C.
Decision 89-08
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision124
- Applicant
- Strathfield Oil and Gas Ltd.
- Application Number
- 890574
- 890576
- 890577
- 890578
- 890579
- 890795
- 890796
- 890797
- 890798
- 890799
- 890800
- 890801
- 890802
- 890803
- Title
- Decision 89-08 : Strathfield Oil and Gas Ltd.: Application for well licences, Provost field
- Date
- 1989
- Title
- Decision 89-08 : Strathfield Oil and Gas Ltd.: Application for well licences, Provost field
- Date
- 1989
- Applicant
- Strathfield Oil and Gas Ltd.
- Application Number
- 890574
- 890576
- 890577
- 890578
- 890579
- 890795
- 890796
- 890797
- 890798
- 890799
- 890800
- 890801
- 890802
- 890803
- Hearing Panel
- Strom NA
- Morin EJ
- Langlo CA
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Category
- Well licence
- Descriptors
- Provost field
- Well licence
- Agricultural land
- Air quality
- Aquifer
- Battery
- Communication
- Community relations
- Cretaceous
- Development well
- Dina member
- Drilling fluid
- Drilling waste disposal
- Emission
- Energy development
- Environmental impact
- Groundwater
- Hydrogen sulphide
- Land use
- Mannville Gp
- NTS 73D
- Oil well
- Reservoir boundary
- Spill
- Sulphur dioxide
- Water pollution
- Water quality
- Well spacing
- Legal References
- Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S2.020
- Notes
- ERCB decision D89-8 on applications no. 890574, 890576-890579, 890795-890803 for licences to drill wells all in Tp.37, R.4, W4; Board hearing 1989-06-27/28
- Interveners
- Hanson, R.
Decision 91-01
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision65
- Applicant
- Polaris Petroleums Ltd.
- Application Number
- 910018
- Title
- Decision 91-01 : Polaris Petroleums Ltd.: Application for a well licence
- Date
- 1991
- Title
- Decision 91-01 : Polaris Petroleums Ltd.: Application for a well licence
- Date
- 1991
- Applicant
- Polaris Petroleums Ltd.
- Application Number
- 910018
- Hearing Panel
- Mink FJ
- Bietz BF
- Berndtsson NG
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Category
- Well licence
- Descriptors
- Provost field
- Well licence
- Air quality
- Battery
- Citizen participation
- Community relations
- Dina member
- Directional well
- Environmental impact
- Exploratory well
- Groundwater
- Land reclamation
- Oil producing
- NTS 73D
- Surface rights
- Well site
- Well spacing
- Legal References
- Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S2.020
- Notes
- Decision D91-1 on application No. 910018 for a licence to drill a well from a surface location in Lsd 5 Sec 31 Twp 37 Rge 3 W4M to obtain oil production from the Dina FM.
- Interveners
- Nelson, W.P.
- Location
- 05-31-037-03W4
Decision 97-13
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2879
- Applicant
- Syncrude Canada Limited
- Application Number
- 960552
- Title
- Decision 97-13: Syncrude Canada Limited : Application by Syncrude for the Aurora Mine
- Date
- 1997
- Title
- Decision 97-13: Syncrude Canada Limited : Application by Syncrude for the Aurora Mine
- Date
- 1997
- Applicant
- Syncrude Canada Limited
- Application Number
- 960552
- Hearing Type
- Board
- No Hearing
- Category
- Oil sands
- Descriptors
- Aurora Mine
- Communication
- Community relations
- Environmental impact
- Fort McMurray area
- Land reclamation
- NTS 74E
- Oil mining
- Reclamation
- Regional planning
- Socio-economic effect
- Tailings
- Tailings - storage
- Oil sands oil recovery
- Oil sands project
- Legal References
- Oil Sands Conservation Act S10
- Notes
- EUB Decision 97-13 on application no. 960552 by Syncrude for approval to construct, operate and reclaim an oil sands mine and associated bitumen extraction facilities in the Fort McMurray area, the Aurora Mine. The Aurora Mine would include two mining areas: the first located within Twp 96, Ranges 9 to 11, W4M (Aurora North Mine), and the second located within Twp 94 & 95, Ranges 8 and 9, W4M (Aurora South Mine). The application covers: two separate truck and shovel oil sands mines, two mining-extraction production systems at each mine; related infrastructure associated with the operation of each mine; water management plants for the proposed development area, and; an integrated reclamation plan for the proposed Aurora Mine;
- No hearing
- Interveners
- Anez VM
- Birch Mountain Resources Ltd.
- Confederation of Regions Political Party
- Mobil Oil Canada Properties
- Northland Forest Products Ltd.
- Shell Canada Limited
- Solv-Ex Corporation
- Pembina Institute for Appropriate Development
- Toxics Watch Society
- Approval
- Approved
Decision 97-15
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2885
- Applicant
- Maxwell Oil and Gas Ltd.
- Application Number
- 970239
- Title
- Decision 97-15: Maxwell Oil & Gas Ltd.: Application for a well licence, Tomahawk Field
- Date
- 1997
- Title
- Decision 97-15: Maxwell Oil & Gas Ltd.: Application for a well licence, Tomahawk Field
- Date
- 1997
- Applicant
- Maxwell Oil and Gas Ltd.
- Application Number
- 970239
- Hearing Panel
- Dilay JD
- Miller GJ
- McManus BT
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Category
- Well licence
- Descriptors
- Well licence
- Tomahawk field
- Community relations
- Horizontal well
- Lake Wabamun
- Lake
- Land use
- Locating
- NTS 83G
- Nordegg Fm
- Regulation
- Safety
- Legal References
- Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S2.020
- Energy Resources Conservation Act S2
- Energy Resources Conservation Act S29
- Notes
- EUB Decision D97-15 on application no. 970239 by Maxwell Oil & Gas Ltd. for a licence to drill a directional well from a surface location in Lsd 4 Sec 5 Twp 53 Rge 5 W5M to obtain oil production from the Nordegg C and Banff D Pool in the Lake Wabamun area
- Board hearing 1997-07-29 and reconvened 1997-08-19
- Interveners
- Lake Wabamun Enhancement and Protection Association
- Hiebert A
- Balcon D
- Newton J
- Korol R
- Drever J
- Spilsted P
- Approval
- Approved
- Location
- 04-05-053-05W5
Decision 99-02
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision3068
- Applicant
- Talisman Energy Inc.
- Application Number
- 1031007
- Title
- Examiner report on application by Talisman Energy Inc. application for a gas battery and pipeline permit Gordondale field
- Date
- 1999
- Title
- Examiner report on application by Talisman Energy Inc. application for a gas battery and pipeline permit Gordondale field
- Date
- 1999
- Applicant
- Talisman Energy Inc.
- Application Number
- 1031007
- Hearing Panel
- Remmer WG
- Lillo HO
- Pesta TJ
- Hearing Type
- Examiners
- Category
- Gas processing
- Descriptors
- Battery
- Community relations
- Gas pipeline
- Gordondale field
- Environmental impact
- NTS 83M
- Pipeline route
- Sour gas
- Sulphur dioxide
- Legal References
- Oil and Gas Conservation Act S26
- Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S7.001
- Pipeline Act Part 4
- Notes
- EUB Examiners report on application no. 1031007 to install a 0.004 tonne per day sulphur single well battery at Lsd 7-32-79-10 W6M and to construct and operate a sour gas pipeline from Lsd 7-32-79-W6M to Lsd 8-33-79-10 W6M.
- Interveners
- Day C
- Approval
- Approved
- Location
- 07-32-079-10W6
- 08-33-079-10W6
Decision 99-16
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision3082
- Applicant
- Canadian 88 Energy Corp.
- Application Number
- 970473
- Title
- Decision 99-16: Canadian 88 Energy Corp. application to drill a level 4 critical sour gas well Lochend field
- Date
- 1999
- Title
- Decision 99-16: Canadian 88 Energy Corp. application to drill a level 4 critical sour gas well Lochend field
- Date
- 1999
- Applicant
- Canadian 88 Energy Corp.
- Application Number
- 970473
- Hearing Panel
- Mink FJ
- Dilay JD
- Miller GJ
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Category
- Well licence
- Descriptors
- Well licence
- Community relations
- Emergency procedure
- Environmental impact
- Hydrogen sulphide
- ID 97-6
- Land use
- Locating
- Safety
- Risk
- Sour gas
- Legal References
- Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S2.020
- Notes
- Decision on application for a well licence to drill a level 4 critical sour gas well at Lsd 10 Sec 35 Twp 26 Rge 3 W5M with a maximum H2S release rate of 2266 10^3m^3/d
- Interveners
- Prize Energy Inc.
- Hutchinson P
- Robertson K
- Reilly
- Turner R
- Turner DJ
- Calgary North H2S Action Committee
- Lochend Sour Gas Emergency Zone Coalition
- City of Calgary
- Calgary Regional Health Authority
- Municipal District of Rocky View No. 44
- MacFarlane DH
- Locke C
- Locke L
- Goodhart R
- Fedor L
- David D
- Gordon S
- Hunt R
- Pollock-Eddy
- Johnson O
- Murray W
- Kaufman R
- Approval
- Approved
- Approved with conditions
- Conditions
- Develop document management process, including policies and procedures; assessment of the effectiveness of this program subject to audit by third party
- That equipment, procedures, and personnel used by contractors are suitable and up to standard
- That casing bowl welding procedure be detailed
- That steel mill heat certificates for casing and drill pipe be submitted
- That Alberta Recommended Practices pipe specifications be used at minimum
- That EUB Calgary South Field receive dailing reports
- That EUB Field Surveillance attend pre-spud meetings
- That EUB drilling rig inspections take place
- That drilling take place between summer months only
- That ignition is implemented within one minute of ignition criteria
- That all components of the Emergency Response Plan (ERP) be tested
- That sensitive individuals be identified within the awareness zone
- That the ERP is fully understood and implemented, including drilling updates
- That all individuals in the EPZ are notified prior to drilling in the critical zone
- That air be monitored for H2S and SO2
- That adequate municipal and provinical resources be available in case of emergency
- That details of the ERP be updated and current
- That the company meet with affected emergency planning organizations to prepare contingency plan
- Location
- 10-36-026-03W5
Decision 2000-20
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision3170
- Applicant
- Dynegy Canada Inc.
- Pinon Oil and Gas Ltd.
- Application Number
- 1034767
- 1034762
- Title
- Decision 2000-20: Dynegy Canada Inc. application for pipeline licence amendments Okotoks field; Pinon Oil and Gas Ltd. application for a sour gas compressor station and pipeline licence Crossfield field
- Date
- 2000
- Title
- Decision 2000-20: Dynegy Canada Inc. application for pipeline licence amendments Okotoks field; Pinon Oil and Gas Ltd. application for a sour gas compressor station and pipeline licence Crossfield field
- Date
- 2000
- Applicant
- Dynegy Canada Inc.
- Pinon Oil and Gas Ltd.
- Application Number
- 1034767
- 1034762
- Hearing Panel
- Remmer WG
- Dunn GC
- Berndtsson NG
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Category
- Pipelines
- Descriptors
- Gas pipeline
- Decision D1984-7
- Community relations
- Emergency procedure
- Energy development
- Hydrogen sulphide
- Pipeline construction permit
- Pipeline route
- Public consultation
- Route selection
- Right of way
- Risk
- Safety
- Sour gas
- Urban development
- Dispute resolution
- Legal References
- Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S7.001
- Pipeline Act Part 4
- Notes
- EUB Decision D2000-20 on application no. 1034767 by Dynegy Canada Inc. requesting approval to extend the operating term of its sour gas pipeline (licence no. 21027), originating at Lsd 12 Sec 20 Twp 22 Rge 28 W4M and carrying 374.9 mol/kmol of H2S, referred to as the Dynegy Chestermere pipeline; and its sweet fuel gas pipeline (licence no. 17711) which connects at Lsd 10 Sec 2 Twp 22 Rge 29 W4M.
- EUB decision 2000-20 on application no. 1034762 by Pinon Oil and Gas Ltd. to construct and operate a sour gas compressor station at Lsd 10 Sec 21 Twp 23 Rge28 W4M and a 11.3 km pipeline carrying 20 mol/kmol H2S from the compressor station to Dynegy's sour gas pipeline at Lsd 12 Sec 20 Twp 22 Rge 28 W4M
- Board requested submission of "Land-use and Resource Development Agreement" by October 1, 2000, and as such extended interim operating approval of Dynegy's pipelines until November 1, 2000
- Board hearing 1999-08-18 - 27 and 1999-11-22 - 30
- Interveners
- Bearspaw Petroleum Ltd.
- The Soutzo Family
- Soutzo, A.
- Giovanetto, R.
- Ollerenshaw Ranch Limited
- The White Families
- van Olm, M.
- White, F.
- White, G.
- Hindson, H.
- Calgary-Chestermere Landowners and Residents
- Nelson, S.
- Ryder, L.
- Belzberg, H.
- Laycock, L.
- Singh, N.
- Hodgson, J.
- Taylor, T.
- Haymour, E.
- The Shields Family
- Shields, R.
- The Southeast-Loop Residents and other local interveners
- Oloman, N.
- Christensen, M
- Hennessey, J.
- Sutherland, G.
- Pearson, D.
- Marshall, G.
- Evans, B.
- Agar, D.
- Taylor, T.J.
- Approval
- Deferred
- Approved with conditions
- Conditions
- Dynegy to conduct full pipeline internal inspection within three months and present results to the Board by July 1, 2000
- Dynegy to update emergency response plan in consultation with affected parties
- Dynegy to develop a plan to address urban growth in area
- Dynegy to work with Shields (interveners) in regards to subdivision plans
Decision 2000-20 Addendum
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision3342
- Applicant
- Dynegy Canada Inc.
- Pinon Oil and Gas Ltd.
- Application Number
- 1034767
- 1034762
- Title
- Decision 2000-20 Addendum : Dynegy Canada Inc. application for pipeline licence amendments Okotoks field; Pinon Oil and Gas Ltd. application for a sour gas compressor station and pipeline licence Crossfield field
- Date
- 2001
- Title
- Decision 2000-20 Addendum : Dynegy Canada Inc. application for pipeline licence amendments Okotoks field; Pinon Oil and Gas Ltd. application for a sour gas compressor station and pipeline licence Crossfield field
- Date
- 2001
- Applicant
- Dynegy Canada Inc.
- Pinon Oil and Gas Ltd.
- Application Number
- 1034767
- 1034762
- Hearing Panel
- Remmer WG
- Dunn GC
- Berndtsson NG
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Category
- Pipelines
- Descriptors
- Gas pipeline
- Decision D1984-7
- Community relations
- Emergency procedure
- Energy development
- Hydrogen sulphide
- NTS 82O
- Pipeline construction permit
- Pipeline route
- Public consultation
- Route selection
- Right of way
- Risk
- Safety
- Sour gas
- Urban development
- Legal References
- Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S7.001
- Pipeline Act Part 4
- Notes
- EUB Decision D2000-20 addendum on application no. 1034767 by Dynegy Canada Inc. requesting approval to extend the operating term of its sour gas pipeline (licence no. 21027), addendum incorporates land-use and resource development agreement (LRD) with landowners
- Interveners
- Bearspaw Petroleum Ltd.
- The Soutzo Family
- Soutzo, A.
- Giovanetto, R.
- Ollerenshaw Ranch Limited
- The White Families
- van Olm, M.
- White, F.
- White, G.
- Hindson, H.
- Calgary-Chestermere Landowners and Residents
- Nelson, S.
- Ryder, L.
- Belzberg, H.
- Laycock, L.
- Singh, N.
- Hodgson, J.
- Taylor, T.
- Haymour, E.
- The Shields Family
- Shields, R.
- The Southeast-Loop Residents and other local interveners
- Oloman, N.
- Christensen, M
- Hennessey, J.
- Sutherland, G.
- Pearson, D.
- Marshall, G.
- Evans, B.
- Agar, D.
- Taylor, T.J.
- Approval
- Approved
- Approved with conditions
- Conditions
- Dynegy must submit amendment to its emergency reponse plan prior ro installation of valves
Decision 2000-20 Default Addendum
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision4117
- Applicant
- Dynegy Canada Inc.
- Pinon Oil and Gas Ltd.
- Application Number
- 1034767
- 1034762
- Title
- Decision 2000-20 Default Addendum : Dynegy Canada Inc. application for pipeline licence amendments Okotoks field; Pinon Oil and Gas Ltd. application for a sour gas compressor station and pipeline licence Crossfield field
- Date
- 2000
- Title
- Decision 2000-20 Default Addendum : Dynegy Canada Inc. application for pipeline licence amendments Okotoks field; Pinon Oil and Gas Ltd. application for a sour gas compressor station and pipeline licence Crossfield field
- Date
- 2000
- Applicant
- Dynegy Canada Inc.
- Pinon Oil and Gas Ltd.
- Application Number
- 1034767
- 1034762
- Hearing Panel
- Remmer WG
- Dunn GC
- Berndtsson NG
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Category
- Pipelines
- Descriptors
- Gas pipeline
- Decision D1984-7
- Community relations
- Emergency procedure
- Energy development
- Hydrogen sulphide
- NTS 82O
- Pipeline construction permit
- Pipeline route
- Public consultation
- Route selection
- Right of way
- Risk
- Safety
- Sour gas
- Urban development
- Legal References
- Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S7.001
- Pipeline Act Part 4
- Notes
- EUB Decision D2000-20 addendum on application no. 1034767 by Dynegy Canada Inc. requesting approval to extend the operating term of its sour gas pipeline (licence no. 21027), addendum incorporates land-use and resource development agreement (LRD) with landowners
- Default addendum released January 31, 2006
- Interveners
- Bearspaw Petroleum Ltd.
- The Soutzo Family
- Soutzo, A.
- Giovanetto, R.
- Ollerenshaw Ranch Limited
- The White Families
- van Olm, M.
- White, F.
- White, G.
- Hindson, H.
- Calgary-Chestermere Landowners and Residents
- Nelson, S.
- Ryder, L.
- Belzberg, H.
- Laycock, L.
- Singh, N.
- Hodgson, J.
- Taylor, T.
- Haymour, E.
- The Shields Family
- Shields, R.
- The Southeast-Loop Residents and other local interveners
- Oloman, N.
- Christensen, M
- Hennessey, J.
- Sutherland, G.
- Pearson, D.
- Marshall, G.
- Evans, B.
- Agar, D.
- Taylor, T.J.
- Approval
- Approved
- Approved with conditions
- Conditions
- Dynegy must submit amendment to its emergency reponse plan prior ro installation of valves
Decision 2003-09
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision3584
- Applicant
- ConocoPhillips Canada Resources Corp.
- Application Number
- 1252461
- 1272754
- Title
- Decision 2003-9: ConocoPhillips Canada Resources Corp. applications for sour gas well, battery, and associated pipelines Sinclair field
- Date
- 2003
- Title
- Decision 2003-9: ConocoPhillips Canada Resources Corp. applications for sour gas well, battery, and associated pipelines Sinclair field
- Date
- 2003
- Applicant
- ConocoPhillips Canada Resources Corp.
- Application Number
- 1252461
- 1272754
- Hearing Panel
- Nichol JR
- Douglas JI
- Hommy MH
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Category
- Well licence
- Descriptors
- Battery
- Community relations
- Copyright
- Emergency procedure
- Montney Fm.
- Pipeline
- NTS 83M
- Risk
- Sinclair Field
- Sour gas
- Well licence
- Legal References
- Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S2.020
- Pipeline Act Part 4
- Notes
- EUB Decision 2003-9 on application no. 1252461 for a level-2 sour gas well to produce from the Montney formation with a maximum H2S content of 71.1 moles/kilomole with a potential release rate of 1.096 m#/s and an EPZ of 2.45 km; and application 1272754 to construct a pipeline and sour gas battery at 13-21-74-12W6M
- Interveners
- von Tiesenhausen P
- von Tiesenhausen T
- Approval
- Approved
- Location
- 13-21-074-12W6
Decision 2010-22
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision4423
- Applicant
- Petro-Canada
- Application Number
- 1517168
- 1517170
- 1574414
- 1574366
- 1574409
- 1517148
- 1520922
- 1517151
- 1520923
- 1517160
- 1517176
- 1520388
- 1513051
- Title
- Decision 2010-022: Petro-Canada applications for eleven well licences, one multiwell gas battery licence, and two pipeline licences Sullivan Field
- Date
- 2010
- Title
- Decision 2010-022: Petro-Canada applications for eleven well licences, one multiwell gas battery licence, and two pipeline licences Sullivan Field
- Date
- 2010
- Applicant
- Petro-Canada
- Application Number
- 1517168
- 1517170
- 1574414
- 1574366
- 1574409
- 1517148
- 1520922
- 1517151
- 1520923
- 1517160
- 1517176
- 1520388
- 1513051
- Hearing Panel
- Dilay GW
- McManus BT
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Category
- Well licence
- Pipelines
- Descriptors
- Battery
- Community relations
- Copyright
- Emergency procedure
- Pipeline
- NTS 82J
- Decision D2008-29
- Fescue
- Grazing
- Socio-economic effect
- Site survey
- Risk
- SullivanField
- Well licence
- Safety
- Environment
- Health
- Livestock
- Environmental impact assessment
- Land use
- Air quality
- Water quality
- Range grass
- Vegetation
- Grass
- Legal References
- Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S2.020
- Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S7.001
- Pipeline Act Part 4
- Notes
- Prehearing meeting was held in Longview on March 18, 2008
- Interveners
- Big Loop Group
- Stoney Nakoda Nation
- Pekisko Group
- Royal Adderson and Bad Ad Ranches Ltd.
- Approval
- Approved with conditions
- Conditions
- See Appendix 1 (p. 113 - 147) Summary of conditions and commitments
- Location
- 12-11-018-05W5