70 records – page 1 of 4.

Decision 73-14

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2197
Applicant
Imperial Oil Limited
Application Number
6823
Title
Decision on application by Imperial Oil Limited, 1973 (increase in the maximum permitted hydrogen sulphide inlet rate at the Golden Spike gas processing plant)
Date
1973
Title
Decision on application by Imperial Oil Limited, 1973 (increase in the maximum permitted hydrogen sulphide inlet rate at the Golden Spike gas processing plant)
Date
1973
Applicant
Imperial Oil Limited
Application Number
6823
Hearing Panel
Govier GW
Craig DR
DeSorcy GJ
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Gas processing
Descriptors
Hydrogen sulphide
Air quality
Gas processing plant
Golden Spike field
Sour gas
Notes
Decision 73-14 and addendum on application No. 6823 to amend approval No. 1531 to authorize increase in maximum hydrogen sulphide inlet rate and maximum permitted sulphur dioxide emission rate at Golden Spike gas processing plant; approval No. 1531D
Interveners
Goebel, I.
Adolph, J.
McDonald, M.
Sinclair, K.V.
Sinclair, R.
Miller, A.K.
Unifarm
Hage, K.D.
Ironside, R.G.
Wilson, D.J.
Jappsen, W.
Secord, R.
Michna, F.W.
Morin, R.D.
Vanthoff, J.
Howell, L.
Boje, J.
Less detail

Decision 77-01

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2147
Applicant
General Crude Oil Company Northern
Application Number
9414
9415
9840
Title
Decision on application by General Crude Oil Company Northern, 1977 (gas processing and pipeline construction Teepee Creek-Sexsmith areas)
Date
1977
Title
Decision on application by General Crude Oil Company Northern, 1977 (gas processing and pipeline construction Teepee Creek-Sexsmith areas)
Date
1977
Applicant
General Crude Oil Company Northern
Application Number
9414
9415
9840
Hearing Panel
Webber HJ
Bellows LA
Strom NA
Hearing Type
Examiners
Category
Pipelines
Descriptors
Gas pipeline
Gas processing plant
Sour gas
Teepee field
Air quality
Emergency procedure
Environmental impact
Gas flaring
Monitoring
NTS 83M
Socio-economic effect
Safety
Sulphur dioxide
Notes
Decision 77-1 on application No. 9414, No. 9415 and No. 9840 to construct a sour gas plant in section 2-74-4 W6M and to construct secondary lines to transport sour gas from points in LSD 10-21-73-3 W6M and LSD 6-26-73-4 W6M to the plant site and to construct a secondary line to transport sour gas from a point in LSD 10-12-74-6 W6M to the plant site.
Interveners
Peace River Regional Planning
County of Grande Prairie
Smith, D.
Hollingworth, N.
Less detail

Decision 79-A

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2344
Applicant
Great Canadian Oil Sands Limited
Application Number
780318
Title
Decision on application by Great Canadian Oil Sands Limited, 1979 (Oil and Gas Conservation Act, part 8)
Date
1979
Title
Decision on application by Great Canadian Oil Sands Limited, 1979 (Oil and Gas Conservation Act, part 8)
Date
1979
Applicant
Great Canadian Oil Sands Limited
Application Number
780318
Hearing Panel
Bohme VE
Evans RG
Kupchanko EE
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Oil sands
Descriptors
Great Canadian Oil Sands
Oil mining
Suncor plant
Oil sands oil recovery
Oil sands project
Air quality
Athabasca River
Benefit cost analysis
Delayed coking
Effluent
Emission
Environmental impact
Expansion
Material balance
Mine design
NTS 74E
Open pit mining
Overburden ratio
Plant design
Pollution control
Recovery factor
Socio-economic effect
Sulphur dioxide
Sulphur recovery
Surface mining
Upgrading
Waste disposal
Water quality
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S43
Notes
ERCB report 79-A on application No. 780318 to amend approval No. 1944 to modify and expand existing facilities located in TP.92-93, R.10, W4M; Board hearing 1979-01-30/31
Less detail

Decision 80-26

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2013
Applicant
Chieftain Development Company Ltd.
Application Number
790487
Title
Decision on application by Chieftain Development Co. Ltd., 1980 (gas processing plant - Hythe-Brainard area)
Date
1980
Title
Decision on application by Chieftain Development Co. Ltd., 1980 (gas processing plant - Hythe-Brainard area)
Date
1980
Applicant
Chieftain Development Company Ltd.
Application Number
790487
Hearing Panel
Webber HJ
Bellows LA
Lupul SL
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Gas processing
Descriptors
Gas processing plant
Grande Prairie area
Sour gas
Air quality
Amine
Claus process
Emission
Environmental impact
Gas processing
Locating
Plant design
Procedure
Sulphur recovery
Legal References
Energy Resources Conservation Act
Notes
Decision 80-26 with Examiners report attached on application No. 790487 to construct a gas processing plant about 19 km northwest of Hythe to process natural gas (75% of which would be sour gas) (TP.74, R.12, W6M); Examiners hearing 1980-07-22 adjourned to 1980-08-14/15/20/21/22
Interveners
Alberta Women's Institutes, Ray Lake Branch
Barnes, E.T.
Blum, J.
Callihoo, R.
Callihoo, G.
Elvestad, L.
Elvestad, R.
Epp, E.
Fischer, G.W.
Gibson, A.O.
Harpe, A.
Harpe, O.
Harpe, T
Harpe, R.
Horse Lake Indian Band
Johnstone, A.
La Glace and District Petitioners
Loberg, G.
Loberg, E.
Lumbis, K.
McAllister, Y.
The Peace Country Acid Soils Committee
Regional Petitioners
Tiesenhausen, I.
Tiesenhausen, N.
Tiesenhausen, R.
The Trumpeter Swan Society
The Valhalla Save Our Soils
The Village of Hythe
Less detail

Decision 81-09

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1758
Applicant
Panther Resources Ltd.
Application Number
800651
Title
Examiners report on application by Panther Resources Ltd., 1981 (gas processing plant)
Date
1981
Title
Examiners report on application by Panther Resources Ltd., 1981 (gas processing plant)
Date
1981
Applicant
Panther Resources Ltd.
Application Number
800651
Hearing Panel
Evans RG
Pearson DG
Remmer WG
Hearing Type
Examiners
Category
Gas processing
Descriptors
Duhamel field
Gas processing plant
Sour gas
Acidification
Air quality
Economic analysis
Emission
Environmental impact
Flare
Hydrogen sulphide removal
Livestock
Locating
Monitoring
NTS 83A
Sulphur dioxide
Sulphur recovery
Water quality
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S38
Notes
ERCB Examiners report No. E81-9 on application No. 800651 to construct and operate a sour gas processing plant southwest of Camrose in LSD 5-31-45-20 W4M; Examiners' hearing 81-01-15 adjourned to 81-03-17/18/19
Interveners
City of Camrose
County of Camrose No.22
Cordes, K.
Calvin, G.
Noden, D.
Luz, W.
Klapstein, W.
Sauer, J.
Sauer, K.
Weyhausen, H.
Weyga Farming Ltd.
Watterodt, T.
Watterodt, W.
Watterodt, M.
Schroeder, D.
Schroeder, K.
Schroeder, P.
Schroeder, H.
Graefin Von Helldorf, V.
Schroeser, I.
Baumgarten, E.
Braim, B.
Krangnes, D.
Snider, R.
Tate, R.
Less detail

Decision 81-10

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1998
Applicant
Alberta Gas Ethylene Company Limited
Application Number
800853
Title
Decision on application by Alberta Gas Ethylene Company Ltd., 1981 (industrial development permit to manufacture ethylene)
Date
1981
Title
Decision on application by Alberta Gas Ethylene Company Ltd., 1981 (industrial development permit to manufacture ethylene)
Date
1981
Applicant
Alberta Gas Ethylene Company Limited
Application Number
800853
Hearing Panel
DeSorcy GJ
Strom NA
Webber HJ
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Industrial development permit
Descriptors
Chemical plant
Ethylene
Industrial development permit
Red Deer area
Air quality
Benefit cost analysis
Design criteria
Emission
Environmental impact
Ethane
Ethane - raw material
Forecasting
Land use
Marketing
Natural gas - fuel
Noise (sound)
NTS 83A
Pollution
Raw material
Socio-economic effect
Supply (economics)
Water
Water quality
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S42
Notes
Decision 81-10 on application No. 800853 to use ethane as feedstock and natural gas as fuel to manufacture ethylene in plant to be constructed (unit 3) adjacent to present facilities (units 1&2) near Joffre (TP.38, R.25, W4M); Board hearing 1981-04-07/08
Interveners
Preserve Agricultural Land
Red Deer Regional Planning Commission
Hainsworth, B.W.
Chessor, D.
Alberta Energy Company Ltd.
Esso Chemical Canada
Du Pont Canada Inc.
Dow Chemical of Canada Limited
NOVA, AN ALBERTA CORPORATION
Shell Canada Limited
Union Carbide Canada Limited
Dome Petroleum Limited
Esso Resources Canada Limited
Gulf Canada Resources Inc.
Hudson's Bay Oil and Gas Company Limited
Sulpetro Limited
Texaco Canada Resources Ltd.
Less detail

Decision 81-12

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1996
Applicant
Phillips Petroleum Company Western Hemisphere
Application Number
801022
Title
Decision on application by Phillips Petroleum Company Western Hemisphere, 1981 (gas processing plant - Morley-Ghost River area)
Date
1981
Title
Decision on application by Phillips Petroleum Company Western Hemisphere, 1981 (gas processing plant - Morley-Ghost River area)
Date
1981
Applicant
Phillips Petroleum Company Western Hemisphere
Application Number
801022
Hearing Panel
DeSorcy GJ
Strom NA
Weaver Dr. RS
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Gas processing
Descriptors
Gas processing plant
Indians of North America
Morley field
Salter field
Sour gas
Air quality
Capacity
Desulphurization
Emission
Environmental impact
Flare
Hydrogen sulphide removal
Jurisdiction
Land use
Locating
Monitoring
NTS 82O
Plant location
Safety
Site survey
Sulphur dioxide
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S38
Notes
Decision 81-12 on application No. 801022 to process sour gas in one of 3 possible sites in TP.26, R.7-8, W5M; Board hearing 1981-04-22/24/27
Interveners
Stoney Band of Indians
Council of the Summer Village of Ghost Lake
Ghost Valley Protection Committee
Wasson, W.A.
Alberta Outfitters Association
The 6th Calgary Boy Scouts Group Committee
Kings' Fold Foundation
David H. McDougall Ranch
Wolf, R.E.
Calgary Regional Planning Commission
Improvement District No. 8
Less detail

Decision 82-12

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2066
Applicant
ESSO Resources Canada Limited
Application Number
810520
Title
Decision on application by Esso Resources Canada Limited, 1982 (Quirk Creek gas processing plant)
Date
1982
Title
Decision on application by Esso Resources Canada Limited, 1982 (Quirk Creek gas processing plant)
Date
1982
Applicant
ESSO Resources Canada Limited
Application Number
810520
Hearing Panel
Millard V
Strom NA
Evans RG
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Gas processing
Descriptors
Gas processing plant
Moose field
Quirk Creek plant
Sour gas
Whiskey field
Air pollution
Air quality
Emergency procedure
Emission
Environmental impact
ID-80-02
IL-71-29
IL-80-24
Expansion
Hydrogen sulphide
Injection
Monitoring
NTS 82J
Pollution control
Procedure
Sulphur dioxide
Sulphur recovery
Underground
Waste disposal
Water pollution
Legal References
Energy Resources Conservation Act S2
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S4
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S26
Notes
Decision 82-12 on application No. 810520 to utilize spare plant capacity to process sour gas reserves from Moose and Whiskey fields at the Quirk Creek gas plant located in the south half of section 4-21-4 W5M; Board hearing 1981-11-04/05/06/23/24/25/26 and 1981-12-14/15/16/17/18 and 1982-01-05/06; see also related Decision D82-3 on Jumping Pound gas plant and ERCB report 82-E for Decisions on related pipeline applications by Shell and Decision D83-8 for local interveners cost awards; see also related report 82-D
Interveners
Shell Canada Resources Limited
Hanen, Z.
Rumsey Ranches
Russell, A.
Canadian Wildlife Federation
Wolf, R.E.
Less detail

Decision 82-21

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2057
Applicant
Inverness Petroleum Ltd.
Application Number
810434
820033
Title
Decision on application by Inverness Petroleum Ltd., 1982 (approval of a gas processing plant and related gas gathering facilities in the Silver Valley area)
Date
1982
Title
Decision on application by Inverness Petroleum Ltd., 1982 (approval of a gas processing plant and related gas gathering facilities in the Silver Valley area)
Date
1982
Applicant
Inverness Petroleum Ltd.
Application Number
810434
820033
Hearing Panel
DeSorcy GJ
Bohme VE
Goodman CJ
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Pipelines
Descriptors
Gas pipeline
Gas processing plant
Gathering line
Pipeline construction permit
Sour gas
Agricultural land
Air quality
Deposition
Emission
Environment protection
Environmental impact
Flare
Health
Livestock
Mathematical model
NTS 84D
Safety
Selenium
Soil analysis
Sulphur dioxide
Water quality
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S26
Pipeline Act
Notes
Decision 82-21 on application No. 810434 to construct a gas plant in LSD 13-27-81-11 W6M and on application No. 820033 for related gas gathering and pipeline facilities; Board hearing 1982-03-22/23
Interveners
Josephine Environmental Protection Group
Rehaume AB
Umbach JE
Scobel K
Baxter DM
Travis KR
Phillips BM
Weiss K
Brown HD
Harpe R
Nagel H
National Farmers Union
Staton ME
Hendricks J
Johnstone AH
Alberta Environment
Liu CS
Defir J
Graveland D
Less detail

Decision 82-36

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2043
Applicant
Albion Petroleum Corporation Limited
Application Number
820244
Title
Decision on application by Albion Petroleum Corporation Ltd., 1982 (experimental in situ oil sands scheme in the Bonnyville area)
Date
1982
Title
Decision on application by Albion Petroleum Corporation Ltd., 1982 (experimental in situ oil sands scheme in the Bonnyville area)
Date
1982
Applicant
Albion Petroleum Corporation Limited
Application Number
820244
Hearing Panel
DeSorcy GJ
Strom NA
Goodman CJ
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Oil sands
Descriptors
Bonnyville area
Cyclic steam injection
In situ
Steam injection
Oil sands oil recovery
Oil sands project
Air quality
Colony sand
Emission
Environmental impact
Grand Rapids Fm
Land use
Noise (sound)
NTS 73L
Pilot scale
Pollution
Producing equipment
Safety
Waste disposal
Water disposal
Water supply
Well pattern
Well spacing
Notes
Decision 82-36 on application No. 820244 for an experimental oil sands scheme in section 12-61-6 W4M to recover bitumen from the Colony sand of the Cold Lake-upper Grand Rapids oil sand deposit by drilling 17 slant hole wells and completing an existing evaluation well to form an 18-well pattern an using cyclic steam injection.
Interveners
Community Advisory Committee
W-32 Corporation Limited
Six-Vee Enterprises Limited
BP Exploration Canada Limited
Less detail

Decision 82-39

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2040
Applicant
Amoco Canada Petroleum Company Limited
Application Number
820308
Title
Decision on application by Amoco Canada Petroleum Company Ltd., 1982 (approval of a solution gas processing plant St. Albert area)
Date
1982
Title
Decision on application by Amoco Canada Petroleum Company Ltd., 1982 (approval of a solution gas processing plant St. Albert area)
Date
1982
Applicant
Amoco Canada Petroleum Company Limited
Application Number
820308
Hearing Panel
DeSorcy GJ
Bohme VE
Brushett ER
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Gas processing
Descriptors
Gas processing plant
Morinville field
Sour gas
St. Albert area
St. Albert-Big Lake field
Air quality
Atmospheric diffusion
Dissolved gas
Emergency procedure
Emission
Environmental impact
Flare
Gas conservation
Health
Hydrogen sulphide
Land use
Locating
NTS 83H
Plant location
Safety
Sulphur dioxide
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S26
Notes
Decision 82-39 on application No. 820308 to process sour solution gas from three batteries in the St. Albert-Big Lake field & Morinville field at an existing battery site in LSD 14-36-53-26 W4M; Board hearing 1982-10-06/07
Interveners
Silver Chief Community Gas Plant Committee
Genstar Land Development
Municipal District of Sturgeon No. 90
Helenslea Acres
Less detail

Decision 83-04

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1201
Applicant
Citadel Resources Ltd.
Scion Petroleum Engineering Limited
Application Number
820763
Title
Examiners report on application by Citadel Resources Ltd., 1983 (sour gas processing plant Sundre area)
Date
1983
Title
Examiners report on application by Citadel Resources Ltd., 1983 (sour gas processing plant Sundre area)
Date
1983
Applicant
Citadel Resources Ltd.
Scion Petroleum Engineering Limited
Application Number
820763
Hearing Panel
Homeniuk TF
Mazurek LA
Nichol JR
Hearing Type
Examiners
Category
Gas processing
Descriptors
Gas processing plant
Sour gas
Sundre area
Air pollution
Air quality
Design criteria
Emergency procedure
Emission
Health
Locating
Monitoring
Noise (sound)
NTS 82O
Plant location
Safety
Sulphur dioxide
Truck
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S26
Notes
Examiners report E83-4 on application No. 820763 by Scion Petroleum & Gildex Ltd. on behalf of Citadel for approval to construct a sour gas processing plant in LSD 13-20-33-5 W5M; Examiners hearing 1982-10-27 adjourned to 1982-11-25
Interveners
Residents in the County of Mountainview
Alberda, R.
Less detail

Decision 83-10|83-10 Addendum

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2388
Applicant
Voyager Petroleums Limited
Signalta Resources Limited
Application Number
821089
830012
830087
Title
Decision on application by Voyager Petroleums Ltd., 1983 (sour gas processing in east-central Alberta); Decision on application by Signalta Resources Limited, 1983 (sour gas processing in east-central Alberta) (and addendum)
Date
1983
Title
Decision on application by Voyager Petroleums Ltd., 1983 (sour gas processing in east-central Alberta); Decision on application by Signalta Resources Limited, 1983 (sour gas processing in east-central Alberta) (and addendum)
Date
1983
Applicant
Voyager Petroleums Limited
Signalta Resources Limited
Application Number
821089
830012
830087
Hearing Panel
DeSorcy GJ
Goodman CJ
Morin EJ
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Gas processing
Descriptors
Amine
Forestburg field
Gas processing
Gas processing plant
Heisler gas plant
Iron sponge process
Strome field
Air quality
Economic analysis
Emergency procedure
Emission
Environmental impact
Flare
Health
Hydrogen sulphide removal
NTS 83A
Safety
Sulphur dioxide
Sulphur recovery
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S26
Notes
Decision D83-10 on application No. 821089 by Voyager to construct & operate sour gas processing facilities at its well in LSD 4-26-41-16 W4M and on application No. 830012 by Signalta for approval to expand the existing Heisler gas plant and install amine sweetening facilities in LSD 13-14-42-16 W4M and on application No. 830087 by Signalta to construct and operate an iron sponge sweetening unit at its well in LSD 10-31-42-15 W4M; Board hearing 1983-03-29/30; see also addendum to D83-10 which deals further with application No. 821089
Interveners
East Central Landholders Protective Association
Hastings Coulee Community
Warren Henderson Family
Henderson, W.
Robert Coulthard Family
Coulthard, R.
Fossen, E.
Fossen, R.
Art Hihn Family
Hihn, M.
Hihn, A.
Kroetsch, C.
Kroetsch, B.
The Town of Daysland
The Village of Forestburg
Aberan Angus Farm
Less detail

Decision 83-20

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1185
Applicant
Consolidated Pipe Lines Company.
Application Number
830141
Title
Examiners report on application by Consolidated Pipe Lines Company, 1983 (gas processing plant Claresholm field)
Date
1983
Title
Examiners report on application by Consolidated Pipe Lines Company, 1983 (gas processing plant Claresholm field)
Date
1983
Applicant
Consolidated Pipe Lines Company.
Application Number
830141
Hearing Panel
Morin EJ
Brushett ER
Fox EG
Hearing Type
Examiners
Category
Gas processing
Descriptors
Claresholm field
Gas processing plant
Sour gas
Air quality
Community relations
Disposal well
Dissolved gas
Emission
Environmental impact
Flare
Gas conservation
Health
Hydrogen sulphide
Monitoring
NTS 82I
Sulphur dioxide
Sulphur recovery
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S26
Notes
ERCB Examiners report E83-20 on application No. 830141 to construct and operate a sour gas processing plant at an existing well located in LSD 6-30-12-25 W4M; Examiners hearing 1983-09-06, 1983-10-12/13
Interveners
Drummond Oil & Gas Ltd.
Town of Claresholm
Oldman River Regional Planning Commission
East Claresholm Clean Air Association
Willow Creek Surface Rights Society
M.G. Mulholland Farms Ltd.
Berg, V.
Berg, D.
Darch, O.
Darch, D.
Deering, V.
Everl, D.
Eberl, F.
Finley, D.
Kruszewski, D.
Kruszewski, S.
Laing, A.
Laing, G.
Opp, F.
Opp, D.
Prusky, M.
Roemmele Farms Ltd.
Ulrich, H.
Weerstra, M.
Less detail

Decision 83-20

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2308
Applicant
Petro-Canada Inc.
Application Number
830041
Title
Decision on application by Petro-Canada Inc., 1983 (gas processing plant, Brazeau River field)
Date
1983
Title
Decision on application by Petro-Canada Inc., 1983 (gas processing plant, Brazeau River field)
Date
1983
Applicant
Petro-Canada Inc.
Application Number
830041
Hearing Panel
Bohme VE
Goodman CJ
Bray JA
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Gas processing
Descriptors
Brazeau River field
Gas processing plant
Sour gas
Air quality
Emission
Energy development
Environmental impact
Gas cycling
Gas producing
Hydrogen sulphide
NTS 83G
Planning
Sulphur dioxide
Sulphur recovery
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S26
Notes
Decision D83-20 on application No. 830041 to construct gas processing plant in LSD 4 of section 31, TP.48, R.12, W5 to process sour gas from the Brazeau River field; Board hearing 1983-07-19/20
Interveners
Hudson's Bay Oil and Gas Company Limited
Texaco Canada Resources Ltd.
Amoco Canada Petroleum Company Ltd.
Pete Calvert Road Maintenance
Wild Card Enterprises Ltd.
D.V. Meter Ltd.
Town of Drayton Valley
Pembina Area Sour Gas Exposures Committee
Less detail

Decision 83-A

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2466
Applicant
McLeod River Coal Ltd.
Application Number
820294
Title
Decision on application by McLeod River Coal Ltd., 1983 (McLeod River coal project, Hinton)
Date
1983
Title
Decision on application by McLeod River Coal Ltd., 1983 (McLeod River coal project, Hinton)
Date
1983
Applicant
McLeod River Coal Ltd.
Application Number
820294
Hearing Panel
Berkowitz N
Strom NA
Mink FJ
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Coal
Descriptors
Coal mine
Coal preparation plant
Coal project
Coalspur coal field
Hinton area
McLeod River coal project
Surface mining
Air quality
Bituminous coal
Capitalized cost
Coal reserve
Cost analysis
Design criteria
Drainage
Dust control
Economic analysis
Employment
Environment protection
Environmental impact
Groundwater
Land reclamation
Land use
Manpower
Marketing
Mine design
NTS 83F
Open pit mining
Operating cost
Overburden ratio
Railroad
Reforestation
Socio-economic effect
Soil conservation
Tailings
Tailings - storage
Terminal facility
Thermal coal
Transportation corridor
Waste disposal
Water quality
Legal References
Coal Conservation Act S10
Coal Conservation Act S23
Notes
ERCB report D83-A on application No. 820294 to develop a surface coal mine in TP.49-51, R.21-23, W5 to extract high volatile C bituminous coal from NW portion of Coalspur coal field and to construct a coal processing plant in TP.51-52, R23-24, W5; Board hearing 1982-08-24/25/26/27
Less detail

Decision 83-C

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2435
Applicant
Mercoal Minerals Ltd.
Application Number
820385
Title
Decision on application by Mercoal Minerals Ltd., 1983 (Mercoal coal project)
Date
1983
Title
Decision on application by Mercoal Minerals Ltd., 1983 (Mercoal coal project)
Date
1983
Applicant
Mercoal Minerals Ltd.
Application Number
820385
Hearing Panel
Berkowitz N
Strom NA
Mink FJ
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Coal
Descriptors
Alberta Coal Branch
Coal mine
Coal preparation plant
Coal project
Hinton area
Mercoal coal project
Surface mining
Air quality
Benefit cost analysis
Bituminous coal
Coal reserve
Coalspur coal field
Cost analysis
Design criteria
Dust control
Economic analysis
Employment
Environmental impact
Land reclamation
Land use
Mine design
Marketing
NTS 83F
Open pit mining
Overburden ratio
Reforestation
Socio-economic effect
Tailings
Tailings - storage
Thermal coal
Waste disposal
Water quality
Water supply
Legal References
Coal Conservation Act S10
Coal Conservation Act S23
Notes
ERCB report D83-C on application No. 820385 to develop a surface coal mine to produce high volatile C bituminous coal and to construct a coal processing plant, to be located in TP.47-49, R.20-23, W5; Board hearing 1982-11-02/03/04
Less detail

Decision 84-03

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1972
Applicant
Western Decalta Petroleum (1977) Limited.
Application Number
831044
Title
Decision on application by Western Decalta Petroleum (1977) Limited, 1984 (Diamond Valley gas project Turner Valley field and area)
Date
1984
Title
Decision on application by Western Decalta Petroleum (1977) Limited, 1984 (Diamond Valley gas project Turner Valley field and area)
Date
1984
Applicant
Western Decalta Petroleum (1977) Limited.
Application Number
831044
Hearing Panel
Bohme VE
Goodman CJ
Homeniuk TF
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Industrial development permit
Descriptors
Diamond Valley gas plant
Gas processing plant
Hartell area
Sour gas
Turner Valley area
Air quality
Emission
Environmental impact
IL-80-24
Hydrogen sulphide removal
Land value
NTS 82J
Plant location
Pollution control
Sulphur dioxide
Sulphur recovery
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S26
Notes
Decision D84-3 on application No. 831044 to construct a gas plant in the Hartell area south of Turner Valley in LSD 10-12-19-2 W5M or LSD 10-8-19-2 W5M (proposed Diamond Valley gas plant) to replace Western Decalta's existing Turner Valley gas plant.
Interveners
Home Oil Company Limited
Mosby, B.A.
Noble, G.F.
Tongue Creek Area Residents
Hartell Area Residents
Wyatt, S.
Wyatt, D.
Wyatt B.
Wyatt, I.
Less detail

Decision 84-06

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1970
Applicant
ESSO Resources Canada Limited
Application Number
830698
Title
Decision on application by Esso Resources Canada Limited, 1984 (Quirk Creek gas processing plant)
Date
1984
Title
Decision on application by Esso Resources Canada Limited, 1984 (Quirk Creek gas processing plant)
Date
1984
Applicant
ESSO Resources Canada Limited
Application Number
830698
Hearing Panel
Millard V
Strom NA
Evans RG
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Gas processing
Descriptors
Gas processing plant
Moose field
Quirk Creek field
Quirk Creek plant
Sour gas
Whiskey field
Air quality
Economic analysis
Emission
Environmental impact
Decision D1982-12
IL-80-24
Hydrogen sulphide removal
NTS 82J
Sulphur dioxide
Sulphur recovery
Legal References
Energy Resources Conservation Act S42
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S26
Notes
Decision D84-6 on application No. 830698 to use spare plant capacity to process sour gas from the Moose and Whiskey fields at the Quirk Creek gas plant in section 4-21-4 W5M; Board hearing 1983-10-24/27, 1984-01-16/17/19/20/25; see also related Decision 82-12
Interveners
Shell Canada Resources Limited
Z. Hanen and Rumsey Ranches
Square Butte Community Association
Waste Heat Products Ltd.
Less detail

Decision 84-07

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1168
Applicant
Dekalb Petroleum Corporation
Application Number
830880
Title
Examiners report on application by Dekalb Petroleum Corporation, 1984 (application for approval of a gas processing plant Willesden Green field)
Date
1984
Title
Examiners report on application by Dekalb Petroleum Corporation, 1984 (application for approval of a gas processing plant Willesden Green field)
Date
1984
Applicant
Dekalb Petroleum Corporation
Application Number
830880
Hearing Panel
Bray JA
Mazurek LA
Dilay JD
Hearing Type
Examiners
Category
Gas processing
Descriptors
Gas processing plant
Willesden Green field
Agricultural land
Air quality
Dissolved gas
Environmental impact
Flare
Gas conservation
Livestock
Locating
NTS 83B
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S26
Notes
ERCB Examiners report E84-7 on application No. 830880 for approval to construct and operate a sweet gas processing plant at an existing multi-well oil battery located in LSD 2-36-40-7 W5M.
Interveners
O'Connor, E.
O'Connor, R.
Less detail

70 records – page 1 of 4.