3 records – page 1 of 1.

Decision 80-26

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2013
Applicant
Chieftain Development Company Ltd.
Application Number
790487
Title
Decision on application by Chieftain Development Co. Ltd., 1980 (gas processing plant - Hythe-Brainard area)
Date
1980
Title
Decision on application by Chieftain Development Co. Ltd., 1980 (gas processing plant - Hythe-Brainard area)
Date
1980
Applicant
Chieftain Development Company Ltd.
Application Number
790487
Hearing Panel
Webber HJ
Bellows LA
Lupul SL
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Gas processing
Descriptors
Gas processing plant
Grande Prairie area
Sour gas
Air quality
Amine
Claus process
Emission
Environmental impact
Gas processing
Locating
Plant design
Procedure
Sulphur recovery
Legal References
Energy Resources Conservation Act
Notes
Decision 80-26 with Examiners report attached on application No. 790487 to construct a gas processing plant about 19 km northwest of Hythe to process natural gas (75% of which would be sour gas) (TP.74, R.12, W6M); Examiners hearing 1980-07-22 adjourned to 1980-08-14/15/20/21/22
Interveners
Alberta Women's Institutes, Ray Lake Branch
Barnes, E.T.
Blum, J.
Callihoo, R.
Callihoo, G.
Elvestad, L.
Elvestad, R.
Epp, E.
Fischer, G.W.
Gibson, A.O.
Harpe, A.
Harpe, O.
Harpe, T
Harpe, R.
Horse Lake Indian Band
Johnstone, A.
La Glace and District Petitioners
Loberg, G.
Loberg, E.
Lumbis, K.
McAllister, Y.
The Peace Country Acid Soils Committee
Regional Petitioners
Tiesenhausen, I.
Tiesenhausen, N.
Tiesenhausen, R.
The Trumpeter Swan Society
The Valhalla Save Our Soils
The Village of Hythe
Less detail

Decision 86-AA

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision619
Applicant
Energy Resources Conservation Board
Alberta. Dept. of the Environment
Title
Sulphur recovery at Alberta gas plants phase 1 of a review of the guidelines : task force report
Date
1986
Title
Sulphur recovery at Alberta gas plants phase 1 of a review of the guidelines : task force report
Date
1986
Applicant
Energy Resources Conservation Board
Alberta. Dept. of the Environment
Category
Environment/Pollution
Descriptors
Air quality
Claus process
Desulphurization
Exhaust gas
Gas processing plant
Pollution control
Sour gas
Sulphur recovery
Alberta
Benefit cost analysis
Standard
Notes
Addendum to report 86-AA filed next to report on shelf.
Less detail

Decision 90-08

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision85
Applicant
Shell Canada Limited
Husky Oil Operations Ltd.
Application Number
890971
890969
891504
891505
891506
891478
891479
891480
891481
891482
891568
891569
891570
891571
900404
891483
891290
900236
891047
891757
891805
891804
891803
891703
891802
Title
Decision 90-08 : Shell Canada Limited and Husky Oil Operations Ltd.: Application for Caroline Beaverhill Lake gas development
Date
1990
Title
Decision 90-08 : Shell Canada Limited and Husky Oil Operations Ltd.: Application for Caroline Beaverhill Lake gas development
Date
1990
Applicant
Shell Canada Limited
Husky Oil Operations Ltd.
Application Number
890971
890969
891504
891505
891506
891478
891479
891480
891481
891482
891568
891569
891570
891571
900404
891483
891290
900236
891047
891757
891805
891804
891803
891703
891802
Hearing Panel
DeSorcy GJ
Mink FJ
Bietz BF
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Gas processing
Descriptors
Caroline field
Caroline gas project
Energy development
Gas pipeline
Gas processing plant
Pipeline construction permit
Product pipeline
Sour gas
Sulphur recovery plant
Bearberry field
Benefit cost analysis
Carbon dioxide
Capitalized cost
Claus process
Conservation
Economic analysis
Emergency procedure
Emission
Environmental impact
ID-81-03
ID-88-01
Feasibility
Forecasting
Groundwater
Nitrogen oxide
Noise (sound)
NTS 82O
NTS 83B
Operating cost
Petroleum conservation
Public interest
Reliability
Safety
Socio-economic effect
Soil conservation
Soil pollution
Sulphur dioxide
Sulphur recovery
Water disposal
Water pollution
Water quality
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S4
Notes
Decision D90-8 on proceeding No. 890971 and on applications by Shell, Husky and associated parties for production, processing and transportation facilities for sour gas reserves in the Caroline Beaverhill Lake area (all in TP.31-36, R.3-10 W5M); Board hearing commenced 1990-04-17 and continued to 1990-05-10 with final argument 1990-05-28/29
Interveners
Federated Pipe Lines Ltd.
Amoco Canada Petroleum Company Ltd.
Altana Exploration Company
ATCOR Ltd.
Canadian Hunter Exploration Ltd.
Gulf Canada Resources Limited
Mobil Oil Canada
NOVA Corporation of Alberta
Numac Oil & Gas Ltd.
Union Pacific Resources Inc.
CN Rail
CP Rail
Alberta Fish and Game Association
Pollution Sub-Committee of the Public Advisory Committees - Environment Council of Alberta
Bauman, J.
Bauman, L.
Brown, R.
McCormick, H.
Brunner, J.
Brunner, L.
Heggie, R.
Burnstick Lake Cottage Owners' Association
Caroline Advisory Board
Caroline & District Chamber of Commerce
Concerned Residents Action Group
County of Mountain View No. 17
Diamond J. Industries Ltd.
Harris, D.
Harris, M.
Hermann, J.
Jans, E.
Jans, B.
Kostuch , M.
Rocky Veterinary Clinic Ltd.
Macklin, J.
Macklin, B.
Mountain View Land Holders Group
Olds& District Chamber of Commerce
Preservation of Agriculture and Living Space Society
Rocky Mountain House & District Chamber of Commerce
Roth, L.
Roth, S.
Saunders, D.
447 Area Residents
Sundre & District Chamber of Commerce
Town of Innisfail
Town of Sundre
Town of Rocky Mountain House
Village of Caroline
Wolf, R.E.
Less detail