26 records – page 1 of 2.

Decision 76-F

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2382
Applicant
Calgary Power Ltd.
Application Number
8706
Title
Decision on application by Calgary Power Ltd., 1976 (240 KV transmission line facilities in Calgary area)
Date
1976
Title
Decision on application by Calgary Power Ltd., 1976 (240 KV transmission line facilities in Calgary area)
Date
1976
Applicant
Calgary Power Ltd.
Application Number
8706
Hearing Panel
Millard V
Craig DR
DeSorcy GJ
Hearing Type
Board
Utilities
Category
Transmission line
Descriptors
Calgary area
Transmission line
Electric power demand
Environmental impact
Forecasting
NTS 82I
NTS 82P
Route selection
Legal References
Hydro and Electric Energy Act S9
Hydro and Electric Energy Act S11
Hydro and Electric Energy Act S13
Hydro and Electric Energy Act S14
Notes
ERCB report 76-F on application No. 8706 to construct and operate a 240-KV transmission line from a point NW of the City of Calgary to the Janet substation (CP 74S) just east of the City; Board hearing 1975-12-09/10
Less detail

Decision 77-21

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2127
Applicant
Calgary Power Ltd.
Application Number
770118
Title
Decision on application by Calgary Power Ltd., 1977 (240 KV transmission line facilities in the Red Deer Calgary area)
Date
1977
Title
Decision on application by Calgary Power Ltd., 1977 (240 KV transmission line facilities in the Red Deer Calgary area)
Date
1977
Applicant
Calgary Power Ltd.
Application Number
770118
Hearing Panel
Millard V
Berkowitz N
Bohme VE
Hearing Type
Board
Utilities
Category
Transmission line
Descriptors
Calgary area
Red Deer area
Transmission line
Agricultural land
Capacity
Electric power demand
Electric power supply
Health
NTS 82P
NTS 83A
Right of way
Route selection
Safety
Legal References
Hydro and Electric Energy Act S9
Hydro and Electric Energy Act S11
Hydro and Electric Energy Act S13
Hydro and Electric Energy Act S14
Notes
Decision 77-21 on application No. 770118 to construct and operate a 240 KV transmission line from the Red Deer substation (CP 63S) to a location 23.4 km north of the Janet substation (CP 74S).
Interveners
A Group of 35 Parties
Sackett, K.
Radau, F.
Latimer, M.E.
Bagrie, D.W.
Osterman, Mrs.
Less detail

Decision 77-G

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2369
Applicant
Calgary Power Ltd.
Application Number
9435
Title
Decision on application by Calgary Power Ltd., 1977 (240 KV transmission line between Calgary and Lethbridge)
Date
1977
Title
Decision on application by Calgary Power Ltd., 1977 (240 KV transmission line between Calgary and Lethbridge)
Date
1977
Applicant
Calgary Power Ltd.
Application Number
9435
Hearing Panel
Millard V
Hearing Type
Board
Utilities
Category
Transmission line
Descriptors
Calgary area
Lethbridge area
Transmission line
Agricultural land
Electric power demand
Environmental impact
Forecasting
Irrigation
NTS 82H
NTS 82I
Reliability
Right of way
Route selection
Safety
Site survey
Southern Alberta
Legal References
Hydro and Electric Energy Act S9
Hydro and Electric Energy Act S11
Hydro and Electric Energy Act S13
Hydro and Electric Energy Act S14
Notes
ERCB report 77-G on application No. 9435 for 240 KV transmission line (to be designated CP 924L) from Janet substation (CP 370S); Board hearing 1976-11-18 adjourned and reconvened 1977-01-26/27/28
Less detail

Decision 78-14

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2106
Applicant
Calgary Power Ltd.
Application Number
770856
Title
Decision on application by Calgary Power Ltd., 1978 (138 KV transmission line facilities in the Calgary area)
Date
1978
Title
Decision on application by Calgary Power Ltd., 1978 (138 KV transmission line facilities in the Calgary area)
Date
1978
Applicant
Calgary Power Ltd.
Application Number
770856
Hearing Panel
Millard V
DeSorcy GJ
Goodman CJ
Hearing Type
Board
Utilities
Category
Transmission line
Descriptors
Calgary area
Transmission line
Electric power demand
NTS 82I
Reliability
Route selection
Legal References
Hydro and Electric Energy Act S9
Hydro and Electric Energy Act S10
Hydro and Electric Energy Act S11
Hydro and Electric Energy Act S13
Hydro and Electric Energy Act S14
Hydro and Electric Energy Act S17
Notes
Decision 78-14 on application No. 770856 to construct & operate a 138 KV transmission line (CP 727L) from the north end of existing line CP 727L to Janet substation CP74S; Board hearing 1978-05-30/31 & 1978-06-02
Interveners
Dietterle, E.
Landmark Farms Limited
Maldeghem Farming Company Ltd.
Less detail

Decision 80-21

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2018
Applicant
Canadian Western Natural Gas Company Limited
Application Number
800462
800490
800433
800492
Title
Decision on application by Canadian Western Natural Gas Company Limited, 1980 (permits to construct pipelines for the transmission of natural gas - Calgary area)
Date
1980
Title
Decision on application by Canadian Western Natural Gas Company Limited, 1980 (permits to construct pipelines for the transmission of natural gas - Calgary area)
Date
1980
Applicant
Canadian Western Natural Gas Company Limited
Application Number
800462
800490
800433
800492
Hearing Panel
Bohme VE
Goodman CJ
Bellows LA
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Pipelines
Descriptors
Calgary area
Gas pipeline
Pipeline construction permit
NTS 82J
Pipeline route
Transportation corridor
Legal References
Pipeline Act
Notes
Decision 80-21 on application No. 800462 to construct pipeline to transport natural gas from existing AGTL line in LSD 15-20-22-3 W5M to proposed regulator station in LSD 16-19-22-1 W5M (Priddis lateral A), on application No. 800490 to construct proposed regulator station (Turner Valley GATE station), on application No. 800433 to construct pipeline to transport gas from proposed regulator station in LSD 16-19-22-1 W5M to proposed regulator station in LSD 13-23-22-1 W5M (Priddis lateral B) and on application No. 800492 for this regulator station in LSD 13-23-22-1 W5M (south Calgary GATE station); Board hearing 1980-09-09/10/23/24 ; see related Decision 81-27 on later application for similar facilities
Interveners
R.Z. Holdings Ltd.
Hartel Holdings Co. Ltd.
Ulster Developments Ltd.
Paperny, M.
Trafalgar Investments Ltd.
Arnold Investments Ltd.
Rogers Pass Recreation Ltd.
Southern, F.D.
Southern, R.D.
Spruce Meadows Complex
Rauh, W.
Rauh, F.
Hope-Ross Group
Big Springs Ranch Ltd.
Brooks, D.
Brooks, M.
Caywood, E.
Drager, J.C.
French, B.
Gordon, E.L.
Hope-Ross, R.M.
Hope-Ross, W.
Klyuzak, A.G.
Sweeney, E.A.
Sweeney, E.G.
Van Wielingen, G.A.
Drager, J.M.
Southern, S.D.
Arthurs, A.G.
Waddell, W.A.
Approval
Denied
Less detail

Decision 80-30

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2009
Applicant
Alberta Products Pipe Line Limited
Application Number
800440
Title
Decision on application by Alberta Products Pipe Line Ltd., 1980 (permit to construct a pipeline from Edmonton to Calgary)
Date
1980
Title
Decision on application by Alberta Products Pipe Line Ltd., 1980 (permit to construct a pipeline from Edmonton to Calgary)
Date
1980
Applicant
Alberta Products Pipe Line Limited
Application Number
800440
Hearing Panel
DeSorcy GJ
Strom NA
Evans RG
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Pipelines
Descriptors
Calgary area
Edmonton area
Petroleum product
Pipeline construction permit
Pipeline project
Product pipeline
Red Deer area
Capacity
Demand (economics)
Environmental impact
NTS 82P
NTS 83A
NTS 83H
Pipeline crossing
Pipeline design
Pipeline route
Right of way
Route selection
Supply (economics)
Transmission corridor
Transportation corridor
Notes
Decision 80-30 on application No. 800440 to construct a pipeline to transport gasolines, diesel fuel, aviation fuels, solvents, and heating oil from a pump station in Edmonton to existing facilities in Calgary (TP.23-53, 23-29, W4M); Board hearing 1980-09-23/26; see related Decisions 81-31 and 81-34 for Decisions on specific segments of route that were matters of concern
Interveners
County of Lacombe No. 14
Daines Farms Ltd.
Paul S. Seiferling
Battle River Regional Planning Commission
City of Edmonton
Turbo Resources Ltd.
Crows Nest Resources Ltd.
Daon Corporation
Less detail

Decision 80-D

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2325
Applicant
Calgary Power Ltd.
Application Number
780709
Title
Decision on application by Calgary Power Ltd., 1980 500 KV transmission line Langdon - Phillips pass
Date
1980
Title
Decision on application by Calgary Power Ltd., 1980 500 KV transmission line Langdon - Phillips pass
Date
1980
Applicant
Calgary Power Ltd.
Application Number
780709
Hearing Type
Utilities
Category
Transmission line
Descriptors
Calgary area
Crowsnest Pass
High voltage
Power system interconnection
Transmission line
Agricultural land
Alberta
British Columbia
Environmental impact
Health
Land use
NTS 82G
NTS 82H
NTS 82I
NTS 82J
Right of way
Route selection
Safety
Legal References
Hydro and Electric Energy Act S9
Hydro and Electric Energy Act S11
Hydro and Electric Energy Act S13
Hydro and Electric Energy Act S14
Hydro and Electric Energy Act S17
Notes
ERCB report 80-D on application No. 780709 to build and operate a 500 KV substation near Langdon and a transmission line linking the substation with B.C. Hydro at Phillipps Pass (TP.6-23, R.26 W4 to R.5 W5); Board hearing 1979-10-09 through 1979-11-02 (19 days), 1979-11-05/06/07/08/12/ see also ERCB report 82-A for Decision on proceeding No. 810326 to consider alternate points of interconnection with B.C. Hydro
Less detail

Decision 81-27

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1981
Applicant
Canadian Western Natural Gas Company Limited
Application Number
810487
Title
Decision on application by Canadian Western Natural Gas Company Limited, 1981 (secondary natural gas lines and regulator facilities Calgary – Priddis areas)
Date
1981
Title
Decision on application by Canadian Western Natural Gas Company Limited, 1981 (secondary natural gas lines and regulator facilities Calgary – Priddis areas)
Date
1981
Applicant
Canadian Western Natural Gas Company Limited
Application Number
810487
Hearing Panel
Bohme VE
Goodman CJ
Bellows LA
Hearing Type
Board
Utilities
Category
Pipelines
Descriptors
Calgary area
Gas pipeline
Pipeline construction permit
Energy development
Gas demand
Land value
NTS 82J
Pipeline route
Regional planning
Route selection
Transmission corridor
Legal References
Pipeline Act
Notes
Decision 81-27 on application No. 810487 to construct about 25 km of 406.4 MM pipeline and associated REGULATING facilities to transport natural gas from an existing Nova pipeline near Priddis to proposed regulator station in south Calgary (TP.22, R.1-3, W5M); Board hearing 1981-09-08/09/10 see related Decision 80-21
Interveners
City of Calgary
Red Deer Lake Community Association
Priddis Community Association
Hope-Ross, W.
Drager, J.C.
Van Weilingen, G.A.
Arnold Investments Ltd.
Babichuk, O.
Big Springs Ranch Ltd.
Brooks, D.
Kluzak, G.
Krassman, M.
Sweeney, E.
Waddell, W.A.
Southern, Mr. & Mrs.
R.Z. Holdings Ltd.
Hartel Holdings Co. Ltd.
Ulster Developments Ltd.
Paperny, M.
Trafalga Investments Ltd.
Very, R.A.
Allen, G.
Payne, B.A.
Less detail

Decision 81-31

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1977
Applicant
Alberta Products Pipe Line Limited
Application Number
810759
Title
Decision on application by Alberta Products Pipe Line Ltd., 1981 (permit to construct segments of a pipeline near Calgary and Leduc)
Date
1981
Title
Decision on application by Alberta Products Pipe Line Ltd., 1981 (permit to construct segments of a pipeline near Calgary and Leduc)
Date
1981
Applicant
Alberta Products Pipe Line Limited
Application Number
810759
Hearing Panel
DeSorcy GJ
Strom NA
Evans RG
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Pipelines
Descriptors
Calgary area
Leduc area
Pipeline construction permit
Product pipeline
Energy development
NTS 82P
NTS 83H
Pipeline route
Route selection
Legal References
Pipeline Act
Notes
Decision 81-31 on application No. 810759 for consideration of segments of pipeline approved (permit No. 189419) in TP.24-25, R. 28-29, W4M and TP.49-50, R.24-25, W4M see related ERCB Decisions 80-30 and 81-34
Interveners
Cathton Holdings Ltd.
Town of Leduc
Approval
Approved
Less detail

Decision 83-06

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2390
Applicant
Energy Resources Conservation Board
Application Number
821207
Title
Decision on public meeting to consider concerns regarding the development of the proposed Saddle Ridge area
Date
1983
Title
Decision on public meeting to consider concerns regarding the development of the proposed Saddle Ridge area
Date
1983
Applicant
Energy Resources Conservation Board
Application Number
821207
Hearing Panel
Millard V
DeSorcy GJ
Bohme VE
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Land use
Descriptors
Energy development
Land use
Regional planning
Risk
Saddleridge area
Sour gas
Urban development
Urban planning
Calgary area
Emergency procedure
Encroachment
ID-81-03
Gas pipeline
Gas producing
Gas reserve
Gas well
Hydrogen sulphide
NTS 82P
Safety
Notes
Decision No. D83-6 on proceeding No. 821207 to consider concerns relating to development of Saddle Ridge area of NE Calgary; public meeting held 1983-01-25/26 & 1983-03-14/15
Interveners
City of Calgary Planning Department
Carma Developers Ltd.
Kentron Development Corporation Ltd.
Cathton Holdings
Qualico Developments
Oscar Fech Construction Ltd.
Longpre Associates
Manz, A.E.
219575 Alberta Ltd.
Saddle Ridge Community Association
Petrogas Processing Ltd.
Less detail

Decision 83-15

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2298
Applicant
TransAlta Utilities Corporation
City of Calgary
Application Number
820874
820889
Title
Decision on application by TransAlta Utilities Corporation, 1983 (138 KV transmission line to north east Calgary area); Decision on application by City of Calgary, 1983 (240 KV transmission line in north east Calgary area)
Date
1983
Title
Decision on application by TransAlta Utilities Corporation, 1983 (138 KV transmission line to north east Calgary area); Decision on application by City of Calgary, 1983 (240 KV transmission line in north east Calgary area)
Date
1983
Applicant
TransAlta Utilities Corporation
City of Calgary
Application Number
820874
820889
Hearing Panel
Goodman CJ
Bohme VE
Evans RG
Hearing Type
Board
Utilities
Category
Transmission line
Descriptors
Transmission line
Calgary area
Electric power demand
Environmental impact
NTS 82I
NTS 82J
NTS 82O
NTS 82P
Oil refinery
Regional planning
Reliability
Route selection
Legal References
Hydro and Electric Energy Act S12
Hydro and Electric Energy Act S14
Hydro and Electric Energy Act S16
Hydro and Electric Energy Act S18
Notes
Decision D83-15 on application No. 820874 to construct and operate a 138 KV transmission line CP 771L and other related facilities to run from existing Turbo refinery substation CP 391 S to City of Calgary boundary and on application 820889 by the City of Calgary for a permit to construct a 240 KV transmission line CC 11,83L and a licence to operate it at 138 KV to run north from the City'S existing No. 11 substation and connect with TransAlta's line at the City boundary (TP.21-26, R.29 W4M to R.1 W5M).
Interveners
Turbo Resources Limited
Genstar Development Company
Bar OW Ranches Ltd.
Wotzke, M.
Less detail

Decision 84-07

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1846
Applicant
Canterra Energy Ltd.
Application Number
831021
831022
Title
Decision on application by Canterra Energy Ltd., 1984 (sour gas pipeline, fuel gas pipeline, Calgary area)
Date
1984
Title
Decision on application by Canterra Energy Ltd., 1984 (sour gas pipeline, fuel gas pipeline, Calgary area)
Date
1984
Applicant
Canterra Energy Ltd.
Application Number
831021
831022
Hearing Panel
DeSorcy GJ
Bohme VE
Goodman CJ
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Pipelines
Descriptors
Calgary area
Fuel gas pipeline
Gas pipeline
Pipeline construction permit
Sour gas
Conflict
Emergency procedure
ID-81-03
Hydrogen sulphide
Land value
NTS 82I
Pipeline accident
Pipeline design
Pipeline route
Regional planning
Route selection
Safety
Urban development
Notes
Decision D84-7 on application No. 831021 to construct fuel gas pipeline from LSD 10-2-22-29 W4M to well sites at 10-13-22-29 W4M, 11-24-22-29 W4M, & 10-20-22-28 W4M and application No. 831022 for sour gas pipeline from well sites to existing pipeline at LSD 10-2-22-29 W4M; Board hearing 1984-02-15/16/17
Interveners
Lammle, B.
Lammle, M.
McKeag, L.
Moeller, A.
Ollerenshaw, F.J.
Pearson, D.
Pearson, R.
Shields, R.
Shields, V.
Soutzo, C.G.
Soutzo, A.G.
Uragi, K.
Workman, D.
Thompson, L.E.
Thompson, L.G.
Walker, D.
Paradis, G.
Paradis, L.
McKinstry, B.
Pawluk, J.
Pawluk, M.
McKeag, A.
City of Calgary
Committee for Toxic Pollutant Controls
Less detail

Decision 85-38

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision982
Applicant
Energy Resources Conservation Board
Application Number
850680
Title
Decision report 85-38: Public meeting to consider lands included in City of Calgary sour gas constraint area
Date
1985
Title
Decision report 85-38: Public meeting to consider lands included in City of Calgary sour gas constraint area
Date
1985
Applicant
Energy Resources Conservation Board
Application Number
850680
Hearing Panel
DeSorcy GJ
Bohme VE
Goodman CJ
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Land use
Descriptors
Land use
Regional planning
Sour gas
Urban development
Calgary area
Conflict
ID-81-03
Hydrogen sulphide
Land value
NTS 82I
Procedure
Notes
Decision D85-38 on proceeding No. 850680 on request by Mr. Fred Ollerenshaw to review the sour gas constraint area established in fall of 1982 for land SE of Calgary City limits insofar as it affects his lands in sections 23 & 24-22-29 W4M.
Interveners
Ollerenshaw, F.
Canterra Energy Ltd.
Soutzo, C.
Soutzo, A.
Bonnycastle, R.
Burgess, J.
City of Calgary
Less detail

Decision 2001-35

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision3359
Applicant
ESBI Alberta Ltd.
Application Number
990005
Title
Decision 2000-35 : ESBI Alberta Ltd. LBC SO contract approval, part G : southern Alberta and Grande Prairie
Date
2001
Title
Decision 2000-35 : ESBI Alberta Ltd. LBC SO contract approval, part G : southern Alberta and Grande Prairie
Date
2001
Applicant
ESBI Alberta Ltd.
Application Number
990005
Hearing Panel
MacDonald NW
Berg AJ
Lock RG
Hearing Type
Board
Utilities
Category
Electric power rate
Descriptors
Public utility
Calgary area
Grande Prairie area
Electric power transmission
Legal References
Electric Utilities Transmission Matters Deficiency Correction Regulation
Approval
Approved
Less detail

Decision 2001-35 Addendum

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision3360
Applicant
ESBI Alberta Ltd.
Application Number
990005
Title
Decision 2000-35 Addendum : ESBI Alberta Ltd. LBC SO contract approval, part G : Addendum A - southern Alberta and Grande Prairie
Date
2001
Title
Decision 2000-35 Addendum : ESBI Alberta Ltd. LBC SO contract approval, part G : Addendum A - southern Alberta and Grande Prairie
Date
2001
Applicant
ESBI Alberta Ltd.
Application Number
990005
Hearing Panel
MacDonald NW
Berg AJ
Lock RG
Hearing Type
Board
Utilities
Category
Electric power rate
Descriptors
Public utility
Calgary area
Grande Prairie area
Electric power transmission
Legal References
Electric Utilities Transmission Matters Deficiency Correction Regulation
Approval
Approved
Less detail

Decision 2003-88

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision3773
Applicant
Compton Petroleum Corporation
Application Number
1276857
1276858
1276859
1276860
1307759
1307760
1278265
1310351
Title
Decision 2003-88: Memorandum of Decision : Compton Petroleum Corporation applications for licences to drill six critical sour natural gas wells, reduced emergency planning zone, special well spacing, and production facilities Okotoks field (southeast Calgary area) - prehearing meeting decison
Date
2003
Title
Decision 2003-88: Memorandum of Decision : Compton Petroleum Corporation applications for licences to drill six critical sour natural gas wells, reduced emergency planning zone, special well spacing, and production facilities Okotoks field (southeast Calgary area) - prehearing meeting decison
Date
2003
Applicant
Compton Petroleum Corporation
Application Number
1276857
1276858
1276859
1276860
1307759
1307760
1278265
1310351
Hearing Panel
Berg AJ
Nichol JR
Miller GJ
Hearing Type
Prehearing
Category
Well licence
Descriptors
Calgary area
Interveners cost
Emergency procedure
Gas producing
Gas well
NTS 82I
Okotoks field
Sour gas
Well licence
Well spacing
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S79
Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S2.020
Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S7.001
Interveners
Agar D
Agar A
Botting R
Brost B
Buckley S
Christensen M
Christensen O
Court L
Hart S
Humenuk S
Jensen D
Jensen B
Kuryk B
Kuryk R
Kutryk A
Kutryk EA
Oloman N
Pujo E
Rayne M
Smith J
Smith R
Walker A
Workman D
Workman C
Yewchuk O
Evans Development Ltd.
Evans B
Evans J
Ollerenshaw Ranch Ltd.
Soutzo A
Soutzo C
White G
White F
White K
White P
White L
Acadia Community Association
Cranston Residents' Association
Inverness Residents' Association (McKenzie Towne)
Lake Bonavista Community Association
Carma Developers Ltd
Southeast Coalition of Residents
Calgary Health Region
City of Calgary
Municipal District of Rocky View
Baiton N
Newton J
Willner H
Willner L
Read R
Thimm H
Yu S
Sierra Club of Canada
Less detail

Decision 2013-20

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision4518
Applicant
Compton Petroleum Corporation
Application Number
1711374
Title
Decision 2013-20: Compton Petroleum Corporation: review of pipeline licence no. 21027 pursuant to default addendum to decision 2000-20 Okotoks field
Date
2013
Title
Decision 2013-20: Compton Petroleum Corporation: review of pipeline licence no. 21027 pursuant to default addendum to decision 2000-20 Okotoks field
Date
2013
Applicant
Compton Petroleum Corporation
Application Number
1711374
Hearing Panel
McManus BT
McManus RC
Engen TC
Hearing Type
No Hearing
Category
Pipelines
Descriptors
Pipeline licence
Urban development
Calgary area
Land use
Resource development
Mazeppa gas plant
Sour gas Facility
Emergency Management Act
Setback
Legal References
Responsible Energy Development Act (REDA)
Energy Resources Conservation Act
Oil and Gas Conservation Act
REDA Transition Regulation
Municipal Government Act
Notes
Change to legal citation effective January 2011
Pipeline Licence No. 21027
Decision 2000-20
Default Addendum to Decision 2000-20 (Default Addendum)
Decision 84-07
Decision 2005-060
Decision 80-6
Informational Letter 80-4
Informational Letter IL 81-7
Inquiry Report D 83-12
Decision 83-13
Decision 84-7
Decision 85-19
Application No. 910253
Directive 056: Energy Development Applications and Schedules
Directive 071: Emergency Preparedness and Response Requirements for the Petroleum Industry
MPP Ltd. Chestermere Pipeline Land Use Planning Review (Planning Review Report)
September 2009 Municipal Development Plan (MDP)
East Regional Context Study
Suburban Residential Growth Study (SRGS)
Strategic Growth & Capital Investment 2011 Plan
Interveners
Olthafer L
Mercer D
Ollerenshaw R
Soutzo (Ollerenshaw-Soutzo) A
Carscallen S
Approval
Approved with conditions
Conditions
[60] Based on the evidence submitted in this proceeding, the AER finds that the pipeline licensed under Pipeline Licence No. 21027 will not adversely affect urban development within the next five years. Therefore, a formal hearing into Pipeline Licence No. 21027 will not be held at this time. Further, in accordance with the intention of the Default Addendum, the AER orders that another informal written review of the pipeline licence be held to determine whether urban development would be adversely affected by the presence of the pipeline within five years of this written review. Based on the results of that written review, the AER will determine whether it should hold a formal hearing to review the pipeline licence. [61 ]The AER finds that Pipeline Licence No. 21027 remains in good standing, and the AER will revisit the status of the licence in its decision on the next informal written review. [62] The licensee of the pipeline is required to initiate the informal written review of the licence with the AER within five years of the date of this decision. Interested parties should have an opportunity to participate in that review process. These interested parties should include, at a minimum, the landowners who own land along the pipeline route within the boundaries of the city of Calgary. [63] The AER affirms the view set out in the numerous previous proceedings and decisions related to energy development in the Chestermere-Okotoks corridor that there will come a point in the future when the pipeline will adversely affect urban development and the sour gas facilities will need to be removed, even if energy resources remain unproduced. This will be necessary in order to avoid having urban development close to these sour facilities. As set out in Decision 2000-20, the AER believes that reducing the sour gas facilities to level-1 should be considered by Compton and notes that the City could apply a 300 m nuisance zone around the sour gas facilities similar to the approach used in northeast Calgary.6 At this time, however, it does not appear that the pipeline setback will have an adverse effect on urban development within the next five years.
Location
xx-18-022-28W4
xx-12-022-29W4
06-18-022-28W4
11-24-022-29W4
10-02-022-29W4
10-13-022-29W4
Less detail

Decision E61-(p.155)

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision770
Applicant
Canadian Fina Oil Limited
Application Number
484
Title
Examiners report on application by Canadian Fina Oil Limited, 1961 (for quarter section spacing for the Cardium zone in the Calgary area)
Date
1961
Title
Examiners report on application by Canadian Fina Oil Limited, 1961 (for quarter section spacing for the Cardium zone in the Calgary area)
Date
1961
Applicant
Canadian Fina Oil Limited
Application Number
484
Hearing Panel
Craig DR
Bohme VE
Hearing Type
Examiners
Category
Spacing
Descriptors
Drilling spacing unit
Cardium Fm
Pressure maintenance
Water injection
Calgary area
Crossfield field
NTS 82O
Notes
Examiners report on application for quarter section spacing; applicant also indicated that pressure maintenance by water injection would be feasible in the future in that area, and that his Company would apply for half section spacing if the Board denied this application.
Approval
Denied
Less detail

Decision E61-(p.237)

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision744
Applicant
Energy Resources Conservation Board
Application Number
571
Title
Examiners report on application by Oil and Gas Conservation Board, 1961 (proposal of the Board for half section spacing units for the Cardium formation in the Calgary area)
Date
1961
Title
Examiners report on application by Oil and Gas Conservation Board, 1961 (proposal of the Board for half section spacing units for the Cardium formation in the Calgary area)
Date
1961
Applicant
Energy Resources Conservation Board
Application Number
571
Hearing Panel
Craig DR
Stabback JG
Hearing Type
Examiners
Category
Spacing
Descriptors
Drilling spacing unit
Cardium Fm
Calgary area
NTS 82O
NTS 82P
Allowable production
Waterflooding
Notes
Examiners report on proposal by the Board's staff that half section spacing units be prescribed for an interim period of two years; majority of operators in the area favour quarter section spacing and Examiners subsequently recommended that quarter section spacing units be prescribed.
Less detail

Decision E62-(p.097)

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision957
Applicant
Bailey Selburn Oil and Gas Ltd.
Application Number
898
Title
Examiners report on application by Bailey Selburn Oil and Gas Ltd., 1962 (to continue for a two year period of well spacing units of one half section for the Cardium formation in the Calgary Crossfield area)
Date
1962
Title
Examiners report on application by Bailey Selburn Oil and Gas Ltd., 1962 (to continue for a two year period of well spacing units of one half section for the Cardium formation in the Calgary Crossfield area)
Date
1962
Applicant
Bailey Selburn Oil and Gas Ltd.
Application Number
898
Hearing Panel
Strom NA
King RH
Hearing Type
Examiners
Category
Spacing
Descriptors
Drilling spacing unit
Cardium Fm
Calgary area
Crossfield Area
NTS 82O
Notes
Examiners report on application requesting a continuation of a two year period of well spacing units of one half section for the said area as well as special dispensation for off target wells in the area under orders 185 and 196.
Less detail

26 records – page 1 of 2.