10 records – page 1 of 1.

Decision 81-09

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1758
Applicant
Panther Resources Ltd.
Application Number
800651
Title
Examiners report on application by Panther Resources Ltd., 1981 (gas processing plant)
Date
1981
Title
Examiners report on application by Panther Resources Ltd., 1981 (gas processing plant)
Date
1981
Applicant
Panther Resources Ltd.
Application Number
800651
Hearing Panel
Evans RG
Pearson DG
Remmer WG
Hearing Type
Examiners
Category
Gas processing
Descriptors
Duhamel field
Gas processing plant
Sour gas
Acidification
Air quality
Economic analysis
Emission
Environmental impact
Flare
Hydrogen sulphide removal
Livestock
Locating
Monitoring
NTS 83A
Sulphur dioxide
Sulphur recovery
Water quality
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S38
Notes
ERCB Examiners report No. E81-9 on application No. 800651 to construct and operate a sour gas processing plant southwest of Camrose in LSD 5-31-45-20 W4M; Examiners' hearing 81-01-15 adjourned to 81-03-17/18/19
Interveners
City of Camrose
County of Camrose No.22
Cordes, K.
Calvin, G.
Noden, D.
Luz, W.
Klapstein, W.
Sauer, J.
Sauer, K.
Weyhausen, H.
Weyga Farming Ltd.
Watterodt, T.
Watterodt, W.
Watterodt, M.
Schroeder, D.
Schroeder, K.
Schroeder, P.
Schroeder, H.
Graefin Von Helldorf, V.
Schroeser, I.
Baumgarten, E.
Braim, B.
Krangnes, D.
Snider, R.
Tate, R.
Less detail

Decision 82-40

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2039
Applicant
Suncor Inc.
Application Number
821059
821060
Title
Decision on application by Suncor Inc., 1982 (to reinstate well licence numbers 97997 and 97998)
Date
1982
Title
Decision on application by Suncor Inc., 1982 (to reinstate well licence numbers 97997 and 97998)
Date
1982
Applicant
Suncor Inc.
Application Number
821059
821060
Hearing Panel
DeSorcy GJ
Goodman CJ
Brushett ER
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Well licence
Descriptors
Acheson East field
Edmonton area
Well licence
Directional drilling
Energy development
ID-81-04
Land use
Regional planning
Urban development
Legal References
Energy Resources Conservation Act S43
Notes
Decision 82-40 on application No. 821059 and 821060 to reinstate well licence 97997 for the well Suncor Acheson east 12-30-52-25 and well licence 97998 for the well Suncor Acheson east 4-31-52-25 both issued to directionally drill two wells from surface location in LSD 14-30-52-25 W4M to obtain production from Basal Quartz Sandstone; pre-inquiry meeting 1982-12-21
Interveners
Belvedere Developments Ltd.
Zukiwski Holdings Ltd.
Corvan Investments Ltd.
Integrated Building Corp. Ltd.
R.E.L. Peers
The City of Edmonton
Location
12-30-052-25W4
04-31-052-25W4
14-30-052-25W4
Less detail

Decision 82-D

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2313
Applicant
Energy Resources Conservation Board
Application Number
810520
810092
Title
Sour gas processing in Alberta : a review of evidence presented at recent ERCB hearings respecting the impacts and surveillance of sour gas plants
Date
1982
Title
Sour gas processing in Alberta : a review of evidence presented at recent ERCB hearings respecting the impacts and surveillance of sour gas plants
Date
1982
Applicant
Energy Resources Conservation Board
Application Number
810520
810092
Category
Gas processing
Descriptors
Air pollution
Emission
Environmental impact
Gas processing
Nitrogen oxide
Soil pollution
Sour gas
Sulphur
Sulphur dioxide
Sulphur dioxide removal
Sulphur recovery
Water pollution
Acidification
Airborne waste
Alberta
Deposition
Exhaust gas
Health
Hydrogen sulphide
Injection
Livestock
Monitoring
Selenium
Trace element
Underground
Waste disposal
Notes
ERCB report 82-D arising from hearing to consider application for sour gas processing at Jumping Pound and Quirk Creek gas plants and pipeline to connect Moose and Whiskey sour gas reserves to Quirk Creek plant. for Decisions on these applications see ERCB Decisions 82-3, 82-12 and report 82-E
Less detail

Decision 84-20

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1156
Applicant
Texaco Canada Resources Ltd.
Application Number
830725
Title
Examiners report on application by Texaco Canada Resources Ltd., 1984 (Open Creek gas processing plant)
Date
1984
Title
Examiners report on application by Texaco Canada Resources Ltd., 1984 (Open Creek gas processing plant)
Date
1984
Applicant
Texaco Canada Resources Ltd.
Application Number
830725
Hearing Panel
Webber HJ
Bray JA
Homeniuk TF
Hearing Type
Examiners
Category
Gas processing
Descriptors
Gas processing plant
Open Creek field
Sour gas
Acidification
Air quality
Atmospheric diffusion
Basal Quartz Fm
Deposition
Emission
Environmental impact
Gas producing
Health
Hydrogen sulphide
Mathematical model
Monitoring
NTS 83B
Revision
Soil analysis
Selenium
Sulphur content
Sulphur dioxide
Notes
ERCB Examiners report E84-20 on application No. 830725 for approval to amend approval 3079 to increase the sulphur inlet rate to the open Creek gas plant located in LSD 10-34-42-5 W4M.
Interveners
Gibson, H.
Bauer, J.
Bauer, L.
Bryanton, W.
Eklund, C.
Eklund, P.
Less detail

Decision 87-02

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision235
Applicant
Tumit Petroleums Ltd.
Application Number
861401
Title
Decision on application by Tumit Petroleums Ltd., 1987 (well licence Acheson east field)
Date
1987
Title
Decision on application by Tumit Petroleums Ltd., 1987 (well licence Acheson east field)
Date
1987
Applicant
Tumit Petroleums Ltd.
Application Number
861401
Hearing Panel
Bohme VE
Goodman CJ
Homeniuk TF
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Well licence
Descriptors
Acheson East field
Well licence
Blairmore Fm
Edmonton area
Land use
Locating
NTS 83H
Oil producing
Oil well
Urban development
Wabamun Gp
Well site
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S2.020
Notes
Decision D87-2 on application No. 861401 for a licence to re-enter an abandoned well in LSD 10-30-52-25 to obtain production from Blairmore and/or Wabamun formation; Board hearing 1986-12-09/10
Interveners
Cascara Properties Ltd.
Integrated Building Corp.Ltd.
Lewis Farms
Approval
Denied
Location
10-30-052-25W4
Less detail

Decision 88-15

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision155
Applicant
Westhill Resources Ltd
Application Number
880984
880985
880986
880988
Title
Decision on application by Westhill Resources Limited, 1988 (well licences Acheson east field)
Date
1988
Title
Decision on application by Westhill Resources Limited, 1988 (well licences Acheson east field)
Date
1988
Applicant
Westhill Resources Ltd
Application Number
880984
880985
880986
880988
Hearing Panel
Prince JP
Morin EJ
Berndtsson NG
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Well licence
Descriptors
Acheson East field
Edmonton area
Well licence
Basal Quartz Fm
Emergency procedure
Environmental impact
Land value
NTS 83H
Oil producing
Urban development
Notes
Decision D88-15 (and interim Decision dated 1988-09-16) on applications for licences to drill for oil in the Basal Quartz FM from a surface location in LSD 10-9-53-25 W4M (at 114 avenue and 174 street, in an industrial area of Edmonton).
Interveners
Homestead Holdings Ltd.
The Jasper Printing Group Ltd.
Lehndorff Property Management Limited
Eleventh Properties Ltd.
Top Discount Stores Ltd.
Continental Can Canada Inc.
Garneau, P.
Garneau, Mrs.
Garneau, R.
Location
10-09-053-25W4
Less detail

Decision 93-02

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision11
Applicant
296283 Alberta Limited
Application Number
920642
Title
Examiner report on application by 296283 Alberta Ltd., 1993 (review of well licence Acheson east field)
Date
1993
Title
Examiner report on application by 296283 Alberta Ltd., 1993 (review of well licence Acheson east field)
Date
1993
Applicant
296283 Alberta Limited
Application Number
920642
Hearing Panel
Homeniuk TF
Skappak DL
Waisman DD
Hearing Type
Examiners
Category
Well licence
Descriptors
Acheson East field
Well licence
Legal References
Energy Resources Conservation Act S42
Notes
ERCB Examiners report E93-02 on proceeding No. 920642 to review well licence No. 0137211 respecting the well Marnell et al Ache 14-31BQ-52-25.
Interveners
Marnell Resources Ltd.
Less detail

Decision E58-(p.071)

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision388
Applicant
Union Oil Company of California
Title
Examiners report on application by Union Oil Company of California, 1958 (area to be used as a factor in determining the production allowable for Union Acheson east 16-19-52-25 well)
Date
1958
Title
Examiners report on application by Union Oil Company of California, 1958 (area to be used as a factor in determining the production allowable for Union Acheson east 16-19-52-25 well)
Date
1958
Applicant
Union Oil Company of California
Hearing Panel
King RH
Macleod NA
Hearing Type
Examiners
Category
Spacing
Descriptors
Allowable production
Oil well
Drilling spacing unit
Acheson East field
NTS 83H
Notes
Examiners recommended that the Board prescribe the area of the spacing unit (section 19-52-25 W4M) to be the area upon which production allowable should be based
Less detail

Decision E58-(p.219)

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision322
Applicant
Union Oil Company of California
Title
Examiners report on application by Union Oil Company of California, 1958 (spacing unit in Acheson east Blairmore B pool)
Date
1958
Title
Examiners report on application by Union Oil Company of California, 1958 (spacing unit in Acheson east Blairmore B pool)
Date
1958
Applicant
Union Oil Company of California
Hearing Panel
Craig DR
Macleod NA
Hearing Type
Examiners
Category
Spacing
Descriptors
Drilling spacing unit
Acheson East field
Blairmore Fm
Notes
Examiners concluded that development of Aicheson East Blairmore B pool on one legal subdivision spacing is not economic and that two legal subdivision spacing should be ordered
Approval
Approved
Less detail

Decision E77-(p.137)

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1922
Applicant
Amerada Minerals Corporation of Canada Limited
Application Number
9693
Title
Examiners report on application by Amerada Minerals Corporation of Canada Ltd., 1977 (gas processing plant Sturgeon Lake field)
Date
1977
Title
Examiners report on application by Amerada Minerals Corporation of Canada Ltd., 1977 (gas processing plant Sturgeon Lake field)
Date
1977
Applicant
Amerada Minerals Corporation of Canada Limited
Application Number
9693
Hearing Panel
Webber HJ
Brushett ER
Strom NA
Hearing Type
Examiners
Category
Gas processing
Descriptors
Gas processing plant
Sour gas
Sturgeon Lake field
Acidification
Airborne waste
Dissolved gas
Emission
Environmental impact
Flare
Gas conservation
Gas flaring
NTS 83N
Soil pollution
Sulphur dioxide
Sulphur recovery
Notes
ERCB Examiners report on application No. 9693 for gas processing plant to process sour gas in LSD 10-29-71-23 W5M in the Sturgeon Lake field; approval No. 2548
Interveners
National Farmers Union
New Fish Creek Community Association
Beddis, A.J.
Drozda, J.
McDonagh, C.
Roschlaub, J.
Less detail

10 records – page 1 of 1.