7 records – page 1 of 1.

Decision 76-E

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2383
Applicant
Alberta Gas Chemicals Limited
Application Number
8744
Title
Decision on application by Alberta Gas Chemicals Ltd., 1976 (Oil and Gas Conservation Act, section 42)
Date
1976
Title
Decision on application by Alberta Gas Chemicals Ltd., 1976 (Oil and Gas Conservation Act, section 42)
Date
1976
Applicant
Alberta Gas Chemicals Limited
Application Number
8744
Hearing Panel
Millard V
Berkowitz N
DeSorcy GJ
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Industrial development permit
Descriptors
Chemical plant
Industrial development permit
Medicine Hat area
ETHANOL
Benefit cost analysis
Capitalized cost
Economic analysis
Efficiency
Gas supply
Marketing
Natural gas - fuel
Natural gas - raw material
NTS 72E
Raw material
Socio-economic effect
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S42
Notes
ERCB report 76-E on application No. 8744 to use gas as raw material and fuel to produce methanol in a plant to be constructed near Medicine Hat (permit AGC 77-1); Board hearing 1976-01-28/29
Less detail

Decision 82-05

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2073
Applicant
Dow Chemical Canada Inc.
Application Number
810042
810043
Title
Decision on application by Dow Chemical Canada Inc., 1982 (Chlorine and caustic soda plant expansion and ethylene dichloride and vinyl chloride monomer plant expansion)
Date
1982
Title
Decision on application by Dow Chemical Canada Inc., 1982 (Chlorine and caustic soda plant expansion and ethylene dichloride and vinyl chloride monomer plant expansion)
Date
1982
Applicant
Dow Chemical Canada Inc.
Application Number
810042
810043
Hearing Panel
Berkowitz N
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Industrial development permit
Descriptors
Chemical plant
Chlorine
Chloroethylene
Dichloroethane
Ethylene
Fort Saskatchewan area
Industrial development permit
Sodium hydroxide
Capitalized cost
Cost analysis
Demand (economics)
Economic analysis
Environmental impact
Expansion
Marketing
Monitoring
Natural gas - fuel
Natural gas - raw material
NTS 83H
Revision
Supply (economics)
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S30
Notes
Decision 82-5 on application No. 810042 to amend IDP No. DCC 80-7 for use of additional natural gas as fuel for production of chlorine and caustic soda and No. 810043 for use of ethylene and natural gas as raw material and fuel for production of ethylene facilities to be installed at Dow's existing plane at Fort Saskatchewan (located in sections 2 & 11-55-22 W4M.
Interveners
Alberta Energy Company Ltd.
Esso Chemical Canada
The Alberta Gas Ethylene Company Ltd.
Less detail

Decision 82-11

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2067
Applicant
ESSO Resources Canada Limited
Application Number
810417
Title
Decision on application by Esso Resources Canada Limited, 1982 (proposed deep-cut facilities Judy Creek area gas processing plants)
Date
1982
Title
Decision on application by Esso Resources Canada Limited, 1982 (proposed deep-cut facilities Judy Creek area gas processing plants)
Date
1982
Applicant
ESSO Resources Canada Limited
Application Number
810417
Hearing Panel
Berkowitz N
DeSorcy GJ
Mink FJ
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Gas processing
Descriptors
Ethane
Gas processing plant
Judy Creek field
Sour gas
Benefit cost analysis
Capitalized cost
Demand (economics)
Economic analysis
Energy development
Expansion
Gas conservation
Liquefied natural gas
Marketing
NTS 83J
Petrochemical industry
Raw material
Supply (economics)
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S26
Notes
Decision on application to modify existing Judy Creek gas conservation plant located in LSD 15-25-64-11 W5M to extract a mixture of ethane and heavier hydrocarbons (ethane plus from the processed gas)
Interveners
Alberta and Southern Gas Co. Ltd.
Alberta Natural Gas Company Ltd.
Amoco Canada Petroleum Company Ltd.
Canadian Hunter Exploration Ltd.
Chevron Standard Limited
Gulf Canada Resources Inc.
Northwestern Utilities Limited
Shell Canada Chemical Company
Texaco Canada Resources Ltd.
Union Carbide Canada Limited
Alberta Energy Company Ltd.
Esso Chemical Company
Hudbay Chemical Company
Alberta Ethane/Ethylene Petrochemical Project
C-I-L-Inc.
Trimac Limited
Dome Petroleum Limited
CU Ethane Limited
Less detail

Decision 82-37|82-30

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision243
Applicant
Peace River Fertilizer Inc.
Application Number
820229
Title
Decision 82-37\Examiners report 82-30 on application by Peace River Fertilizer Inc., 1982 (industrial development permit to manufacture ammonia at Kathleen)
Date
1982
Title
Decision 82-37\Examiners report 82-30 on application by Peace River Fertilizer Inc., 1982 (industrial development permit to manufacture ammonia at Kathleen)
Date
1982
Applicant
Peace River Fertilizer Inc.
Application Number
820229
Hearing Panel
Berkowitz N
Hearing Type
Examiners
Category
Industrial development permit
Descriptors
Ammonia
Chemical plant
Industrial development permit
Peace River area
Capitalized cost
Cost analysis
Demand (economics)
Economic analysis
Environmental impact
Fertilizer
Natural gas - fuel
Natural gas - raw material
NTS 83N
Socio-economic effect
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S30
Notes
Examiners report E82-30 on application No. 820229 to allow for use of natural gas to produce anhydrous ammonia in a new plant to be constructed in section 23-76-19 W5M near Kathleen.
Decision 82-37 released with Examiners Report 82-30
Interveners
Smoky River Regional Economic Development Board
High Prairie Regional Economic Development Board
Residents and Property Owners of Kathleen
Hill, R.
Lessard, F.
Laurin, P.
Audet, G.
Isert, D.
Cox, D.
Less detail

Decision 83-A

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2466
Applicant
McLeod River Coal Ltd.
Application Number
820294
Title
Decision on application by McLeod River Coal Ltd., 1983 (McLeod River coal project, Hinton)
Date
1983
Title
Decision on application by McLeod River Coal Ltd., 1983 (McLeod River coal project, Hinton)
Date
1983
Applicant
McLeod River Coal Ltd.
Application Number
820294
Hearing Panel
Berkowitz N
Strom NA
Mink FJ
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Coal
Descriptors
Coal mine
Coal preparation plant
Coal project
Coalspur coal field
Hinton area
McLeod River coal project
Surface mining
Air quality
Bituminous coal
Capitalized cost
Coal reserve
Cost analysis
Design criteria
Drainage
Dust control
Economic analysis
Employment
Environment protection
Environmental impact
Groundwater
Land reclamation
Land use
Manpower
Marketing
Mine design
NTS 83F
Open pit mining
Operating cost
Overburden ratio
Railroad
Reforestation
Socio-economic effect
Soil conservation
Tailings
Tailings - storage
Terminal facility
Thermal coal
Transportation corridor
Waste disposal
Water quality
Legal References
Coal Conservation Act S10
Coal Conservation Act S23
Notes
ERCB report D83-A on application No. 820294 to develop a surface coal mine in TP.49-51, R.21-23, W5 to extract high volatile C bituminous coal from NW portion of Coalspur coal field and to construct a coal processing plant in TP.51-52, R23-24, W5; Board hearing 1982-08-24/25/26/27
Less detail

Decision 85-39

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision971
Applicant
Alberta Energy Company Limited
Cominco Chemicals and Fertilizers
Application Number
850703
Title
Decision on application by Alberta Energy Company Ltd. and Cominco Chemicals and Fertilizers, 1985 (industrial development permit to manufacture ammonia)
Date
1985
Title
Decision on application by Alberta Energy Company Ltd. and Cominco Chemicals and Fertilizers, 1985 (industrial development permit to manufacture ammonia)
Date
1985
Applicant
Alberta Energy Company Limited
Cominco Chemicals and Fertilizers
Application Number
850703
Hearing Panel
DeSorcy GJ
Bohme VE
Homeniuk TF
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Industrial development permit
Descriptors
Ammonia
Chemical plant
Industrial development permit
Red Deer area
Agricultural land
Air quality
Capitalized cost
Emission
Environmental impact
Hydrogen
Marketing
Natural gas - fuel
Nitrogen
NTS 83A
Plant location
Raw material
Socio-economic effect
Waste water
Water supply
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S30
Notes
Decision D85-39 on application No. 850703 for industrial development permit authorizing the use of hydrogen as raw material and natural gas as fuel to produce anhydrous ammonia at a plant to be constructed near Joffre (TP.39, R.22-23, W4M).
Interveners
Chessor, D.
Preserve Agricultural Land
Canadian Fertilizers Ltd.
The Alberta Gas Ethylene Co. Ltd.
Less detail

Decision 90-08

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision85
Applicant
Shell Canada Limited
Husky Oil Operations Ltd.
Application Number
890971
890969
891504
891505
891506
891478
891479
891480
891481
891482
891568
891569
891570
891571
900404
891483
891290
900236
891047
891757
891805
891804
891803
891703
891802
Title
Decision 90-08 : Shell Canada Limited and Husky Oil Operations Ltd.: Application for Caroline Beaverhill Lake gas development
Date
1990
Title
Decision 90-08 : Shell Canada Limited and Husky Oil Operations Ltd.: Application for Caroline Beaverhill Lake gas development
Date
1990
Applicant
Shell Canada Limited
Husky Oil Operations Ltd.
Application Number
890971
890969
891504
891505
891506
891478
891479
891480
891481
891482
891568
891569
891570
891571
900404
891483
891290
900236
891047
891757
891805
891804
891803
891703
891802
Hearing Panel
DeSorcy GJ
Mink FJ
Bietz BF
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Gas processing
Descriptors
Caroline field
Caroline gas project
Energy development
Gas pipeline
Gas processing plant
Pipeline construction permit
Product pipeline
Sour gas
Sulphur recovery plant
Bearberry field
Benefit cost analysis
Carbon dioxide
Capitalized cost
Claus process
Conservation
Economic analysis
Emergency procedure
Emission
Environmental impact
ID-81-03
ID-88-01
Feasibility
Forecasting
Groundwater
Nitrogen oxide
Noise (sound)
NTS 82O
NTS 83B
Operating cost
Petroleum conservation
Public interest
Reliability
Safety
Socio-economic effect
Soil conservation
Soil pollution
Sulphur dioxide
Sulphur recovery
Water disposal
Water pollution
Water quality
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S4
Notes
Decision D90-8 on proceeding No. 890971 and on applications by Shell, Husky and associated parties for production, processing and transportation facilities for sour gas reserves in the Caroline Beaverhill Lake area (all in TP.31-36, R.3-10 W5M); Board hearing commenced 1990-04-17 and continued to 1990-05-10 with final argument 1990-05-28/29
Interveners
Federated Pipe Lines Ltd.
Amoco Canada Petroleum Company Ltd.
Altana Exploration Company
ATCOR Ltd.
Canadian Hunter Exploration Ltd.
Gulf Canada Resources Limited
Mobil Oil Canada
NOVA Corporation of Alberta
Numac Oil & Gas Ltd.
Union Pacific Resources Inc.
CN Rail
CP Rail
Alberta Fish and Game Association
Pollution Sub-Committee of the Public Advisory Committees - Environment Council of Alberta
Bauman, J.
Bauman, L.
Brown, R.
McCormick, H.
Brunner, J.
Brunner, L.
Heggie, R.
Burnstick Lake Cottage Owners' Association
Caroline Advisory Board
Caroline & District Chamber of Commerce
Concerned Residents Action Group
County of Mountain View No. 17
Diamond J. Industries Ltd.
Harris, D.
Harris, M.
Hermann, J.
Jans, E.
Jans, B.
Kostuch , M.
Rocky Veterinary Clinic Ltd.
Macklin, J.
Macklin, B.
Mountain View Land Holders Group
Olds& District Chamber of Commerce
Preservation of Agriculture and Living Space Society
Rocky Mountain House & District Chamber of Commerce
Roth, L.
Roth, S.
Saunders, D.
447 Area Residents
Sundre & District Chamber of Commerce
Town of Innisfail
Town of Sundre
Town of Rocky Mountain House
Village of Caroline
Wolf, R.E.
Less detail

7 records – page 1 of 1.