20 records – page 1 of 1.

Decision 78-05

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2115
Applicant
Energy Resources Conservation Board
Application Number
9750X
Title
Decision on proceeding on spacing and target area requirements for oil and gas wells drilled in the province of Alberta, 1978
Date
1978
Title
Decision on proceeding on spacing and target area requirements for oil and gas wells drilled in the province of Alberta, 1978
Date
1978
Applicant
Energy Resources Conservation Board
Application Number
9750X
Hearing Panel
Craig DR
Millard V
DeSorcy GJ
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Spacing
Descriptors
Drilling spacing unit
Land use
Target area
Well spacing
Agricultural land
Alberta
Citizen participation
Communication
Community relations
Economic analysis
Environmental impact
Gas well
History
Oil well
Procedure
Regulation
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S4.030
Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S15.060
Notes
Decision on proceeding No. 9750X to consider representations from agricultural groups on the need to amend the present well spacing and target area requirements
Less detail

Decision 81-36

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1731
Applicant
Norcen Energy Resources Ltd.
Application Number
810534
810649
Title
Examiners report on application by Norcen Energy Resources Ltd., 1981 (gas processing plant Joarcam field)
Date
1981
Title
Examiners report on application by Norcen Energy Resources Ltd., 1981 (gas processing plant Joarcam field)
Date
1981
Applicant
Norcen Energy Resources Ltd.
Application Number
810534
810649
Hearing Panel
Pearson DG
Brushett ER
Nichol JR
Hearing Type
Examiners
Category
Gas processing
Descriptors
Gas processing plant
Joarcam field
Battery
Community relations
Dissolved gas
Emission
Environmental impact
Gas conservation
Locating
Noise (sound)
NTS 83H
Pollution
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S38
Notes
ERCB Examiners report No. E81-36 on application No. 810534 to construct & operate plant in LSD 8-14-5--22 W4M approved under approval No. 3302 (application No. 800887) and on proceeding No. 810649 initiated by the Board to reconsider approval No. 3302; Examiners' hearing 81-09-28/29/30
Interveners
Hansen, S.A.
Hansen, H.J.
Otto, R.L.
Otto, A.D.
Knopp, A.J.
Knopp, B.
Ogoniski, B.
Less detail

Decision 82-23

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2055
Applicant
Gulf Canada Resources Inc.
Application Number
820283
Title
Decision on application by Gulf Canada Resources Inc., 1982 (well licence to drill an exploratory well Millarville area)
Date
1982
Title
Decision on application by Gulf Canada Resources Inc., 1982 (well licence to drill an exploratory well Millarville area)
Date
1982
Applicant
Gulf Canada Resources Inc.
Application Number
820283
Hearing Panel
DeSorcy GJ
Bohme VE
Brushett ER
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Well licence
Descriptors
Sour gas
Well licence
Community relations
Contamination
Drilling fluid
Drilling program
Drilling Waste disposal
Emergency procedure
Environmental impact
ID-81-03
Exploratory well
Gas well
Safety
Waste disposal
Water supply
Water well
Legal References
EUB Rules of Practice
Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S2.020
Notes
Decision 82-23 on application No. 820283 to drill the proposed well Gulf et al Millarville 6-32-22-4 directionally from a surface location in LSD 14-29-22-4 W5M.
Interveners
Rusticana Estates,Echo Hill and surrounding area residents
Canadian Wildlife Federation
Location
06-32-022-04W5
14-29-022-04W5
Less detail

Decision 83-20

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1185
Applicant
Consolidated Pipe Lines Company.
Application Number
830141
Title
Examiners report on application by Consolidated Pipe Lines Company, 1983 (gas processing plant Claresholm field)
Date
1983
Title
Examiners report on application by Consolidated Pipe Lines Company, 1983 (gas processing plant Claresholm field)
Date
1983
Applicant
Consolidated Pipe Lines Company.
Application Number
830141
Hearing Panel
Morin EJ
Brushett ER
Fox EG
Hearing Type
Examiners
Category
Gas processing
Descriptors
Claresholm field
Gas processing plant
Sour gas
Air quality
Community relations
Disposal well
Dissolved gas
Emission
Environmental impact
Flare
Gas conservation
Health
Hydrogen sulphide
Monitoring
NTS 82I
Sulphur dioxide
Sulphur recovery
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S26
Notes
ERCB Examiners report E83-20 on application No. 830141 to construct and operate a sour gas processing plant at an existing well located in LSD 6-30-12-25 W4M; Examiners hearing 1983-09-06, 1983-10-12/13
Interveners
Drummond Oil & Gas Ltd.
Town of Claresholm
Oldman River Regional Planning Commission
East Claresholm Clean Air Association
Willow Creek Surface Rights Society
M.G. Mulholland Farms Ltd.
Berg, V.
Berg, D.
Darch, O.
Darch, D.
Deering, V.
Everl, D.
Eberl, F.
Finley, D.
Kruszewski, D.
Kruszewski, S.
Laing, A.
Laing, G.
Opp, F.
Opp, D.
Prusky, M.
Roemmele Farms Ltd.
Ulrich, H.
Weerstra, M.
Less detail

Decision 85-06

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1686
Applicant
Dome Petroleum Limited
Application Number
840739
Title
Decision on application by Dome Petroleum Limited, 1985 (Experimental in situ scheme Lindbergh sector)
Date
1985
Title
Decision on application by Dome Petroleum Limited, 1985 (Experimental in situ scheme Lindbergh sector)
Date
1985
Applicant
Dome Petroleum Limited
Application Number
840739
Hearing Panel
DeSorcy GJ
Strom NA
Bellows LA
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Oil sands
Descriptors
Cyclic steam injection
Elk Point area
In situ
Lindbergh area
Steam injection
Oil sands oil recovery
Oil sands project
Thermal recovery
Air quality
Community relations
Cummings Fm
Emission
Environmental impact
Land value
Monitoring
Noise (sound)
NTS 73E
Pilot scale
Pollution
Safety
Well spacing
Legal References
Oil Sands Conservation Act S10
Notes
Decision D85-6 on application No. 840739 for approval to develop a 16 well cyclic steam experimental project in the Cummings zone of the Cold Lake Wabiskaw-McMurray oil sands deposit (section 10-56-6 W4M); resulted in approval No. 4448
Interveners
Yaremkevich, D.
Kadutski, D.
Elk Point Surface Rights Association
Group of Elk Point-Lindbergh Area Residents
Town of Elk Point
County of Vermillion River
County of St.Paul
Less detail

Decision 85-07

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1685
Applicant
PanCanadian Petroleum Limited
Application Number
840736
840986
Title
Decision on application by PanCanadian Petroleum Limited, 1985 (reduced well spacing and cleaning plant Lindbergh sector)
Date
1985
Title
Decision on application by PanCanadian Petroleum Limited, 1985 (reduced well spacing and cleaning plant Lindbergh sector)
Date
1985
Applicant
PanCanadian Petroleum Limited
Application Number
840736
840986
Hearing Panel
DeSorcy GJ
Strom NA
Bellows LA
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Spacing
Descriptors
Drilling spacing unit
In situ
Industrial plant
Lindbergh area
Oil sands oil recovery
Oil sands project
Thermal recovery
Bitumen
Cleaning
Community relations
Contamination
Cummings Fm
Directional well
Environmental impact
Groundwater
Monitoring
Noise (sound)
NTS 73E
Oil pipeline
Solid hydrocarbon
Transportation
Truck
Water disposal
Well spacing
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S7.001
Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S7.002
Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S4.030
Notes
Decision D85-7 on application No. 840736 and No. 840986 to reduce well spacing for primary recovery from Cummings zone-Cold Lake-Wabiskaw-McMurray oil sands deposit and to construct and operate a cleaning plant to handle hydrocarbon production trucked from various PanCanadian wells (in section 3-56-6 W4M); Board hearing 84-12-11/12; resulted in Order No. Misc 8501
Interveners
Amoco Canada Petroleum Company Ltd.
Shymkiw, J.
Shymkiw, Mrs.J.
Shymkiw, H.
Shymikiw, Mrs.H.
Kozicky, C.
Kozicky, Mrs.C.
Elk Point Surface Rights Association
Group of Elk Point-Lindbergh Area Residents
Town of Elk Point
County of St. Paul
Less detail

Decision 85-20

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision828
Applicant
Koch Exploration Canada Ltd.
Application Number
841220
Title
Examiner report on application by Koch Exploration Canada Ltd., 1985 (experimental oil sands project Beaverdam sector)
Date
1985
Title
Examiner report on application by Koch Exploration Canada Ltd., 1985 (experimental oil sands project Beaverdam sector)
Date
1985
Applicant
Koch Exploration Canada Ltd.
Application Number
841220
Hearing Panel
Homeniuk TF
Lillo HO
Nichol JR
Hearing Type
Examiners
Category
Oil sands
Descriptors
Cyclic steam injection
In situ
Steam injection
Oil sands oil recovery
Oil sands project
Thermal recovery
Community relations
Disposal well
Emission
Environmental impact
Grand Rapids Fm
Injection well
Locating
Noise (sound)
NTS 73L
Pilot scale
Safety
Legal References
Oil Sands Conservation Act S10
Notes
ERCB Examiners report E85-20 on application No. 841220 to expand existing experimental cyclic steam project in the west half of section 19-61-4 W4M for recovery of bitumen from Cold Lake upper Grand Rapids oil sands deposit.
Interveners
Beaunoyer, L.
Beaunoyer, D.
Bonny Glen Farms, Limited
Campeau, L.
Suncor Inc.
Less detail

Decision 85-36

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision983
Applicant
Murphy Oil Company Limited.
Application Number
841338
Title
Decision on application by Murphy Oil Company Limited, 1985 (commercial oil sands project phase 1, Lindbergh sector)
Date
1985
Title
Decision on application by Murphy Oil Company Limited, 1985 (commercial oil sands project phase 1, Lindbergh sector)
Date
1985
Applicant
Murphy Oil Company Limited.
Application Number
841338
Hearing Panel
DeSorcy GJ
Bellows LA
Strom NA
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Oil sands
Descriptors
Cyclic steam injection
Elk Point area
In situ
Lindbergh area
Lindbergh thermal recovery project
Steam injection
Oil sands oil recovery
Oil sands project
Thermal recovery
Agricultural land
Air quality
Community relations
Directional well
Drilling fluid
Drilling Waste disposal
Electric power distribution
Environmental impact
Land reclamation
NTS 73L
Recovery factor
Right of way
Transmission corridor
Waste disposal
Water supply
Legal References
Oil Sands Conservation Act S10
Notes
Decision D85-36 on application No. 841338 for approval in principle of the Lindbergh thermal recovery project (being an expansion of an experimental scheme operating in section 13-58-5 W4M) and to construct and operate phase 1 to recover crude bitumen from the Cold Lake oil sands deposits using a cyclic steam stimulation recovery technique; Board hearing 1985-06-18 and 1985-07-03/04/05
Interveners
Opanavicius, A.
Elk Point Surface Rights Association
Elizabeth Metis Settlement Association No.9 and Federation of Metis Settlements
Town of Elk Point
Dome Petroleum Limited
Alberta Municipal Affairs
Less detail

Decision 87-08

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision218
Applicant
Shell Canada Limited
Application Number
861525
870045
870046
870047
Title
Decision on application by Shell Canada Limited, 1987 (approval of the transportation and processing of high hydrogen sulphide sour gas reserves in the Caroline field and area, Bearberry demonstration project)
Date
1987
Title
Decision on application by Shell Canada Limited, 1987 (approval of the transportation and processing of high hydrogen sulphide sour gas reserves in the Caroline field and area, Bearberry demonstration project)
Date
1987
Applicant
Shell Canada Limited
Application Number
861525
870045
870046
870047
Hearing Panel
Strom NA
Bellows LA
Fox EG
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Gas processing
Descriptors
Caroline field
Caroline gas project
Gas pipeline
Gas processing plant
Gathering line
Pipeline construction permit
Sour gas
Sulphur
Sulphur recovery
Community relations
Design criteria
Emission
Environmental impact
IL-80-24
Locating
NTS 82O
Phase behavior
Pilot scale
Plant design
Safety
Sulphur content
Transportation system
Truck
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S26
Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S15.050
Notes
Decision D87-8 on application No. 861525, 870045, 870046, and 870047 for a demonstration project to improve sulfur recovery; the project is to last five years and is designed to establish the technical and economic feasibility of commercial development.
Interveners
Bauman, L.
Bauman, J.
Newsham, C.
Less detail

Decision 89-08

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision124
Applicant
Strathfield Oil and Gas Ltd.
Application Number
890574
890576
890577
890578
890579
890795
890796
890797
890798
890799
890800
890801
890802
890803
Title
Decision 89-08 : Strathfield Oil and Gas Ltd.: Application for well licences, Provost field
Date
1989
Title
Decision 89-08 : Strathfield Oil and Gas Ltd.: Application for well licences, Provost field
Date
1989
Applicant
Strathfield Oil and Gas Ltd.
Application Number
890574
890576
890577
890578
890579
890795
890796
890797
890798
890799
890800
890801
890802
890803
Hearing Panel
Strom NA
Morin EJ
Langlo CA
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Well licence
Descriptors
Provost field
Well licence
Agricultural land
Air quality
Aquifer
Battery
Communication
Community relations
Cretaceous
Development well
Dina member
Drilling fluid
Drilling waste disposal
Emission
Energy development
Environmental impact
Groundwater
Hydrogen sulphide
Land use
Mannville Gp
NTS 73D
Oil well
Reservoir boundary
Spill
Sulphur dioxide
Water pollution
Water quality
Well spacing
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S2.020
Notes
ERCB decision D89-8 on applications no. 890574, 890576-890579, 890795-890803 for licences to drill wells all in Tp.37, R.4, W4; Board hearing 1989-06-27/28
Interveners
Hanson, R.
Less detail

Decision 91-01

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision65
Applicant
Polaris Petroleums Ltd.
Application Number
910018
Title
Decision 91-01 : Polaris Petroleums Ltd.: Application for a well licence
Date
1991
Title
Decision 91-01 : Polaris Petroleums Ltd.: Application for a well licence
Date
1991
Applicant
Polaris Petroleums Ltd.
Application Number
910018
Hearing Panel
Mink FJ
Bietz BF
Berndtsson NG
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Well licence
Descriptors
Provost field
Well licence
Air quality
Battery
Citizen participation
Community relations
Dina member
Directional well
Environmental impact
Exploratory well
Groundwater
Land reclamation
Oil producing
NTS 73D
Surface rights
Well site
Well spacing
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S2.020
Notes
Decision D91-1 on application No. 910018 for a licence to drill a well from a surface location in Lsd 5 Sec 31 Twp 37 Rge 3 W4M to obtain oil production from the Dina FM.
Interveners
Nelson, W.P.
Location
05-31-037-03W4
Less detail

Decision 97-13

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2879
Applicant
Syncrude Canada Limited
Application Number
960552
Title
Decision 97-13: Syncrude Canada Limited : Application by Syncrude for the Aurora Mine
Date
1997
Title
Decision 97-13: Syncrude Canada Limited : Application by Syncrude for the Aurora Mine
Date
1997
Applicant
Syncrude Canada Limited
Application Number
960552
Hearing Type
Board
No Hearing
Category
Oil sands
Descriptors
Aurora Mine
Communication
Community relations
Environmental impact
Fort McMurray area
Land reclamation
NTS 74E
Oil mining
Reclamation
Regional planning
Socio-economic effect
Tailings
Tailings - storage
Oil sands oil recovery
Oil sands project
Legal References
Oil Sands Conservation Act S10
Notes
EUB Decision 97-13 on application no. 960552 by Syncrude for approval to construct, operate and reclaim an oil sands mine and associated bitumen extraction facilities in the Fort McMurray area, the Aurora Mine. The Aurora Mine would include two mining areas: the first located within Twp 96, Ranges 9 to 11, W4M (Aurora North Mine), and the second located within Twp 94 & 95, Ranges 8 and 9, W4M (Aurora South Mine). The application covers: two separate truck and shovel oil sands mines, two mining-extraction production systems at each mine; related infrastructure associated with the operation of each mine; water management plants for the proposed development area, and; an integrated reclamation plan for the proposed Aurora Mine;
No hearing
Interveners
Anez VM
Birch Mountain Resources Ltd.
Confederation of Regions Political Party
Mobil Oil Canada Properties
Northland Forest Products Ltd.
Shell Canada Limited
Solv-Ex Corporation
Pembina Institute for Appropriate Development
Toxics Watch Society
Approval
Approved
Less detail

Decision 97-15

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2885
Applicant
Maxwell Oil and Gas Ltd.
Application Number
970239
Title
Decision 97-15: Maxwell Oil & Gas Ltd.: Application for a well licence, Tomahawk Field
Date
1997
Title
Decision 97-15: Maxwell Oil & Gas Ltd.: Application for a well licence, Tomahawk Field
Date
1997
Applicant
Maxwell Oil and Gas Ltd.
Application Number
970239
Hearing Panel
Dilay JD
Miller GJ
McManus BT
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Well licence
Descriptors
Well licence
Tomahawk field
Community relations
Horizontal well
Lake Wabamun
Lake
Land use
Locating
NTS 83G
Nordegg Fm
Regulation
Safety
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S2.020
Energy Resources Conservation Act S2
Energy Resources Conservation Act S29
Notes
EUB Decision D97-15 on application no. 970239 by Maxwell Oil & Gas Ltd. for a licence to drill a directional well from a surface location in Lsd 4 Sec 5 Twp 53 Rge 5 W5M to obtain oil production from the Nordegg C and Banff D Pool in the Lake Wabamun area
Board hearing 1997-07-29 and reconvened 1997-08-19
Interveners
Lake Wabamun Enhancement and Protection Association
Hiebert A
Balcon D
Newton J
Korol R
Drever J
Spilsted P
Approval
Approved
Location
04-05-053-05W5
Less detail

Decision 99-02

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision3068
Applicant
Talisman Energy Inc.
Application Number
1031007
Title
Examiner report on application by Talisman Energy Inc. application for a gas battery and pipeline permit Gordondale field
Date
1999
Title
Examiner report on application by Talisman Energy Inc. application for a gas battery and pipeline permit Gordondale field
Date
1999
Applicant
Talisman Energy Inc.
Application Number
1031007
Hearing Panel
Remmer WG
Lillo HO
Pesta TJ
Hearing Type
Examiners
Category
Gas processing
Descriptors
Battery
Community relations
Gas pipeline
Gordondale field
Environmental impact
NTS 83M
Pipeline route
Sour gas
Sulphur dioxide
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S26
Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S7.001
Pipeline Act Part 4
Notes
EUB Examiners report on application no. 1031007 to install a 0.004 tonne per day sulphur single well battery at Lsd 7-32-79-10 W6M and to construct and operate a sour gas pipeline from Lsd 7-32-79-W6M to Lsd 8-33-79-10 W6M.
Interveners
Day C
Approval
Approved
Location
07-32-079-10W6
08-33-079-10W6
Less detail

Decision 99-16

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision3082
Applicant
Canadian 88 Energy Corp.
Application Number
970473
Title
Decision 99-16: Canadian 88 Energy Corp. application to drill a level 4 critical sour gas well Lochend field
Date
1999
Title
Decision 99-16: Canadian 88 Energy Corp. application to drill a level 4 critical sour gas well Lochend field
Date
1999
Applicant
Canadian 88 Energy Corp.
Application Number
970473
Hearing Panel
Mink FJ
Dilay JD
Miller GJ
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Well licence
Descriptors
Well licence
Community relations
Emergency procedure
Environmental impact
Hydrogen sulphide
ID 97-6
Land use
Locating
Safety
Risk
Sour gas
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S2.020
Notes
Decision on application for a well licence to drill a level 4 critical sour gas well at Lsd 10 Sec 35 Twp 26 Rge 3 W5M with a maximum H2S release rate of 2266 10^3m^3/d
Interveners
Prize Energy Inc.
Hutchinson P
Robertson K
Reilly
Turner R
Turner DJ
Calgary North H2S Action Committee
Lochend Sour Gas Emergency Zone Coalition
City of Calgary
Calgary Regional Health Authority
Municipal District of Rocky View No. 44
MacFarlane DH
Locke C
Locke L
Goodhart R
Fedor L
David D
Gordon S
Hunt R
Pollock-Eddy
Johnson O
Murray W
Kaufman R
Approval
Approved
Approved with conditions
Conditions
Develop document management process, including policies and procedures; assessment of the effectiveness of this program subject to audit by third party
That equipment, procedures, and personnel used by contractors are suitable and up to standard
That casing bowl welding procedure be detailed
That steel mill heat certificates for casing and drill pipe be submitted
That Alberta Recommended Practices pipe specifications be used at minimum
That EUB Calgary South Field receive dailing reports
That EUB Field Surveillance attend pre-spud meetings
That EUB drilling rig inspections take place
That drilling take place between summer months only
That ignition is implemented within one minute of ignition criteria
That all components of the Emergency Response Plan (ERP) be tested
That sensitive individuals be identified within the awareness zone
That the ERP is fully understood and implemented, including drilling updates
That all individuals in the EPZ are notified prior to drilling in the critical zone
That air be monitored for H2S and SO2
That adequate municipal and provinical resources be available in case of emergency
That details of the ERP be updated and current
That the company meet with affected emergency planning organizations to prepare contingency plan
Location
10-36-026-03W5
Less detail

Decision 2000-20

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision3170
Applicant
Dynegy Canada Inc.
Pinon Oil and Gas Ltd.
Application Number
1034767
1034762
Title
Decision 2000-20: Dynegy Canada Inc. application for pipeline licence amendments Okotoks field; Pinon Oil and Gas Ltd. application for a sour gas compressor station and pipeline licence Crossfield field
Date
2000
Title
Decision 2000-20: Dynegy Canada Inc. application for pipeline licence amendments Okotoks field; Pinon Oil and Gas Ltd. application for a sour gas compressor station and pipeline licence Crossfield field
Date
2000
Applicant
Dynegy Canada Inc.
Pinon Oil and Gas Ltd.
Application Number
1034767
1034762
Hearing Panel
Remmer WG
Dunn GC
Berndtsson NG
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Pipelines
Descriptors
Gas pipeline
Decision D1984-7
Community relations
Emergency procedure
Energy development
Hydrogen sulphide
Pipeline construction permit
Pipeline route
Public consultation
Route selection
Right of way
Risk
Safety
Sour gas
Urban development
Dispute resolution
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S7.001
Pipeline Act Part 4
Notes
EUB Decision D2000-20 on application no. 1034767 by Dynegy Canada Inc. requesting approval to extend the operating term of its sour gas pipeline (licence no. 21027), originating at Lsd 12 Sec 20 Twp 22 Rge 28 W4M and carrying 374.9 mol/kmol of H2S, referred to as the Dynegy Chestermere pipeline; and its sweet fuel gas pipeline (licence no. 17711) which connects at Lsd 10 Sec 2 Twp 22 Rge 29 W4M.
EUB decision 2000-20 on application no. 1034762 by Pinon Oil and Gas Ltd. to construct and operate a sour gas compressor station at Lsd 10 Sec 21 Twp 23 Rge28 W4M and a 11.3 km pipeline carrying 20 mol/kmol H2S from the compressor station to Dynegy's sour gas pipeline at Lsd 12 Sec 20 Twp 22 Rge 28 W4M
Board requested submission of "Land-use and Resource Development Agreement" by October 1, 2000, and as such extended interim operating approval of Dynegy's pipelines until November 1, 2000
Board hearing 1999-08-18 - 27 and 1999-11-22 - 30
Interveners
Bearspaw Petroleum Ltd.
The Soutzo Family
Soutzo, A.
Giovanetto, R.
Ollerenshaw Ranch Limited
The White Families
van Olm, M.
White, F.
White, G.
Hindson, H.
Calgary-Chestermere Landowners and Residents
Nelson, S.
Ryder, L.
Belzberg, H.
Laycock, L.
Singh, N.
Hodgson, J.
Taylor, T.
Haymour, E.
The Shields Family
Shields, R.
The Southeast-Loop Residents and other local interveners
Oloman, N.
Christensen, M
Hennessey, J.
Sutherland, G.
Pearson, D.
Marshall, G.
Evans, B.
Agar, D.
Taylor, T.J.
Approval
Deferred
Approved with conditions
Conditions
Dynegy to conduct full pipeline internal inspection within three months and present results to the Board by July 1, 2000
Dynegy to update emergency response plan in consultation with affected parties
Dynegy to develop a plan to address urban growth in area
Dynegy to work with Shields (interveners) in regards to subdivision plans
Less detail

Decision 2000-20 Addendum

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision3342
Applicant
Dynegy Canada Inc.
Pinon Oil and Gas Ltd.
Application Number
1034767
1034762
Title
Decision 2000-20 Addendum : Dynegy Canada Inc. application for pipeline licence amendments Okotoks field; Pinon Oil and Gas Ltd. application for a sour gas compressor station and pipeline licence Crossfield field
Date
2001
Title
Decision 2000-20 Addendum : Dynegy Canada Inc. application for pipeline licence amendments Okotoks field; Pinon Oil and Gas Ltd. application for a sour gas compressor station and pipeline licence Crossfield field
Date
2001
Applicant
Dynegy Canada Inc.
Pinon Oil and Gas Ltd.
Application Number
1034767
1034762
Hearing Panel
Remmer WG
Dunn GC
Berndtsson NG
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Pipelines
Descriptors
Gas pipeline
Decision D1984-7
Community relations
Emergency procedure
Energy development
Hydrogen sulphide
NTS 82O
Pipeline construction permit
Pipeline route
Public consultation
Route selection
Right of way
Risk
Safety
Sour gas
Urban development
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S7.001
Pipeline Act Part 4
Notes
EUB Decision D2000-20 addendum on application no. 1034767 by Dynegy Canada Inc. requesting approval to extend the operating term of its sour gas pipeline (licence no. 21027), addendum incorporates land-use and resource development agreement (LRD) with landowners
Interveners
Bearspaw Petroleum Ltd.
The Soutzo Family
Soutzo, A.
Giovanetto, R.
Ollerenshaw Ranch Limited
The White Families
van Olm, M.
White, F.
White, G.
Hindson, H.
Calgary-Chestermere Landowners and Residents
Nelson, S.
Ryder, L.
Belzberg, H.
Laycock, L.
Singh, N.
Hodgson, J.
Taylor, T.
Haymour, E.
The Shields Family
Shields, R.
The Southeast-Loop Residents and other local interveners
Oloman, N.
Christensen, M
Hennessey, J.
Sutherland, G.
Pearson, D.
Marshall, G.
Evans, B.
Agar, D.
Taylor, T.J.
Approval
Approved
Approved with conditions
Conditions
Dynegy must submit amendment to its emergency reponse plan prior ro installation of valves
Less detail

Decision 2000-20 Default Addendum

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision4117
Applicant
Dynegy Canada Inc.
Pinon Oil and Gas Ltd.
Application Number
1034767
1034762
Title
Decision 2000-20 Default Addendum : Dynegy Canada Inc. application for pipeline licence amendments Okotoks field; Pinon Oil and Gas Ltd. application for a sour gas compressor station and pipeline licence Crossfield field
Date
2000
Title
Decision 2000-20 Default Addendum : Dynegy Canada Inc. application for pipeline licence amendments Okotoks field; Pinon Oil and Gas Ltd. application for a sour gas compressor station and pipeline licence Crossfield field
Date
2000
Applicant
Dynegy Canada Inc.
Pinon Oil and Gas Ltd.
Application Number
1034767
1034762
Hearing Panel
Remmer WG
Dunn GC
Berndtsson NG
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Pipelines
Descriptors
Gas pipeline
Decision D1984-7
Community relations
Emergency procedure
Energy development
Hydrogen sulphide
NTS 82O
Pipeline construction permit
Pipeline route
Public consultation
Route selection
Right of way
Risk
Safety
Sour gas
Urban development
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S7.001
Pipeline Act Part 4
Notes
EUB Decision D2000-20 addendum on application no. 1034767 by Dynegy Canada Inc. requesting approval to extend the operating term of its sour gas pipeline (licence no. 21027), addendum incorporates land-use and resource development agreement (LRD) with landowners
Default addendum released January 31, 2006
Interveners
Bearspaw Petroleum Ltd.
The Soutzo Family
Soutzo, A.
Giovanetto, R.
Ollerenshaw Ranch Limited
The White Families
van Olm, M.
White, F.
White, G.
Hindson, H.
Calgary-Chestermere Landowners and Residents
Nelson, S.
Ryder, L.
Belzberg, H.
Laycock, L.
Singh, N.
Hodgson, J.
Taylor, T.
Haymour, E.
The Shields Family
Shields, R.
The Southeast-Loop Residents and other local interveners
Oloman, N.
Christensen, M
Hennessey, J.
Sutherland, G.
Pearson, D.
Marshall, G.
Evans, B.
Agar, D.
Taylor, T.J.
Approval
Approved
Approved with conditions
Conditions
Dynegy must submit amendment to its emergency reponse plan prior ro installation of valves
Less detail

Decision 2003-09

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision3584
Applicant
ConocoPhillips Canada Resources Corp.
Application Number
1252461
1272754
Title
Decision 2003-9: ConocoPhillips Canada Resources Corp. applications for sour gas well, battery, and associated pipelines Sinclair field
Date
2003
Title
Decision 2003-9: ConocoPhillips Canada Resources Corp. applications for sour gas well, battery, and associated pipelines Sinclair field
Date
2003
Applicant
ConocoPhillips Canada Resources Corp.
Application Number
1252461
1272754
Hearing Panel
Nichol JR
Douglas JI
Hommy MH
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Well licence
Descriptors
Battery
Community relations
Copyright
Emergency procedure
Montney Fm.
Pipeline
NTS 83M
Risk
Sinclair Field
Sour gas
Well licence
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S2.020
Pipeline Act Part 4
Notes
EUB Decision 2003-9 on application no. 1252461 for a level-2 sour gas well to produce from the Montney formation with a maximum H2S content of 71.1 moles/kilomole with a potential release rate of 1.096 m#/s and an EPZ of 2.45 km; and application 1272754 to construct a pipeline and sour gas battery at 13-21-74-12W6M
Interveners
von Tiesenhausen P
von Tiesenhausen T
Approval
Approved
Location
13-21-074-12W6
Less detail

Decision 2010-22

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision4423
Applicant
Petro-Canada
Application Number
1517168
1517170
1574414
1574366
1574409
1517148
1520922
1517151
1520923
1517160
1517176
1520388
1513051
Title
Decision 2010-022: Petro-Canada applications for eleven well licences, one multiwell gas battery licence, and two pipeline licences Sullivan Field
Date
2010
Title
Decision 2010-022: Petro-Canada applications for eleven well licences, one multiwell gas battery licence, and two pipeline licences Sullivan Field
Date
2010
Applicant
Petro-Canada
Application Number
1517168
1517170
1574414
1574366
1574409
1517148
1520922
1517151
1520923
1517160
1517176
1520388
1513051
Hearing Panel
Dilay GW
McManus BT
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Well licence
Pipelines
Descriptors
Battery
Community relations
Copyright
Emergency procedure
Pipeline
NTS 82J
Decision D2008-29
Fescue
Grazing
Socio-economic effect
Site survey
Risk
SullivanField
Well licence
Safety
Environment
Health
Livestock
Environmental impact assessment
Land use
Air quality
Water quality
Range grass
Vegetation
Grass
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S2.020
Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S7.001
Pipeline Act Part 4
Notes
Prehearing meeting was held in Longview on March 18, 2008
Interveners
Big Loop Group
Stoney Nakoda Nation
Pekisko Group
Royal Adderson and Bad Ad Ranches Ltd.
Approval
Approved with conditions
Conditions
See Appendix 1 (p. 113 - 147) Summary of conditions and commitments
Location
12-11-018-05W5
Less detail

20 records – page 1 of 1.