Narrow Results By
Applicant
- Alberta Power Limited 1
- Amoco Canada Petroleum Company Limited 1
- Boonstra 1
- Bryzgorni 1
- Canadian Crude Separators Inc. 1
- Canadian Occidental Petroleum Ltd. 1
- Canterra Energy Ltd. 1
- Caprice Holdings Inc. 1
- Dover Operating Corp. 1
- Energy Resources Conservation Board 2
- Gulf Canada Resources Inc. 1
- Husky Oil Operations Ltd. 2
Decision 78-05
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2115
- Applicant
- Energy Resources Conservation Board
- Application Number
- 9750X
- Title
- Decision on proceeding on spacing and target area requirements for oil and gas wells drilled in the province of Alberta, 1978
- Date
- 1978
- Title
- Decision on proceeding on spacing and target area requirements for oil and gas wells drilled in the province of Alberta, 1978
- Date
- 1978
- Applicant
- Energy Resources Conservation Board
- Application Number
- 9750X
- Hearing Panel
- Craig DR
- Millard V
- DeSorcy GJ
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Category
- Spacing
- Descriptors
- Drilling spacing unit
- Land use
- Target area
- Well spacing
- Agricultural land
- Alberta
- Citizen participation
- Communication
- Community relations
- Economic analysis
- Environmental impact
- Gas well
- History
- Oil well
- Procedure
- Regulation
- Legal References
- Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S4.030
- Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S15.060
- Notes
- Decision on proceeding No. 9750X to consider representations from agricultural groups on the need to amend the present well spacing and target area requirements
Decision 82-15|82-15 Addendum
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2063
- Applicant
- Canterra Energy Ltd.
- Gulf Canada Resources Inc.
- Application Number
- 810650
- 810849
- Title
- Decision on application by Canterra Energy Ltd. and Gulf Canada Resources Inc., 1982 (Ram River gas processing plant and Strachan gas processing plant) (and addendum)
- Date
- 1982
- Title
- Decision on application by Canterra Energy Ltd. and Gulf Canada Resources Inc., 1982 (Ram River gas processing plant and Strachan gas processing plant) (and addendum)
- Date
- 1982
- Application Number
- 810650
- 810849
- Hearing Panel
- Millard V
- Strom NA
- Evans RG
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Category
- Gas processing
- Descriptors
- Blackstone field
- Brazeau River field
- Chedderville field
- Gas processing plant
- Hanlan field
- Ricinus field
- Sour gas
- Stolberg field
- Strachan field
- Capacity
- Citizen participation
- Design criteria
- Desulphurization
- Emission
- Energy development
- Environmental impact
- IL-80-24
- Expansion
- NTS 82O
- NTS 83B
- NTS 83C
- Revision
- Sulfreen process
- Sulphur dioxide
- Sulphur recovery
- Legal References
- Oil and Gas Conservation Act S26
- Notes
- Decision 82-15 and addendum on application No. 810650 by Canterra (formerly Aquitaine) to amend approval No. 2820 to include additional fields and increase sulphur recovery for its Ram River gas plant located in section 2-37-10 W5M and on application No. 810849 by Gulf to amend approval No. 3351 to include additional fields and increase sulphur recovery for its Strachan gas plant located in section 35-37-9 W5M; Board hearing 1982-04-26/27 & 1982-05-03/04/05/06; see Decision D82-2 for related pipeline applications
- Interveners
- Rocky Veterinary Clinic Ltd.
- Federation of Alberta Naturalists
- The Alberta Fish and Game Association
- Public Advisory Committee to the Environment Council of Alberta
- Red Deer Fish and Game Association
Decision 87-09
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision208
- Applicant
- Norcen Energy Resources Ltd.
- Application Number
- 861041
- Title
- Decision on application by Norcen Energy Resources Ltd., 1987 (approval of a gas processing plant in the Campbell-Namao field)
- Date
- 1987
- Title
- Decision on application by Norcen Energy Resources Ltd., 1987 (approval of a gas processing plant in the Campbell-Namao field)
- Date
- 1987
- Applicant
- Norcen Energy Resources Ltd.
- Application Number
- 861041
- Hearing Panel
- Goodman CJ
- Mink FJ
- Bruni MJ
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Category
- Gas processing
- Descriptors
- Campbell Namao field
- Gas processing plant
- Sour gas
- Air pollution
- Air quality
- Citizen participation
- Emission
- Environmental impact
- Health
- Locating
- Negotiation
- Noise (sound)
- NTS 73H
- Safety
- Soil analysis
- Sulphur dioxide
- Sulphur recovery
- Water quality
- Legal References
- Oil and Gas Conservation Act S26
- Notes
- Decision D87-9 on application No. 861041 to construct a gas processing plant in LSD 1-55-25 W4M to process non-associate and solution gas from wells in several fields in the general area; Board hearing 1987-03-17/18/19
- Interveners
- Rose Ridge Citizens Committee
- Blach, W.
- Bocock, J.
- Pasay, I.
- Silito, S.
- Sinkovics, A.
- Zuidema, P.
- Councillor in the Municipal District of Sturgeon #90
- MLA for Consistuency of Westlock-Sturgeon
- Location
- ##-01-055-25W4
Decision 88-22
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision146
- Applicant
- Norcen Energy Resources Ltd.
- Application Number
- 861041
- Title
- Decision on application by Norcen Energy Resources Ltd., 1988 (approval of a gas processing facility in the Campbell-Namao field)
- Date
- 1988
- Title
- Decision on application by Norcen Energy Resources Ltd., 1988 (approval of a gas processing facility in the Campbell-Namao field)
- Date
- 1988
- Applicant
- Norcen Energy Resources Ltd.
- Application Number
- 861041
- Hearing Panel
- Mink FJ
- Bruni MJ
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Category
- Gas processing
- Descriptors
- Campbell Namao field
- Gas processing plant
- Sour gas
- Air pollution
- Air quality
- Citizen participation
- Emission
- Environmental impact
- Health
- Locating
- Negotiation
- Noise (sound)
- NTS 73H
- Safety
- Soil analysis
- Sulphur dioxide
- Sulphur recovery
- Water quality
- Legal References
- Oil and Gas Conservation Act S26
- Notes
- Decision D88-22 on application No. 861041 to construct a gas processing plant in LSD 1-55-25 W4M to process non-associate and solution gas from well in several fields in the general area; pre-hearing meeting held 1988-09-08.
- Interveners
- A Group of Area Residents
- Blach, W.
- Bocok, J.
- Mackay, G.
- Sinkovics, A.
- Councillor in the Municipal District of Sturgeon # 90
- MLA for Constitutuency of Westlock- Sturgeon
- Location
- ##-01-055-25W4
Decision 91-01
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision65
- Applicant
- Polaris Petroleums Ltd.
- Application Number
- 910018
- Title
- Decision 91-01 : Polaris Petroleums Ltd.: Application for a well licence
- Date
- 1991
- Title
- Decision 91-01 : Polaris Petroleums Ltd.: Application for a well licence
- Date
- 1991
- Applicant
- Polaris Petroleums Ltd.
- Application Number
- 910018
- Hearing Panel
- Mink FJ
- Bietz BF
- Berndtsson NG
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Category
- Well licence
- Descriptors
- Provost field
- Well licence
- Air quality
- Battery
- Citizen participation
- Community relations
- Dina member
- Directional well
- Environmental impact
- Exploratory well
- Groundwater
- Land reclamation
- Oil producing
- NTS 73D
- Surface rights
- Well site
- Well spacing
- Legal References
- Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S2.020
- Notes
- Decision D91-1 on application No. 910018 for a licence to drill a well from a surface location in Lsd 5 Sec 31 Twp 37 Rge 3 W4M to obtain oil production from the Dina FM.
- Interveners
- Nelson, W.P.
- Location
- 05-31-037-03W4
Decision 94-02
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2507
- Applicant
- Husky Oil Operations Ltd.
- Application Number
- 931689
- 931696
- 931746
- 931747
- 931748
- Title
- Decision 94-02: Husky Oil Operations Ltd.: Application for well licences, Moose Mountain area
- Date
- 1994
- Title
- Decision 94-02: Husky Oil Operations Ltd.: Application for well licences, Moose Mountain area
- Date
- 1994
- Applicant
- Husky Oil Operations Ltd.
- Application Number
- 931689
- 931696
- 931746
- 931747
- 931748
- Hearing Panel
- Bietz BF
- Berndtsson NG
- Evans RG
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Category
- Well licence
- Descriptors
- Citizen participation
- Environmental impact
- IL-93-09
- Kananaskis area
- Moose Mt area
- Public relations
- Safety
- Sour crude
- Sour gas
- Well licence
- Well testing
- NTS 87J
- Legal References
- Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S2.020
- Notes
- Decision on applications for licences for five wells all to be drilled from surface locations in Tp.23, R.7 W5M to obtain production from the Turner Valley Formation
- Interveners
- Rigel Oil & Gas Ltd.
- Old Sarcee Band,
- Uterus Clan
- Bragg Creek Environmental Coalition
- Tsuu T'ina Nation
- Green Peace Climate Change Campaign
- Western Canada Wilderness Committee
- The Wildlife Foundation
- Rocky Mountain Ecosystem Coalition
Decision 94-08
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2523
- Applicant
- Amoco Canada Petroleum Company Limited
- Application Number
- 931598
- Title
- Decision 94-08 : Amoco Canada Petroleum Company Limited : Application for an exploratory well, Whaleback Ridge area
- Date
- 1994
- Title
- Decision 94-08 : Amoco Canada Petroleum Company Limited : Application for an exploratory well, Whaleback Ridge area
- Date
- 1994
- Applicant
- Amoco Canada Petroleum Company Limited
- Application Number
- 931598
- Hearing Panel
- Mink FJ
- Bietz BF
- Evans RG
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Category
- Well licence
- Descriptors
- Citizen participation
- Eastern Slopes area
- Environmental impact
- IL-93-09
- Hunter Creek area
- Land use
- Natural area
- NTS 82G
- Public interest
- Safety
- Sour gas
- Well licence
- Whaleback Ridge area
- Legal References
- Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S2.020
- Notes
- Decision for a licence to drill a well in Lsd 9 Sec 18 Twp 11 Rge 2 W5M (to be known as Amoco Hunter Creek 10-18-11-2) for the purpose of exploring the production potential from the Mississippian system; Board hearing started 1994-05-16 and concluded on 1994-05-30
- Interveners
- Hunter Creek Coalition
- Smith, T.
- Huntley, J.
- Smith, H.
- Mcall, M.
- Nelson, E.
- Nelson, J.
- Molson, T.
- Nelson, R.
- Nelson, P.
- Thiesson, H.W.
- Wishart, W.D.
- Ross, W.A.
- McMillan, W.
- Eickmeier, J.R.
- Whaleback Coalition
- Tweedie, J.A.
- Wallis, C.
- Pachal, D.L.
- Van Tighem, K.
- Gerrand, M.
- Francis, W.
- Longair, R.
- Peigan Nation
- Antelope Butte Ranch
- Sheppard, D.
- Marty, S.
- Jericho, K.
- Hoff, R.
- Squair, E.
- W.C. Ranching
- Top Hand Industrial Services
- Diamond Hitch Outfitters
- Pincher Creek Chamber of Commerce
- McFarland, J.
- Location
- 09-18-011-02W5
Decision 95-04
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2537
- Applicant
- Unocal Canada Management Limited
- Application Number
- 931526
- 941508
- Title
- Decision 95-04 : Unocal Canada Management Limited : Application for an approved sour gas plant by Unocal Canada Management Limited Slave field (Lubicon Lake area)
- Date
- 1995
- Title
- Decision 95-04 : Unocal Canada Management Limited : Application for an approved sour gas plant by Unocal Canada Management Limited Slave field (Lubicon Lake area)
- Date
- 1995
- Applicant
- Unocal Canada Management Limited
- Application Number
- 931526
- 941508
- Hearing Panel
- Mink FJ
- Evans RG
- Berndtsson NG
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Category
- Gas processing
- Descriptors
- Gas processing plant
- Sour gas
- Lubicon Lake area
- Government hearing
- Jurisdiction
- Citizen participation
- Native land claims
- Air quality
- Health
- Safety
- NTS 84C
- Legal References
- Energy Resources Conservation Act S42
- Energy Resources Conservation Act S29
- Notes
- Decision 95-4 regarding the review (Proceeding No. 941508) of a gas plant approval for Unocal's sour gas plant in the Slave Field (Lubicon Lake area). The proceeding resulted from an objection received from the Lubicon Lake Indian Nation indicating that they were not fully informed of this project at the time of the original approval and had concerns with safety, health, environmental, and social impacts of the plant. The plant, located at Lsd 9 Sec 15 Twp 84 Rge 14 W5M, was about 75% constructed at the time of the objection.
- A public hearing was held from November 8 to December 2 1994. After review, the Board decided not to revoke the approval on February 23, 1995.
- Decisions D95-4 and D95-5 are bound together in one volume, library has 2 copies. Executive summary is stapled inside front cover.
- Interveners
- Lubicon Lake Indian Nation
- Group for Research and Education in Human Rights
- Committee Against Racism
- Edmonton Friends of the North
- Environmental Society
- Taiga Rescue Network
- Friends of the Lubicon
- Canadians for Responsible Northern Development
- Aboriginal Rights Coalition
- Leader of the New Democrats in Alberta
- Mennonite Central Committee
- Lubicons Settlement Commission of Review
- Liberal Opposition in Alberta
- Edmonton Indigenous Coalition
- Wilde, R.
- Smith Environmental Association
- Location
- 09-15-084-14W5
Decision 95-05
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2539
- Applicant
- Alberta Power Limited
- Application Number
- 940704
- Title
- Decision 95-5 : Alberta Power Limited : Application for a 144/25-kV substation, Slave Field (Lubicon Lake area)
- Date
- 1995
- Title
- Decision 95-5 : Alberta Power Limited : Application for a 144/25-kV substation, Slave Field (Lubicon Lake area)
- Date
- 1995
- Applicant
- Alberta Power Limited
- Application Number
- 940704
- Hearing Panel
- Mink FJ
- Evans RG
- Berndtsson NG
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Utilities
- Category
- Electric power
- Descriptors
- Electric power plant
- Lubicon Lake area
- Government hearing
- Citizen participation
- Native land claims
- NTS 84C
- Legal References
- Hydro and Electric Energy Act S12
- Hydro and Electric Energy Act S14
- Hydro and Electric Energy Act S17
- Notes
- Decision 95-5 respecting Alberta Power Limited's application 940704 to construct and operate an electric substation (Seal Lake AP 869S) and to alter existing 144-kV electric transmission line (AP 7L12) to tap into the proposed substation. This would supply electric power to the Unocal sour gas plant being constructed in the Lubicon Lake area as well as to other operators. Objected to by the Lubicon Lake Indian Nation with respect to their objections regarding the Unocal plant (see Decision 95-4).
- A public hearing was held December 2 1994. The application was approved on February 23, 1995.
- Decisions D95-4 and D95-5 are bound together in one volume, library has 2 copies. An executive summary is stapled inside the front cover.
- Approval
- Approved
Decision 98-11
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2946
- Applicant
- Caprice Holdings Inc.
- Application Number
- 970378
- Title
- Decision 98-11 : Caprice Holdings Inc.: Application to construct and operate an oilfield waste management facility, Brazeau/Elk River area
- Date
- 1998
- Title
- Decision 98-11 : Caprice Holdings Inc.: Application to construct and operate an oilfield waste management facility, Brazeau/Elk River area
- Date
- 1998
- Applicant
- Caprice Holdings Inc.
- Application Number
- 970378
- Hearing Panel
- Dilay JD
- Mink FJ
- Shirley EA
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Category
- Waste management
- Descriptors
- Air pollution
- Brazeau River area
- Citizen participation
- Elk River area
- Environmental impact assessment
- Environmental impact
- Flare
- Guide 58
- Groundwater
- Hydrogeology
- Locating
- Organic compound
- Regulation
- Waste disposal
- Waste treatment
- NTS 83B
- Legal References
- Energy Resources Conservation Act S29
- Oil and Gas Conservation Act S26
- Notes
- EUB Decision D98-14 on application no. 970378 by Caprice Holdings to construct and operate an oilfield waste management facility at Lsd 11, Section 3, Township 47, Range 11 W5M to process solids, produced water, and oily waste. Issues considered included the need for the facility, the location and impact, adequacy of public consultation, and issues surrounding the Board application process such as completeness and accuracy, need for an EIA, initiation of facility construction proir to approval, and the role of interveners.
- Interveners
- Byram Industrial Services Ltd.
- Kalita P
- Pembina Institute for Appropriate Development
- Approval
- Approved
- Approved with conditions
- Conditions
- Groundwater monitoring and submission of a re-evaluation of the geology and hydrogeology of the site prior to operation
- Solids storage pit: to contain solids defined in Guide 58 only, and to be cleaned and inspected annually
- Surface runoff containment: management system is appropriate
- Location
- 11-03-047-11W5
Decision 2002-55
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision3511
- Applicant
- Canadian Crude Separators Inc.
- Application Number
- 2000343
- 1242258
- 1096927
- 1096321
- Title
- Decision 2002-55: Canadian Crude Separators Inc. applications to construct and operate an oilfield waste management facility, drill a disposal well, construct and operate a pipeline, and operate a disposal scheme Edson field
- Date
- 2002
- Title
- Decision 2002-55: Canadian Crude Separators Inc. applications to construct and operate an oilfield waste management facility, drill a disposal well, construct and operate a pipeline, and operate a disposal scheme Edson field
- Date
- 2002
- Applicant
- Canadian Crude Separators Inc.
- Application Number
- 2000343
- 1242258
- 1096927
- 1096321
- Hearing Panel
- Bietz BF
- Nichol JR
- Railton JB
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Category
- Waste management
- Descriptors
- Air pollution
- Citizen participation
- Edson field
- Environmental impact assessment
- Flare
- Guide 51
- Guide 55
- Guide 58
- Injection well
- Leduc Fm
- Locating
- NTS 83F
- Pipeline construction
- Pipeline route
- Waste disposal
- Waste treatment
- Notes
- CCS INc. applied to the Board to construct an oilfield waste management facility at LSD 7-18-53-18W5M; to drill a well at LSD 12-16-53-19W5M; to construct and operate 7.8 km of pipeline and to inject class 1b fluids into the Leduc Fm.
- Interveners
- West Edson Landlords Coalition
- Armstrong J
- Bugg H
- Bugg J
- Chapman N
- Crawford C
- Crawford D
- Knutson E
- Makowecki F
- Secord RC
- Thebeau B
- Thebeau D
- Thompson C
- Approval
- Approved with conditions
- Conditions
- EUB hereby approves the applications subject to the applicant's strict adherence to the commitments and conditions summarized in the Appendix. Application No. 1096321 is approved subject to the drilling and evaluation of the proposed well and to adherence with the wellbore integrity requirements of Guide 51 : Injection and Disposal Wells.
- Location
- 07-18-053-18W5
- 12-16-053-19W5
Decision 2007-03
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision4192
- Applicant
- Husky Oil Operations Ltd.
- Application Number
- 1464044
- Title
- Decision D2007-003: Examiner report respecting Husky Oil Operations Ltd. application to amend facility licence No. 32659, Elnora Field
- Date
- 2007
- Title
- Decision D2007-003: Examiner report respecting Husky Oil Operations Ltd. application to amend facility licence No. 32659, Elnora Field
- Date
- 2007
- Applicant
- Husky Oil Operations Ltd.
- Application Number
- 1464044
- Hearing Panel
- Paulson RL
- Hubbard BC
- Eastlick BK
- Hearing Type
- Examiners
- Category
- Well licence
- Legal References
- Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S7.001
- Interveners
- McQuillan R
- Roberts R
- Approval
- Approved
- Location
- 06-07-035-22W4
Decision 2013-14
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision4511
- Applicant
- Dover Operating Corp.
- Application Number
- 1673682
- Title
- Decision 2013-014 : Dover Operating Corp.: Application for bitumen recovery scheme Athabasca oil sands area
- Date
- 2013
- Title
- Decision 2013-014 : Dover Operating Corp.: Application for bitumen recovery scheme Athabasca oil sands area
- Date
- 2013
- Applicant
- Dover Operating Corp.
- Application Number
- 1673682
- Hearing Panel
- Engen TC
- McManus RC
- Eynon G
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Category
- Land use
- Gas/Bitumen
- Sulphur
- Descriptors
- Law and legislation
- Oil Sands Conservation Act
- Oil sands
- Environment protection - citizen participation
- Environment protection - Law and Legislation
- Recovery
- Environmental impact assessment
- Wildlife
- Athabasca area
- Reclamation
- Sulphur recovery
- Emission
- Air quality
- Land use
- Economic analysis
- Transportation
- Development
- Legal References
- Responsible Energy Development Act (REDA)
- Energy Resources Conservation Act
- Oil Sands Conservation Act
- Transition Regulation
- Energy Resources Conservation Act S3
- Energy Resources Conservation Act S10(3)
- REDA General Regulation D3
- Responsible Energy Development Act (REDA) D15
- Environmental Protection and Enhancement Act S53
- Canadian Environmental Assessment Act
- Oil and Gas Conservation Act S10
- Water Act
- Constitution Act S91(24)
- Indian Act
- Natural Resources Transfer Agreement
- Administrative Procedures and Jurisdiction Act S12
- Responsible Energy Development Act (REDA) D2
- Oil Sands Conservation Act S10
- Oil Sands Conservation Act S3
- Decision Makers Regulation
- Responsible Energy Development Act D20
- Responsible Energy Development Act D21
- Alberta Land Stewardship Act
- Notes
- Change to legal citation effective January 2011
- Dover Operating Corp. has changed its name to Brion Energy Corporation.
- Interveners
- Fort McKay First Nation
- Fort McKay Metis Community Association
- Regional Municipality of Wood Buffalo
- Approval
- Approved with conditions
- Conditions
- Conditions generally are requirements in addition to or otherwise expanding upon existing regulations and guidelines. An applicant must comply with conditions or it is in breach of its approval and subject to enforcement action by the AER. Enforcement of an approval includes enforcement of the conditions attached to that licence. Sanctions imposed for the breach of such conditions can include the suspension of the approval, resulting in the shut-in of a facility. The conditions imposed on the licence are summarized below. The Panel notes that Dover has made certain promises and commitments (collectively referred to as commitments) to parties involving activities or operations that are not strictly required under AER requirements. These commitments are separate arrangements between the parties and do not constitute conditions of the AER’s approval of the application. The commitments that have been given some weight by the Panel are summarized below. The Panel expects the applicant to comply with commitments made to all parties. However, while the Panel has considered these commitments in arriving at its decision, the Panel cannot enforce them. If the applicant does not comply with commitments made, affected parties can request a review of the original approval. At that time, the AER will assess whether the circumstances of any failed commitment warrant a review of the original approval. CONDITIONS The Panel notes the following commitments made by Dover, which the Panel has decided to make conditions of the approval [see paragraph 131]:
- Plant-wide fugitive emissions will be identified and controlled using the protocol recommended by the Environmental Code of Practice for the Measurement and Control of Fugitive Emissions from Equipment Leaks (Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment, 1993).
- A leak detection and repair system will be implemented.
- A program will be developed and implemented to detect and repair leaks, and that program must meet or exceed the CAPP Best Management Practice for Fugitive Emissions Management.
- A low oxides of nitrogen emissions technology will be selected as required by the Alberta Interim Emission Guidelines for Oxides of Nitrogen for New Boilers, Heaters and Turbines using Gaseous Fuels for the Oil Sands Region (Alberta Environment, 2007).
- VRU will be used to reduce hydrocarbon emissions.
- There will be no continuous flaring other than of pilot and purge gas.
- Odour indicator species will be continuously monitored.
- A protocol must developed for responding to odours, including investigating the source of the odour, notifying communities near the Project, addressing the odour source, and monitoring to verify that the source of the odour has been addressed. The Panel also requires the following:
- Dover must provide a plan to mitigate SO2 emissions and meet AER Interim Directive 2001-03 on a project-wide basis. The plan must be submitted to the AER for review. [See paragraph 129.]
- The scheme approval must include directional and motion-sensitive lighting at the plant sites, well pads, and associated facilities. [See paragraph 137.] COMMITMENTS BY DOVER
- Dover committed to a coordinated approach to wildlife monitoring in the region and to a deer and wolf management program in collaboration with ESRD and other in situ operators. To reduce effects on caribou habitat, Dover proposed on-site mitigations that reflect standard industry practices, as well as an off-site caribou habitat enhancement program. [See paragraph 72.]
- Dover indicated that it would manage access to its Project at a gate located about 30 km southwest of Fort McKay IR174. Dover noted that there will be control gates at each of its processing plants, but that these plant sites are only small areas of the Project. Dover also committed to restricting access to its operations and prohibiting workers residing in its camp from using all-terrain vehicles for recreational use while on site. [See paragraph 84.]
- Dover committed to accommodating Fort McKay members who wish to access their traditional lands through the Project area. [See paragraph 150.]
- Location
- 00-00-093-16W4
- 00-00-094-17W4
- 00-00-095-17W4
- 00-13-092-15W4
Decision 2018-005
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision4561
- Applicant
- Prosper Petroleum Ltd.
- Application Number
- 1778538
- 001-341659
- 00370772-001
- Title
- Decision 2018-005 : Prosper Petroleum Ltd. Rigel project
- Date
- 2018
- Title
- Decision 2018-005 : Prosper Petroleum Ltd. Rigel project
- Date
- 2018
- Applicant
- Prosper Petroleum Ltd.
- Application Number
- 1778538
- 001-341659
- 00370772-001
- Hearing Panel
- Low CA
- Macken C
- Engen T
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Category
- Oil sands
- Descriptors
- Law and legislation
- Oil Sands Conservation Act
- Oil sands
- Environment protection - citizen participation
- Environment protection - Law and Legislation
- Recovery
- Environmental impact assessment
- Wildlife
- Athabasca area
- Reclamation
- Emission
- Air quality
- Land use
- Economic analysis
- Transportation
- Development
- Legal References
- Responsible Energy Development Act (REDA)
- Energy Resources Conservation Act
- Oil Sands Conservation Act
- Water Act
- Notes
- Change to legal citation effective January 2011
- Interveners
- Fort McKay First Nation
- Approval
- Approved with conditions
- Conditions
- 1) Prosper will place coarse woody debris to restrict access to existing linear disturbances that intersect its access road. 2) Prosper will prohibit firearms, fishing gear, pets and personal ATVs in Prosper’s Rigel project camps and worksites throughout the construction and operation phases of the Rigel project. 3) Prosper will install pumps at well pads and the CPF in buildings to reduce their noise contribution. 4) Prosper will notify Fort McKay First Nation, Fort McKay Métis and any other group Prosper chooses about planned events that may generate more noise than usual. 5) Prosper will establish a toll free line so anyone can access information on daily activities for the Rigel project and register any complaint or concern. 6) If Fort McKay Métis or Fort McKay First Nation shares with Prosper the specific location of a trail or traditional use site located within the Prosper lease, Prosper will work with the relevant community to avoid or mitigate any impacts to that site.
- Location
- ##-20-096-17W4
- ##-21-096-17W4
Decision Memorandum of Decision 1987-01-12
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision234
- Applicant
- Canadian Occidental Petroleum Ltd.
- Application Number
- 860544
- Title
- Memorandum of Decision on request for postponement of a hearing by Canadian Occidental Petroleum Ltd., 1987
- Date
- 1987
- Title
- Memorandum of Decision on request for postponement of a hearing by Canadian Occidental Petroleum Ltd., 1987
- Date
- 1987
- Applicant
- Canadian Occidental Petroleum Ltd.
- Application Number
- 860544
- Hearing Type
- Prehearing
- Category
- Gas processing
- Descriptors
- Gas processing plant
- Pembina field
- Sour gas
- Citizen participation
- Ellerslie member
- Environmental impact
- Expansion
- Mediation
- Negotiation
- NTS 83B
- Sulphur dioxide
- Notes
- Application submitted April 1986 for approval to process sour gas at an existing sweet gas plant located in LSD 5-35-48-4 W5M
- Meeting held 1987-01-12 to set date for rescheduled hearing to be held 1987-02-24
- Interveners
- Keystone Concerned Citizens
- Appelt AG
- Location
- 05-35-048-04W5
Decision Memorandum of Decision 1987-09-11
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision205
- Applicant
- Energy Resources Conservation Board
- Application Number
- 871318
- Title
- Memorandum of Decision on planning meeting on ethane policy implementation, 1987
- Date
- 1987
- Title
- Memorandum of Decision on planning meeting on ethane policy implementation, 1987
- Date
- 1987
- Applicant
- Energy Resources Conservation Board
- Application Number
- 871318
- Hearing Type
- Prehearing
- Category
- Ethane
- Notes
- Memorandum of Decision on proceeding No. 871318 to determine, at a public meeting held 1987-09-01, the most effective way for the ERCB to consider and report on the policy statement on ethane issued 1987-08-21; public meeting held 1987-09-01
- Interveners
- Alberta Gas Ethylene Company Ltd.
- Alberta Natural Gas Company
- Alberta and Southern Gas Co. Ltd.
- Amerada Minerals Corporation of Canada Ltd.
- Amoco Canada Petroleum Company Ltd.
- Anderson Exploration Ltd.
- Canadian Hunter Exploration Ltd.
- CanStates Energy
- Chevron Canada Resources Limited
- Conoco Canada Limited
- Dome Petroleum Limited
- Dow Chemical Canada Inc.
- Esso Resources Canada Limited
- Gulf Canada Resources Limited
- Home Oil Company Limited
- PanCanadian Petroleum Limited
- Petro-Canada Inc.
- Shell Canada Limited
- Sulpetro Ltd.
- Texaco Canada Resources
- Williamson HD
- Putnam MA
- Meghani MA
- Mustard RW
- Williamson AH
- Booth RT
- Robb CJ
- Pashelka RA
- Dachis D
- McLarty AL
- Neufeld RA
- Henry DJ
- Caffrey JT
- Hooker HL
- Murray PR
- Hope-Ross WJ
- Riegert RW
- Lane RR
- Muscoby W
Decision Memorandum of Decision 1988-09-19
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision159
- Applicant
- Norcen Energy Resources Ltd.
- Application Number
- 861041
- Title
- Memorandum of Decision on application by Norcen Energy Resources Ltd., 1988 (Campbell-Namao gas processing plant)
- Date
- 1988
- Title
- Memorandum of Decision on application by Norcen Energy Resources Ltd., 1988 (Campbell-Namao gas processing plant)
- Date
- 1988
- Applicant
- Norcen Energy Resources Ltd.
- Application Number
- 861041
- Hearing Type
- Prehearing
- Category
- Gas processing
- Descriptors
- Campbell Namao field
- Gas processing plant
- Sour gas
- Agricultural land
- Air quality
- Citizen participation
- Emission
- Encroachment
- Environmental impact
- Locating
- NTS 73H
- Sulphur dioxide
- Sulphur recovery
- Urban development
- Notes
- Memorandum of Decision on application No. 861041 to amend the application for a gas processing plant, heard and recommended for approval in March 1987 (D87-9); amendment would provide for installation of facilities for the complete removal and recovery of sulphurous compounds; hearing to be reopened 1988-11-08/09; pre-hearing meeting held 1988-09-19
Decision Memorandum of Decision 2000-05-09
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision3198
- Applicant
- Ludwig
- Boonstra
- Schilthuis
- Wright
- Bryzgorni
- Johnstone
- Scott WO
- Title
- Memorandum of Decision 2000-05-09 : Response to Inquiry request from the Ludwig, Schilthuis, Boonstra, Wraight, Bryzgorni, and Johnstone families and Dr. W.O. Scott
- Date
- 2000
- Title
- Memorandum of Decision 2000-05-09 : Response to Inquiry request from the Ludwig, Schilthuis, Boonstra, Wraight, Bryzgorni, and Johnstone families and Dr. W.O. Scott
- Date
- 2000
- Hearing Type
- Prehearing
- Category
- Inquiry
- Descriptors
- Air pollution
- Agricultural land
- Citizen participation
- Gas flaring
- Health
- Inquiry
- NTS 83M
- Safety
- Sour gas
- Sulphur recovery
- Water pollution
- Legal References
- Energy Resources Conservation Act S22
- Notes
- Letter received on behalf Ludwig, Schilthuis, Boonstra, Wraight, Bryzgorni, and Johnstone families and Dr. W.O. Scott requesting that the EUB hold an inquiry into oil and gas activity in the Hythe and Beaverlodge areas pursuant to Section 22 of the Energy Resources Conservation Act; letter expressed health and environmental complaints about emissions from petroleum operations in the area, as well as concern about increasing community frustration and intentional damage to petroleum facilities
- No Board hearing
- Approval
- Denied