11 records – page 1 of 1.

Decision 78-02

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2118
Applicant
BP Exploration Canada Limited
Application Number
770629
Title
Decision on application by BP Exploration Canada Limited, 1978 (licence to drill a well in the Chestermere Lake area)
Date
1978
Title
Decision on application by BP Exploration Canada Limited, 1978 (licence to drill a well in the Chestermere Lake area)
Date
1978
Applicant
BP Exploration Canada Limited
Application Number
770629
Hearing Panel
Millard V
DeSorcy GJ
Manyluk AF
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Well licence
Descriptors
Chestermere Lake area
Well licence
Blowout preventer
Casing (well)
Contamination
Elkton Fm
Emergency procedure
Environmental impact
Geologic interpretation
Land value
Locating
NTS 82P
Oil producing
Residential building
Safety
Water pollution
Notes
Decision 78-2 on application No. 770629 for a licence to drill a well in LSD 6-15-24-28 W4M to evaluate and obtain production from the Elkton FM; Board hearing 1977-10-06; adjourned to 1977-11-09
Interveners
The Summer Village of Chestermere Leake
Comport Industries Ltd.
Argyle Management Ltd.
Scott, J.
Scott, C.
Anderson, G.
Location
06-15-024-28W4
Less detail

Decision 82-19

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2059
Applicant
Mitchell Energy Corporation
Application Number
820260
820261
Title
Decision on application by Mitchell Energy Corporation, 1982 (reinstatement of well licence and permit to construct pipelines in the Okotoks area)
Date
1982
Title
Decision on application by Mitchell Energy Corporation, 1982 (reinstatement of well licence and permit to construct pipelines in the Okotoks area)
Date
1982
Applicant
Mitchell Energy Corporation
Application Number
820260
820261
Hearing Panel
DeSorcy GJ
Goodman CJ
Bellows LA
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Pipelines
Descriptors
Fuel gas pipeline
Gas pipeline
Okotoks area
Okotoks field
Pipeline construction permit
Sour gas
Well licence
Blowout preventer
Directional drilling
Drilling cost
Emergency procedure
Energy development
Environmental impact
Equity
ID-81-03
IL-81-07
Gas producing
Gas reserve
Gas well
Hydrogen sulphide
Land use
Land value
Lease drainage
Locating
NTS 82I
Pipeline route
Safety
Urban development
Legal References
Energy Resources Conservation Act S41
Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S2.020
Pipeline Act
Notes
Decision 82-19 on application No. 820260 to reinstate well licence 92961 to drill well in LSD 11-30-20-28 W4M to obtain sour gas production from Crossfield member of Wabamun GP and No. 820261 for permits to construct pipelines to transport sour gas and fuel gas in the area; Board hearing 1982-04-27/28
Interveners
Payne, L.H.
deVries, D.
Rio Frio Ranch Ltd.
Sallenbach, O.
Less detail

Decision 83-17

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2316
Applicant
ICG Resources Ltd.
Canadian Occidental Petroleum Ltd.
Petrogas Processing Ltd.
Application Number
830165
830166
830167
830460
830461
830488
830489
Title
Decision on application by ICG Resources Ltd., 1983 (to drill well and construct pipelines in Crossfield Airdrie area); Decision on application by Canadian Occidental Petroleum Ltd., 1983 (special drilling spacing unit and licence to drill a well in Crossfield Airdrie area); Decision on application by Petrogas Processing Ltd., 1983 (to construct two pipelines in Crossfiled Airdrie area) 1983
Date
1983
Title
Decision on application by ICG Resources Ltd., 1983 (to drill well and construct pipelines in Crossfield Airdrie area); Decision on application by Canadian Occidental Petroleum Ltd., 1983 (special drilling spacing unit and licence to drill a well in Crossfield Airdrie area); Decision on application by Petrogas Processing Ltd., 1983 (to construct two pipelines in Crossfiled Airdrie area) 1983
Date
1983
Applicant
ICG Resources Ltd.
Canadian Occidental Petroleum Ltd.
Petrogas Processing Ltd.
Application Number
830165
830166
830167
830460
830461
830488
830489
Hearing Panel
DeSorcy GJ
Strom NA
Bellows LA
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Well licence
Descriptors
Crossfield Airdrie area
Crossfield East field
Drilling spacing unit
Fuel gas pipeline
Gas pipeline
Gathering line
Pipeline construction permit
Sour gas
Well licence
Blowout control
Blowout preventer
Design criteria
Emergency procedure
Equity
ID-81-03
ID-OG-76-02
Gas producing
Geologic interpretation
Hydrogen sulphide
NTS 82O
NTS 82P
Pipeline route
Route selection
Safety
Target area
Wabamun Gp
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S2.020
Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S4.020
Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S4.050
Pipeline Act
Notes
Decision on application No. 830167 by ICG to drill a well on application No. 830165 by ICG to construct sweet fule gas pipeline to the well, on application No. 830166 by ICG to construct sour gas pipeline to tie well into existing Canoxy gas gathering system on application No. 830461 by Canoxy for a special drilling spacing unit and on application No. 830460 by Canoxy to drill a well, on application No. 830488 by Petrogas for sour gas pipeline proposed well to existing Canoxy gathering system and application No. 830489 by Petrogas to construct sweet fuel gas pipeline to the well sites (all in TP.27, R.28 W4 to R.1 W5)
Interveners
Austin Exploration Ltd.
Associated Engineering Services Ltd.
Fletcher, A.T.
Fletcher, H.
Less detail

Decision 84-05

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1969
Applicant
Energy Resources Conservation Board
Application Number
830007
Title
Decision report 84-05: Lodgepole blowout Inquiry - phase 2: sour gas well blowouts in Alberta: their causes, and actions required to minimize their future occurrence
Date
1984
Title
Decision report 84-05: Lodgepole blowout Inquiry - phase 2: sour gas well blowouts in Alberta: their causes, and actions required to minimize their future occurrence
Date
1984
Applicant
Energy Resources Conservation Board
Application Number
830007
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Inquiry - Blowout
Descriptors
Blowout (well)
Drilling (well)
Lodgepole blowout
Sour gas
Alberta
Blowout preventer
Cost analysis
Drilling problem
Emergency procedure
Inspecting
Insurance
Recommendation
Regulation
Safety
Training
Well classification
Notes
Decision D84-5 on phase 2 of proceeding No. 830007; see Decision No. D84-9 for phase 1 report
Interveners
F. G. Bercha and Associates Limited Confer Consulting Ltd. Shaw K. L. Energy Resources Conservation Board
Pembina Area Sour Gas Exposures Committee
Sams C.
Canadian Association of Oilwell Drilling Contractors
Canadian Petroleum Association
Independent Petroleum Association of Canada
Sabey D. 0.
Canterra Energy Ltd.
Dome Petroleum Limited
Gulf Canada Resources Inc.
Petro-Canada Inc.
Shell Canada Resources Limited
Alberta Government Departments
Amoco Canada Petroleum Company Ltd.
Bercha FG
Griffin BJ
Macdonald RI
Engbloom GM
Shaw KL
Remmer WG
May EF
McFarlane BE
Bissett KR
Whitelock C
Sams C
Grigg PC
Rath H
Parker IM
Maciej H
Elser WA
Farries JK
Sawotin WH
Lewis D
Reid R
Thomas RL
Strain HJ
Wichert A
Demosky LD
Belczewski DS
Smith FC
Wallace AE
McGrath RT
Brown KC
Roeske WE
Tilbe JR
Piaskoski J
Straub B
Murray AS
Less detail

Decision 84-28

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1690
Applicant
Canterra Energy Ltd.
Application Number
830495
Title
Decision on application by Canterra Energy Ltd., 1984 (critical sour well in the Sundre area)
Date
1984
Title
Decision on application by Canterra Energy Ltd., 1984 (critical sour well in the Sundre area)
Date
1984
Applicant
Canterra Energy Ltd.
Application Number
830495
Hearing Panel
DeSorcy GJ
Goodman CJ
Bellows LA
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Well licence
Descriptors
Bergen area
Sour gas
Sundre area
Well licence
Blowout control
Blowout preventer
Casing string design
Drilling program
Emergency procedure
ID-81-03
Exploratory well
Gas producing
Gas well
Health
Hydrogen sulphide
Inspecting
Leduc Fm
NTS 82O
Marketing
Plugging
Producing well
Safety
Safety equipment
Solvent
Sulphur
Well classification
Notes
Decision D84-28 on application No. 830495 for a licence to drill a critical sour gas well in the Sundre area in LSD 12-12-32-6 W5M to evaluate and obtain production from the Leduc FM; Board hearing 1984-08-01/02/03/07/08/09/10/11
Interveners
Bergen Ratepayers Association
Inter-Varsity Christian Fellowship
Community of Fallen Timber
Town of Sundre
Mountain View Land Holders Group
City of Red Deer
Amoco Canada Petroleum Co. Ltd.
Burton, S.
Cloakey, G.E.
Goodwin, B.
Goodwin, M.
Grimstead, J.
Grimstead, C.
Halvorson, I.
Halvorson, M.
Worobetz, T.
Worobetz, M.
The Bauman Family
Bauman, Dr. J.A.
Haug, J.
Orr, J.
Huisman, Dr. R.
Newell, A.
Location
12-12-032-06W5
Less detail

Decision 84-B

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1695
Applicant
East Claresholm Clean Air Association
Title
Public meeting to consider concerns regarding an uncontrolled flow of sour gas and the operation of a sour gas plant in the Claresholm area
Date
1984
Title
Public meeting to consider concerns regarding an uncontrolled flow of sour gas and the operation of a sour gas plant in the Claresholm area
Date
1984
Applicant
East Claresholm Clean Air Association
Hearing Panel
Bellows LA
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Inquiry
Descriptors
Air pollution
Blowout (well)
Blowout control
Claresholm area
Gas processing plant
Sour gas
Air quality
Blowout preventer
Emergency procedure
Environmental impact
Evacuation
Gas well
Health
Hydrogen sulphide
Livestock
Monitoring
NTS 82H
NTS 82I
Planning
Safety
Soil analysis
Notes
Report on a public meeting regarding the sour gas well blowout (Drummond et al Claresholm 6-30-12-25 W4M) and ongoing concerns over the operation of the Claresholm sour gas processing plant located in the SW quarter of section 30-12-25 W4M; public meeting 1984-11-08
Less detail

Decision E58-(p.224)

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision327
Applicant
Energy Resources Conservation Board
Title
Examiners report on inquiry into a blowout which occurred at Colorado et al Bigoray 10-18-51-8 well, 1958
Date
1958
Title
Examiners report on inquiry into a blowout which occurred at Colorado et al Bigoray 10-18-51-8 well, 1958
Date
1958
Applicant
Energy Resources Conservation Board
Hearing Panel
Macleod NA
Manyluk AF
Hearing Type
Examiners
Category
Inquiry - Blowout
Descriptors
Inquiry
Blowout (well)
Blowout preventer
Blowout control
Drilling equipment
Safety
Notes
Examiners recommend that commonwealth drilling company be severely reprimanded for the violation of board regulations; subject company required to immediately install outside source of heat on all operating rigs and to undergo further training in regard to the operation of blowout prevention equipment
Less detail

Decision E59-(p.026)

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision549
Applicant
Energy Resources Conservation Board
Title
Examiners report on inquiry into blowout prevention equipment and practices of the Regent drilling rig No. 30 on the well, Cities Service Pembina 6-36-48-9, 1959
Date
1959
Title
Examiners report on inquiry into blowout prevention equipment and practices of the Regent drilling rig No. 30 on the well, Cities Service Pembina 6-36-48-9, 1959
Date
1959
Applicant
Energy Resources Conservation Board
Hearing Panel
Macleod NA
Manyluk AF
Hearing Type
Examiners
Category
Inquiry
Descriptors
Inquiry
Blowout preventer
Drilling equipment
Drilling rig
Blowout control
Hydraulics
Pembina field
Notes
Examiners report on inquiry into hydraulic line leaks, poorly maintained hydril rubbers, and schaffer blend rams that could not be closed.
Less detail

Decision E59-(p.029)

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision548
Applicant
Energy Resources Conservation Board
Title
Examiners report on inquiry into blowout prevention equipment and practices at the Dernick - Guyer drilling rig No. 1 while drilling on the RCV Calstan Clive N.W. 13-36-40-25 well, 1959
Date
1959
Title
Examiners report on inquiry into blowout prevention equipment and practices at the Dernick - Guyer drilling rig No. 1 while drilling on the RCV Calstan Clive N.W. 13-36-40-25 well, 1959
Date
1959
Applicant
Energy Resources Conservation Board
Hearing Panel
Macleod NA
Manyluk AF
Hearing Type
Examiners
Category
Inquiry
Descriptors
Inquiry
Blowout control
Equipment
Blowout preventer
Drilling rig
Drilling equipment
Notes
Examiners report on inquiry into allegations that blowout preventers were not being tested daily as required by Drilling and Production Regulations; as well, the pressure accumulator was not serviceable and manual controls were not connected.
Less detail

Decision E59-(p.256)

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision457
Applicant
Energy Resources Conservation Board
Title
Examiners report on inquiry into alleged contraventions of the Drilling and Production Regulations by Loffland Brothers Company of Canada, 1959
Date
1959
Title
Examiners report on inquiry into alleged contraventions of the Drilling and Production Regulations by Loffland Brothers Company of Canada, 1959
Date
1959
Applicant
Energy Resources Conservation Board
Hearing Panel
Edgecombe RW
Macleod NA
Hearing Type
Examiners
Category
Inquiry
Descriptors
Inquiry
Blowout (well)
Blowout preventer
Equipment
Swan Hills field
NTS 83J
Legal References
Drilling and Production Regulation
Notes
Examiners report on inquiry into the well, Home Regent A Swan Hills 4-10-67-10, which was inspected and found to have leaking hydraulic lines, and disconnected manual controls.
Less detail

Decision E59-(p.275)

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision453
Applicant
Energy Resources Conservation Board
Title
Examiners report on inquiry into alleged contraventions of the Drilling and Production Regulations by Brown Drilling Ltd. at the well Mollusca et al E Drum 14-6-29-18, 1959
Date
1959
Title
Examiners report on inquiry into alleged contraventions of the Drilling and Production Regulations by Brown Drilling Ltd. at the well Mollusca et al E Drum 14-6-29-18, 1959
Date
1959
Applicant
Energy Resources Conservation Board
Hearing Panel
Bohme VE
Macleod NA
Hearing Type
Examiners
Category
Inquiry
Descriptors
Inquiry
Blowout preventer
Legal References
Drilling and Production Regulation
Notes
Examiners report on inquiry into drilling that continued when no effectively operating blowout prevention equipment was available; Examiners recommend that Brown Drilling Ltd. be strongly warned that their permit to operate may be cancelled.
Less detail

11 records – page 1 of 1.