Narrow Results By
Applicant
- AEC Pipelines 1
- Amoco Canada Petroleum Company Limited 2
- Boonstra 1
- Bryzgorni 1
- CE Alberta BioClean Ltd. 1
- Canadian Crude Separators Inc. 1
- Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency 2
- Caprice Holdings Inc. 1
- Cardinal River Coals Ltd. 2
- Citadel Resources Ltd. 1
- Concord Scientific Corporation 1
- ESSO Resources Canada Limited 1
Decision 71-03
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2238
- Applicant
- Petrogas Processing Ltd.
- Application Number
- 5383
- Title
- Decision on application by Petrogas Processing Ltd., 1971 (gas processing Crossfield field Petrogas Processing Ltd.)
- Date
- 1971
- Title
- Decision on application by Petrogas Processing Ltd., 1971 (gas processing Crossfield field Petrogas Processing Ltd.)
- Date
- 1971
- Applicant
- Petrogas Processing Ltd.
- Application Number
- 5383
- Hearing Panel
- Govier GW
- Manyluk AF
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Category
- Gas processing
- Descriptors
- Crossfield field
- Gas processing plant
- Sulphur recovery
- Air pollution
- Emission
- OPERATING
- Pollution control
- Sulphur dioxide
- Notes
- ERCB decision on application to amend board approval 843 and provincial boar of health interim air pollution approval No. 1092-P-265 relating to sulphur recovery at the Petrogas Crossfield gas plant; granted by approval No. No. 1477
- Interveners
- Department of Health
- Approval
- Approved
Decision 78-08
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2112
- Applicant
- Amoco Canada Petroleum Company Limited
- Application Number
- 780023
- Title
- Decision on inquiry into uncontrolled flow from the well Amoco Pacific Brazr 7-10-48-12 W5M in the Lodgepole Drayton Valley area, 1978
- Date
- 1978
- Title
- Decision on inquiry into uncontrolled flow from the well Amoco Pacific Brazr 7-10-48-12 W5M in the Lodgepole Drayton Valley area, 1978
- Date
- 1978
- Applicant
- Amoco Canada Petroleum Company Limited
- Application Number
- 780023
- Hearing Panel
- DeSorcy GJ
- Bohme VE
- Kupchanko EE
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Category
- Inquiry - Blowout
- Descriptors
- Blowout (well)
- Blowout control
- Drayton Valley area
- Lodgepole blowout
- Sour gas
- Well killing
- Air pollution
- Case history
- Inquiry
- Emergency procedure
- Emission
- Environmental impact
- Health
- Hydrogen sulphide
- NTS 83G
- Procedure
- Safety
- Legal References
- Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S8.137
- Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S8.142
- Notes
- Decision 78-8 on proceeding No. 780023 to investigate an uncontrolled flow of sour gas from a well in LSD 7-10-48-12 W5M during a period from 1977-12-06 to 1978-01-02; Board inquiry 1978-02-22/23
- Interveners
- Alberta Disaster Services
- Pacific Petroleum Ltd.
- S&T Drilling (Northern) Ltd.
Decision 82-12
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2066
- Applicant
- ESSO Resources Canada Limited
- Application Number
- 810520
- Title
- Decision on application by Esso Resources Canada Limited, 1982 (Quirk Creek gas processing plant)
- Date
- 1982
- Title
- Decision on application by Esso Resources Canada Limited, 1982 (Quirk Creek gas processing plant)
- Date
- 1982
- Applicant
- ESSO Resources Canada Limited
- Application Number
- 810520
- Hearing Panel
- Millard V
- Strom NA
- Evans RG
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Category
- Gas processing
- Descriptors
- Gas processing plant
- Moose field
- Quirk Creek plant
- Sour gas
- Whiskey field
- Air pollution
- Air quality
- Emergency procedure
- Emission
- Environmental impact
- ID-80-02
- IL-71-29
- IL-80-24
- Expansion
- Hydrogen sulphide
- Injection
- Monitoring
- NTS 82J
- Pollution control
- Procedure
- Sulphur dioxide
- Sulphur recovery
- Underground
- Waste disposal
- Water pollution
- Legal References
- Energy Resources Conservation Act S2
- Oil and Gas Conservation Act S4
- Oil and Gas Conservation Act S26
- Notes
- Decision 82-12 on application No. 810520 to utilize spare plant capacity to process sour gas reserves from Moose and Whiskey fields at the Quirk Creek gas plant located in the south half of section 4-21-4 W5M; Board hearing 1981-11-04/05/06/23/24/25/26 and 1981-12-14/15/16/17/18 and 1982-01-05/06; see also related Decision D82-3 on Jumping Pound gas plant and ERCB report 82-E for Decisions on related pipeline applications by Shell and Decision D83-8 for local interveners cost awards; see also related report 82-D
- Interveners
- Shell Canada Resources Limited
- Hanen, Z.
- Rumsey Ranches
- Russell, A.
- Canadian Wildlife Federation
- Wolf, R.E.
Decision 82-D
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2313
- Applicant
- Energy Resources Conservation Board
- Application Number
- 810520
- 810092
- Title
- Sour gas processing in Alberta : a review of evidence presented at recent ERCB hearings respecting the impacts and surveillance of sour gas plants
- Date
- 1982
- Title
- Sour gas processing in Alberta : a review of evidence presented at recent ERCB hearings respecting the impacts and surveillance of sour gas plants
- Date
- 1982
- Applicant
- Energy Resources Conservation Board
- Application Number
- 810520
- 810092
- Category
- Gas processing
- Descriptors
- Air pollution
- Emission
- Environmental impact
- Gas processing
- Nitrogen oxide
- Soil pollution
- Sour gas
- Sulphur
- Sulphur dioxide
- Sulphur dioxide removal
- Sulphur recovery
- Water pollution
- Acidification
- Airborne waste
- Alberta
- Deposition
- Exhaust gas
- Health
- Hydrogen sulphide
- Injection
- Livestock
- Monitoring
- Selenium
- Trace element
- Underground
- Waste disposal
- Notes
- ERCB report 82-D arising from hearing to consider application for sour gas processing at Jumping Pound and Quirk Creek gas plants and pipeline to connect Moose and Whiskey sour gas reserves to Quirk Creek plant. for Decisions on these applications see ERCB Decisions 82-3, 82-12 and report 82-E
Decision 83-04
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1201
- Applicant
- Citadel Resources Ltd.
- Scion Petroleum Engineering Limited
- Application Number
- 820763
- Title
- Examiners report on application by Citadel Resources Ltd., 1983 (sour gas processing plant Sundre area)
- Date
- 1983
- Title
- Examiners report on application by Citadel Resources Ltd., 1983 (sour gas processing plant Sundre area)
- Date
- 1983
- Application Number
- 820763
- Hearing Panel
- Homeniuk TF
- Mazurek LA
- Nichol JR
- Hearing Type
- Examiners
- Category
- Gas processing
- Descriptors
- Gas processing plant
- Sour gas
- Sundre area
- Air pollution
- Air quality
- Design criteria
- Emergency procedure
- Emission
- Health
- Locating
- Monitoring
- Noise (sound)
- NTS 82O
- Plant location
- Safety
- Sulphur dioxide
- Truck
- Legal References
- Oil and Gas Conservation Act S26
- Notes
- Examiners report E83-4 on application No. 820763 by Scion Petroleum & Gildex Ltd. on behalf of Citadel for approval to construct a sour gas processing plant in LSD 13-20-33-5 W5M; Examiners hearing 1982-10-27 adjourned to 1982-11-25
- Interveners
- Residents in the County of Mountainview
- Alberda, R.
Decision 84-09
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1698
- Applicant
- Amoco Canada Petroleum Company Limited
- Application Number
- 830007
- Title
- Decision report 84-09: Lodgepole blowout report (phase 1)
- Date
- 1984
- Title
- Decision report 84-09: Lodgepole blowout report (phase 1)
- Date
- 1984
- Applicant
- Amoco Canada Petroleum Company Limited
- Application Number
- 830007
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Category
- Inquiry - Blowout
- Descriptors
- Blowout (well)
- Blowout control
- Brazeau River field
- Lodgepole blowout
- Sour gas
- Well killing
- Air pollution
- Emission
- Environmental impact
- Health
- Hydrogen sulphide
- NTS 83G
- Procedure
- Recommendation
- Sulphur dioxide
- Notes
- Decision D84-9 on proceeding No. 830007 (phase 1) on blowout of the well, Amoco Dome Brazeau River 13-12-48-12; 1 volume (main report, summary& recommendations, addendum; pamphlet-causes, effects, actions filed with 1984 Decisions); see Decision report D84-5 for phase 2 report
- Interveners
- Nabors Drilling Limited
- Doyle TL
- Berg E
- Brown B
- Randall W
- Rode G
- Alberta Government Departments
- Alberta Agriculture
- Christian RG
- Beck BE
- Klavano GG
- Lillie LE
- Walkey D
- Alberta Forest Service Division of Energy and Natural Resources
- Benson JE
- Jaap EG
- McFadyen AB
- Fish and Wildlife Division of Energy and Natural Resources
- Thompson G
- Hunt CA
- Smith K
- Wig D
- Occupational Health and Safety Division of Workers' Health, Safety and Compensation
- Johnston BJ
- Arnold I
- MacPherson J
- Ung E
- Weiss A
- Alberta Disaster Services
- Egener IDM
- Tyler E
- Bennett B
- Langman SR
- Social Services and Community Health
- Provincial Board of Health
- Durkin SM
- Bharnbhani Y
- O'Laney JM
- Orford RR
- Rogers RE
- Waters JR
- Love EJ
- Alberta Environment
- Kupchanko EE
- Briggs RN
- Kostler JF
- Sakiyama S
- Schulz AR
- Edmonton Area Respiratory Patient
- May C
- McPherson C
- Semaka MG
- Clanachan AS
- Brown NE
- Sarns C
- Campbell W
- Town of Drayton Valley
- Mayhew R
- Dykes I
- Royal Canadian Mounted Police Drayton Valley Detachment
- Bannerman L
- County of Parkland No. 31
- Steele R
- Canadian Institute of Public Health Inspectors - Alberta Branch
- Greenwood R
- Hodge T
- Alberta West Central Health Unit
- Bayliss NJ
- Public Advisory Committee to the Environment Council of Alberta
- Kostuch MS
- Behie SW
- Guy PR
- Johnson RL
- Health Unit Association of Alberta
- Shell Canada Resources Ltd.
- Canterra Energy Ltd.
- Canadian Petroleum Association
- Independent Petroleum Association of Canada
- Canadian Association of Oilwell Drilling Contractors
- Environmental Law Centre
- City of Edmonton
- Edmonton Board of Health
- Pembina Area Sour Gas Exposures Committee
- Macintosh R
- Baker D
- Baker O
- Grinde M
- Strach C
- Whitelock C
- Elton W
- Lodgepole Area Panel
- Belair D
- Nail L
- Wentland T
- Violet Grove Area Panel
- C. Andersen
- Bolianatz J
- McGhee D
- Buck Creek Area Panel
- Rosell C
- Rosell WD
- Sackela R
- Wasser A
- Cynthia Area Panel
- Beck R
- Nichols D
- Penner J
- Easyford Area Panel
- Huska D
- Huska J
- Kynoch B
- Macintosh L
- Vowk D
- Drayton Valley Panel
- Benger J
- Gottschalk E
- Guze O
- Rowles J
- Stewart J
- Health Panel
- Horstman L
- Josephson KE
- Cowdery R
- Struzik E
- Members of the Public
- Luethi H
- Henkle Mrs.
- McConnen S
- Beckett L
- Gramlich D
- Rosell W
- Smeland L
- Cavanagh C
- Shirvell W
- Welsh Mr.
- Bosrnan A
- Barnett Mr.
- Hall E
- Mallett L
- Sams C
Decision 84-B
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1695
- Applicant
- East Claresholm Clean Air Association
- Title
- Public meeting to consider concerns regarding an uncontrolled flow of sour gas and the operation of a sour gas plant in the Claresholm area
- Date
- 1984
- Title
- Public meeting to consider concerns regarding an uncontrolled flow of sour gas and the operation of a sour gas plant in the Claresholm area
- Date
- 1984
- Applicant
- East Claresholm Clean Air Association
- Hearing Panel
- Bellows LA
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Category
- Inquiry
- Descriptors
- Air pollution
- Blowout (well)
- Blowout control
- Claresholm area
- Gas processing plant
- Sour gas
- Air quality
- Blowout preventer
- Emergency procedure
- Environmental impact
- Evacuation
- Gas well
- Health
- Hydrogen sulphide
- Livestock
- Monitoring
- NTS 82H
- NTS 82I
- Planning
- Safety
- Soil analysis
- Notes
- Report on a public meeting regarding the sour gas well blowout (Drummond et al Claresholm 6-30-12-25 W4M) and ongoing concerns over the operation of the Claresholm sour gas processing plant located in the SW quarter of section 30-12-25 W4M; public meeting 1984-11-08
Decision 87-09
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision208
- Applicant
- Norcen Energy Resources Ltd.
- Application Number
- 861041
- Title
- Decision on application by Norcen Energy Resources Ltd., 1987 (approval of a gas processing plant in the Campbell-Namao field)
- Date
- 1987
- Title
- Decision on application by Norcen Energy Resources Ltd., 1987 (approval of a gas processing plant in the Campbell-Namao field)
- Date
- 1987
- Applicant
- Norcen Energy Resources Ltd.
- Application Number
- 861041
- Hearing Panel
- Goodman CJ
- Mink FJ
- Bruni MJ
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Category
- Gas processing
- Descriptors
- Campbell Namao field
- Gas processing plant
- Sour gas
- Air pollution
- Air quality
- Citizen participation
- Emission
- Environmental impact
- Health
- Locating
- Negotiation
- Noise (sound)
- NTS 73H
- Safety
- Soil analysis
- Sulphur dioxide
- Sulphur recovery
- Water quality
- Legal References
- Oil and Gas Conservation Act S26
- Notes
- Decision D87-9 on application No. 861041 to construct a gas processing plant in LSD 1-55-25 W4M to process non-associate and solution gas from wells in several fields in the general area; Board hearing 1987-03-17/18/19
- Interveners
- Rose Ridge Citizens Committee
- Blach, W.
- Bocock, J.
- Pasay, I.
- Silito, S.
- Sinkovics, A.
- Zuidema, P.
- Councillor in the Municipal District of Sturgeon #90
- MLA for Consistuency of Westlock-Sturgeon
- Location
- ##-01-055-25W4
Decision 88-05
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision168
- Applicant
- AEC Pipelines
- Application Number
- 871983
- Title
- Decision on application by AEC pipelines, 1988 (pump station and related facilities in the la Corey area)
- Date
- 1988
- Title
- Decision on application by AEC pipelines, 1988 (pump station and related facilities in the la Corey area)
- Date
- 1988
- Applicant
- AEC Pipelines
- Application Number
- 871983
- Hearing Panel
- Mink FJ
- Dilay JD
- Sharp KG
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Category
- Pipelines
- Descriptors
- La Corey area
- Pipeline pump
- Pump station
- Storage facility
- TANK
- Air pollution
- Emission
- Environmental impact
- Land value
- Noise (sound)
- NTS 73L
- Pollution
- Truck
- Legal References
- Pipeline Act Part 4
- Notes
- Decision D88-5 (and interim Decision) on application No. 871983 to construct a pump station and related facilities along its Cold Lake to Edmonton pipeline system in LSD 14-30-63-5 W4M (Lacorey terminal); amendment dated 1988-07-26; Board hearing 1988-04-13/14
- Interveners
- Dyck, J.
- Szymanski, F.
- Szymanski, M.
- Sabatier, G.
- Spanier, W.
- Spanier, G.
- Location
- 14-30-063-05W4
Decision 88-22
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision146
- Applicant
- Norcen Energy Resources Ltd.
- Application Number
- 861041
- Title
- Decision on application by Norcen Energy Resources Ltd., 1988 (approval of a gas processing facility in the Campbell-Namao field)
- Date
- 1988
- Title
- Decision on application by Norcen Energy Resources Ltd., 1988 (approval of a gas processing facility in the Campbell-Namao field)
- Date
- 1988
- Applicant
- Norcen Energy Resources Ltd.
- Application Number
- 861041
- Hearing Panel
- Mink FJ
- Bruni MJ
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Category
- Gas processing
- Descriptors
- Campbell Namao field
- Gas processing plant
- Sour gas
- Air pollution
- Air quality
- Citizen participation
- Emission
- Environmental impact
- Health
- Locating
- Negotiation
- Noise (sound)
- NTS 73H
- Safety
- Soil analysis
- Sulphur dioxide
- Sulphur recovery
- Water quality
- Legal References
- Oil and Gas Conservation Act S26
- Notes
- Decision D88-22 on application No. 861041 to construct a gas processing plant in LSD 1-55-25 W4M to process non-associate and solution gas from well in several fields in the general area; pre-hearing meeting held 1988-09-08.
- Interveners
- A Group of Area Residents
- Blach, W.
- Bocok, J.
- Mackay, G.
- Sinkovics, A.
- Councillor in the Municipal District of Sturgeon # 90
- MLA for Constitutuency of Westlock- Sturgeon
- Location
- ##-01-055-25W4
Decision 90-B
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision99
- Applicant
- Energy Resources Conservation Board
- Concord Scientific Corporation
- Title
- Field measurement program (Gascon2) (Gascon)
- Date
- 1990
- Title
- Field measurement program (Gascon2) (Gascon)
- Date
- 1990
- Category
- Environment/Pollution
- Descriptors
- Air pollution
- Airborne waste
- Atmospheric diffusion
- Blowout (well)
- Emission
- Gas leak
- Hazard
- Hydrogen sulphide
- Meteorological data
- Pipeline accident
- Plume
- Risk
- Sour gas
- Sulphur dioxide
- Comparison
- Evaluation
- Mathematical model
- Model
- Monitoring
- Sample analysis
- Notes
- Preliminary draft released 1990-04-06, final report released 1990-10 10 volume plus background release public document non-circulating no photocopies
Decision 97-08
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2854
- Applicant
- Cardinal River Coals Ltd.
- TransAlta Utilities Corporation
- Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency
- Application Number
- 960313
- 960314
- 960677
- Title
- Decision 97-08: Cardinal River Coals Ltd. and TransAlta Utilities Corporation : Appplication for EUB-CEAA Joint Review Panel - Cheviot Coal Project, Mountain Park Area, Alberta : Report
- Date
- 1997
- Title
- Decision 97-08: Cardinal River Coals Ltd. and TransAlta Utilities Corporation : Appplication for EUB-CEAA Joint Review Panel - Cheviot Coal Project, Mountain Park Area, Alberta : Report
- Date
- 1997
- Applicant
- Cardinal River Coals Ltd.
- TransAlta Utilities Corporation
- Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency
- Application Number
- 960313
- 960314
- 960677
- Hearing Type
- Joint
- Utilities
- Category
- Coal
- Descriptors
- Coal project
- Cheviot coal project
- Air pollution
- Air quality
- Biological effect
- Coal development policy for Alberta (1976)
- Coal mine
- Coal preparation plant
- Environmental impact
- Mountain Park area
- NTS 83C
- Open pit mining
- Physiological effect
- Socio-economic effect
- Soil pollution
- Transmission line
- Water pollution
- Water quality
- Wildlife
- Legal References
- Alberta Environmental Protection and Enhancement Act S47
- Alberta Environmental Protection and Enhancement Act S51
- Canadian Environmental Assessment Act S37
- Canadian Environmental Assessment Act S40
- Canadian Environmental Assessment Act S41
- Coal Conservation Act S10
- Coal Conservation Act S23
- Energy Resources Conservation Act S29
- EUB Rules of Practice
- Fisheries Act S35
- Hydro and Electric Energy Act S12
- Hydro and Electric Energy Act S14
- Hydro and Electric Energy Act S17
- Notes
- EUB Decision D97-08 (report of the EUB-CEAA Joint Review Panel) on applications no. 960313, 960314, and 960677 by Cardinal River Coals and TransAlta Utilities Corporation for a proposed coal mine and coal processing plant (Cheviot Coal Project) and associated transmission line and substation (all in township 45-46, range 22-24, W5M); Joint Review Panel public hearing 1997-01-13 through 1997-02-20 and re-opened on 1997-04-01 for one day
- Interveners
- King MA
- Inland Cement
- Weldwood Canada
- Hinton and District Chamber of Commerce
- Alberta Chamber of Commerce
- United Mine Workers of America Local 1656
- Town of Hinton
- Van Binsbergen D
- Breitkreuz C
- Alexis First Nation
- Cadomin Environmental Protection Association
- Alpine Club of Canada
- Alberta Native Plant Council
- Mountain Park Environmental Protection and Heritage Association
- Alberta Wilderness Association
- Jasper Environmental Society
- Pembina Institute for Responsible Development
- Canadian Parks and Wilderness Society
- Gadd B
- Alberta Fish and Game Association
- Trout Unlimited
- Rocky Mountain Ecosystem Coalition
- Western Canada Wilderness Committee
- Smallboy Camp
- Dave family
- Clark JD
- Higgins B
- Approval
- Approved
- Conditions
- Section 35-45-24 W5M and SW quarter of Section 36-45-24 W5M (upper Prospect Creek) are excluded from application no. 960313
- Cardinal Rivers Coals (CRC) shall monitor aquatic ecology of Lac Des Roche
- CRC shall justify the need for each end lake pit and rock drain
- CRC shall carry out long term monitoring of groundwater and surface water quality
- CRC shall maintain 1000 m buffer between mine disturbance and the Cardinal Divide Natural Area wherever practical
- CRC shall monitor impacts on wildlife populations
- CRC shall establish permissable noise levels
- CRC shall establish community liaison groups, in particular with the Mountain Park Association, stewards of the Cardinal Divide Natural Area, the Alexis First Nation, and the Smallboy Camp
Decision 98-01
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2893
- Applicant
- CE Alberta BioClean Ltd.
- Application Number
- 960864
- Title
- Decision 98-10: CE Alberta BioClean Ltd.: Application for an industrial development permit for a new MTBE / ETBE plant, Fort Saskatchewan area
- Date
- 1998
- Title
- Decision 98-10: CE Alberta BioClean Ltd.: Application for an industrial development permit for a new MTBE / ETBE plant, Fort Saskatchewan area
- Date
- 1998
- Applicant
- CE Alberta BioClean Ltd.
- Application Number
- 960864
- Hearing Panel
- Mink FJ
- McManus BT
- Schnitzler WJ
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Category
- Industrial development permit
- Descriptors
- Air pollution
- Butane
- Chemical plant
- Carbon dioxide
- Emergency procedure
- Energy conservation - industrial
- Environmental impact
- Ethanol
- Ether
- Fort Saskatchewan area
- Gas flaring
- Gasoline
- Grain crop
- Hydrogen
- Industrial development permit
- Locating
- Methanol
- Petrochemistry
- Petroleum product
- Demand (economics)
- Natural gas - fuel
- Noise (sound)
- NTS 83H
- Safety
- Socio-economic effect
- Supply (economics)
- Legal References
- Agricultural and Recreational Land Ownership Act
- Oil and Gas Conservation Act S42
- Notes
- EUB decision D98-01 on application no. 960864 for an industrial development permit respecting a new methyl tertiary butyl ether (MBTE) / ethyl teriary butyl ether (ETBE) facility in Strathcona County at Section 18, Twp 55 Rg 21 W4M. The IDP application requested permit to use field butanes and hydrogen as feedstock to convert barley in the production of ethanol, methonol, ethers MTBE/ETBE, and agricultural livestock feed by-product Distillers Dried Grain with Soluables (DDGS); and permit to use natural gas as a fuel
- Board hearing 1997-09-04/05
- Interveners
- Trans Mountain Pipe Line Company Ltd.
- Alberta Barley Commission
- City of Fort Saskatchewan
- Strathcona County
- Alberta Envirofuels Inc.
- Dzurny AM
- Demeule NE
- Schotte E
- Finch A
- Chartrand M
- Anez VM
- Approval
- Approved
- Approved with conditions
- Conditions
- That satisfactory corporate and financial arrangements are in place to develop the project in advance of the start of construction
- That a satisfactory emergycy response plan has been developed and implemented before the start up of the project
- Location
- ##-18-055-21W4
Decision 98-03
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2909
- Applicant
- Shell Chemicals Canada Ltd.
- Application Number
- 1008234
- Title
- Decision 98-03 : Shell Chemicals Canada Ltd.: Application for an industrial development permit for a new ethylene glycols plant, Fort Saskatchewan area
- Date
- 1998
- Title
- Decision 98-03 : Shell Chemicals Canada Ltd.: Application for an industrial development permit for a new ethylene glycols plant, Fort Saskatchewan area
- Date
- 1998
- Applicant
- Shell Chemicals Canada Ltd.
- Application Number
- 1008234
- Hearing Panel
- Mink FJ
- Miller GJ
- Bruni MJ
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Category
- Industrial development permit
- Descriptors
- Ethylene glycol
- Air pollution
- Chemical plant
- Emergency procedure
- Energy conservation - industrial
- Environmental impact
- Ethylene - raw material
- Fort Saskatchewan area
- Industrial development permit
- Land use
- Natural gas - raw material
- Petroleum product
- Regional planning
- Safety
- Socio-economic effect
- NTS 83H
- Notes
- EUB decision D98-03 on application no. 1008234 for an industrial development permit respecting a new ethylene glycols facility in Strathcona County at Section 32, Twp 55 Rg 21 W4M and the south half of Section 5 Twp 56 Rg 21 W4M. The IDP application requested authorization to use ethylene feedstock and natural gas as fuel in the production of monoethylene glycol, diethylene glycol, and triethylene glycol
- Interveners
- Strathcona County
- City of Fort Saskatchewan
- Dzurny AM
- Demeule NE
- Schotte E
- Samoil K
- Anez VM
- Approval
- Approved
- Location
- ##-32-055-21W4
- ##-05-056-21W4
Decision 98-07
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2915
- Applicant
- Union Carbide Canada Inc.
- Application Number
- 970188
- Title
- Decision 98-07 : Union Carbide Canada Inc.: Application for a proposed new polyethylene plant, Prentiss area
- Date
- 1998
- Title
- Decision 98-07 : Union Carbide Canada Inc.: Application for a proposed new polyethylene plant, Prentiss area
- Date
- 1998
- Applicant
- Union Carbide Canada Inc.
- Application Number
- 970188
- Hearing Panel
- Mink FJ
- Boon JA
- Rahnama F
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Category
- Industrial development permit
- Descriptors
- Air pollution
- Chemical plant
- Environmental impact
- Ethylene
- Ethylene - raw material
- Industrial development permit
- Land reclamation
- Land use
- Natural gas - fuel
- NTS 83A
- Railroad
- Reclamation
- Regional planning
- Safety
- Soil conservation
- Notes
- EUB decision D98-07 on application no. 970188 for an industrial development permit respecting a new polyethylene plant to be located at its existing Prentiss site in the west half of Section 30, Township 39, Range 25, W4M. The applicant applied to use a maximum of 740 kilotonnes per year of ethylene as feedstock and 83.85 million cubic metres per year of natural gas as fuel in the production of a maximum of 771 kt/yr of polyethylene. The plant would have a rail loading facility associated with it; Board Hearing 1997-11-03/04/25
- Interveners
- Canadian National Railway
- Sharp M
- Chessor D
- Pocock B
- Friesen G
- Gordon M
- Hainsworth J
- Anez VM
- Approval
- Approved
- Location
- ##-30-039-25W4
Decision 98-11
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2946
- Applicant
- Caprice Holdings Inc.
- Application Number
- 970378
- Title
- Decision 98-11 : Caprice Holdings Inc.: Application to construct and operate an oilfield waste management facility, Brazeau/Elk River area
- Date
- 1998
- Title
- Decision 98-11 : Caprice Holdings Inc.: Application to construct and operate an oilfield waste management facility, Brazeau/Elk River area
- Date
- 1998
- Applicant
- Caprice Holdings Inc.
- Application Number
- 970378
- Hearing Panel
- Dilay JD
- Mink FJ
- Shirley EA
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Category
- Waste management
- Descriptors
- Air pollution
- Brazeau River area
- Citizen participation
- Elk River area
- Environmental impact assessment
- Environmental impact
- Flare
- Guide 58
- Groundwater
- Hydrogeology
- Locating
- Organic compound
- Regulation
- Waste disposal
- Waste treatment
- NTS 83B
- Legal References
- Energy Resources Conservation Act S29
- Oil and Gas Conservation Act S26
- Notes
- EUB Decision D98-14 on application no. 970378 by Caprice Holdings to construct and operate an oilfield waste management facility at Lsd 11, Section 3, Township 47, Range 11 W5M to process solids, produced water, and oily waste. Issues considered included the need for the facility, the location and impact, adequacy of public consultation, and issues surrounding the Board application process such as completeness and accuracy, need for an EIA, initiation of facility construction proir to approval, and the role of interveners.
- Interveners
- Byram Industrial Services Ltd.
- Kalita P
- Pembina Institute for Appropriate Development
- Approval
- Approved
- Approved with conditions
- Conditions
- Groundwater monitoring and submission of a re-evaluation of the geology and hydrogeology of the site prior to operation
- Solids storage pit: to contain solids defined in Guide 58 only, and to be cleaned and inspected annually
- Surface runoff containment: management system is appropriate
- Location
- 11-03-047-11W5
Decision 2000-59
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision3281
- Applicant
- Cardinal River Coals Ltd.
- Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency
- Application Number
- 960313
- 960314
- Title
- Decision on application by Cardinal River Coals Ltd., Cheviot Coal Project, 2000 (report of the EUB-CEAA Joint Review Panel - Cheviot Coal Project, Mountain Park Area, Alberta) (EUB Applications No. 960313 and 960314)
- Date
- 2000
- Title
- Decision on application by Cardinal River Coals Ltd., Cheviot Coal Project, 2000 (report of the EUB-CEAA Joint Review Panel - Cheviot Coal Project, Mountain Park Area, Alberta) (EUB Applications No. 960313 and 960314)
- Date
- 2000
- Application Number
- 960313
- 960314
- Hearing Panel
- Bietz BF
- Miller GJ
- Beck T
- Hearing Type
- Joint
- Utilities
- Category
- Coal
- Descriptors
- Air pollution
- Air quality
- Biological effect
- Cheviot Coal Project
- Coal development policy for Alberta (1976)
- Coal mining
- Coal preparation plant
- Ecological research
- Environmental impact
- Evaluation
- Indians of North America
- Mountain Park Area
- NTS 83C
- Open pit mining
- Physiological effect
- Road construction
- Socio-economic effect
- Soil pollution
- Transmission line
- Water pollution
- Water quality
- Wildlife
- Legal References
- Alberta Environmental Protection and Enhancement Act S47
- Alberta Environmental Protection and Enhancement Act S51
- Canadian Environmental Assessment Act S37
- Canadian Environmental Assessment Act S40
- Canadian Environmental Assessment Act S41
- Coal Conservation Act S10
- Coal Conservation Act S23
- Energy Resources Conservation Act S29
- EUB Rules of Practice
- Fisheries Act S35
- Hydro and Electric Energy Act S12
- Hydro and Electric Energy Act S14
- Hydro and Electric Energy Act S17
- Notes
- Conclusions made in this report are supplemental to those made in the Panels' 1997 report, Decision 97-8 (Appendix 1) and include any new information obtained since the release of that report.
- Interveners
- Hinton and District Chamber of Commerce
- Gouthro B
- Dery M
- Carramusa R
- Mork C
- United Mine Workers of America, Local 1656 (UMWA)
- Campbell R
- Town of Hinton
- Risvold R
- Alberta Environment (AENV)
- Alberta Health and Wellness
- Macdonald W
- Cox D
- Smith K
- Stenhouse G
- Sterling G
- Notan L
- MacKenzie A
- Cadomin Environmental Protection Association (CEPA)
- Way C
- Government of Canada
- Linsey G
- Tupper R
- LeFebvre JG
- LaPalme L
- Fairbairn M
- Fenton W
- Gregoire P
- Holroyd G
- Hooper R
- Weaver J
- Bradford W
- Cardiff S
- Johnson D
- Dobson B
- Purves H
- Hodgins D
- Kirkland D
- Weldwood of Canada Ltd. (Weldwood)
- Udell R
- Stauffer R
- Lougheed H
- Alberta Wilderness Association, Jasper Environmental Society,
- Pembina Institute for Responsible Development, Canadian
- Parks and Wilderness Society, and Ben Gadd (AWA Coalition)
- Pachal D
- Gunsch S
- Gadd B
- Seaton J
- Notnes R
- Kittredge P
- Howery D
- Stellmach H
- Mountain Park Environmental Protection and
- Heritage Association
- Godby EA
- Bracko M
- Alpine Club of Canada/Alberta Native Plant Council (ACC/ANPC)
- Dinwoodie A
- Strang I
- Breitkreuz C
- Griffiths G
- Mountain Cree Camp
- Mountain Cree Camp Syllabics Institute
- Nadeau M
- Parry B
- Fedirchuk G
- Nielson R
- Budinski J
- Trout Unlimited Canada (TUC)
- Brewin K
- Alberta Fish and Game Association (AFGA)
- Alexis First Nation (AFN)
- Chief Francis Alexis
- Potts P
- Canadian Nature Federation (CNF)
- Environmental Resource Centre
- Clark J. D
- Mitchell J
- O’Chiese J
- Western Canada Wilderness Committee (WCWC)
- Phillips L
- Jones G
- Treaty 8 First Nations of Alberta (Treaty 8 FN)
- Rath J
- Handel J
- Panel Consultants:
- Ross W
- Peterson E
- Stephenson HG
- Panel Secretariat:
- Kennedy WY
- MacLachlan LJ
- Henderson DIR
- Seguin N
- Creasey R
- Powell R
- Thompson JP
- Roberts L
- Stoddart A
- Brown C
- Morris D
- Nixon V
- Approval
- Approved
- Conditions
- In addition to the original conditions, CRC shall: monitor selenium levels in the water of new end-pit lakes and assess adverse effects; schedule its rail and road construction after consulting with regional forestry and petroleum companies; conduct surveys for rare plant species on mine property; control mining impact on grizzly bears; protect historic archaeological sites; develop alternative to Mountain Park off-highway staging site; maintain regional environmental management initiatives.
Decision 2001-111
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision3490
- Applicant
- Epcor Generation Inc.
- Epcor Power Development Corpoaration
- Application Number
- 2001173
- Title
- Decision 2001-111: EPCOR Generation Inc. and EPCOR Power Development Corporation expansion of Genesee power plant
- Date
- 2001
- Title
- Decision 2001-111: EPCOR Generation Inc. and EPCOR Power Development Corporation expansion of Genesee power plant
- Date
- 2001
- Application Number
- 2001173
- Hearing Panel
- McCrank MN
- Lock RG
- Miller GJ
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Utilities
- Category
- Electric power
- Descriptors
- Electric power generation
- Genesee Power Plant
- Coal - fuel
- Thermal Power Plant
- Leduc area
- NTS 83G
- Decision D2001-33
- Decision D2001-101
- Environmental impact
- Safety
- Air pollution
- Fisheries
- Water pollution
- Wildlife
- Noise (sound)
- Health
- Human factor
- Socio-economic effect
- Cooling system
- Legal References
- Hydro and Electric Energy Act S9
- Hydro and Electric Energy Act S2
- Energy Resources Conservation Act S2
- Notes
- EUB Decision 2001-111 on application no. 2001173 by EPCOR Generation Inc. and EPCOR Power Development Corporation to construct a 490-megawatt expansion to its existing coal-fired Genesee power plant at Rge 25-50-3 W5M
- Interveners
- Alberta Environment
- Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency
- Capital Health Authority
- Clean Energy Coalition
- Department of Fisheries and Oceans
- ENMAX Energy Corporation
- ENMAX Power Corporation
- Enron Canada Corporation
- Environment Canada
- ESBI Alberta Ltd.
- Fording Coal Limited
- Hebner Group
- Kruger Group (for the local area residents of Genesee)
- Mewassin Community Action Group
- Paul First Nation
- TransAlta Utilities Corporation
- TransCanada Energy Limited
- Anderson AM
- Bernette Ho L
- Bird T
- Bjorge R
- Blackall P
- Bodnarek R
- Bradford J
- Buchwald V
- Bull A
- Buss K
- Cheng L
- Chesterman D
- Cook S
- Cusano LA
- Dobko R
- Donahue W
- Fairbairn M
- Forster C
- Forster L
- Gagner E
- Gaspe D
- Good Striker D
- Griffiths M
- Hannaford DJ
- Hebner B
- Hebner D
- Hemstock RN
- Hnytka F
- Huber HR
- Kellerhals M
- Kruger D
- Lakeman B
- Lawrence L
- Lawrence S
- Legge A
- Lloyd D
- MacDonald B
- Mackenzie A
- Mak A
- Marr-Laing T
- McDonald K
- Paul D
- Phillips L
- Rain O
- Rain P
- Rain R
- Ross G
- Sawatsky N
- Secord RC
- Shores W
- Stepaniuk DW
- Stubbings
- Tyrell H
- Valupadas P
- Vincent M
- Wallace RB
- Yanor-McRae R
- Approval
- Approved
- Conditions
- The Board expects that EPCOR will adhere to all commitments it made during the consultation process, in the application, and at the hearing on such matters as mitigation, monitoring, and bilateral agreements.
- Location
- ##-25-050-03W5
Decision 2002-55
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision3511
- Applicant
- Canadian Crude Separators Inc.
- Application Number
- 2000343
- 1242258
- 1096927
- 1096321
- Title
- Decision 2002-55: Canadian Crude Separators Inc. applications to construct and operate an oilfield waste management facility, drill a disposal well, construct and operate a pipeline, and operate a disposal scheme Edson field
- Date
- 2002
- Title
- Decision 2002-55: Canadian Crude Separators Inc. applications to construct and operate an oilfield waste management facility, drill a disposal well, construct and operate a pipeline, and operate a disposal scheme Edson field
- Date
- 2002
- Applicant
- Canadian Crude Separators Inc.
- Application Number
- 2000343
- 1242258
- 1096927
- 1096321
- Hearing Panel
- Bietz BF
- Nichol JR
- Railton JB
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Category
- Waste management
- Descriptors
- Air pollution
- Citizen participation
- Edson field
- Environmental impact assessment
- Flare
- Guide 51
- Guide 55
- Guide 58
- Injection well
- Leduc Fm
- Locating
- NTS 83F
- Pipeline construction
- Pipeline route
- Waste disposal
- Waste treatment
- Notes
- CCS INc. applied to the Board to construct an oilfield waste management facility at LSD 7-18-53-18W5M; to drill a well at LSD 12-16-53-19W5M; to construct and operate 7.8 km of pipeline and to inject class 1b fluids into the Leduc Fm.
- Interveners
- West Edson Landlords Coalition
- Armstrong J
- Bugg H
- Bugg J
- Chapman N
- Crawford C
- Crawford D
- Knutson E
- Makowecki F
- Secord RC
- Thebeau B
- Thebeau D
- Thompson C
- Approval
- Approved with conditions
- Conditions
- EUB hereby approves the applications subject to the applicant's strict adherence to the commitments and conditions summarized in the Appendix. Application No. 1096321 is approved subject to the drilling and evaluation of the proposed well and to adherence with the wellbore integrity requirements of Guide 51 : Injection and Disposal Wells.
- Location
- 07-18-053-18W5
- 12-16-053-19W5
Decision 2006-85
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision4166
- Applicant
- Shell Canada Limited
- Application Number
- 1398448
- Title
- Decision 2006-085: Decision on an application by Shell Canada Limited to expand the Scotford upgrader, Strathcona County, Fort Saskatchewan
- Date
- 2006
- Title
- Decision 2006-085: Decision on an application by Shell Canada Limited to expand the Scotford upgrader, Strathcona County, Fort Saskatchewan
- Date
- 2006
- Applicant
- Shell Canada Limited
- Application Number
- 1398448
- Hearing Panel
- Lock RG
- Remmer WG
- Warren WA
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Category
- Industrial development permit
- Descriptors
- Air pollution
- Airborne waste
- Emergency procedure
- Emergency response plan
- Fort Saskatchewan area
- ID 2001-03
- Monitoring
- Noise (sound)
- NTS 83H
- Pollution control
- Sulphur recovery
- Legal References
- Environmental Protection and Enhancement Act S49
- Interveners
- Industrial Heartland Residents (IHR)
- Chichak D
- Chichak M
- Radke J
- Radke K
- Radke R
- Northwest Upgrading Inc.
- Synenco Energy Inc.
- Brown A
- Approval
- Approved with conditions
- Conditions
- APPENDIX 2 COMMITMENTS BY SHELL CANADA LIMITED 1 The following commitments were made by Shell during the hearing: 1.1 Sulphur Recovery 1.2 Emergency Response Planning 1.3 Noise 1.4 Construction Traffic 1.5 Voluntary Land Purchase Program 2 The following commitments are taken from Hearing Exhibit 12, submission 45697, Shell, June 16, 2006: 2.1 Stack Top Temperature 2.2 Flaring 2.3 Leak Detection and Repair Program 2.4 Cooling Tower Emissions 2.5 Equipment Exhaust Stack Emissions 2.6 Ultra Low NOx Burners 2.7 Air Monitoring APPENDIX 3 APPROVAL CONDITIONS This section is provided for the convenience of readers. In the event of any difference between the conditions in this section and those in the main body of the decision, the wording in the main body of the decision shall prevail. 1) Shell will coordinate another track clearing exercise within six months of the approval date and will report on the performance of the exercise to the EUB and other stakeholders. 2) Shell will comply with the minimum calendar quarter-year sulphur recovery guidelines set out in ID 2001-03, Table 1, on the basis of the calendar quarter-year average sulphur content of the combined acid gas feed to the sulphur recovery processes installed at its Scotford complex inclusive of the sulphur content of acid gas that is flared.