41 records – page 1 of 3.

Decision 75-F

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2362
Applicant
PanCanadian Petroleum Limited
Alberta Ammonia Limited
Application Number
8009
7907
Title
Decision on application by PanCanadian Petroleum Limited, 1975 (ammonia plant near Brooks) and Decision on application by Alberta Ammonia Ltd., 1975 (ammonia plant near Raymond)
Date
1975
Title
Decision on application by PanCanadian Petroleum Limited, 1975 (ammonia plant near Brooks) and Decision on application by Alberta Ammonia Ltd., 1975 (ammonia plant near Raymond)
Date
1975
Applicant
PanCanadian Petroleum Limited
Alberta Ammonia Limited
Application Number
8009
7907
Hearing Panel
Govier GW
Millard V
DeSorcy GJ
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Industrial development permit
Descriptors
Ammonia
Brooks area
Chemical plant
Fertilizer
Industrial development permit
Petrochemical industry
Raymond area
Alberta
Benefit cost analysis
Economic analysis
Environmental impact
Fuel consumption
Gas consumption
Natural gas - fuel
Natural gas - raw material
NTS 72L
NTS 82H
Socio-economic effect
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S42
Notes
ERCB report 75-F on application No. 8009 (Alberta ammonia) to use gas as raw material and fuel to produce anhydrous ammonia in plant near Raymond (request for Order-in-Council withdrawn) and on application No. 7907 (PanCanadian) to use gas as raw material and fuel to produce anhydrous ammonia in plant near Brooks (application withdrawn); Board hearing 1974-09-30, 1974-10-01/02/16; see also ERCB report 75-FA for supplementary information.
Less detail

Decision 75-FA

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2361
Applicant
PanCanadian Petroleum Limited
Alberta Ammonia Limited
Application Number
8009
7907
Title
Decision on application by PanCanadian Petroleum Limited, 1975 (ammonia plant Decision on application by Alberta Ammonia Ltd. (ammonia plant near Raymond) (section 42 of the Oil and Gas Conservation Act)
Date
1975
Title
Decision on application by PanCanadian Petroleum Limited, 1975 (ammonia plant Decision on application by Alberta Ammonia Ltd. (ammonia plant near Raymond) (section 42 of the Oil and Gas Conservation Act)
Date
1975
Applicant
PanCanadian Petroleum Limited
Alberta Ammonia Limited
Application Number
8009
7907
Hearing Panel
N/A
Hearing Type
N/A
Category
Industrial development permit
Descriptors
Ammonia
Brooks area
Chemical plant
Fertilizer
Industrial development permit
Petrochemical industry
Raymond area
Alberta
Benefit cost analysis
Economic analysis
Environmental impact
Fuel consumption
Gas consumption
Natural gas - fuel
Natural gas - raw material
NTS 72L
NTS 82H
Socio-economic effect
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S42
Notes
ERCB report 75-FA supplementing ERCB report 75-F
Less detail

Decision 75-G

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2360
Applicant
Canadian Fertilizers Limited
Application Number
8162
Title
Decision on application by Canadian Fertilizers Limited, 1975 (Oil and Gas Conservation Act, Section 42 for ammonia plant at Medicine Hat)
Date
1975
Title
Decision on application by Canadian Fertilizers Limited, 1975 (Oil and Gas Conservation Act, Section 42 for ammonia plant at Medicine Hat)
Date
1975
Applicant
Canadian Fertilizers Limited
Application Number
8162
Hearing Panel
Govier GW
Millard V
DeSorcy GJ
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Industrial development permit
Descriptors
Ammonia
Chemical plant
Fertilizer
Industrial development permit
Medicine Hat area
Petrochemical industry
Urea
Alberta
Benefit cost analysis
Economic analysis
Environmental impact
ERCB 75-F
ID-74-01
Fuel consumption
Gas consumption
Natural gas - fuel
Natural gas - raw material
NTS 72L
Socio-economic effect
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S42
Notes
ERCB report 75-G on application No. 8162 to use gas as a raw material and fuel to produce ammonia in plant at Medicine Hat (section 14-13-6 W4); Board hearing 1974-12-16/17/18; permit No. CFL 75-1
Less detail

Decision 75-N

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2353
Applicant
Alberta Gas Ethylene Company Limited
Dupont of Canada Limited
Dow Chemical of Canada Limited
Canadian Industries Limited
Application Number
8491
8514
8549
8554
Title
Decision on application by Alberta Gas Ethylene Company Ltd., Dupont of Canada Limited, Dow Chemical Of Canada Limited and Canadian Industries Limited, 1975 (Oil and Gas Conservation Act, section 42)
Date
1975
Title
Decision on application by Alberta Gas Ethylene Company Ltd., Dupont of Canada Limited, Dow Chemical Of Canada Limited and Canadian Industries Limited, 1975 (Oil and Gas Conservation Act, section 42)
Date
1975
Applicant
Alberta Gas Ethylene Company Limited
Dupont of Canada Limited
Dow Chemical of Canada Limited
Canadian Industries Limited
Application Number
8491
8514
8549
8554
Hearing Panel
Govier GW
Millard V
DeSorcy GJ
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Industrial development permit
Descriptors
Chemical plant
Chloroethylene
Dichloroethane
Ethylene
Fort Saskatchewan area
Industrial development permit
Joffre area
Polymer
Red Deer area
Redwater area
Alberta
Chlorine - raw material
Economic analysis
Environmental impact
Ethane - raw material
Ethylene - raw material
Natural gas - fuel
NTS 83A
NTS 83H
Socio-economic effect
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S42
Notes
ERCB report 75-N on application No. 8491 (A.G.E.) to use ethane and gas as fuel and raw material to produce ethylene near Red Deer (A.G.E. unit 1) (permit No. age 76-1) and on application No. 8514 (Dupont) to use gas as fuel in production of high density polyethylene near Red Deer (application withdrawn) and on application No. 8549 (Dow) to use gas as fuel in vinyl chloride monomer plant near Fort Saskatchewan (permit no.DCC 76-1) and on application No. 8554 (CIL) to use gas as fuel in a low density polyethylene plant near Redwater (application withdrawn); Board hearing (age & Dupont); 1975-06-18/19/20 Board hearing (Dow & CIL) 1975-07-09.
Less detail

Decision 76-B

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2386
Applicant
Dow Chemical of Canada Limited
Application Number
9118
Title
Decision on application by Dow Chemical Of Canada Limited, 1976 (For industrial development permit under section 42 of the Oil and Gas Conservation Act)
Date
1976
Title
Decision on application by Dow Chemical Of Canada Limited, 1976 (For industrial development permit under section 42 of the Oil and Gas Conservation Act)
Date
1976
Applicant
Dow Chemical of Canada Limited
Application Number
9118
Hearing Panel
Millard V
Berkowitz N
DeSorcy GJ
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Industrial development permit
Descriptors
Chemical plant
Ethylene glycol
Ethylene oxide
Fort Saskatchewan area
Industrial development permit
Alberta
Natural gas - fuel
NTS 83H
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S42
Notes
ERCB report 76-B on application No. 9118 for an IDP to use gas as fuel to produce ethylene glycol and ethylene oxide in plant to be constructed at Fort Saskatchewan (permit DCC 76-2).
Less detail

Decision 76-E

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2383
Applicant
Alberta Gas Chemicals Limited
Application Number
8744
Title
Decision on application by Alberta Gas Chemicals Ltd., 1976 (Oil and Gas Conservation Act, section 42)
Date
1976
Title
Decision on application by Alberta Gas Chemicals Ltd., 1976 (Oil and Gas Conservation Act, section 42)
Date
1976
Applicant
Alberta Gas Chemicals Limited
Application Number
8744
Hearing Panel
Millard V
Berkowitz N
DeSorcy GJ
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Industrial development permit
Descriptors
Chemical plant
Industrial development permit
Medicine Hat area
ETHANOL
Benefit cost analysis
Capitalized cost
Economic analysis
Efficiency
Gas supply
Marketing
Natural gas - fuel
Natural gas - raw material
NTS 72E
Raw material
Socio-economic effect
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S42
Notes
ERCB report 76-E on application No. 8744 to use gas as raw material and fuel to produce methanol in a plant to be constructed near Medicine Hat (permit AGC 77-1); Board hearing 1976-01-28/29
Less detail

Decision 76-G

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2381
Applicant
Dow Chemical of Canada Limited
Application Number
9222
Title
Decision on application by Dow Chemical Of Canada Limited, 1976 (power plant at Fort Saskatchewan)
Date
1976
Title
Decision on application by Dow Chemical Of Canada Limited, 1976 (power plant at Fort Saskatchewan)
Date
1976
Applicant
Dow Chemical of Canada Limited
Application Number
9222
Hearing Panel
Millard V
Berkowitz N
DeSorcy GJ
Hearing Type
Board
Utilities
Category
Electric power
Descriptors
Electric power project
Fort Saskatchewan area
Chemical plant
Electric power demand
Electric power supply
Environmental impact
Industrial plant
NTS 83H
Legal References
Hydro and Electric Energy Act S7
Hydro and Electric Energy Act S14
Notes
ERCB Report 76-G on application 9222 to construct and operate a 140 mw power plant at its Fort Saskatchewan chemical processing complex (in TP.55, R.22, W4M) and to connect the power plant to Calgary Power's transmission system; See also Report 76-I for decision on use of gas as fuel to increase production of chlorine and sodium hydroxide
Less detail

Decision 76-I

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2379
Applicant
Dow Chemical of Canada Limited
Application Number
9493
Title
Decision on application by Dow Chemical Of Canada Limited, 1976 (Oil and Gas Conservation Act, section 42)
Date
1976
Title
Decision on application by Dow Chemical Of Canada Limited, 1976 (Oil and Gas Conservation Act, section 42)
Date
1976
Applicant
Dow Chemical of Canada Limited
Application Number
9493
Hearing Panel
Millard V
Hearing Type
Board
No Hearing
Category
Industrial development permit
Descriptors
Chemical plant
Chlorine
Fort Saskatchewan area
Industrial development permit
Sodium hydroxide
Economic analysis
Fuel consumption
Gas consumption
Natural gas - fuel
NTS 83H
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S42
Notes
ERCB report 76-I on application No. 9493 for an industrial development permit authorizing the use of natural gas as fuel in the production of chlorine and caustic soda in an existing plant in the Dow complex at Fort Saskatchewan that would be expanded to increase capacity; no hearing; see also report 76-G for Decision on power plant for the complex.
Less detail

Decision 77-10

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2138
Applicant
Alberta Gas Trunk Line Company Limited
Dome Petroleum Limited
Application Number
770084
Title
Decision on application by Alberta Gas Trunk Line Company Limited and Dome Petroleum Limited, 1977 (construct a pipeline from Cochrane to Red Deer)
Date
1977
Title
Decision on application by Alberta Gas Trunk Line Company Limited and Dome Petroleum Limited, 1977 (construct a pipeline from Cochrane to Red Deer)
Date
1977
Applicant
Alberta Gas Trunk Line Company Limited
Dome Petroleum Limited
Application Number
770084
Hearing Panel
Craig DR
Millard V
DeSorcy GJ
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Pipelines
Descriptors
Butane
Ethane
Cochrane area
Oil pipeline
Pipeline construction permit
Pentanes plus
Propane
Red Deer area
Chemical plant
Environmental impact
NTS 82P
NTS 83A
Pipeline design
Pipeline route
Safety
Legal References
Pipeline Act
Notes
Decision 77-10 on application No. 770084 to construct an oil line to transport ethane, propane, butane and pentanes plus from a point in the NE quarter of section 16, TP.26, R.4 (W5M) near Cochrane to a point in the NW quarter of section 8, TP.38, R.25 (W4M) near Red Deer as part of the Alberta ethane gathering system to provide a continous supply of ethane to the age plant at Joffre.
Interveners
Alberta Natural Gas Company Ltd.
Beddoes, J.L.
Less detail

Decision 77-C

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2373
Applicant
Alberta Energy Company Limited
Hudson's Bay Oil and Gas Company Limited
Mitsubishi Petrochemical Company Limited
Mitsubishi Corporation
Petalta Project (Petrochemicals Alberta Project)
Alberta Gas Trunk Line Company Limited
Dow Chemical of Canada Limited
Alberta Gas Chemicals Limited
Application Number
9070
8911
Title
Decision on application by Petalta Project (Alberta Energy Company Ltd, Hudson's Bay Oil And Gas Company Limited, Mitsubishi Petrochemical Company Limited, and Mitsubishi Corporation), 1977 (benzene plant) and Decision on application by Alberta Gas Trunk Line, Dow Chemical Of Canada Limited and Alberta Gas Chemicals Ltd., 1977 (benzene plant)
Date
1977
Title
Decision on application by Petalta Project (Alberta Energy Company Ltd, Hudson's Bay Oil And Gas Company Limited, Mitsubishi Petrochemical Company Limited, and Mitsubishi Corporation), 1977 (benzene plant) and Decision on application by Alberta Gas Trunk Line, Dow Chemical Of Canada Limited and Alberta Gas Chemicals Ltd., 1977 (benzene plant)
Date
1977
Applicant
Alberta Energy Company Limited
Hudson's Bay Oil and Gas Company Limited
Mitsubishi Petrochemical Company Limited
Mitsubishi Corporation
Petalta Project (Petrochemicals Alberta Project)
Alberta Gas Trunk Line Company Limited
Dow Chemical of Canada Limited
Alberta Gas Chemicals Limited
Application Number
9070
8911
Hearing Panel
Craig DR
Berkowitz N
DeSorcy GJ
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Industrial development permit
Descriptors
Benzene
Bruderheim area
Chemical plant
Fort Saskatchewan area
Industrial development permit
Petalta Project (Petrochemicals Alberta Project)
Benefit cost analysis
Economic analysis
NTS 83H
Pentanes plus - fuel
Pentanes plus - raw material
Socio-economic effect
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S42
Notes
ERCB report 77-C on application No. 9070 by AEC et al (Petalta) for a plant to be located near Fort Saskatchewan to convert pentanes plus to benzene and liquid byproducts and on application No. 8911 by AGTL et al for a plant to be constructed near Bruderheim to convert pentanes plus to benzene and liquid byproduct (including gasoline or diesel fuel); Board hearing (Petalta project APP # 9070) 1976-06-15/16 and 1976-07-05; Board hearing (AGTL Bruderheim APP # 8911) 1977-07-06/07/08/09
Less detail

Decision 77-H

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2368
Applicant
Turbo Resources Limited
Application Number
770040
Title
Decision on application by Turbo Resources Limited, 1977 (Oil and Gas Conservation Act, section 42)
Date
1977
Title
Decision on application by Turbo Resources Limited, 1977 (Oil and Gas Conservation Act, section 42)
Date
1977
Applicant
Turbo Resources Limited
Application Number
770040
Hearing Panel
Millard V
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Industrial development permit
Descriptors
Benzene
Chemical plant
Edmonton area
Gas
Industrial development permit
Naphtha
Petroleum product
Toluene
Crude oil - raw material
Economic analysis
ERCB 77-C
NTS 83H
Pentanes plus - raw material
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S42
Notes
ERCB report 77-H on application No. 770040 (application subsequently withdrawn) for an IDP to use crude oil and pentanes plus to manufacture benzene-toluene (BT) naptha, motor gasoline, recycled lube oils and other by-products in a plant to be constructed 3 miles east of Edmonton; Board hearing 1977-05-04/05
Less detail

Decision 78-23

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2097
Applicant
Petrochemicals Alberta Project
Application Number
780591
Title
Decision on application by Petrochemicals Alberta Project, 1978 (amendment of industrial development permit No. PAP 78-1)
Date
1978
Title
Decision on application by Petrochemicals Alberta Project, 1978 (amendment of industrial development permit No. PAP 78-1)
Date
1978
Applicant
Petrochemicals Alberta Project
Application Number
780591
Hearing Panel
N/A
Hearing Type
N/A
No Hearing
Category
Industrial development permit
Descriptors
Benzene
Chemical plant
Fort Saskatchewan area
Industrial development permit
Benefit cost analysis
Natural gas - raw material
NTS 83G
Pentanes plus - raw material
Revision
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S42
Notes
Decision 78-23 on application No. 780591 to amend IDP No. PAP 78-1 to decrease use of pentanes plus as raw material and increase use of natural gas as raw material; no hearing; see also related ERCB reports 77-C and 77-H
Less detail

Decision 78-A

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2335
Applicant
Celanese Canada Limited
Application Number
770700
Title
Decision on application by Celanese Canada Limited, 1978 (Oil And Gas Conservation Act, section 42)
Date
1978
Title
Decision on application by Celanese Canada Limited, 1978 (Oil And Gas Conservation Act, section 42)
Date
1978
Applicant
Celanese Canada Limited
Application Number
770700
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Industrial development permit
Descriptors
Chemical plant
Clover Bar area
Industrial development permit
Vinyl acetate
Acetic acid
Benefit cost analysis
Cost analysis
Economic analysis
ERCB 76-B
ERCB 74-W
Ethylene - raw material
Natural gas - fuel
NTS 83H
Raw material
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S42
Notes
ERCB report 78-A on application No. 770700 to use ethylene and acetic acid as raw material and gas as fuel to produce vinyl acetate monomer in a plant to be constructed on celanese existing plant site at Clover BAR (section 17, TP.53, R.23 W4M); permit No. CCL 78-1
Less detail

Decision 80-17

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2022
Applicant
ESSO Chemical Canada
Application Number
800304
Title
Decision on application by ESSO Chemical Canada, 1980 (industrial development permit to manufacture ammonia and urea)
Date
1980
Title
Decision on application by ESSO Chemical Canada, 1980 (industrial development permit to manufacture ammonia and urea)
Date
1980
Applicant
ESSO Chemical Canada
Application Number
800304
Hearing Panel
Millard V
Berkowitz N
Webber HJ
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Industrial development permit
Descriptors
Ammonia
Chemical plant
Industrial development permit
Redwater area
Urea
Benefit cost analysis
Expansion
Gas supply
Natural gas - fuel
Natural gas - raw material
NTS 83H
Socio-economic effect
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S42
Notes
Decision 80-17 on application No. 800304 to use gas in the manufacture of ammonia at existing plant near Redwater and ammonia and urea at an expansion of this facility (section 17 & 20, TP.56, R.21, W4M); Board hearing 1980-07-28/29
Interveners
Sherritt Gordon Mines Limited
Less detail

Decision 81-03

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2005
Applicant
Alberta Energy Company Limited
ESSO Chemical Canada
Shell Canada Limited
Nova, an Alberta Corporation
Application Number
800530
800733
Title
Decision on application by Alberta Energy Company Ltd. and Esso Chemical Canada and Shell Canada Limited and Nova, an Alberta Corporation, 1981 (styrene monomer production)
Date
1981
Title
Decision on application by Alberta Energy Company Ltd. and Esso Chemical Canada and Shell Canada Limited and Nova, an Alberta Corporation, 1981 (styrene monomer production)
Date
1981
Applicant
Alberta Energy Company Limited
ESSO Chemical Canada
Shell Canada Limited
Nova, an Alberta Corporation
Application Number
800530
800733
Hearing Panel
Berkowitz N
Bohme VE
Mink FJ
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Industrial development permit
Descriptors
Bruderheim area
Chemical plant
Fort Saskatchewan area
Industrial development permit
Styrene
Benefit cost analysis
Benzene
Demand (economics)
Economic analysis
Ethylene - raw material
Marketing
Natural gas - fuel
Natural gas - raw material
NTS 83H
Raw material
Socio-economic effect
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S42
Notes
Decision 81-3 on application No. 800530 by AEC/ESSO to use gas, benzene and ethylene to produce styrene monomer in plant to be located adjacent Shell/Husky Strathcona refinery (TP.55-56, R.21, W4M); Board hearing 1980-11-25/26
Interveners
C-I-L Inc.
The Alberta Gas Ethylene Company Ltd.
Less detail

Decision 81-10

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1998
Applicant
Alberta Gas Ethylene Company Limited
Application Number
800853
Title
Decision on application by Alberta Gas Ethylene Company Ltd., 1981 (industrial development permit to manufacture ethylene)
Date
1981
Title
Decision on application by Alberta Gas Ethylene Company Ltd., 1981 (industrial development permit to manufacture ethylene)
Date
1981
Applicant
Alberta Gas Ethylene Company Limited
Application Number
800853
Hearing Panel
DeSorcy GJ
Strom NA
Webber HJ
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Industrial development permit
Descriptors
Chemical plant
Ethylene
Industrial development permit
Red Deer area
Air quality
Benefit cost analysis
Design criteria
Emission
Environmental impact
Ethane
Ethane - raw material
Forecasting
Land use
Marketing
Natural gas - fuel
Noise (sound)
NTS 83A
Pollution
Raw material
Socio-economic effect
Supply (economics)
Water
Water quality
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S42
Notes
Decision 81-10 on application No. 800853 to use ethane as feedstock and natural gas as fuel to manufacture ethylene in plant to be constructed (unit 3) adjacent to present facilities (units 1&2) near Joffre (TP.38, R.25, W4M); Board hearing 1981-04-07/08
Interveners
Preserve Agricultural Land
Red Deer Regional Planning Commission
Hainsworth, B.W.
Chessor, D.
Alberta Energy Company Ltd.
Esso Chemical Canada
Du Pont Canada Inc.
Dow Chemical of Canada Limited
NOVA, AN ALBERTA CORPORATION
Shell Canada Limited
Union Carbide Canada Limited
Dome Petroleum Limited
Esso Resources Canada Limited
Gulf Canada Resources Inc.
Hudson's Bay Oil and Gas Company Limited
Sulpetro Limited
Texaco Canada Resources Ltd.
Less detail

Decision 81-16

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1992
Applicant
Nova, an Alberta Corporation
Shell Canada Limited
Application Number
800910
Title
Decision on application by Nova, an Alberta Corporation and Shell Canada Limited, 1981 (industrial development permit to manufacture polyethylene)
Date
1981
Title
Decision on application by Nova, an Alberta Corporation and Shell Canada Limited, 1981 (industrial development permit to manufacture polyethylene)
Date
1981
Applicant
Nova, an Alberta Corporation
Shell Canada Limited
Application Number
800910
Hearing Panel
DeSorcy GJ
Strom NA
Webber HJ
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Industrial development permit
Descriptors
Chemical plant
Ethylene homopolymer
Industrial development permit
Red Deer area
Demand (economics)
Economic analysis
Environmental impact
Ethylene - raw material
Land use
Locating
Marketing
Natural gas - fuel
Noise (sound)
NTS 83A
Plant location
Pollution
Socio-economic effect
Supply (economics)
Water quality
Water supply
Notes
Decision 81-16 on application No. 800910 to use ethylene as feedstock and gas as fuel to manufacture polyethylene at a LINEAR low-density polyethylene plant to be constructed on the site of Alberta gas ethylene'S existing ethylene plant east of Red Deer (TP.38-40, R.23-27, W4M).
Interveners
Preserve Agricultural Land
Alberta Institute of Agrologists Red Deer Branch
F.E.M. Farms
Hainsworth, J.W.
Federation of Alberta Naturalists Land Use Committee
Red Deer Regional Planning Commission
Dow Chemical of Canada Limited
Union Carbide Canada Limited
Alberta Energy Company Ltd.
Du Pont Canada Inc.
Esso Chemical Canada
Less detail

Decision 81-17

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1991
Applicant
Alberta Energy Company Limited
Dupont Canada Inc.
Application Number
801017
Title
Decision on application by Alberta Energy Company Ltd. and Dupont Canada Inc., 1981 (industrial development permit to manufacture polyethylene)
Date
1981
Title
Decision on application by Alberta Energy Company Ltd. and Dupont Canada Inc., 1981 (industrial development permit to manufacture polyethylene)
Date
1981
Applicant
Alberta Energy Company Limited
Dupont Canada Inc.
Application Number
801017
Hearing Panel
Millard V
Goodman CJ
Webber HJ
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Industrial development permit
Descriptors
Chemical plant
Ethylene homopolymer
Industrial development permit
Redwater area
Demand (economics)
Economic analysis
Ethylene - raw material
Locating
Marketing
Natural gas - fuel
NTS 83H
Plant location
Socio-economic effect
Supply (economics)
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S42
Notes
Decision 81-17 on application No. 801017 to use ethylene as feedstock and gas as fuel to manufacture polyethylene at a plant to be constructed near Redwater (TP.56, R.21-22, W4M); Board hearing 1981-07-07/08
Interveners
Alberta Gas Chemicals Ltd.
C-I-L Inc.
Trimac Limited
Town of Gibbons
Council of the Town of Redwater
Dow Chemical of Canada, Limited
Minchau, D.
Minchau, C.
Municipal District of Sturgeon No. 90
NOVA, AN ALBERTA CORPORATION
Shell Canada Limited
Smulski, K.
The Alberta Gas Ethylene Company Ltd.
Union Carbide Canada Limited
Less detail

Decision 81-22

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1986
Applicant
C.I.L. Inc.
Trimac Ltd.
Application Number
800908
Title
Decision on application by C.I.L. Inc. and Trimac Ltd., 1981 (industrial development permit to manufacture polyethylene)
Date
1981
Title
Decision on application by C.I.L. Inc. and Trimac Ltd., 1981 (industrial development permit to manufacture polyethylene)
Date
1981
Applicant
C.I.L. Inc.
Trimac Ltd.
Application Number
800908
Hearing Panel
Berkowitz N
Goodman CJ
Strom NA
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Industrial development permit
Descriptors
Chemical plant
Edmonton area
Ethylene homopolymer
Industrial development permit
Benefit cost analysis
Demand (economics)
Economic analysis
Ethylene - raw material
Marketing
Natural gas - fuel
NTS 83H
Socio-economic effect
Supply (economics)
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S42
Notes
Decision 81-22 on application No. 800908 to use ethylene as feedstock and gas as fuel to manufacture polyethylene in a new plant to be constructed on site of applicant's existing plant site in Edmonton (section 36-52-24 W4M).
Interveners
Alberta Energy Company Ltd.
Esso Chemical of Canada
Du Pont Canada Inc.
The Alberta Gas Ethylene Company Ltd.
Less detail

Decision 81-24

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1984
Applicant
Union Carbide Canada Limited
Application Number
800889
Title
Decision on application by Union Carbide Canada Limited, 1981 (industrial development permit to manufacture ethylene glycol)
Date
1981
Title
Decision on application by Union Carbide Canada Limited, 1981 (industrial development permit to manufacture ethylene glycol)
Date
1981
Applicant
Union Carbide Canada Limited
Application Number
800889
Hearing Panel
DeSorcy GJ
Bohme VE
Goodman CJ
McAndrews CJ
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Industrial development permit
Descriptors
Chemical plant
Ethylene glycol
Industrial development permit
Prentiss area
Agricultural land
Conflict
Demand (economics)
Economic analysis
Energy development
Environmental impact
Ethylene - raw material
Land use
Locating
Marketing
Natural gas - fuel
NTS 83A
Plant location
Socio-economic effect
Supply (economics)
Water supply
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S42
Notes
Decision 81-24 on application No. 800889 to use ethylene as feedstock and gas as fuel to produce ethylene glycol in a new plant to be constructed near Prentiss (section 30-39-25 W4M); Board hearing 1981-04-14/15/16/20/21
Interveners
Preserve Agricultural Land
Craigievar Farms
Unifarm
Christian Farmers Federation
Red Deer Board of the Alberta Institute of Agrologists
Superior Sod Farms
F.E.M. Farms Ltd.
Carlyle, R.J.
Friesen, G.
Hainsworth, J.W.
Russell, M.
Russell, E.
Low, D.C.
Chessor, D.
Sather, A.P.
Red Deer River Regional Planning Commission
Buffalo Lake Regional Resources Project
Alix Chamber of Commerce
Village of Mirror
Alberta Energy Company Ltd.
Esso Chemical Canada
Du Pont Canada Inc.
Alberta Gas Ethylene Company Ltd.
NOVA, AN ALBERTA CORPORATION
Shell Canada Limited
Less detail

41 records – page 1 of 3.