Narrow Results By
Applicant
- Alberta Ammonia Limited 2
- Alberta Energy Company Limited 5
- Alberta Gas Chemicals Limited 3
- Alberta Gas Ethylene Company Limited 2
- Alberta Gas Trunk Line Company Limited 2
- Biewag Energy Resources Ltd. 2
- C.I.L. Inc. 1
- CE Alberta BioClean Ltd. 1
- Calgary Power Ltd. 3
- Canadian Fertilizers Limited 1
- Canadian Industries Limited 1
- Celanese Canada Inc. 1
Decision 75-F
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2362
- Applicant
- PanCanadian Petroleum Limited
- Alberta Ammonia Limited
- Application Number
- 8009
- 7907
- Title
- Decision on application by PanCanadian Petroleum Limited, 1975 (ammonia plant near Brooks) and Decision on application by Alberta Ammonia Ltd., 1975 (ammonia plant near Raymond)
- Date
- 1975
- Title
- Decision on application by PanCanadian Petroleum Limited, 1975 (ammonia plant near Brooks) and Decision on application by Alberta Ammonia Ltd., 1975 (ammonia plant near Raymond)
- Date
- 1975
- Application Number
- 8009
- 7907
- Hearing Panel
- Govier GW
- Millard V
- DeSorcy GJ
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Category
- Industrial development permit
- Descriptors
- Ammonia
- Brooks area
- Chemical plant
- Fertilizer
- Industrial development permit
- Petrochemical industry
- Raymond area
- Alberta
- Benefit cost analysis
- Economic analysis
- Environmental impact
- Fuel consumption
- Gas consumption
- Natural gas - fuel
- Natural gas - raw material
- NTS 72L
- NTS 82H
- Socio-economic effect
- Legal References
- Oil and Gas Conservation Act S42
- Notes
- ERCB report 75-F on application No. 8009 (Alberta ammonia) to use gas as raw material and fuel to produce anhydrous ammonia in plant near Raymond (request for Order-in-Council withdrawn) and on application No. 7907 (PanCanadian) to use gas as raw material and fuel to produce anhydrous ammonia in plant near Brooks (application withdrawn); Board hearing 1974-09-30, 1974-10-01/02/16; see also ERCB report 75-FA for supplementary information.
Decision 75-FA
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2361
- Applicant
- PanCanadian Petroleum Limited
- Alberta Ammonia Limited
- Application Number
- 8009
- 7907
- Title
- Decision on application by PanCanadian Petroleum Limited, 1975 (ammonia plant Decision on application by Alberta Ammonia Ltd. (ammonia plant near Raymond) (section 42 of the Oil and Gas Conservation Act)
- Date
- 1975
- Title
- Decision on application by PanCanadian Petroleum Limited, 1975 (ammonia plant Decision on application by Alberta Ammonia Ltd. (ammonia plant near Raymond) (section 42 of the Oil and Gas Conservation Act)
- Date
- 1975
- Application Number
- 8009
- 7907
- Hearing Panel
- N/A
- Hearing Type
- N/A
- Category
- Industrial development permit
- Descriptors
- Ammonia
- Brooks area
- Chemical plant
- Fertilizer
- Industrial development permit
- Petrochemical industry
- Raymond area
- Alberta
- Benefit cost analysis
- Economic analysis
- Environmental impact
- Fuel consumption
- Gas consumption
- Natural gas - fuel
- Natural gas - raw material
- NTS 72L
- NTS 82H
- Socio-economic effect
- Legal References
- Oil and Gas Conservation Act S42
- Notes
- ERCB report 75-FA supplementing ERCB report 75-F
Decision 75-G
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2360
- Applicant
- Canadian Fertilizers Limited
- Application Number
- 8162
- Title
- Decision on application by Canadian Fertilizers Limited, 1975 (Oil and Gas Conservation Act, Section 42 for ammonia plant at Medicine Hat)
- Date
- 1975
- Title
- Decision on application by Canadian Fertilizers Limited, 1975 (Oil and Gas Conservation Act, Section 42 for ammonia plant at Medicine Hat)
- Date
- 1975
- Applicant
- Canadian Fertilizers Limited
- Application Number
- 8162
- Hearing Panel
- Govier GW
- Millard V
- DeSorcy GJ
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Category
- Industrial development permit
- Descriptors
- Ammonia
- Chemical plant
- Fertilizer
- Industrial development permit
- Medicine Hat area
- Petrochemical industry
- Urea
- Alberta
- Benefit cost analysis
- Economic analysis
- Environmental impact
- ERCB 75-F
- ID-74-01
- Fuel consumption
- Gas consumption
- Natural gas - fuel
- Natural gas - raw material
- NTS 72L
- Socio-economic effect
- Legal References
- Oil and Gas Conservation Act S42
- Notes
- ERCB report 75-G on application No. 8162 to use gas as a raw material and fuel to produce ammonia in plant at Medicine Hat (section 14-13-6 W4); Board hearing 1974-12-16/17/18; permit No. CFL 75-1
Decision 75-N
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2353
- Applicant
- Alberta Gas Ethylene Company Limited
- Dupont of Canada Limited
- Dow Chemical of Canada Limited
- Canadian Industries Limited
- Application Number
- 8491
- 8514
- 8549
- 8554
- Title
- Decision on application by Alberta Gas Ethylene Company Ltd., Dupont of Canada Limited, Dow Chemical Of Canada Limited and Canadian Industries Limited, 1975 (Oil and Gas Conservation Act, section 42)
- Date
- 1975
- Title
- Decision on application by Alberta Gas Ethylene Company Ltd., Dupont of Canada Limited, Dow Chemical Of Canada Limited and Canadian Industries Limited, 1975 (Oil and Gas Conservation Act, section 42)
- Date
- 1975
- Applicant
- Alberta Gas Ethylene Company Limited
- Dupont of Canada Limited
- Dow Chemical of Canada Limited
- Canadian Industries Limited
- Application Number
- 8491
- 8514
- 8549
- 8554
- Hearing Panel
- Govier GW
- Millard V
- DeSorcy GJ
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Category
- Industrial development permit
- Descriptors
- Chemical plant
- Chloroethylene
- Dichloroethane
- Ethylene
- Fort Saskatchewan area
- Industrial development permit
- Joffre area
- Polymer
- Red Deer area
- Redwater area
- Alberta
- Chlorine - raw material
- Economic analysis
- Environmental impact
- Ethane - raw material
- Ethylene - raw material
- Natural gas - fuel
- NTS 83A
- NTS 83H
- Socio-economic effect
- Legal References
- Oil and Gas Conservation Act S42
- Notes
- ERCB report 75-N on application No. 8491 (A.G.E.) to use ethane and gas as fuel and raw material to produce ethylene near Red Deer (A.G.E. unit 1) (permit No. age 76-1) and on application No. 8514 (Dupont) to use gas as fuel in production of high density polyethylene near Red Deer (application withdrawn) and on application No. 8549 (Dow) to use gas as fuel in vinyl chloride monomer plant near Fort Saskatchewan (permit no.DCC 76-1) and on application No. 8554 (CIL) to use gas as fuel in a low density polyethylene plant near Redwater (application withdrawn); Board hearing (age & Dupont); 1975-06-18/19/20 Board hearing (Dow & CIL) 1975-07-09.
Decision 76-B
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2386
- Applicant
- Dow Chemical of Canada Limited
- Application Number
- 9118
- Title
- Decision on application by Dow Chemical Of Canada Limited, 1976 (For industrial development permit under section 42 of the Oil and Gas Conservation Act)
- Date
- 1976
- Title
- Decision on application by Dow Chemical Of Canada Limited, 1976 (For industrial development permit under section 42 of the Oil and Gas Conservation Act)
- Date
- 1976
- Applicant
- Dow Chemical of Canada Limited
- Application Number
- 9118
- Hearing Panel
- Millard V
- Berkowitz N
- DeSorcy GJ
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Category
- Industrial development permit
- Descriptors
- Chemical plant
- Ethylene glycol
- Ethylene oxide
- Fort Saskatchewan area
- Industrial development permit
- Alberta
- Natural gas - fuel
- NTS 83H
- Legal References
- Oil and Gas Conservation Act S42
- Notes
- ERCB report 76-B on application No. 9118 for an IDP to use gas as fuel to produce ethylene glycol and ethylene oxide in plant to be constructed at Fort Saskatchewan (permit DCC 76-2).
Decision 76-E
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2383
- Applicant
- Alberta Gas Chemicals Limited
- Application Number
- 8744
- Title
- Decision on application by Alberta Gas Chemicals Ltd., 1976 (Oil and Gas Conservation Act, section 42)
- Date
- 1976
- Title
- Decision on application by Alberta Gas Chemicals Ltd., 1976 (Oil and Gas Conservation Act, section 42)
- Date
- 1976
- Applicant
- Alberta Gas Chemicals Limited
- Application Number
- 8744
- Hearing Panel
- Millard V
- Berkowitz N
- DeSorcy GJ
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Category
- Industrial development permit
- Descriptors
- Chemical plant
- Industrial development permit
- Medicine Hat area
- ETHANOL
- Benefit cost analysis
- Capitalized cost
- Economic analysis
- Efficiency
- Gas supply
- Marketing
- Natural gas - fuel
- Natural gas - raw material
- NTS 72E
- Raw material
- Socio-economic effect
- Legal References
- Oil and Gas Conservation Act S42
- Notes
- ERCB report 76-E on application No. 8744 to use gas as raw material and fuel to produce methanol in a plant to be constructed near Medicine Hat (permit AGC 77-1); Board hearing 1976-01-28/29
Decision 76-G
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2381
- Applicant
- Dow Chemical of Canada Limited
- Application Number
- 9222
- Title
- Decision on application by Dow Chemical Of Canada Limited, 1976 (power plant at Fort Saskatchewan)
- Date
- 1976
- Title
- Decision on application by Dow Chemical Of Canada Limited, 1976 (power plant at Fort Saskatchewan)
- Date
- 1976
- Applicant
- Dow Chemical of Canada Limited
- Application Number
- 9222
- Hearing Panel
- Millard V
- Berkowitz N
- DeSorcy GJ
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Utilities
- Category
- Electric power
- Descriptors
- Electric power project
- Fort Saskatchewan area
- Chemical plant
- Electric power demand
- Electric power supply
- Environmental impact
- Industrial plant
- NTS 83H
- Legal References
- Hydro and Electric Energy Act S7
- Hydro and Electric Energy Act S14
- Notes
- ERCB Report 76-G on application 9222 to construct and operate a 140 mw power plant at its Fort Saskatchewan chemical processing complex (in TP.55, R.22, W4M) and to connect the power plant to Calgary Power's transmission system; See also Report 76-I for decision on use of gas as fuel to increase production of chlorine and sodium hydroxide
Decision 76-I
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2379
- Applicant
- Dow Chemical of Canada Limited
- Application Number
- 9493
- Title
- Decision on application by Dow Chemical Of Canada Limited, 1976 (Oil and Gas Conservation Act, section 42)
- Date
- 1976
- Title
- Decision on application by Dow Chemical Of Canada Limited, 1976 (Oil and Gas Conservation Act, section 42)
- Date
- 1976
- Applicant
- Dow Chemical of Canada Limited
- Application Number
- 9493
- Hearing Panel
- Millard V
- Hearing Type
- Board
- No Hearing
- Category
- Industrial development permit
- Descriptors
- Chemical plant
- Chlorine
- Fort Saskatchewan area
- Industrial development permit
- Sodium hydroxide
- Economic analysis
- Fuel consumption
- Gas consumption
- Natural gas - fuel
- NTS 83H
- Legal References
- Oil and Gas Conservation Act S42
- Notes
- ERCB report 76-I on application No. 9493 for an industrial development permit authorizing the use of natural gas as fuel in the production of chlorine and caustic soda in an existing plant in the Dow complex at Fort Saskatchewan that would be expanded to increase capacity; no hearing; see also report 76-G for Decision on power plant for the complex.
Decision 77-10
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2138
- Applicant
- Alberta Gas Trunk Line Company Limited
- Dome Petroleum Limited
- Application Number
- 770084
- Title
- Decision on application by Alberta Gas Trunk Line Company Limited and Dome Petroleum Limited, 1977 (construct a pipeline from Cochrane to Red Deer)
- Date
- 1977
- Title
- Decision on application by Alberta Gas Trunk Line Company Limited and Dome Petroleum Limited, 1977 (construct a pipeline from Cochrane to Red Deer)
- Date
- 1977
- Application Number
- 770084
- Hearing Panel
- Craig DR
- Millard V
- DeSorcy GJ
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Category
- Pipelines
- Descriptors
- Butane
- Ethane
- Cochrane area
- Oil pipeline
- Pipeline construction permit
- Pentanes plus
- Propane
- Red Deer area
- Chemical plant
- Environmental impact
- NTS 82P
- NTS 83A
- Pipeline design
- Pipeline route
- Safety
- Legal References
- Pipeline Act
- Notes
- Decision 77-10 on application No. 770084 to construct an oil line to transport ethane, propane, butane and pentanes plus from a point in the NE quarter of section 16, TP.26, R.4 (W5M) near Cochrane to a point in the NW quarter of section 8, TP.38, R.25 (W4M) near Red Deer as part of the Alberta ethane gathering system to provide a continous supply of ethane to the age plant at Joffre.
- Interveners
- Alberta Natural Gas Company Ltd.
- Beddoes, J.L.
Decision 77-C
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2373
- Applicant
- Alberta Energy Company Limited
- Hudson's Bay Oil and Gas Company Limited
- Mitsubishi Petrochemical Company Limited
- Mitsubishi Corporation
- Petalta Project (Petrochemicals Alberta Project)
- Alberta Gas Trunk Line Company Limited
- Dow Chemical of Canada Limited
- Alberta Gas Chemicals Limited
- Application Number
- 9070
- 8911
- Title
- Decision on application by Petalta Project (Alberta Energy Company Ltd, Hudson's Bay Oil And Gas Company Limited, Mitsubishi Petrochemical Company Limited, and Mitsubishi Corporation), 1977 (benzene plant) and Decision on application by Alberta Gas Trunk Line, Dow Chemical Of Canada Limited and Alberta Gas Chemicals Ltd., 1977 (benzene plant)
- Date
- 1977
- Title
- Decision on application by Petalta Project (Alberta Energy Company Ltd, Hudson's Bay Oil And Gas Company Limited, Mitsubishi Petrochemical Company Limited, and Mitsubishi Corporation), 1977 (benzene plant) and Decision on application by Alberta Gas Trunk Line, Dow Chemical Of Canada Limited and Alberta Gas Chemicals Ltd., 1977 (benzene plant)
- Date
- 1977
- Applicant
- Alberta Energy Company Limited
- Hudson's Bay Oil and Gas Company Limited
- Mitsubishi Petrochemical Company Limited
- Mitsubishi Corporation
- Petalta Project (Petrochemicals Alberta Project)
- Alberta Gas Trunk Line Company Limited
- Dow Chemical of Canada Limited
- Alberta Gas Chemicals Limited
- Application Number
- 9070
- 8911
- Hearing Panel
- Craig DR
- Berkowitz N
- DeSorcy GJ
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Category
- Industrial development permit
- Descriptors
- Benzene
- Bruderheim area
- Chemical plant
- Fort Saskatchewan area
- Industrial development permit
- Petalta Project (Petrochemicals Alberta Project)
- Benefit cost analysis
- Economic analysis
- NTS 83H
- Pentanes plus - fuel
- Pentanes plus - raw material
- Socio-economic effect
- Legal References
- Oil and Gas Conservation Act S42
- Notes
- ERCB report 77-C on application No. 9070 by AEC et al (Petalta) for a plant to be located near Fort Saskatchewan to convert pentanes plus to benzene and liquid byproducts and on application No. 8911 by AGTL et al for a plant to be constructed near Bruderheim to convert pentanes plus to benzene and liquid byproduct (including gasoline or diesel fuel); Board hearing (Petalta project APP # 9070) 1976-06-15/16 and 1976-07-05; Board hearing (AGTL Bruderheim APP # 8911) 1977-07-06/07/08/09
Decision 77-H
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2368
- Applicant
- Turbo Resources Limited
- Application Number
- 770040
- Title
- Decision on application by Turbo Resources Limited, 1977 (Oil and Gas Conservation Act, section 42)
- Date
- 1977
- Title
- Decision on application by Turbo Resources Limited, 1977 (Oil and Gas Conservation Act, section 42)
- Date
- 1977
- Applicant
- Turbo Resources Limited
- Application Number
- 770040
- Hearing Panel
- Millard V
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Category
- Industrial development permit
- Descriptors
- Benzene
- Chemical plant
- Edmonton area
- Gas
- Industrial development permit
- Naphtha
- Petroleum product
- Toluene
- Crude oil - raw material
- Economic analysis
- ERCB 77-C
- NTS 83H
- Pentanes plus - raw material
- Legal References
- Oil and Gas Conservation Act S42
- Notes
- ERCB report 77-H on application No. 770040 (application subsequently withdrawn) for an IDP to use crude oil and pentanes plus to manufacture benzene-toluene (BT) naptha, motor gasoline, recycled lube oils and other by-products in a plant to be constructed 3 miles east of Edmonton; Board hearing 1977-05-04/05
Decision 78-23
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2097
- Applicant
- Petrochemicals Alberta Project
- Application Number
- 780591
- Title
- Decision on application by Petrochemicals Alberta Project, 1978 (amendment of industrial development permit No. PAP 78-1)
- Date
- 1978
- Title
- Decision on application by Petrochemicals Alberta Project, 1978 (amendment of industrial development permit No. PAP 78-1)
- Date
- 1978
- Applicant
- Petrochemicals Alberta Project
- Application Number
- 780591
- Hearing Panel
- N/A
- Hearing Type
- N/A
- No Hearing
- Category
- Industrial development permit
- Descriptors
- Benzene
- Chemical plant
- Fort Saskatchewan area
- Industrial development permit
- Benefit cost analysis
- Natural gas - raw material
- NTS 83G
- Pentanes plus - raw material
- Revision
- Legal References
- Oil and Gas Conservation Act S42
- Notes
- Decision 78-23 on application No. 780591 to amend IDP No. PAP 78-1 to decrease use of pentanes plus as raw material and increase use of natural gas as raw material; no hearing; see also related ERCB reports 77-C and 77-H
Decision 78-A
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2335
- Applicant
- Celanese Canada Limited
- Application Number
- 770700
- Title
- Decision on application by Celanese Canada Limited, 1978 (Oil And Gas Conservation Act, section 42)
- Date
- 1978
- Title
- Decision on application by Celanese Canada Limited, 1978 (Oil And Gas Conservation Act, section 42)
- Date
- 1978
- Applicant
- Celanese Canada Limited
- Application Number
- 770700
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Category
- Industrial development permit
- Descriptors
- Chemical plant
- Clover Bar area
- Industrial development permit
- Vinyl acetate
- Acetic acid
- Benefit cost analysis
- Cost analysis
- Economic analysis
- ERCB 76-B
- ERCB 74-W
- Ethylene - raw material
- Natural gas - fuel
- NTS 83H
- Raw material
- Legal References
- Oil and Gas Conservation Act S42
- Notes
- ERCB report 78-A on application No. 770700 to use ethylene and acetic acid as raw material and gas as fuel to produce vinyl acetate monomer in a plant to be constructed on celanese existing plant site at Clover BAR (section 17, TP.53, R.23 W4M); permit No. CCL 78-1
Decision 80-17
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2022
- Applicant
- ESSO Chemical Canada
- Application Number
- 800304
- Title
- Decision on application by ESSO Chemical Canada, 1980 (industrial development permit to manufacture ammonia and urea)
- Date
- 1980
- Title
- Decision on application by ESSO Chemical Canada, 1980 (industrial development permit to manufacture ammonia and urea)
- Date
- 1980
- Applicant
- ESSO Chemical Canada
- Application Number
- 800304
- Hearing Panel
- Millard V
- Berkowitz N
- Webber HJ
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Category
- Industrial development permit
- Descriptors
- Ammonia
- Chemical plant
- Industrial development permit
- Redwater area
- Urea
- Benefit cost analysis
- Expansion
- Gas supply
- Natural gas - fuel
- Natural gas - raw material
- NTS 83H
- Socio-economic effect
- Legal References
- Oil and Gas Conservation Act S42
- Notes
- Decision 80-17 on application No. 800304 to use gas in the manufacture of ammonia at existing plant near Redwater and ammonia and urea at an expansion of this facility (section 17 & 20, TP.56, R.21, W4M); Board hearing 1980-07-28/29
- Interveners
- Sherritt Gordon Mines Limited
Decision 81-03
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2005
- Applicant
- Alberta Energy Company Limited
- ESSO Chemical Canada
- Shell Canada Limited
- Nova, an Alberta Corporation
- Application Number
- 800530
- 800733
- Title
- Decision on application by Alberta Energy Company Ltd. and Esso Chemical Canada and Shell Canada Limited and Nova, an Alberta Corporation, 1981 (styrene monomer production)
- Date
- 1981
- Title
- Decision on application by Alberta Energy Company Ltd. and Esso Chemical Canada and Shell Canada Limited and Nova, an Alberta Corporation, 1981 (styrene monomer production)
- Date
- 1981
- Applicant
- Alberta Energy Company Limited
- ESSO Chemical Canada
- Shell Canada Limited
- Nova, an Alberta Corporation
- Application Number
- 800530
- 800733
- Hearing Panel
- Berkowitz N
- Bohme VE
- Mink FJ
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Category
- Industrial development permit
- Descriptors
- Bruderheim area
- Chemical plant
- Fort Saskatchewan area
- Industrial development permit
- Styrene
- Benefit cost analysis
- Benzene
- Demand (economics)
- Economic analysis
- Ethylene - raw material
- Marketing
- Natural gas - fuel
- Natural gas - raw material
- NTS 83H
- Raw material
- Socio-economic effect
- Legal References
- Oil and Gas Conservation Act S42
- Notes
- Decision 81-3 on application No. 800530 by AEC/ESSO to use gas, benzene and ethylene to produce styrene monomer in plant to be located adjacent Shell/Husky Strathcona refinery (TP.55-56, R.21, W4M); Board hearing 1980-11-25/26
- Interveners
- C-I-L Inc.
- The Alberta Gas Ethylene Company Ltd.
Decision 81-10
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1998
- Applicant
- Alberta Gas Ethylene Company Limited
- Application Number
- 800853
- Title
- Decision on application by Alberta Gas Ethylene Company Ltd., 1981 (industrial development permit to manufacture ethylene)
- Date
- 1981
- Title
- Decision on application by Alberta Gas Ethylene Company Ltd., 1981 (industrial development permit to manufacture ethylene)
- Date
- 1981
- Applicant
- Alberta Gas Ethylene Company Limited
- Application Number
- 800853
- Hearing Panel
- DeSorcy GJ
- Strom NA
- Webber HJ
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Category
- Industrial development permit
- Descriptors
- Chemical plant
- Ethylene
- Industrial development permit
- Red Deer area
- Air quality
- Benefit cost analysis
- Design criteria
- Emission
- Environmental impact
- Ethane
- Ethane - raw material
- Forecasting
- Land use
- Marketing
- Natural gas - fuel
- Noise (sound)
- NTS 83A
- Pollution
- Raw material
- Socio-economic effect
- Supply (economics)
- Water
- Water quality
- Legal References
- Oil and Gas Conservation Act S42
- Notes
- Decision 81-10 on application No. 800853 to use ethane as feedstock and natural gas as fuel to manufacture ethylene in plant to be constructed (unit 3) adjacent to present facilities (units 1&2) near Joffre (TP.38, R.25, W4M); Board hearing 1981-04-07/08
- Interveners
- Preserve Agricultural Land
- Red Deer Regional Planning Commission
- Hainsworth, B.W.
- Chessor, D.
- Alberta Energy Company Ltd.
- Esso Chemical Canada
- Du Pont Canada Inc.
- Dow Chemical of Canada Limited
- NOVA, AN ALBERTA CORPORATION
- Shell Canada Limited
- Union Carbide Canada Limited
- Dome Petroleum Limited
- Esso Resources Canada Limited
- Gulf Canada Resources Inc.
- Hudson's Bay Oil and Gas Company Limited
- Sulpetro Limited
- Texaco Canada Resources Ltd.
Decision 81-16
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1992
- Applicant
- Nova, an Alberta Corporation
- Shell Canada Limited
- Application Number
- 800910
- Title
- Decision on application by Nova, an Alberta Corporation and Shell Canada Limited, 1981 (industrial development permit to manufacture polyethylene)
- Date
- 1981
- Title
- Decision on application by Nova, an Alberta Corporation and Shell Canada Limited, 1981 (industrial development permit to manufacture polyethylene)
- Date
- 1981
- Application Number
- 800910
- Hearing Panel
- DeSorcy GJ
- Strom NA
- Webber HJ
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Category
- Industrial development permit
- Descriptors
- Chemical plant
- Ethylene homopolymer
- Industrial development permit
- Red Deer area
- Demand (economics)
- Economic analysis
- Environmental impact
- Ethylene - raw material
- Land use
- Locating
- Marketing
- Natural gas - fuel
- Noise (sound)
- NTS 83A
- Plant location
- Pollution
- Socio-economic effect
- Supply (economics)
- Water quality
- Water supply
- Notes
- Decision 81-16 on application No. 800910 to use ethylene as feedstock and gas as fuel to manufacture polyethylene at a LINEAR low-density polyethylene plant to be constructed on the site of Alberta gas ethylene'S existing ethylene plant east of Red Deer (TP.38-40, R.23-27, W4M).
- Interveners
- Preserve Agricultural Land
- Alberta Institute of Agrologists Red Deer Branch
- F.E.M. Farms
- Hainsworth, J.W.
- Federation of Alberta Naturalists Land Use Committee
- Red Deer Regional Planning Commission
- Dow Chemical of Canada Limited
- Union Carbide Canada Limited
- Alberta Energy Company Ltd.
- Du Pont Canada Inc.
- Esso Chemical Canada
Decision 81-17
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1991
- Applicant
- Alberta Energy Company Limited
- Dupont Canada Inc.
- Application Number
- 801017
- Title
- Decision on application by Alberta Energy Company Ltd. and Dupont Canada Inc., 1981 (industrial development permit to manufacture polyethylene)
- Date
- 1981
- Title
- Decision on application by Alberta Energy Company Ltd. and Dupont Canada Inc., 1981 (industrial development permit to manufacture polyethylene)
- Date
- 1981
- Application Number
- 801017
- Hearing Panel
- Millard V
- Goodman CJ
- Webber HJ
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Category
- Industrial development permit
- Descriptors
- Chemical plant
- Ethylene homopolymer
- Industrial development permit
- Redwater area
- Demand (economics)
- Economic analysis
- Ethylene - raw material
- Locating
- Marketing
- Natural gas - fuel
- NTS 83H
- Plant location
- Socio-economic effect
- Supply (economics)
- Legal References
- Oil and Gas Conservation Act S42
- Notes
- Decision 81-17 on application No. 801017 to use ethylene as feedstock and gas as fuel to manufacture polyethylene at a plant to be constructed near Redwater (TP.56, R.21-22, W4M); Board hearing 1981-07-07/08
- Interveners
- Alberta Gas Chemicals Ltd.
- C-I-L Inc.
- Trimac Limited
- Town of Gibbons
- Council of the Town of Redwater
- Dow Chemical of Canada, Limited
- Minchau, D.
- Minchau, C.
- Municipal District of Sturgeon No. 90
- NOVA, AN ALBERTA CORPORATION
- Shell Canada Limited
- Smulski, K.
- The Alberta Gas Ethylene Company Ltd.
- Union Carbide Canada Limited
Decision 81-22
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1986
- Applicant
- C.I.L. Inc.
- Trimac Ltd.
- Application Number
- 800908
- Title
- Decision on application by C.I.L. Inc. and Trimac Ltd., 1981 (industrial development permit to manufacture polyethylene)
- Date
- 1981
- Title
- Decision on application by C.I.L. Inc. and Trimac Ltd., 1981 (industrial development permit to manufacture polyethylene)
- Date
- 1981
- Applicant
- C.I.L. Inc.
- Trimac Ltd.
- Application Number
- 800908
- Hearing Panel
- Berkowitz N
- Goodman CJ
- Strom NA
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Category
- Industrial development permit
- Descriptors
- Chemical plant
- Edmonton area
- Ethylene homopolymer
- Industrial development permit
- Benefit cost analysis
- Demand (economics)
- Economic analysis
- Ethylene - raw material
- Marketing
- Natural gas - fuel
- NTS 83H
- Socio-economic effect
- Supply (economics)
- Legal References
- Oil and Gas Conservation Act S42
- Notes
- Decision 81-22 on application No. 800908 to use ethylene as feedstock and gas as fuel to manufacture polyethylene in a new plant to be constructed on site of applicant's existing plant site in Edmonton (section 36-52-24 W4M).
- Interveners
- Alberta Energy Company Ltd.
- Esso Chemical of Canada
- Du Pont Canada Inc.
- The Alberta Gas Ethylene Company Ltd.
Decision 81-24
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1984
- Applicant
- Union Carbide Canada Limited
- Application Number
- 800889
- Title
- Decision on application by Union Carbide Canada Limited, 1981 (industrial development permit to manufacture ethylene glycol)
- Date
- 1981
- Title
- Decision on application by Union Carbide Canada Limited, 1981 (industrial development permit to manufacture ethylene glycol)
- Date
- 1981
- Applicant
- Union Carbide Canada Limited
- Application Number
- 800889
- Hearing Panel
- DeSorcy GJ
- Bohme VE
- Goodman CJ
- McAndrews CJ
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Category
- Industrial development permit
- Descriptors
- Chemical plant
- Ethylene glycol
- Industrial development permit
- Prentiss area
- Agricultural land
- Conflict
- Demand (economics)
- Economic analysis
- Energy development
- Environmental impact
- Ethylene - raw material
- Land use
- Locating
- Marketing
- Natural gas - fuel
- NTS 83A
- Plant location
- Socio-economic effect
- Supply (economics)
- Water supply
- Legal References
- Oil and Gas Conservation Act S42
- Notes
- Decision 81-24 on application No. 800889 to use ethylene as feedstock and gas as fuel to produce ethylene glycol in a new plant to be constructed near Prentiss (section 30-39-25 W4M); Board hearing 1981-04-14/15/16/20/21
- Interveners
- Preserve Agricultural Land
- Craigievar Farms
- Unifarm
- Christian Farmers Federation
- Red Deer Board of the Alberta Institute of Agrologists
- Superior Sod Farms
- F.E.M. Farms Ltd.
- Carlyle, R.J.
- Friesen, G.
- Hainsworth, J.W.
- Russell, M.
- Russell, E.
- Low, D.C.
- Chessor, D.
- Sather, A.P.
- Red Deer River Regional Planning Commission
- Buffalo Lake Regional Resources Project
- Alix Chamber of Commerce
- Village of Mirror
- Alberta Energy Company Ltd.
- Esso Chemical Canada
- Du Pont Canada Inc.
- Alberta Gas Ethylene Company Ltd.
- NOVA, AN ALBERTA CORPORATION
- Shell Canada Limited