Narrow Results By
Decision 79-A
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2344
- Applicant
- Great Canadian Oil Sands Limited
- Application Number
- 780318
- Title
- Decision on application by Great Canadian Oil Sands Limited, 1979 (Oil and Gas Conservation Act, part 8)
- Date
- 1979
- Title
- Decision on application by Great Canadian Oil Sands Limited, 1979 (Oil and Gas Conservation Act, part 8)
- Date
- 1979
- Applicant
- Great Canadian Oil Sands Limited
- Application Number
- 780318
- Hearing Panel
- Bohme VE
- Evans RG
- Kupchanko EE
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Category
- Oil sands
- Descriptors
- Great Canadian Oil Sands
- Oil mining
- Suncor plant
- Oil sands oil recovery
- Oil sands project
- Air quality
- Athabasca River
- Benefit cost analysis
- Delayed coking
- Effluent
- Emission
- Environmental impact
- Expansion
- Material balance
- Mine design
- NTS 74E
- Open pit mining
- Overburden ratio
- Plant design
- Pollution control
- Recovery factor
- Socio-economic effect
- Sulphur dioxide
- Sulphur recovery
- Surface mining
- Upgrading
- Waste disposal
- Water quality
- Legal References
- Oil and Gas Conservation Act S43
- Notes
- ERCB report 79-A on application No. 780318 to amend approval No. 1944 to modify and expand existing facilities located in TP.92-93, R.10, W4M; Board hearing 1979-01-30/31
Decision 2013-17
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision4515
- Applicant
- Tech Resources Limited
- Application Number
- 1749543
- 1749567
- 1749568
- 1749569
- 1749570
- 1749572
- 1749605
- 1749607
- 1749620
- 1751999
- 1752756
- 1763318
- 1763325
- 1763326
- 1763327
- Title
- Decision 2013-017 : Teck Resources Ltd. application for oil sands evaluation well licences undefined field
- Date
- 2013
- Title
- Decision 2013-017 : Teck Resources Ltd. application for oil sands evaluation well licences undefined field
- Date
- 2013
- Applicant
- Tech Resources Limited
- Application Number
- 1749543
- 1749567
- 1749568
- 1749569
- 1749570
- 1749572
- 1749605
- 1749607
- 1749620
- 1751999
- 1752756
- 1763318
- 1763325
- 1763326
- 1763327
- Hearing Panel
- McManus RC
- Bolton AH
- McNeil B
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Category
- Well licence
- Descriptors
- Evaluation
- Bitumen
- Fort Chipewyan area
- Coring
- Land use
- Water quality
- Athabasca River area
- Athabasca River Delta
- Wildlife
- Animal migration
- Native land claims
- Public interest
- Oil Sands
- McMurray FM
- Fort Mackay area
- Well
- Legal References
- Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S2.030
- Oil and Gas Conservation Act S4
- Oil Sands Conservation Act S3
- Responsible Energy Development Act (REDA) D15
- 2013 ABAER 017
- Notes
- Change to legal citation effective January 2011
- Interveners
- Athabasca Chipewyan First Nation (ACFN)
- Mikisew Cree First Nation (MCFN)
- Fort Chipewyan Métis Local 125 (FCM)
- Clark G
- Approval
- Approved with conditions
- Conditions
- SUMMARY OF CONDITIONS AND COMMITMENTS Conditions generally are requirements in addition to or otherwise expanding upon existing regulations and guidelines. An applicant must comply with conditions or it is in breach of its approval and subject to enforcement action by the AER. Enforcement of an approval includes enforcement of the conditions attached to that licence. Sanctions imposed for the breach of such conditions may include the suspension of the approval, resulting in the shut-in of a facility. The conditions imposed on the licence are summarized below. Undertakings, promises, and commitments (collectively referred to as commitments) to parties involving activities or operations that are not strictly required under AER requirements. These commitments are separate arrangements between the parties and do not constitute conditions of the AER’s approval of the applications. The commitments that have been given some weight by the AER are summarized below. The AER expects the applicant to comply with commitments made to all parties. However, while the AER has considered these commitments in arriving at its decision, the AER cannot enforce them. If the applicant does not comply with commitments made, affected parties may request a review of the original approval. At that time, the AER will assess whether the circumstances regarding any failed commitment warrant a review of the original approval.
- COMMITMENTS BY TECK Teck committed to providing FCM with Directive 056 notification at the same time it provides notification to other Fort Chipewyan-based First Nations in the future.