114 records – page 1 of 6.

Decision 2004-01

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision3818
Applicant
Direct Energy Regulated Services
Application Number
1326929
File No. 2010-5
Title
Decision 2004-1: Direct Energy Regulated Services regulated rate tariff transition rate request for approval to commence a negotiated settlement
Date
2004
Title
Decision 2004-1: Direct Energy Regulated Services regulated rate tariff transition rate request for approval to commence a negotiated settlement
Date
2004
Applicant
Direct Energy Regulated Services
Application Number
1326929
File No. 2010-5
Hearing Panel
McManus BT
Douglas JI
Taylor WK
Hearing Type
Utilities
Category
Electric power rate
Descriptors
Electric power rate
Negotiated settlement
Regulated rate tariff
Legal References
Electric Utilities Act
Electric Utilities Regulated Default Supply Regulation
Approval
Approved
Less detail

Decision 2004-02

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision3819
Applicant
Direct Energy Regulated Services
Application Number
1302109
File No. 6405-20-1
Title
Decision 2004-2: Direct Energy Regulated Services gas default rate tariff terms and conditions of default rate service and electricity regulated rate tariff terms and conditions of regulated rate service
Date
2004
Title
Decision 2004-2: Direct Energy Regulated Services gas default rate tariff terms and conditions of default rate service and electricity regulated rate tariff terms and conditions of regulated rate service
Date
2004
Applicant
Direct Energy Regulated Services
Application Number
1302109
File No. 6405-20-1
Hearing Panel
McManus BT
Douglas JI
Taylor WK
Hearing Type
Utilities
Category
Gas rate
Electric power rate
Descriptors
Decision D2003 106
Electric power rate
Gas rate
Regulated rate tariff
Services
Terms and conditions
Approval
Approved
Less detail

Decision 2004-03

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision3820
Applicant
ATCO Pipelines
Application Number
1292783
File No. 4100-1
Title
Decision 2004-3: ATCO Pipelines 2003/2004 general rate application – Phase I errata of Decision 2003-100
Date
2004
Title
Decision 2004-3: ATCO Pipelines 2003/2004 general rate application – Phase I errata of Decision 2003-100
Date
2004
Applicant
ATCO Pipelines
Application Number
1292783
File No. 4100-1
Hearing Panel
Dahl Rees C
McManus BT
Edwards MW
Hearing Type
Utilities
Category
Pipeline system rate
Descriptors
Decision D2003 100
General rate application
General rate application phase I
Revision
Less detail

Decision 2004-04

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision3821
Applicant
ATCO Gas
Application Number
1303682
File No. 4000-4
Title
Decision 2004-4: ATCO Gas errata to Decision 2003-108 2003 gas rate unbundling
Date
2004
Title
Decision 2004-4: ATCO Gas errata to Decision 2003-108 2003 gas rate unbundling
Date
2004
Applicant
ATCO Gas
Application Number
1303682
File No. 4000-4
Hearing Panel
McManus BT
Douglas JI
Taylor WK
Hearing Type
Utilities
Category
Gas rate
Descriptors
Decision D2003 108
Gas rate
Unbundling
Less detail

Decision 2004-05

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision3790
Applicant
Canadian Natural Resources Limited
Application Number
1273113
Title
Decision 2004-5: Canadian Natural Resources Limited, application for an oil sands mine, bitumen extraction plant, and bitumen upgrading plant in the Fort McMurray area (Horizon Oilsands project Joint panel report of Alberta Energy and Utilities Board and Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency)
Date
2004
Title
Decision 2004-5: Canadian Natural Resources Limited, application for an oil sands mine, bitumen extraction plant, and bitumen upgrading plant in the Fort McMurray area (Horizon Oilsands project Joint panel report of Alberta Energy and Utilities Board and Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency)
Date
2004
Applicant
Canadian Natural Resources Limited
Application Number
1273113
Hearing Panel
Dilay JD
Houlihan RN
Kupfer G
Hearing Type
Board
Joint
Category
Oil sands
Descriptors
Bitumen
Environmental impact assessment
Fort McMurray area
NTS 83H
Oil mining
Upgrading
Legal References
Environmental Protection and Enhancement Act 1992
Oil Sands Conservation Act S10
Oil Sands Conservation Act S11
Notes
Also available in French
Interveners
Deer Creek Energy Limited
Theriault D
Montemurro M
Hackbarth D
Mikisew Cree First Nations
Schindler D
Byrne J
Brownlee J
Kienzle S
Komers P
Waquan A (Chief)
Courtorielle W
Courtorielle S
McKay R
Waquan MR
Marten T
Oil Sands Environmental Coalition
Kitagawa M
Woynillowicz D
Dort-McLean A
Fort McKay First Nation
Metis Local 122 (Fort McKay)
Athabasca Chipewyan First Nation
Fort McMurray Medical Staff Association
Marlboro Environmental Committee
Brandenburg
Sierra Club of Canada
Dastous C
Dastous M
Shell Canada Limited
Suncor Energ Inc.
Imperial Oil Resources
ExxonMobil Canada
Syncrude Canada
UTS Energy Corp.
Birch Mountain Resources Ltd.
Government of Canada
Environment Canada
Fairbairn M
Bates-Frymel L
Norton MR
Brownlee B
Lindeman D
Department of Fisheries and Oceans
Majewski D
Thomson A
Courtney R
Makowecki B
Shamess J
Walker D
Huber W
Natural Resources Canada
Browning GR
Cliffe MK
Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Alberta
Yoshisaka D
de la Chevrotiere C
Marriott P
Boyd M
Barrett R
Bodo K
Chabaylo R
Rhude L
McEachern P
Singh K
Hale C
Wood Buffalo First Nation
Campbell RSJ
Castor W
Cree E
Woodward R
McDonald D
Chipewyan Prairie First Nation Industrial Relations Corporation
Approval
Approved with conditions
Conditions
CNRL must do the following as conditions of approval: On or before December 31, 2007, submit to the EUB for its review and approval a report on the southwest area lease boundary containing a comprehensive evaluation of the lease boundary geology and reserves, geotechnical conditions, alternative mining scenarios and impacts, and associated costs, in accordance with Section 3.1 of EUB ID 2001-7 (Section 7.1.3). At least five years prior to mining at the southeast lease boundary but no later than December 31, 2010, submit to the EUB for its review and approval a report on the southeast area lease boundary containing a comprehensive evaluation of the lease boundary geology and reserves, geotechnical conditions, alternative mining scenarios and impacts, and associated costs, in accordance with Section 3.1 of ID 2001-7 (Section 7.1.3). At least six months prior to the construction of the plant site, submit to the EUB for its review and approval a report documenting efforts that have been taken to optimize the plant site area with respect to the minimization of resource sterilization (Section 7.2.2). At least six months prior to field preparation, submit to the EUB for its review and approval detailed geotechnical designs for all external overburden disposal areas (Section 7.3.2). At least five years prior to mining at the final pit wall but no later than December 31, 2016, submit to the EUB for its review and approval a report evaluating the mineable oil sands ore quality and nonrecoverable quantity in the east final pit wall area adjacent to the Athabasca River, and a detailed geotechnical stability evaluation of the final east pit wall location (Section 7.5.2). Beginning with the September 2004 annual mine plan, submit to the EUB the details of the MOPP testing (Section 7.6.2). At least six months prior to beginning mine depressurization activities, submit to the EUB for its review and approval a monitoring plan to detect basal aquifer pressure changes at the lease boundary with DCEL (Section 7.7.3). On or before February 28 of each year following start-up of mine depressurization activities, or such other date as the EUB may stipulate, submit to the EUB a report on the results of the basal aquifer monitoring program at the lease boundary with DCEL (Section 7.7.3). Within one year of project approval, satisfy the EUB on the need, or otherwise, to monitor the effects of depressurization and injection activities along the northern and western boundary of mining activities (Section 7.7.3). On an annual average basis, limit diluent losses to tailings and the scheme to not more than 4.0 volumes per 1000 volumes of bitumen production, unless it can satisfy the Board that a limit of 4.3 volumes per 1000 volumes of bitumen production is appropriate (Section 8.2.3). Not discharge any untreated froth treatment tailings to the tailings area (Section 8.2.3). Every five years commencing February 28, 2010, or such other date as the EUB may stipulate, submit to the EUB a report on the feasibility of coke use and sales potential (Section 9.13). On or before February 28, 2005, and every year thereafter, or such other date as the EUB may stipulate, submit to the EUB a progress report summarizing
research and development on solid tailings technologies, and
modifications to the existing tailings plan to ensure a trafficable landscape, rapid progressive reclamation and to eliminate the need for long-term storage of fluid tailings (Section 10.1.3). Two years prior to planned start-up, or such other date as the EUB may stipulate, submit to the EUB a report summarizing the engineering design and operating plans for the NST system (Section 10.1.3). On or before February 28 of every year following start-up, or such other date or frequency as the EUB may stipulate, submit to the EUB a report summarizing for the preceding year the performance of the NST system, including reasons for deviations from design (Section 10.1.3). Within one year of project approval, satisfy the EUB on the need, or otherwise, to monitor for potential effects of injection activities on the depressurization needs of other developments in the regional study area (Section 12.7). Include in the project area a minimum setback of 250 m from the edge of the wetted width of the Athabasca River during spring flow, excluding the water intake facility (Section 15.6).
Less detail

Decision 2004-06

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision3789
Applicant
Solex Gas Processing Corp.
Application Number
1283973
Title
Decision 2004-006: Solex Gas Processing Corp. application to amend a gas processing scheme and for natural gas pipelines
Date
2004
Title
Decision 2004-006: Solex Gas Processing Corp. application to amend a gas processing scheme and for natural gas pipelines
Date
2004
Applicant
Solex Gas Processing Corp.
Application Number
1283973
Hearing Panel
Nichol JR
Rahnama F
Evans RG
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Gas processing
Descriptors
Gas pipeline
Gas processing
Harmattan Elkton field
Natural gas
NTS 82O
Pipeline
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S39
Pipeline Act Part 4
Interveners
ATCO Midstream Ltd.
BP Canada Energy Company
BP Canada Energy Resources Company
Rose B
Castonguay S
Moe D
Cahill P
Stauft T
Burlington Resources Canada Partnership
Imperial Oil Resources
ExxonMobil Canada
ConocoPhillips Canada
EnCana Corporation
Bietz G
Drazen M
Foothills Natural Gas
Nova Chemicals Corporation
Nova Gas Transmission Ltd.
Williams Energy (Canada) Inc.
Chappell D
Murphy P
Raggett C
Hutchings R
Poos P
Alberta Industrial Group
Mansell R
Schlenker R
Approval
Denied
Less detail

Decision 2004-07

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision3822
Applicant
AltaLink Management Limited
TransAlta Utilities Corporation
Application Number
1314521
File No. 2000-5
1314520
File No. 1209-3
Title
Decision 2004-7 AltaLink Management Ltd. and TransAlta Utilities Corporation transmission tariff for May 1, 2002 – April 30, 2004 TransAlta Utilities Corporation transmission tariff for January 1, 2002 – April 30, 2002 compliance with Board directions in Decision 2003-061
Date
2004
Title
Decision 2004-7 AltaLink Management Ltd. and TransAlta Utilities Corporation transmission tariff for May 1, 2002 – April 30, 2004 TransAlta Utilities Corporation transmission tariff for January 1, 2002 – April 30, 2002 compliance with Board directions in Decision 2003-061
Date
2004
Applicant
AltaLink Management Limited
TransAlta Utilities Corporation
Application Number
1314521
File No. 2000-5
1314520
File No. 1209-3
Hearing Panel
Lock RG
McGee TM
Gilmour JG
Hearing Type
Utilities
Category
Electric power rate
Descriptors
Decision D2003 61
Electric power distribution
Electric power rate
Electric power transmission
General tariff application
Rate base
Refiling
Tariff
Transmission facility owner
Approval
Deferred upon refiling
Less detail

Decision 2004-08

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision3800
Applicant
Advantage Oil and Gas Limited
Application Number
1298953
Title
Decision 2004-008: Advantage Oil and Gas Ltd. application for a licence for a natural gas pipeline Provost area
Date
2004
Title
Decision 2004-008: Advantage Oil and Gas Ltd. application for a licence for a natural gas pipeline Provost area
Date
2004
Applicant
Advantage Oil and Gas Limited
Application Number
1298953
Hearing Panel
Paulson RL
Pesta TJ
Reid JE
Hearing Type
Examiners
Category
Pipelines
Descriptors
Guide 56
Natural gas
NTS 73D
Pipeline licence
Provost area
Interveners
Morrell G
Morrell S
Approval
Approved
Less detail

Decision 2004-09

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision3801
Applicant
Shell Canada Limited
Application Number
1271285
1271307
1271383
Title
Decision 2004-9: Shell Canada Limited applications for an oil sands mine, bitumen extraction plant, cogeneration plant, and water pipeline in the Fort McMurray area (Joint panel report EUB and CEAA)
Date
2004
Title
Decision 2004-9: Shell Canada Limited applications for an oil sands mine, bitumen extraction plant, cogeneration plant, and water pipeline in the Fort McMurray area (Joint panel report EUB and CEAA)
Date
2004
Applicant
Shell Canada Limited
Application Number
1271285
1271307
1271383
Hearing Panel
Dilay JD
Kupfer G
Houlihan RN
Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency
Hearing Type
Board
Joint
Utilities
Category
Bitumen production
Descriptors
Bitumen
Cogeneration
Extraction
Fort McMurray area
NTS 83H
Oil sands project
Water pipeline
Legal References
Hydro and Electric Energy Act S11
Oil Sands Conservation Act S10
Oil Sands Conservation Act S11
Pipeline Act Part 4
Interveners
Oil Sands Environmental coalition
Woynillowicz
Athabasca Chipewyan First Nation
Fort McMurray Medical Staff Association
Suave' M (MD)
Sierra Club of Canada
May E
Mikisew Cree First Nations
Waquan A (chief)
Courtorielle W
Courtorielle A
Komers P (Dr.)
Dickson E (Dr.)
Byrne J (Dr.)
Kienzle S (Dr.)
Brownlee J
Evans B
McKay V
Wood Buffalo First Nation
Malcolm J
Woodward R
Castor W
Castor G
Grant J
Canadian Natural Resources Limited
Imperial Oil Resources
ExxonMobil Canada
Syncrude Canada Limited
Suncor Energy Limited
UTS Energy Corp.
Government of Canada
Department of Fisheries and Oceans
Courtney R
Majewski D
Makowechi B
Walker D
Shamess J
Thomson A
Environment Canada
Fairbairn M
Bates-Frymel L
Gregoire P
Linderman D
Brownlee B
Coutts B
Natural Resources Canada
Wells L
Health Canada
Liu L
Vuzi O
Indian and NOrther Affairs Canada
Maksymiec K
Her Majest the Queen in Right of Alberta
Alberta Environment
Pretula B
de la Chevrotiere C
Boyd M
Barrett R
Rhude L
Singh K
Marriott P
Alberta Sustainable Resource Development
Chabaylo R
Hale C
McEachern P
Alberta Health and Wellness
MacKenzie A
Bodo K (Dr.)
Approval
Approved with conditions
Conditions
Shell shall submit a lease boundary report five years prior to mining activities reaching any common lease boundary. The report must include a comprehensive description of the lease boundary geology and reserves, geotechnical conditions, alternative mining scenarios and impacts, and the costs associated with each, all in accordance with Section 3.1 of EUB Interim Directive (ID) 2001-7: Operating Criteria: Resource Recovery for Oil Sands Mines and Processing Sites (Section 6.2.2).
Shell shall submit, for EUB approval, an access road and utility corridor update in its 2006 annual report. The report shall include a resource assessment of the oil sands located in the Sharkbite area and under the modified infrastructure corridor. It shall also include a comparison of alternative access road and utility corridor alignments with respect to resource recovery and other relevant criteria (Section 6.3.2).
Shell shall submit, for EUB approval, a resource assessment of the plant site area two years prior to construction (Section 6.3.2).
Shell shall submit, for EUB approval, detailed geotechnical design for all external overburden disposal areas at least six months prior to field preparation in those areas (Section 6.4.2).
Shell shall submit, for EUB approval, a resource assessment of the three waste disposal areas and reclamation material stockpile two years prior to material placement (Section 6.4.2).
Shell shall submit, for EUB approval, a ten-year mine plan and material balance by the earlier of 2008 or six months prior to pit development (Section 6.4.2).
Shell must satisfy the EUB, two years prior to construction of either the Khahago surge facility or the tailings disposal area, that the design of the tailings disposal area, including the surge facility, provides for adequate capacity, stability, and minimization of resource sterilization and environmental impact (Section 6.7.2).
Shell shall provide an annual report to the EUB on the status of the project and its development commencing on February 28, 2005, or such other date and frequency the EUB may stipulate (Section 6.8.2).
Shell shall provide a report on progress in improving the bitumen extraction recovery in every second annual report to the EUB starting in 2008, or such other date and frequency the EUB may stipulate (Section 7.3).
Shell shall continue to evaluate tailing solvent recovery unit (TSRU) thickeners technology and report results to the EUB in the 2006 annual report. The report must identify any opportunities to include TSRU thickeners in the project design and construction (Section 7.3).
Shell shall report on its progress in dealing with separation characteristics of asphaltenes in the TSRU tailings in its annual report to the EUB commencing in 2005, or such other date and frequency the EUB may stipulate (Section 7.3).
On or before February 28 of each year commencing in 2011, Shell shall provide to the EUB a summary of the previous year’s operation stating the amount of asphaltene rejected. The amount of asphaltenes rejection shall be limited to 10 mass per cent based on bitumen production (Section 7.3).
On an annual average basis, Shell must limit site-wide solvent losses to not more than 4 volumes per 1000 volumes of bitumen production under all operating conditions. Shell shall not discharge untreated froth treatment tailings to the tailings disposal area (Section 7.3).
Shell shall submit a report to the EUB prior to final design or June 30, 2006, whichever is earlier, on the feasibility of producing consolidated tailings (CT) on commencement of operation in order to reduce the accumulation of thickened tailings, thin fine tails, and mature fine tails (Section 8.2).
Shell shall describe its progress on developing solid tailings technology in every second annual report to the EUB, commencing on February 28, 2005, or such other date and frequency the EUB may stipulate (Section 8.2).
Shell shall submit to the EUB a report summarizing the engineering design and operating plans for the CT system two years prior to planned start-up, or such other date the EUB may stipulate (Section 8.2).
Shell shall submit to the EUB on or before February 28 of every year commencing in 2011, or such other date or frequency the EUB may stipulate, a report summarizing the performance of the tailings management system during the preceding year, including Shell’s reasons for any deviations from design (Section 8.2).
Shell shall provide a report, for EUB approval, detailing its mine plans near the Pleistocene Channel aquifer (PCA) five years prior to mining in this area to allow for the consideration of resource recovery issues and environmental impacts. The report shall include the proposed location of the pit limits and their proximity to the PCA, as well as a description of any mitigation that would be completed to minimize the impact of mining near the PCA (Section 13.1.6).
Shell shall provide an annual report on regional development cooperation to the EUB starting in 2005. The report shall describe guiding principles and activities for cooperative development, opportunities and constraints of collaborative work among developers, specific time frames and implementation steps for all project phases to integrate them with other oil sands projects in the Muskeg River basin, and the means to evaluate outcomes (Section 18.4).
Less detail

Decision 2004-10

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision3823
Applicant
EPCOR Utilities Inc.
Application Number
1316005
Title
Decision 2004-10: EPCOR Utilities Inc. code of conduct and exemption application
Date
2004
Title
Decision 2004-10: EPCOR Utilities Inc. code of conduct and exemption application
Date
2004
Applicant
EPCOR Utilities Inc.
Application Number
1316005
Hearing Panel
Berg AJ
Lock RG
McGee TM
Hearing Type
Utilities
Descriptors
Code of conduct
Decision D2003-40
Legal References
Electric Utilities Code of Conduct Regulation
Notes
EPCOR Code exemption
Approval
Approved
Less detail

Decision 2004-11

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision3824
Applicant
ATCO Gas and Pipelines Limited
Application Number
1330470
Title
Decision 2004-01: ATCO Gas and Pipelines Ltd. application for a revised franchise rider in the City of Edmonton
Date
2004
Title
Decision 2004-01: ATCO Gas and Pipelines Ltd. application for a revised franchise rider in the City of Edmonton
Date
2004
Applicant
ATCO Gas and Pipelines Limited
Application Number
1330470
Hearing Panel
Miller GJ
McGee TM
Hearing Type
Utilities
Category
Gas rate
Descriptors
Franchise agreement
Rate rider
Interim rate
Approval
Approved
Less detail

Decision 2004-12

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision3976
Applicant
Alberta Electric System Operator
Application Number
1322864
Title
Decision 2004-012: Alberta Electric System Operator 2004 general tariff application "own costs" module
Date
2004
Title
Decision 2004-012: Alberta Electric System Operator 2004 general tariff application "own costs" module
Date
2004
Applicant
Alberta Electric System Operator
Application Number
1322864
Hearing Panel
Berg AJ
Nichol JR
Asgar-Deen ML
Hearing Type
Board
Utilities
Category
Electric power rate
Descriptors
Cost
Decision D2003 77
General tariff application
Revenue requirement
Legal References
Electric Utilities Act S119
Electric Utilities Act S30
Electric Utilities Transmission Deficiency Correction Regulation
Interveners
Consumers Group
EPCOR Utilities Inc.
ATCO Electric Ltd.
Independent Power Producers Society of Alberta
TransCanada Energy Ltd.
AltaGas (Representing the ASTC Partnership)
ENMAX Power Corporation
ENMAX Energy Corporation
FIRM Group: Alberta Irrigation Projects Association
Alberta Association of Municipal Districts and Counties
Alberta Federation of REAs Ltd.
Alberta Urban Municipalities Association
Consumers Coalition of Alberta
Public Institutional Consumers of Alberta
Aboriginal Commuinties and the Care Centre Group
Less detail

Decision 2004-13

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision3825
Applicant
ATCO Gas South
Application Number
1314487
File No. 5626-59
Title
Decision 2004-13: ATCO Gas South Jumping Pound meter station – gas measurement adjustment
Date
2004
Title
Decision 2004-13: ATCO Gas South Jumping Pound meter station – gas measurement adjustment
Date
2004
Applicant
ATCO Gas South
Application Number
1314487
File No. 5626-59
Hearing Panel
McManus BT
Bruni MJ
Dahl Rees C
Hearing Type
Utilities
Board
Category
Gas processing
Descriptors
Jumping Pound field
Jumping Pound gas plant
Deferral accounting
Measuring
Meter station
NTS 82O
Interveners
Alberta Urban Municipalities
Public Institutional Consumers of Alberta
Less detail

Decision 2004-14

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision3826
Applicant
ATCO Electric Limited
Application Number
1275494
1275539
1275540
File No. 1111-1
File No. 1111-2
File No. 1111-3
Title
Decision 2004-14 ATCO Electric Ltd. 2003-2004 general tariff application – phase I refiling (amended by D2004-16)
Date
2004
Title
Decision 2004-14 ATCO Electric Ltd. 2003-2004 general tariff application – phase I refiling (amended by D2004-16)
Date
2004
Applicant
ATCO Electric Limited
Application Number
1275494
1275539
1275540
File No. 1111-1
File No. 1111-2
File No. 1111-3
Hearing Panel
Berg AJ
Dilay JD
Nichol JR
Hearing Type
Utilities
Category
Electric power rate
Descriptors
Electric power distribution
General tariff application
Rate rider
Refiling
Approval
Approved
Less detail

Decision 2004-15

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision3827
Applicant
ATCO Electric Limited
Application Number
1319540
File No. 5600-26
Title
Decisions 2004-15 ATCO Electric Ltd. balancing pool amounts related to sale of isolated generating unit
Date
2004
Title
Decisions 2004-15 ATCO Electric Ltd. balancing pool amounts related to sale of isolated generating unit
Date
2004
Applicant
ATCO Electric Limited
Application Number
1319540
File No. 5600-26
Hearing Panel
Berg AJ
Miller GJ
Nichol JR
Hearing Type
Utilities
Category
Sale of assets
Descriptors
Decision D2003 10
Sale of assets
Legal References
Electric Utilities Isolated Generating Units and Customer Choice Regulation S17
Electric Utilities Isolated Generating Units and Customer Choice Regulation S20
Electric Utilities Isolated Generating Units and Customer Choice Regulation S22
EUB Rules of Practice S12
Less detail

Decision 2004-16

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision3828
Applicant
ATCO Electric Limited
Application Number
1275494
1275539
1275540
File No. 1111-1
File No. 1111-2
File No. 1111-3
Title
Decision 2004-16: ATCO Electric Ltd. errata to Decision 2004-014 2003-2004 general tariff application Phase I refiling
Date
2004
Title
Decision 2004-16: ATCO Electric Ltd. errata to Decision 2004-014 2003-2004 general tariff application Phase I refiling
Date
2004
Applicant
ATCO Electric Limited
Application Number
1275494
1275539
1275540
File No. 1111-1
File No. 1111-2
File No. 1111-3
Hearing Panel
Berg AJ
Dilay JD
Nichol JR
Hearing Type
Utilities
Category
Electric power rate
Descriptors
Electric power distribution
General tariff application
Rate rider
Refiling
Less detail

Decision 2004-17

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision3817
Applicant
Talisman Energy Canada
Application Number
1324846
Title
Decision 2004-17: Examiner report respecting Talisman Energy Canada, application for enlargement of Turner Valley Unit No. 5 Turner Valley field
Date
2004
Title
Decision 2004-17: Examiner report respecting Talisman Energy Canada, application for enlargement of Turner Valley Unit No. 5 Turner Valley field
Date
2004
Applicant
Talisman Energy Canada
Application Number
1324846
Hearing Panel
Willard RJ
Hearing Type
Written hearing
No Hearing
Examiners
Category
Unit agreement
Descriptors
NTS 82J
Turner Valley field
Turner Valley Unit 5
Unit agreement
Legal References
Energy Resources Conservation Act S18
Turner Valley Unit Operations Act S6
Interveners
French R
French T
Approval
Approved
Less detail

Decision 2004-18

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision3902
Applicant
EPCOR Transmission Inc.
Application Number
1287139
Title
Decision 2004-18: EPCOR Transmission Inc. 2003-2004 transmission facility owner tariff and negotiated settlement
Date
2004
Title
Decision 2004-18: EPCOR Transmission Inc. 2003-2004 transmission facility owner tariff and negotiated settlement
Date
2004
Applicant
EPCOR Transmission Inc.
Application Number
1287139
Hearing Panel
Lock RG
McGee TM
Gilmour JG
Hearing Type
Utilities - rate
Written hearing
Utilities
Category
Electric power rate
Descriptors
Decision D2003 32
Depreciation
IL 98 4 (revised)
Negotiated settlement
Operating cost
Rate base
Return on investment
Revenue requirement
Tariff
Transmission facility owner
Legal References
Electric Utilities Act S134
Approval
Approved
Less detail

Decision 2004-19

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision3900
Applicant
Direct Energy Regulated Services
Application Number
1318247
Title
Decision 2004-19: Direct Energy Regulated Services gas code of conduct regulation compliance plan
Date
2004
Title
Decision 2004-19: Direct Energy Regulated Services gas code of conduct regulation compliance plan
Date
2004
Applicant
Direct Energy Regulated Services
Application Number
1318247
Hearing Panel
McManus BT
Douglas JI
Taylor WK
Hearing Type
Utilities
Written hearing
Category
Gas utility
Descriptors
Code of conduct
Compliance filing
Gas rate
Legal References
Gas Utilities Act
Gas Utilities Code of Conduct Regulation S30
Gas Utilities Code of Conduct Regulation S31
Approval
Approved
Less detail

Decision 2004-20

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision3899
Applicant
Direct Energy Partnership
Application Number
1319537
Title
Decision 2004-20: Direct Energy Partnership gas code of conduct regulation compliance plan
Date
2004
Title
Decision 2004-20: Direct Energy Partnership gas code of conduct regulation compliance plan
Date
2004
Applicant
Direct Energy Partnership
Application Number
1319537
Hearing Panel
McManus BT
Douglas JI
Taylor WK
Hearing Type
Utilities
Written hearing
Category
Gas utility
Descriptors
Code of conduct
Compliance filing
Gas rate
Legal References
Gas Utilities Act
Gas Utilities Code of Conduct Regulation S30
Gas Utilities Code of Conduct Regulation S31
Approval
Approved
Less detail

114 records – page 1 of 6.