62 records – page 1 of 4.

Decision 80-01

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2037
Applicant
Texasgulf Inc.
Application Number
780293
780647
780646
780276
790591
780275
Title
Decision on application by Texasgulf Inc., 1980 (licence to drill a well and permits to construct or resume operation of five pipelines in the Okotoks area)
Date
1980
Title
Decision on application by Texasgulf Inc., 1980 (licence to drill a well and permits to construct or resume operation of five pipelines in the Okotoks area)
Date
1980
Applicant
Texasgulf Inc.
Application Number
780293
780647
780646
780276
790591
780275
Hearing Panel
DeSorcy GJ
Goodman CJ
Bellows LA
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Pipelines
Descriptors
Fuel gas pipeline
Gas pipeline
Okotoks area
Okotoks field
Pipeline construction permit
Sour gas
Well licence
Crossfield Fm
Emergency procedure
Environmental impact
ID-79-02
Gas well
Land value
NTS 82I
Pipeline route
Right of way
Safety
Notes
Decision 80-1 on application No. 780293 to drill a well in LSD 11-1-22-29 W4M to evaluate & obtain production down to Crossfield FM, No. 780647 for pipeline to transport sour gas, No. 780646 for fuel gas pipeline, No. 780276 for pipeline to transport sour gas, No. 790591 for fuel gas pipeline and No. 780275 to resume operation of pipeline to transport sour gas.
Interveners
Carman, D.K.
Klaver, K.
Klaver, Mrs.
Heschl, B.
Heschl, Mrs.
Uragi, K.
Less detail

Decision 80-02

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2036
Applicant
ESSO Resources Canada Limited
Application Number
790377
Title
Decision on application by Esso Resources Canada Limited, 1980 (enhanced recovery by carbon dioxide miscible flood Judy Creek Beaverhill Lake A pool)
Date
1980
Title
Decision on application by Esso Resources Canada Limited, 1980 (enhanced recovery by carbon dioxide miscible flood Judy Creek Beaverhill Lake A pool)
Date
1980
Applicant
ESSO Resources Canada Limited
Application Number
790377
Hearing Panel
DeSorcy GJ
Strom NA
Bray JA
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Enhanced recovery
Descriptors
Carbon dioxide flooding
Enhanced recovery scheme
Judy Creek field
Miscible displacement
Beaverhill Lake Fm
Development drilling
Economic analysis
Monitoring
NTS 83J
Oil saturation
Reservoir model
Sweep efficiency
Tertiary recovery
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S38
Notes
Decision 80-2 on application No. 790377 for approval of a CO2 miscible flood scheme to enhance recovery of oil from Judy Creek Beaverhill Lake A pool (TP.63-64, R.10-11, W5M).
Interveners
Amoco Canada Petroleum Company Ltd.
Gulf Canada Resources Inc.
Less detail

Decision 80-03

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2078
Applicant
American Trading and Production Corporation
Application Number
790548
Title
Decision on application by American Trading and Production Corporation, 1980 (direction of the proportions of the common purchaser's acquisitions and designation of delivery point - Dixonville Bluesky B and Gething A pools)
Date
1980
Title
Decision on application by American Trading and Production Corporation, 1980 (direction of the proportions of the common purchaser's acquisitions and designation of delivery point - Dixonville Bluesky B and Gething A pools)
Date
1980
Applicant
American Trading and Production Corporation
Application Number
790548
Hearing Panel
Webber HJ
Page CJC
Vrskovy MJ
Hearing Type
Examiners
Category
Common purchaser
Descriptors
Common purchaser
Dixonville field
Bluesky Fm
Gas producing
Gas purchase
Gething Fm
Measuring
NTS 84C
Reservoir boundary
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S52
Notes
Decision 80-3 and Examiners report on application No. 790548 to have Board direct the point at which common purchaser shall take delivery and to direct the proportion of common purchaser's acquisitions from Bluesky B and Gething A pools (TP.86-87, R.25 (W5) to R.1 (W6)).
Interveners
Canadian Superior Oil Ltd
Numac Oil and Gas Ltd.
Northwestern Utilities Limited
Less detail

Decision 80-04

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2035
Applicant
Mitchell Energy Corporation
Application Number
790670
790650
790651
Title
Decision on application by Mitchell Energy Corporation, 1980 (licence to drill a well and permits to construct two pipelines in the Okotoks area)
Date
1980
Title
Decision on application by Mitchell Energy Corporation, 1980 (licence to drill a well and permits to construct two pipelines in the Okotoks area)
Date
1980
Applicant
Mitchell Energy Corporation
Application Number
790670
790650
790651
Hearing Panel
DeSorcy GJ
Goodman CJ
Bellows LA
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Pipelines
Well licence
Descriptors
Fuel gas pipeline
Gas pipeline
Okotoks field
Pipeline construction permit
Sour gas
Well licence
Blowout control
Crossfield Fm
Drilling fluid
Environmental impact
ID-79-02
Locating
Safety
Legal References
Pipeline Act
Notes
Decision D80-4 on application No. 790670 to drill a well in LSD 11-30-20-28 W4M to evaluate and obtain production from all formations down to and including the Crossfield, application No. 790650 to construct an 88.9 MM pipeline to transport sour gas from well to existing gathering system and application No. 790651 to construct 60.3 MM - 133.4 MM pipelines to transport fuel gas from existing fuel gas system to well site; see related Decision D82-19
Interveners
Payne, L.
Rio Frio Ranch Ltd.
Location
11-30-020-28W4
Less detail

Decision 80-05

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2034
Applicant
Calgary Power Ltd.
Application Number
790504
Title
Decision on application by Calgary Power Ltd., 1980 (240 KV transmission line in the Entwhistle-Whitecourt area)
Date
1980
Title
Decision on application by Calgary Power Ltd., 1980 (240 KV transmission line in the Entwhistle-Whitecourt area)
Date
1980
Applicant
Calgary Power Ltd.
Application Number
790504
Hearing Panel
Berkowitz N
Goodman CJ
Warne GA
Hearing Type
Board
Utilities
Category
Transmission line
Descriptors
Electric substation
Transmission line
Whitecourt area
Agricultural land
Electric power demand
Environmental impact
Locating
NTS 83G
NTS 83J
Legal References
Hydro and Electric Energy Act S9
Hydro and Electric Energy Act S10
Hydro and Electric Energy Act S11
Hydro and Electric Energy Act S13
Hydro and Electric Energy Act S14
Notes
Decision 80-5 on application No. 790504 for permits to construct and licences to operate a 240 KV transmission line designated as CP 919L from point near Entwhistle to Whitecourt (TP.53-59, R.6-12, W5M); Board hearing 1980-02-05/06 see also related Decision 78-17
Interveners
Alberta Power Limited
Lenko, P.S.
Lenko, Mrs.
Shumborski, R.
Shumborski, Mrs.
Farmers' Power Line Association et al Kurt Preugschas
Renlim Resources
Kobel, K.
Quinnell, G.D.
Town of Whitecourt
Miller, R.E.
Berget, J.L.
Berget. Mrs.
Less detail

Decision 80-06

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2033
Applicant
Amerada Minerals Corporation of Canada Limited
Application Number
800242
Title
Decision on application by Amerada Minerals Corporation of Canada Ltd., 1980 (permit to construct a pipeline Chestermere-Okotoks area)
Date
1980
Title
Decision on application by Amerada Minerals Corporation of Canada Ltd., 1980 (permit to construct a pipeline Chestermere-Okotoks area)
Date
1980
Applicant
Amerada Minerals Corporation of Canada Limited
Application Number
800242
Hearing Panel
DeSorcy GJ
Goodman CJ
Bellows LA
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Pipelines
Descriptors
Gas pipeline
Gathering line
Okotoks area
Pipeline construction permit
Sour gas
Emergency procedure
Encroachment
ID-79-02
Gas producing
Lease drainage
Locating
NTS 82I
Pipeline design
Pipeline route
Safety
Safety equipment
Legal References
Pipeline Act
Notes
Decision 80-6 on application No. 780242 to construct secondary pipeline to transport sour natural gas from existing wells in 22-28 W4M and 22-29 W4M to an existing gathering system; Board hearing 1979-06-19, 1980-01-15, 1980-03-04/05
Interveners
Schang, R. E.
Schang, D.L.
Schang, E.
Schang, M.
Pottinger, J.R.
Marshall, G.
Marshall, J.
Uragi, Mr.
Uragi, Mrs.
Ollerenshaw, Mr.
Shamash, Mr.
Deplaedt Holdings Ltd.
Klaver, Mr.
Klaver, Mrs.
Bowview Developers
Bridgewater, H.
Bridgewater, J.
Bridgewater Livestock Company Ltd.
Carman, Mr.
Carman, Mrs.
Soutzo, A.
Soutzo, C.
Less detail

Decision 80-07

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2032
Applicant
Alberta Power Limited
Application Number
790592
Title
Decision on application by Alberta Power Ltd., 1980 (DC tie line with Saskatchewan and Dc converter station near Provost)
Date
1980
Title
Decision on application by Alberta Power Ltd., 1980 (DC tie line with Saskatchewan and Dc converter station near Provost)
Date
1980
Applicant
Alberta Power Limited
Application Number
790592
Hearing Panel
DeSorcy GJ
Goodman CJ
Dunbar RB
Hearing Type
Board
Utilities
Category
Transmission line
Descriptors
Power system interconnection
Provost area
Transmission line
Alberta
Capacity
Economic analysis
Electric power demand
NTS 73D
Reliability
Legal References
Hydro and Electric Energy Act S9
Hydro and Electric Energy Act S11
Hydro and Electric Energy Act S14
Notes
Decision 80-7 on application No. 790592 to construct & operate a 200 MW DC converter station in the Provost area and transmission line from Metiskow substation to proposed converter station and transmission line from proposed converter station to the Alberta Saskatchewan border to interconnect the transmission systems of Alberta & Saskatchewan (TP.39-40, R.1-5, W4M); Board hearing 1980-03-11/12 & 1980-04-09.
Interveners
Electric Utility Planning Council
Mid-West Television Limited
Calgary Power Ltd.
Provost Surface Rights Society
Aker, D.
Rehman, A.E.
Downing, M.
Watson, S.
Farrish, W.R.
Farrish, R. W.
C.G. Paulgaard Farms
Paulgaard, C.
Scidmore, D.G.
Miller, H.J. on behalf of W.C. Chisholm Estate
Goodman, L.W.
Paulgaard, H.R.
Goodman, H.
Approval
Denied
Less detail

Decision 80-08

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2031
Applicant
Grande Prairie Chamber of Commerce Agricultural Committee
Albright Surface Rights Group
Bear Lake Farmers Rights Group
Elmworth Surface Rights Group
Application Number
800050
Title
Decision D80-08: Application by Grande Prairie Chamber of Commerce Agricultural Committee et al for drilling spacing unit target area requirements for oil and gas wells drilled - Grande Prairie area
Date
1980
Title
Decision D80-08: Application by Grande Prairie Chamber of Commerce Agricultural Committee et al for drilling spacing unit target area requirements for oil and gas wells drilled - Grande Prairie area
Date
1980
Applicant
Grande Prairie Chamber of Commerce Agricultural Committee
Albright Surface Rights Group
Bear Lake Farmers Rights Group
Elmworth Surface Rights Group
Application Number
800050
Hearing Panel
Millard V
Strom NA
Warne GA
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Spacing
Descriptors
Drilling spacing unit
Energy development
Grande Prairie area
Land use
Target area
Well spacing
Agricultural land
Environmental impact
IL-76-01
Gas producing
NTS 83L
NTS 83M
Oil producing
Procedure
Regulation
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S2.020
Notes
Decision 80-8 on application No. 800050 that the Board consider the drilling spacing unit target area requirements for future oil and gas wells to be drilled in the Grande Prairie area (TP.69-76, R.1-13, W6M); Board hearing 1980-04-21/22/23
Interveners
Lozeron, A.
Grande Prairie Agricultural Development Committee
Canadian Hunter Exploration Ltd.
Canadian Petroleum Association
Esso Resources Canada Limited
Sulpetro Limited
Dome Petroleum Limited
Total Petroleum (N.A.) Limited
PanCanadian Petroleum Limited
Texaco Canada Resources Lte.
Brascan Resources Limited
Less detail

Decision 80-09

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2030
Applicant
Hudson's Bay Oil and Gas Company Limited
Application Number
790560
Title
Decision on application by Hudson's Bay Oil And Gas Company Limited, 1980 (commencement of blowdown in gas unit no. 1 Kaybob South Beaverhill Lake A pool)
Date
1980
Title
Decision on application by Hudson's Bay Oil And Gas Company Limited, 1980 (commencement of blowdown in gas unit no. 1 Kaybob South Beaverhill Lake A pool)
Date
1980
Applicant
Hudson's Bay Oil and Gas Company Limited
Application Number
790560
Hearing Panel
DeSorcy GJ
Strom NA
Bray JA
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Blowdown
Descriptors
Blowdown
Kaybob South field
Beaverhill Lake Fm
Gas cycling
Gas producing
Gas saturation
NTS 83K
Oil producing
Oil recovery
Petroleum conservation
Pressure release
Reservoir model
Reservoir performance
Reservoir pressure
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S36
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S37
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S38
Notes
Decision 80-9 on application No. 790560 to amend Board approval 995 to permit cessation of injection of residue gas and commencement of blowdown in the Kaybob south Beaverhill Lake gas unit No. 1 (TP.61, R.19, W5M).
Interveners
Chevron Standard Limited
Amoco Canada Petroleum Company Ltd.
Mobil Oil Canada, Ltd.
Petrofina Canada Inc.
Alberta and Southern Gas Co. Ltd.
Consolidated Natural Gas Liimited
TransCanada PipeLines Limited
Alberta Gas Trunk Line Company Limited
Less detail

Decision 80-10

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2029
Applicant
Town of Sundre
Application Number
800359
Title
Decision on application by Town of Sundre, 1980 (relocation of a pipeline)
Date
1980
Title
Decision on application by Town of Sundre, 1980 (relocation of a pipeline)
Date
1980
Applicant
Town of Sundre
Application Number
800359
Hearing Panel
Goodman CJ
Strom NA
Bellows LA
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Pipelines
Descriptors
Gas pipeline
Pipeline route
Relocation
Sundre area
Cost analysis
Encroachment
NTS 82O
Regional planning
Right of way
Urban development
Legal References
Pipeline Act S34
Notes
Decision 80-10 on application No. 800359 to have Board Order the relocation of a pipeline owned by Alberta Gas Trunk Line located in section 33-32-5 W5M and section 4-33-5 W5M so as not to affect future development of the Town of Sundre under its annexation plan.
Interveners
The Alberta Gas Trunk Line Company Limited
EMA Holdings Ltd.
Alberta and Southern Gas Co. Ltd.
Newall, A.P.
Less detail

Decision 80-11

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2028
Applicant
Alberta Gas Trunk Line Company Limited
Application Number
800207
800248
Title
Decision on application by Alberta Gas Trunk Line Company Limited, 1980 (Knight Compressor Station and Edson main pipeline looping)
Date
1980
Title
Decision on application by Alberta Gas Trunk Line Company Limited, 1980 (Knight Compressor Station and Edson main pipeline looping)
Date
1980
Applicant
Alberta Gas Trunk Line Company Limited
Application Number
800207
800248
Hearing Panel
Millard V
Goodman CJ
Chelmick G
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Pipelines
Descriptors
Compressor station
Gas pipeline
Pipeline construction permit
Capacity
Expansion
NTS 83B
NTS 83C
NTS 83F
Legal References
Pipeline Act
Notes
Decision 80-11 on application No. 800207 to construct an addition to AGTL's existing Knight compressor station in section 28-57-17 W5M and on application No. 800248 to construct pipelines to loop the Edson main gas line in 3 sections (Clearwater loop, Nordegg loop & Wolf Lake loop) (TP.38-53, R.9-18, W5M); Board hearing 1980-06-24/25
Interveners
Alberta & Southern Gas Co. Ltd.
Canadian Hunter Exploration Ltd.
Independent Petroleum Association
Pan-Alberta Gas Ltd.
ProGas Limited
TransCanada Pipelines
Less detail

Decision 80-12

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2027
Applicant
Shell Canada Limited
Application Number
800229
Title
Decision on application by Shell Canada Limited, 1980 (industrial development permit synthetic crude oil refinery)
Date
1980
Title
Decision on application by Shell Canada Limited, 1980 (industrial development permit synthetic crude oil refinery)
Date
1980
Applicant
Shell Canada Limited
Application Number
800229
Hearing Panel
DeSorcy GJ
Bohme VE
Mink FJ
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Industrial development permit
Descriptors
Benzene
Butane
Industrial development permit
Manufactured crude oil
Oil refinery
Pentanes plus
Petroleum product
Propane
Scotford area
Demand (economics)
Economic analysis
Environmental impact
NTS 83H
Raw material
Socio-economic effect
Oil sands oil
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S42
Notes
Decision 80-12 on application No. 800229 to use synthetic crude oil, natural gas liquids & gas to manufacture refinery products, benzene, N-Hexane, propane, butanes & pentanes plus in a new refinery to be constructed near Scotford in TP.55, R.23, W4M and TP.56, R.21, W4M.
Interveners
Alberta Energy Company Limited
Chevron Standard Limited
Dome Petroleum Limited
Fort Saskatchewan Chamber of Commerce
Gulf Canada Limited
Hudson's Bay Oil and Gas Company Limited
Imperial Oil Limited
Turbo Resources Limited
Less detail

Decision 80-13

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2026
Applicant
Turbo Resources Limited
Application Number
800249
Title
Decision on application by Turbo Resources Limited, 1980 (industrial development permit for a southern Alberta refinery)
Date
1980
Title
Decision on application by Turbo Resources Limited, 1980 (industrial development permit for a southern Alberta refinery)
Date
1980
Applicant
Turbo Resources Limited
Application Number
800249
Hearing Panel
DeSorcy GJ
Bohme VE
Mink FJ
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Industrial development permit
Descriptors
Balzac area
Industrial development permit
Oil refinery
Petroleum product
Demand (economics)
Design criteria
Lubricating oil
Natural gas - fuel
NTS 82P
Raw material
Recycling
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S42
Notes
Decision 80-13 on application No. 800249 to use crude oil, pentanes plus and butanes as feedstock & gas as fuel in a refinery/waste lubricating oil recycling facility to be constructed near Balzac (section 1-26-29 W4M).
Interveners
Alberta Energy Company Limited
Chevron Standard Limited
Dome Petroleum Limited
Gulf Canada Limited
Imperial Oil Limited
Shell Canada Limited
Less detail

Decision 80-14|80-14 Addendum

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2025
Applicant
Edmonton Power
Application Number
800049
Title
Decision on application by Edmonton Power, 1980 (240 KV transmission line Jasper terminal-north Calder) (and addendum)
Date
1980
Title
Decision on application by Edmonton Power, 1980 (240 KV transmission line Jasper terminal-north Calder) (and addendum)
Date
1980
Applicant
Edmonton Power
Application Number
800049
Hearing Panel
Berkowitz N
Goodman CJ
Bray JA
Hearing Type
Board
Utilities
Category
Transmission line
Descriptors
Edmonton area
Transmission line
Reliability
Right of way
Route selection
Transmission corridor
Legal References
Hydro and Electric Energy Act
Notes
Decision and addendum on application to construct and operate a 240 KV transmission line designated as EP 930L from Edmonton Power's Jasper terminal to Calgary Power's north Calder substation (TP.53, R.25, W4M)
Interveners
Duke, M.
Babie, T.L.
Less detail

Decision 80-15

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2024
Applicant
Peace Pipe Line Ltd.
Federated Pipe Lines Ltd.
Dome Petroleum Limited
Application Number
790677
800109
800113
Title
Decision on application by Peace Pipe Line Ltd., Federated Pipe Lines Ltd. and Dome Petroleum Limited, 1980 (permits to construct pipelines - Grande Prairie area)
Date
1980
Title
Decision on application by Peace Pipe Line Ltd., Federated Pipe Lines Ltd. and Dome Petroleum Limited, 1980 (permits to construct pipelines - Grande Prairie area)
Date
1980
Applicant
Peace Pipe Line Ltd.
Federated Pipe Lines Ltd.
Dome Petroleum Limited
Application Number
790677
800109
800113
Hearing Panel
DeSorcy GJ
Bohme VE
Goodman CJ
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Pipelines
Descriptors
Competition
High pressure
Grande Prairie area
Liquefied petroleum gas
Oil pipeline
Pipeline construction permit
Deliverability
Economic analysis
Environmental impact
Pipeline crossing
Pipeline design
Route selection
Safety
Notes
Decision 80-15 on application No. 790677 by Peace Pipe, No. 800109 by Federated Pipelines and No. 800113 by Dome Petroleum all to transport liquids from the deep basin area of NW Alberta (TP.53-82, R.13 (W5M) to R.12 (W6M)); Board hearing 1980-04-28 to 1980-05-02 and from 1980-05-05 through 1980-05-07
Interveners
Alberta Energy Co. Ltd.
The Alberta Gas Trunk Line Company Limited
Amerada Minerals Corporation
Amoco Canada Petroleum Co. Ltd.
Canadian Hunter Exploration Ltd.
Canadian Superior Oil Ltd.
CanDel Oil Ltd.
Chieftan Development Co. Ltd.
Esso Resources Canada Ltd.
Hudson's Bay Oil and Gas Company Limited
Husky Oil Ltd.
Koch Pipelines
PanCanadian Petroleum Ltd.
Petro-Canada Explorations Inc.
Sulpetro Ltd.
Texaco Canada Resources Ltd.
Total Petroleum (N.A.) Ltd.
Union Oil Company of Canada Ltd.
North Canadian Forest Industries
Proctor & Gamble Cellulose Ltd.
Bear Lake Farm Rights Group
Drysdale, F.
Patterson, P.
Friedel, L.
Rigler, C.
MacLeod, L.
Schubert, A.
Less detail

Decision 80-16

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2023
Applicant
Northwestern Utilities Limited
Application Number
800115
Title
Decision on application by Northwestern Utilities Limited, 1980 (permit to construct a pipeline loop - northeast Edmonton area)
Date
1980
Title
Decision on application by Northwestern Utilities Limited, 1980 (permit to construct a pipeline loop - northeast Edmonton area)
Date
1980
Applicant
Northwestern Utilities Limited
Application Number
800115
Hearing Panel
DeSorcy GJ
Goodman CJ
Strom NA
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Pipelines
Descriptors
Edmonton area
Gas pipeline
Pipeline construction permit
Capacity
Gas demand
Heating fuel
Pipeline design
Legal References
Pipeline Act
Notes
Decision 80-16 on application No. 800115 to construct a pipeline in NE Edmonton area to transport natural gas from main transmission supplies to an existing distribution system supplying gas to customers in the north Edmonton area (from a point in LSD 4-19-53-23 W4M to a point in LSD 5-6-54-23 W4M); Board hearing (heard with application No. 800204) see Decision 80-20 for Decision on this related application
Less detail

Decision 80-17

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2022
Applicant
ESSO Chemical Canada
Application Number
800304
Title
Decision on application by ESSO Chemical Canada, 1980 (industrial development permit to manufacture ammonia and urea)
Date
1980
Title
Decision on application by ESSO Chemical Canada, 1980 (industrial development permit to manufacture ammonia and urea)
Date
1980
Applicant
ESSO Chemical Canada
Application Number
800304
Hearing Panel
Millard V
Berkowitz N
Webber HJ
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Industrial development permit
Descriptors
Ammonia
Chemical plant
Industrial development permit
Redwater area
Urea
Benefit cost analysis
Expansion
Gas supply
Natural gas - fuel
Natural gas - raw material
NTS 83H
Socio-economic effect
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S42
Notes
Decision 80-17 on application No. 800304 to use gas in the manufacture of ammonia at existing plant near Redwater and ammonia and urea at an expansion of this facility (section 17 & 20, TP.56, R.21, W4M); Board hearing 1980-07-28/29
Interveners
Sherritt Gordon Mines Limited
Less detail

Decision 80-18

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2021
Applicant
Energy Resources Conservation Board
Application Number
800442
800443
800444
800445
800446
800447
Title
Decision on proceedings on rescission on inactive gas removal permits
Date
1980
Title
Decision on proceedings on rescission on inactive gas removal permits
Date
1980
Applicant
Energy Resources Conservation Board
Application Number
800442
800443
800444
800445
800446
800447
Hearing Panel
DeSorcy GJ
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Gas removal
Descriptors
Gas removal
Revision
Legal References
Gas Resources Preservation Act
Notes
Decision 80-18 on application No. 800447 by PetroCanada and proceeding No. 800442, 800443, 800444, 800445, and 800446 to consider rescinding inactive gas removal permits.
Interveners
Petro-Canada Exploration Inc.
Alberta and Southern Gas Co. Ltd.
Less detail

Decision 80-19

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2020
Applicant
Fekete and Associates
Lario Oil and Gas Company
Application Number
800375
Title
Decision on application by Lario Oil and Gas Company, 1980 (order directing the porportions of gas to be purchased in the Whitecourt Pekisko E pool)
Date
1980
Title
Decision on application by Lario Oil and Gas Company, 1980 (order directing the porportions of gas to be purchased in the Whitecourt Pekisko E pool)
Date
1980
Applicant
Fekete and Associates
Lario Oil and Gas Company
Application Number
800375
Hearing Panel
Warne GA
Vrskovy, MJ
Stanton PM
Hearing Type
Examiners
Category
Common purchaser
Descriptors
Common purchaser
Whitecourt field
Gas producing
Gas purchase
Geologic interpretation
Lease drainage
Measuring
NTS 83J
Pekisko Fm
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S52
Notes
Decision 80-19 with Examiners report appended on application No. 800375 by Fekete and Associates on behalf of Lario for an Order directing the proportion of gas TransCanada pipelines must purchase from each producer or owner from the Whitecourt Pekisko E pool (TP.60, R.10-11, W5M).
Interveners
TransCanada PipeLines Limited
Less detail

Decision 80-20

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2019
Applicant
Northwestern Utilities Limited
Application Number
800204
Title
Decision on application by Northwestern Utilities Limited, 1980 (permit to construct a pipeline in the north Edmonton area)
Date
1980
Title
Decision on application by Northwestern Utilities Limited, 1980 (permit to construct a pipeline in the north Edmonton area)
Date
1980
Applicant
Northwestern Utilities Limited
Application Number
800204
Hearing Panel
DeSorcy GJ
Goodman CJ
Strom NA
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Pipelines
Descriptors
Edmonton area
Gas pipeline
Pipeline construction permit
Capacity
Gas demand
Heating fuel
NTS 83H
Pipeline design
Pipeline route
Route selection
Legal References
Pipeline Act
Notes
Decision 80-20 on application No. 800204 to construct a pipeline to transport gas from main transmission lines to existing distribution facilities supplying gas to customers in the north Edmonton area (TP.53-54, R.23-25, W4M); Board hearing heard with application No. 800115 see related Decision 80-16 for Decision on phase 1 (application No. 800115)
Less detail

62 records – page 1 of 4.