Narrow Results By
Applicant
- AEC Pipelines 1
- Amerada Minerals Corporation of Canada Limited 1
- Amoco Canada Petroleum Company Limited 2
- Boonstra 1
- Bryzgorni 1
- CE Alberta BioClean Ltd. 1
- Canadian Crude Separators Inc. 1
- Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency 2
- Caprice Holdings Inc. 1
- Cardinal River Coals Ltd. 2
- Citadel Resources Ltd. 1
- Concord Scientific Corporation 1
Decision E60-(p.197)
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision628
- Applicant
- Energy Resources Conservation Board
- Application Number
- 252
- Title
- Examiners report on inquiry into alleged violation of section 40A of the Drilling and Production Regulations with respect to air pollution due to unflared gas at the new Devon No.2 battery by Western Decalta Petroleum Limited, 1960
- Date
- 1960
- Title
- Examiners report on inquiry into alleged violation of section 40A of the Drilling and Production Regulations with respect to air pollution due to unflared gas at the new Devon No.2 battery by Western Decalta Petroleum Limited, 1960
- Date
- 1960
- Applicant
- Energy Resources Conservation Board
- Application Number
- 252
- Hearing Panel
- King RH
- Lashuk NJ
- Hearing Type
- Examiners
- Category
- Inquiry
- Descriptors
- Battery
- Air pollution
- Emission
- Gas flaring
- Penalty
- Inquiry
- Notes
- Examiners report on inquiry into allegations that the company was producing gas to the flare pit without the gas being burned, and that this gas was contributing to the air pollution in the area.
Decision E60-(p.194)
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision629
- Applicant
- Energy Resources Conservation Board
- Application Number
- 251
- Title
- Examiners report on inquiry into an alleged violation of section 40A of the Drilling and Production Regulations with respect to air pollution due to unflared gas at the Texaco Calmar battery, 1960
- Date
- 1960
- Title
- Examiners report on inquiry into an alleged violation of section 40A of the Drilling and Production Regulations with respect to air pollution due to unflared gas at the Texaco Calmar battery, 1960
- Date
- 1960
- Applicant
- Energy Resources Conservation Board
- Application Number
- 251
- Hearing Panel
- King RH
- Lashuk NJ
- Hearing Type
- Examiners
- Category
- Inquiry
- Descriptors
- Air pollution
- Battery
- Emission
- Gas flaring
- Waste disposal
- Inquiry
- Notes
- Examiners concluded that the company was producing gas to the flare pit without the gas being burned, and that this gas may have been contributing significantly to the air pollution in the area.
Decision E60-(p.191)
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision630
- Applicant
- Energy Resources Conservation Board
- Application Number
- 250
- Title
- Examiners report on inquiry into an alleged violation of section 40A of the Drilling and Production Regulations by the British American Oil Company Limited with respect to air pollution due to unflared gas at the B.A. Leduc leaseholds northern development Bablitz battery near the Town of Calmar, 1960
- Date
- 1960
- Title
- Examiners report on inquiry into an alleged violation of section 40A of the Drilling and Production Regulations by the British American Oil Company Limited with respect to air pollution due to unflared gas at the B.A. Leduc leaseholds northern development Bablitz battery near the Town of Calmar, 1960
- Date
- 1960
- Applicant
- Energy Resources Conservation Board
- Application Number
- 250
- Hearing Panel
- King RH
- Lashuk NJ
- Hearing Type
- Examiners
- Category
- Inquiry
- Descriptors
- Battery
- Calmar area
- Gas flaring
- Air pollution
- Penalty
- Inquiry
- Notes
- Examiners report on inquiry into allegations that the company was producing gas to the flare pit at the subject battery without the gas being burned; Examiners concluded that this contributed to the air pollution in the area; no further penalty required, as wells had already been shut in for a period of time.
Decision E60-(p.004)
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision701
- Applicant
- Energy Resources Conservation Board
- Title
- Examiners report on inquiry into the contravention of section 40A of the Drilling and Production Regulations at Calmar west battery by venting unburned gas, 1960
- Date
- 1960
- Title
- Examiners report on inquiry into the contravention of section 40A of the Drilling and Production Regulations at Calmar west battery by venting unburned gas, 1960
- Date
- 1960
- Applicant
- Energy Resources Conservation Board
- Hearing Panel
- Bohme VE
- Craig DR
- Hearing Type
- Examiners
- Category
- Inquiry
- Descriptors
- Battery
- Inquiry
- Air pollution
- Gas flaring
- Calmar area
- Odor
- Legal References
- Drilling and Production Regulation S40
- Notes
- Examiners report on inquiry following a complaint regarding obnoxious odors; gas was being vented from the flare line of the subject battery and the gas was not burning; Examiners recommended that Calmar west #1 well remain closed in until the flare pit at this battery was emptied.
Decision E61-(p.047)
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision846
- Applicant
- Energy Resources Conservation Board
- Application Number
- 400
- Title
- Examiners report on inquiry into an alleged violation of section 40A of the Drilling and Production Regulations at the Texaco McColl A battery
- Date
- 1961
- Title
- Examiners report on inquiry into an alleged violation of section 40A of the Drilling and Production Regulations at the Texaco McColl A battery
- Date
- 1961
- Applicant
- Energy Resources Conservation Board
- Application Number
- 400
- Hearing Panel
- Bohme VE
- Macleod NA
- Hearing Type
- Examiners
- Category
- Inquiry
- Descriptors
- Inquiry
- Battery
- Emission
- Tank
- Air pollution
- Notes
- Examiners report on inquiry into allegations that gas was escaping into the atmosphere without being burned at a rate that polluted the atmosphere, and that the escape of gas was the result of equipment failure.
Decision E67-(P.260)
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1536
- Applicant
- Energy Resources Conservation Board
- Application Number
- 3628
- Title
- Examiners report on the alleged venting of unburned gas from the battery, Shell CDN-Sup Bty 12-15-32-2, contrary to the provisions of section 40A of the Drilling and Production Regulations and the alleged discoloration of paint and offensive odour arising therefrom in and near the Town of Olds
- Date
- 1967
- Title
- Examiners report on the alleged venting of unburned gas from the battery, Shell CDN-Sup Bty 12-15-32-2, contrary to the provisions of section 40A of the Drilling and Production Regulations and the alleged discoloration of paint and offensive odour arising therefrom in and near the Town of Olds
- Date
- 1967
- Applicant
- Energy Resources Conservation Board
- Application Number
- 3628
- Hearing Panel
- Bohme VE
- Macleod NA
- Hearing Type
- Examiners
- Category
- Inquiry
- Descriptors
- Gas flaring
- Battery
- Air pollution
- Olds area
- Notes
- Examiners report E67-(P.260) on application no. 3628 in the matter of inquiry into the alleged venting of unburned gas from the battery, Shell Cdn-Sup Bty 12-15-32-2, contrary to the provisions of section 40a of the Drilling and Production Regulations and the alleged discoloration of paint and offensive odour arising therefrom in and near the Town of Olds.
Decision E73-(p.021)
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision3623
- Applicant
- Energy Resources Conservation Board
- Title
- Examiners report on inquiry into the operation of the battery Sun Penhold with regard to an alleged contravention of section 7.070, subsection (7) of the Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations by venting unburned gas
- Date
- 1973
- Title
- Examiners report on inquiry into the operation of the battery Sun Penhold with regard to an alleged contravention of section 7.070, subsection (7) of the Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations by venting unburned gas
- Date
- 1973
- Applicant
- Energy Resources Conservation Board
- Hearing Panel
- Bohme VE
- Strom NA
- Hearing Type
- Examiners
- Category
- Inquiry
- Descriptors
- Battery
- Inquiry
- Air pollution
- Gas flaring
- Odor
- Legal References
- Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S7.070
Decision 82-D
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2313
- Applicant
- Energy Resources Conservation Board
- Application Number
- 810520
- 810092
- Title
- Sour gas processing in Alberta : a review of evidence presented at recent ERCB hearings respecting the impacts and surveillance of sour gas plants
- Date
- 1982
- Title
- Sour gas processing in Alberta : a review of evidence presented at recent ERCB hearings respecting the impacts and surveillance of sour gas plants
- Date
- 1982
- Applicant
- Energy Resources Conservation Board
- Application Number
- 810520
- 810092
- Category
- Gas processing
- Descriptors
- Air pollution
- Emission
- Environmental impact
- Gas processing
- Nitrogen oxide
- Soil pollution
- Sour gas
- Sulphur
- Sulphur dioxide
- Sulphur dioxide removal
- Sulphur recovery
- Water pollution
- Acidification
- Airborne waste
- Alberta
- Deposition
- Exhaust gas
- Health
- Hydrogen sulphide
- Injection
- Livestock
- Monitoring
- Selenium
- Trace element
- Underground
- Waste disposal
- Notes
- ERCB report 82-D arising from hearing to consider application for sour gas processing at Jumping Pound and Quirk Creek gas plants and pipeline to connect Moose and Whiskey sour gas reserves to Quirk Creek plant. for Decisions on these applications see ERCB Decisions 82-3, 82-12 and report 82-E
Decision 84-20
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1156
- Applicant
- Texaco Canada Resources Ltd.
- Application Number
- 830725
- Title
- Examiners report on application by Texaco Canada Resources Ltd., 1984 (Open Creek gas processing plant)
- Date
- 1984
- Title
- Examiners report on application by Texaco Canada Resources Ltd., 1984 (Open Creek gas processing plant)
- Date
- 1984
- Applicant
- Texaco Canada Resources Ltd.
- Application Number
- 830725
- Hearing Panel
- Webber HJ
- Bray JA
- Homeniuk TF
- Hearing Type
- Examiners
- Category
- Gas processing
- Descriptors
- Gas processing plant
- Open Creek field
- Sour gas
- Acidification
- Air quality
- Atmospheric diffusion
- Basal Quartz Fm
- Deposition
- Emission
- Environmental impact
- Gas producing
- Health
- Hydrogen sulphide
- Mathematical model
- Monitoring
- NTS 83B
- Revision
- Soil analysis
- Selenium
- Sulphur content
- Sulphur dioxide
- Notes
- ERCB Examiners report E84-20 on application No. 830725 for approval to amend approval 3079 to increase the sulphur inlet rate to the open Creek gas plant located in LSD 10-34-42-5 W4M.
- Interveners
- Gibson, H.
- Bauer, J.
- Bauer, L.
- Bryanton, W.
- Eklund, C.
- Eklund, P.
Decision 90-B
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision99
- Applicant
- Energy Resources Conservation Board
- Concord Scientific Corporation
- Title
- Field measurement program (Gascon2) (Gascon)
- Date
- 1990
- Title
- Field measurement program (Gascon2) (Gascon)
- Date
- 1990
- Category
- Environment/Pollution
- Descriptors
- Air pollution
- Airborne waste
- Atmospheric diffusion
- Blowout (well)
- Emission
- Gas leak
- Hazard
- Hydrogen sulphide
- Meteorological data
- Pipeline accident
- Plume
- Risk
- Sour gas
- Sulphur dioxide
- Comparison
- Evaluation
- Mathematical model
- Model
- Monitoring
- Sample analysis
- Notes
- Preliminary draft released 1990-04-06, final report released 1990-10 10 volume plus background release public document non-circulating no photocopies