10 records – page 1 of 1.

Decision 78-05

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2115
Applicant
Energy Resources Conservation Board
Application Number
9750X
Title
Decision on proceeding on spacing and target area requirements for oil and gas wells drilled in the province of Alberta, 1978
Date
1978
Title
Decision on proceeding on spacing and target area requirements for oil and gas wells drilled in the province of Alberta, 1978
Date
1978
Applicant
Energy Resources Conservation Board
Application Number
9750X
Hearing Panel
Craig DR
Millard V
DeSorcy GJ
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Spacing
Descriptors
Drilling spacing unit
Land use
Target area
Well spacing
Agricultural land
Alberta
Citizen participation
Communication
Community relations
Economic analysis
Environmental impact
Gas well
History
Oil well
Procedure
Regulation
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S4.030
Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S15.060
Notes
Decision on proceeding No. 9750X to consider representations from agricultural groups on the need to amend the present well spacing and target area requirements
Less detail

Decision 84-26

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1148
Applicant
PanCanadian Petroleum Limited
Application Number
831102
Title
Examiners report on application by PanCanadian Petroleum Limited, 1984 (experimental in situ scheme Lindbergh area)
Date
1984
Title
Examiners report on application by PanCanadian Petroleum Limited, 1984 (experimental in situ scheme Lindbergh area)
Date
1984
Applicant
PanCanadian Petroleum Limited
Application Number
831102
Hearing Panel
Warne GA
Moloney JK
Remmer WG
Hearing Type
Examiners
Category
Oil sands
Descriptors
Carbon dioxide injection
Cyclic steam injection
Elk Point area
In situ
Lindbergh area
Steam injection
Oil sands oil recovery
Oil sands project
Thermal recovery
Air quality
Communication
Emission
Environmental impact
Hydrogen sulphide
Noise (sound)
NTS 73E
Pilot scale
Pollution
Sulphur dioxide
Water well
Legal References
Oil Sands Conservation Act S10
Notes
ERCB Examiners report E84-26 on application No. 831102 for approval of an experimental scheme to cyclicly stimulate 10 existing wells in section 3, TP.56, R.6 W4M using steam and carbon dioxide to evaluate the technical and economic feasibility of this recovery method in the Cold Lake Wabiskaw McMurray oil sands deposit.
Interveners
Shymkiw, J.
Shymkiw, Mrs.J.
Shymkiw, H.
Shymkiw, Mrs.H.
Elk Point Surface Rights Association
Less detail

Decision 88-13

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision157
Applicant
Ranchmen's Resources Ltd.
Application Number
872046
Title
Examiner report on application by Ranchmen's Resources Ltd., 1988 (infill well (IW) orders in a portion of the Provost Basal Quartz C pool)
Date
1988
Title
Examiner report on application by Ranchmen's Resources Ltd., 1988 (infill well (IW) orders in a portion of the Provost Basal Quartz C pool)
Date
1988
Applicant
Ranchmen's Resources Ltd.
Application Number
872046
Hearing Panel
Berndtsson NG
Dilay JD
Houlihan RN
Hearing Type
Examiners
Category
Spacing
Descriptors
Drilling spacing unit
Provost field
Basal Quartz Fm
Communication
Environmental impact
Lease drainage
Locating
Noise (sound)
NTS 73D
Oil producing
Oil recovery
Pollution
Notes
ERCB Examiners report E88-13 on application No. 872046 to permit drilling and completion of four well per drilling spacing unit in part of the Provost Basal Quartz C pool.
Interveners
Cuthbert, L.
Cuthbert, Mrs.
Southoff, E.
Southoff, Mrs.
Swanson, D.
Less detail

Decision 89-08

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision124
Applicant
Strathfield Oil and Gas Ltd.
Application Number
890574
890576
890577
890578
890579
890795
890796
890797
890798
890799
890800
890801
890802
890803
Title
Decision 89-08 : Strathfield Oil and Gas Ltd.: Application for well licences, Provost field
Date
1989
Title
Decision 89-08 : Strathfield Oil and Gas Ltd.: Application for well licences, Provost field
Date
1989
Applicant
Strathfield Oil and Gas Ltd.
Application Number
890574
890576
890577
890578
890579
890795
890796
890797
890798
890799
890800
890801
890802
890803
Hearing Panel
Strom NA
Morin EJ
Langlo CA
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Well licence
Descriptors
Provost field
Well licence
Agricultural land
Air quality
Aquifer
Battery
Communication
Community relations
Cretaceous
Development well
Dina member
Drilling fluid
Drilling waste disposal
Emission
Energy development
Environmental impact
Groundwater
Hydrogen sulphide
Land use
Mannville Gp
NTS 73D
Oil well
Reservoir boundary
Spill
Sulphur dioxide
Water pollution
Water quality
Well spacing
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S2.020
Notes
ERCB decision D89-8 on applications no. 890574, 890576-890579, 890795-890803 for licences to drill wells all in Tp.37, R.4, W4; Board hearing 1989-06-27/28
Interveners
Hanson, R.
Less detail

Decision 93-08

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision7
Applicant
Ranchmen's Resources Ltd.
Application Number
901312
931123
931124
931125
931149
Title
Decision 93-08 : Ranchmen's Resources Ltd. : Application for approval to construct and operate well site facilities and permits to construct pipelines, Knopcik field
Date
1993
Title
Decision 93-08 : Ranchmen's Resources Ltd. : Application for approval to construct and operate well site facilities and permits to construct pipelines, Knopcik field
Date
1993
Applicant
Ranchmen's Resources Ltd.
Application Number
901312
931123
931124
931125
931149
Hearing Panel
Prince JP
Berndtsson NG
Remmer WG
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Pipelines
Descriptors
Knopcik field
NTS 83M
Pipeline construction permit
Well licence
Communication
Emergency procedure
Environmental impact
Decision D1990-16
Gas producing
Producing equipment
Sour gas
Notes
Decision D93-8 on applications No. 901312, 931123, 931124, 931125 and 931149 to resume operations at the well Ranchmen's et al Knopcik 7-19-74-11 (W6M) and to construct production facilities at the well and to construct pipelines.
Interveners
Ludwig, M.L.
Ludwig, B.D.
Ludwig, F.R.
Ludwig, W.R.
Ludwig, K.L.
Ludwig, D.L.
Ludwig, J.
Schiltuis, H.A.
Ludwig, R.P.
Location
07-19-074-11W6
Less detail

Decision 93-Unnumbered

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision3027
Applicant
Ranchmen's Resources Ltd.
Application Number
901312
931123
931124
931125
931149
Title
Decision on application by Ranchmen's Resources Ltd., 1993 (resumptions of operations at the well Ranchmens et al Knopcik 7-19-74-11)
Date
1993
Title
Decision on application by Ranchmen's Resources Ltd., 1993 (resumptions of operations at the well Ranchmens et al Knopcik 7-19-74-11)
Date
1993
Applicant
Ranchmen's Resources Ltd.
Application Number
901312
931123
931124
931125
931149
Hearing Panel
Berndtsson NG
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Well licence
Descriptors
Knopcik field
NTS 83M
Well licence
Communication
Emergency procedure
Environmental impact
Decision D1990-16
Decision D1993-08
Gas flaring
Gas producing
Hydrogen sulphide
Producing equipment
Sour gas
Notes
Decision D93-unnumbered to inquire into operations aththe Ranchmen's et al Knopcik 7-19-74-11 (W6M). H2S was released from the tubing in the well. Boare inquiry 1993-12-14. File with D98-3
Interveners
Sully, K
Brooker, T
Cummings, B
Shand, J
Concord Environmental
Dabbs, D
The Ludwig Family
Location
07-19-074-11W6
Less detail

Decision 97-11

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2877
Applicant
Poffenroth A
Canadian Occidental Petroleum Ltd.
Application Number
960925
Title
Decision 97-11:Mr. A. Poffenroth: Application for Board to review Canadian Occidental Petroleum Ltd. Licence No. 26758, Pipeline No. 12, Delacour Area
Date
1997
Title
Decision 97-11:Mr. A. Poffenroth: Application for Board to review Canadian Occidental Petroleum Ltd. Licence No. 26758, Pipeline No. 12, Delacour Area
Date
1997
Applicant
Poffenroth A
Canadian Occidental Petroleum Ltd.
Application Number
960925
Hearing Panel
Mink FJ
McManus BT
Miller GJ
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Pipelines
Descriptors
Communication
Delacour area
Gas pipeline
Hydrogen sulphide
NTS 82P
Pipeline route
Route selection
Sour gas
Legal References
Energy Resources Conservation Act S42
Notes
EUB Decision D97-11 on application no. 960925 by Mr. A Poffenroth requesting that the Board review its decision approving the Canadian Occidental Petroleum Ltd. pipeline for transporting sour gas from Lsd 7 Sec 26 Twp 25 Rge 28 W4M to an existing facility at Lsd 7 Sec 2 Twp 26 Rge 28 W4M. Mr. Poffenroth's application, under Section 42 of the Energy Resources Conservation Act, indicated that he was not properly advised that the pipeline through his land would be transporting sour gas and had he been aware the gas would be sour, he would have proposed alternative routings; Issues were provision of notice, adequacy of notice, and impact associated with the original and proposed routes.
Interveners
Canadian Occidental Petroleum Ltd.
Poffenroth A
Approval
Denied
Location
07-26-025-28W4
07-02-026-28W4
Less detail

Decision 97-13

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2879
Applicant
Syncrude Canada Limited
Application Number
960552
Title
Decision 97-13: Syncrude Canada Limited : Application by Syncrude for the Aurora Mine
Date
1997
Title
Decision 97-13: Syncrude Canada Limited : Application by Syncrude for the Aurora Mine
Date
1997
Applicant
Syncrude Canada Limited
Application Number
960552
Hearing Type
Board
No Hearing
Category
Oil sands
Descriptors
Aurora Mine
Communication
Community relations
Environmental impact
Fort McMurray area
Land reclamation
NTS 74E
Oil mining
Reclamation
Regional planning
Socio-economic effect
Tailings
Tailings - storage
Oil sands oil recovery
Oil sands project
Legal References
Oil Sands Conservation Act S10
Notes
EUB Decision 97-13 on application no. 960552 by Syncrude for approval to construct, operate and reclaim an oil sands mine and associated bitumen extraction facilities in the Fort McMurray area, the Aurora Mine. The Aurora Mine would include two mining areas: the first located within Twp 96, Ranges 9 to 11, W4M (Aurora North Mine), and the second located within Twp 94 & 95, Ranges 8 and 9, W4M (Aurora South Mine). The application covers: two separate truck and shovel oil sands mines, two mining-extraction production systems at each mine; related infrastructure associated with the operation of each mine; water management plants for the proposed development area, and; an integrated reclamation plan for the proposed Aurora Mine;
No hearing
Interveners
Anez VM
Birch Mountain Resources Ltd.
Confederation of Regions Political Party
Mobil Oil Canada Properties
Northland Forest Products Ltd.
Shell Canada Limited
Solv-Ex Corporation
Pembina Institute for Appropriate Development
Toxics Watch Society
Approval
Approved
Less detail

Decision 2011-12

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision4451
Applicant
Athabasca Oil Sands Corp.
Application Number
1647807
Title
Decision 2011-012 : Athabasca Oil Sands Corp. requests for interim shut-in of gas Liege Field Athabasca Oil Sands area
Date
2011
Title
Decision 2011-012 : Athabasca Oil Sands Corp. requests for interim shut-in of gas Liege Field Athabasca Oil Sands area
Date
2011
Applicant
Athabasca Oil Sands Corp.
Application Number
1647807
Hearing Panel
Dilay JD
McManus BT
Willard RJ
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Gas/Bitumen
Descriptors
Bitumen
Liege field
Athabasca Oil Sands
Communication
Steam assisted gravity drainage
Shutin well
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S3
Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations11.150
Oil Sands Conservation Regulation S3
2011 ABERCB 012
Notes
Change to legal citation effective January 2011
Interveners
Canadian Natural Resources Limited (CNRL)
Japan Canada OIl Sands Limited
Paramount Energy Operating Corp.
EnCana Oil and Gas Ltd.
Approval
Approved
Less detail

Decision 2012-05

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision4480
Applicant
Kallisto Energy Corporation
Application Number
1697898
Title
Decision 2012-005 : Kallisto Energy Corp. application for a well licence Crossfield East Field
Date
2012
Title
Decision 2012-005 : Kallisto Energy Corp. application for a well licence Crossfield East Field
Date
2012
Applicant
Kallisto Energy Corporation
Application Number
1697898
Hearing Panel
McManus RC
Eynon G
Warren WA
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Well licence
Descriptors
Communication (well)
Emergency response plan
Emergency procedure
Airdrie area
Basal Quartz FM
Hydrogen sulphide
Well licence
Position (location)
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S2.020
2012 ABERCB 005
Notes
Change to legal citation effective January 2011
Interveners
CrossAlta Gas Storate & Service
BP Canada Energy
BPCanada Energy Company
GransCanaada Pipelines Limited
Approval
Approved with conditions
Conditions
CONDITIONS
The licensee must obtain and immediately submit stabilized initial pressure data to the ERCB and CrossAlta.
The licensee must not use fracture stimulation on the well that exceeds 40 tonnes unless consent has been given by the Board.
The licensee must obtain and submit stabilized pre- and post-frac pressure data to the ERCB and CrossAlta.
Location
11-26-027-01W5
Less detail

10 records – page 1 of 1.