93 records – page 1 of 5.

Decision 57-02

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2418
Applicant
Saskatchewan Power Corporation
Application Number
000079 (HEARING)
Title
Decision on application by Saskatchewan Power Corporation, 1957 (removal of gas produced from the Medicine Hat field)
Date
1957
Title
Decision on application by Saskatchewan Power Corporation, 1957 (removal of gas produced from the Medicine Hat field)
Date
1957
Applicant
Saskatchewan Power Corporation
Application Number
000079 (HEARING)
Hearing Panel
McKinnon IN
Goodall DP
Govier GW
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Gas removal
Descriptors
Gas removal
Alberta
Etzikom field
Gas demand
Gas reserve
Gas supply
Medicine Hat area
Legal References
Gas Resources Preservation Act 1956
Notes
ERCB Report 57-2 on Hearing No. 79 on an application by Saskatchewan Power to remove gas from the Medicine Hat and Etzikom fields; Board hearing 1956-12-11 and 1957-01-15/16/17/18
Less detail

Decision 57-UNNUMBERED (57-08-30)

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision106
Applicant
Energy Resources Conservation Board
Application Number
000085 (HEARING)
Title
Decision on the proration plan and the economic allowance (letter to all operators)
Date
1957
Title
Decision on the proration plan and the economic allowance (letter to all operators)
Date
1957
Applicant
Energy Resources Conservation Board
Application Number
000085 (HEARING)
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Prorationing
Descriptors
Marketing
MPR
Proration
Alberta
Notes
Decision (released as letter to all operators) on proceeding no.85 to review the main principles of the Board's plan for proration to market demand and to consider the role and method of computation of the economic allowance
Less detail

Decision 2009-01

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision4336
Applicant
ConocoPhillips Canada (BRC) Limited
Application Number
1550490
1550706
Title
Decision 2009-001: ConocoPhillips Canada (BRC) Ltd. applications for two well licences Pembina Field (and errata)
Date
2009
Title
Decision 2009-001: ConocoPhillips Canada (BRC) Ltd. applications for two well licences Pembina Field (and errata)
Date
2009
Applicant
ConocoPhillips Canada (BRC) Limited
Application Number
1550490
1550706
Hearing Panel
Miller GJ
Willard RJ
Tingley DG
Hearing Type
Board
No Hearing
Category
Well licence
Descriptors
Safety
Pembina Field
NTS 83G
Well licence
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S2.020
ERCB Rules of Practice S21
Notes
Errata, January 15, 2009 attached to back page of Decision
Interveners
Whitlock C
Whitlock A
Approval
Withdrawn
Location
05-15-048-09W5
Less detail

Decision 2009-02

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision4337
Applicant
Petro-Canada Oil Sands Incorporated
Application Number
1490956
Title
Decision 2009-002: Petro-Canada Oil Sands Inc. application to construct and operate an oil sands upgrader in Sturgeon County
Date
2009
Title
Decision 2009-002: Petro-Canada Oil Sands Inc. application to construct and operate an oil sands upgrader in Sturgeon County
Date
2009
Applicant
Petro-Canada Oil Sands Incorporated
Application Number
1490956
Hearing Panel
Dilay JD
Ebbels JD
Gilmour JG
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Oil sands
Descriptors
Air quality
Safety
Surface water
Groundwater
Reclamation
Noise (sound)
Gasification
Gas flaring
Coking
Vegetation
Oil sands
Upgrader
Sturgeon County
NTS83H
Legal References
Oil Sands Conservation Act S11
Alberta Utilities Commission Act S80
Environmental Protection and Enhancement Act S49
Water Act S36
Water Act S37
Water Act S49
Water Act S50
Administrative Procedures and Jurisdiction Act S12
Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms S7
Interveners
Northwest Sturgeon County Industrial Landowners and Citzens for Responsible Development NESCIL/CFRD
Shaw Femily
SV Half Diamond Ranch, SV Farms Ltd.
Hoehn R
Sturgeon County
Town of Gibbons
Alberta Justice
Algerta Industrial Heartland Association of Sturgeon County
Energy Resources Conservation Board Staff
Metis Nation of Alberta (MNA)
Total E&P Canada Ltd.
Suncor Energy Inc.
Shell Canada
StatoiHydro
North West Upgrading Inc (North West)
Approval
Approved with conditions
Conditions
APPENDIX 1
Summary of Commitments
Commitments by Petro-Canada Oil Sands Inc.
General
Stakeholders
Noise
Light
Flare
Dust
Air
FAP
VOC/PAH
GHG
Water
Land
Wastes
ERP
Traffic
Historical
Wildlife APPENDIX 2
Approval Conditions
Less detail

Decision 2009-03

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision4338
Applicant
Tournament Exploration Limited
Application Number
1582618
Title
Decision 2009-003: Examiner report respecting Tournament Exploration Limited application for special oil well spacing Gilby Field
Date
2009
Title
Decision 2009-003: Examiner report respecting Tournament Exploration Limited application for special oil well spacing Gilby Field
Date
2009
Applicant
Tournament Exploration Limited
Application Number
1582618
Hearing Panel
Willard RJ
Hubbard BC
Dibus TA
Hearing Type
Examiner Report
No Hearing
Category
Spacing
Descriptors
Drainage
Dispute resolution
Well spacing
NTS 83B
Gilby field
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S79
Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S5.190
Interveners
Quatro Resources Inc.
Approval
Approved
Location
##-15-042-03W5
Less detail

Decision 2009-05

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision4339
Applicant
Encana Corporation
Application Number
1562431
Title
Decision 2009-005: Examiner report respecting Encana Corporation application for a single-well oil battery licence Elnora Field
Date
2009
Title
Decision 2009-005: Examiner report respecting Encana Corporation application for a single-well oil battery licence Elnora Field
Date
2009
Applicant
Encana Corporation
Application Number
1562431
Hearing Panel
Wilson-Temple LD
Knox HW
Craig MS
Hearing Type
Examiner Report
No Hearing
Category
Well licence
Descriptors
Safety
Road
Well licence
Elnora Field
NTS 82P
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S7.001
Interveners
Winther E
Winther L
Approval
Approved
Location
16-17-035-23W4
Less detail

Decision 2009-06

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision4340
Applicant
Artek Exploration Limited
Application Number
1593351
Title
Decision 2009-006: Artek Exploration Ltd. section 40 review of well licence no. 0400525 Clayhurst Field
Date
2009
Title
Decision 2009-006: Artek Exploration Ltd. section 40 review of well licence no. 0400525 Clayhurst Field
Date
2009
Applicant
Artek Exploration Limited
Application Number
1593351
Hearing Panel
Ebbels JD
Hearing Type
Board
No Hearing
Category
Well licence
Descriptors
Hydrogen sulphide
Well licence
Clayhurst Field
NTS 84D
Review and variance
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S2.020
Energy Resources Conservation Act S40
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S25(d)
Interveners
Klassen J
Klassen S
Approval
No approval required
Location
05-24-083-05W6
Less detail

Decision 2009-08

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision4346
Applicant
Encana Corporation
Application Number
1435831
Title
Decision 2009-08: Encana Corporation shallow gas infill development project Suffield National Wildlife Area, Alberta (ERCB application no. 1435831, CEAA reference no. 05-07-15620) report of the ERCB-CEAA joint review panel
Date
2009
Title
Decision 2009-08: Encana Corporation shallow gas infill development project Suffield National Wildlife Area, Alberta (ERCB application no. 1435831, CEAA reference no. 05-07-15620) report of the ERCB-CEAA joint review panel
Date
2009
Applicant
Encana Corporation
Application Number
1435831
Hearing Panel
Connelly RG
Ross B
DeSorcy GJ
Hearing Type
Board
Joint
Descriptors
Reclamation
Wildlife
Vegetation
Soil
Wetland
Water resource
Renewable resource
Noise reduction
Air quality
Health
Climate
Greenhouse effect
Meteorology
Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency
NTS 72L
Shallow producing
Suffield area
Gas well
Environmental impact
Milk River FM
Medicine Hat FM
Second White Specks FM
Conservation
Legal References
Canada Wildlife Act S2
Canadian Environmental Assessment Act S35
Wildlife Area Regulations S3
Wildlife Area Regulations S4
Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S2.020
EUB Rules of Practice S12
Interveners
Environmental Coalition
Government of Canada
Suffield Environmental Advisory Committee (SEAC)
Sufrfield Industry Range Control (SIRC)
Living World Nature Trust
Kettenbach M
Federation of Alberta Naturalists
Longair Dr. R
Trottier G
Flint Energy
Society of Grasslands Naturalists
Cerpro Energy
Gardner R
Canadian Parks & Wilderness Society and Nature Saskatchewan
Hagen D
Ernst J
Approval
Approved with conditions
Approved (partial)
Location
11-28-015-06W4
13-28-015-06W4
15-28-015-06W4
Less detail

Decision 2009-09

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision4354
Applicant
Alberta Energy and Utilities Board
Application Number
1513726
Title
Decision 2009-009 : Inquiry into natural gas liquids (NGL) extraction matters
Date
2009
Title
Decision 2009-009 : Inquiry into natural gas liquids (NGL) extraction matters
Date
2009
Applicant
Alberta Energy and Utilities Board
Application Number
1513726
Hearing Panel
McManus BT
Dahl Rees C
DeSorcy G
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Energy resources
Descriptors
Natural gas
Extraction
Allowable production
Demand (economics)
Government policy
Marketing
Petrochemical industry
Raw material
Supply (economics)
Alberta
Economic forecasting
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S94
Energy Resources Conservation Act S21
Public Utilities Board Act S46
Alberta Utilities Commission Act S80(3)
Notes
Appendices 1 - 13 included
Interveners
Alberta Department of Energy
Alberta Ethane Gathering System L.P.
Alliance Pipeline Ltd.
AltaGas Ltd.
Amended Straddle Plant Group
ATCO Midstream Ltd.
ATCO Pipelines
Aux Sable Canada Ltd.
BP Canada Energy Company
Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers
Canadian Chemical Producers' Association
ConocoPhillips Canada Ltd.
Dpw Chemical Canada Inc.
EnCana Corporation
Government of the Northwest Territories
Industrial Gas Consumers Association of Alberta
Imperial Oil Resources
Inter Pipeline Fund
Keyera Energy Limited Partnership
Nexen Inc.
NOVA Chemicals Corporation
NOVA Gas Transmission Ltd
Utilities Consumer Advocate
Pembina Pipeline Corporation
Provident Energy Ltd
Quicksilver Resources Canada Inc
Shell Canada Energy, Shell Energy North America (Canada) Inc., Shell Canada Products, and Shell Chemicals Canada Ltd.
Spectra Energy Empress
State of Alaska
Straddle Plant Group
Talisman Energy Inc.
Taylor NGL Limited Partnership
Tenaska Marketing Ventures and Tenaska Marketing Canada
Western Export Group
Ziff Energy Group
Approval
Approved
Less detail

Decision 2009-11

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision4341
Applicant
Encana Corporation
Application Number
1563943
1578501
Title
Decision 2009-011: Encana Corporation applications for two pipeline licences Twining Field
Date
2009
Title
Decision 2009-011: Encana Corporation applications for two pipeline licences Twining Field
Date
2009
Applicant
Encana Corporation
Application Number
1563943
1578501
Hearing Panel
Miller GJ
Gilmour JG
Turner DJ
Hearing Type
Board
No Hearing
Category
Pipelines
Descriptors
Pipeline licence
Twining Field
Land use
Land value
NTS 82P
Legal References
ERCB Rules of Practice S21
Pipeline Act Part 4
Interveners
Niemi K
Niemi E
Lemay G
Lemay H
Lemay M
Lemay S
Approval
Withdrawn
Location
13-04-033-23W4
06-28-032-23W4
15-04-023-23W4
14-04-033-23W4
08-04-033-23W4
07-04-033-23W4
06-04-033-23W4
Less detail

Decision 2009-13

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision4342
Applicant
Tykewest Limited
Application Number
1552791
Title
Decision 2009-013: Examiner report respecting Tykewest Limited application for a common carrier order, Knopcik Field
Date
2009
Title
Decision 2009-013: Examiner report respecting Tykewest Limited application for a common carrier order, Knopcik Field
Date
2009
Applicant
Tykewest Limited
Application Number
1552791
Hearing Panel
Dilay GW
Crowfoot CA
MacGillivray JR
Hearing Type
Examiner Report
Category
Common carrier
Descriptors
Pool designation
Proliferation
Common carrier
Knopcik Field
NTS 83M
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S48(1)
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S48(4)(a)
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S48(4)(b)
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S56
Interveners
New North
Approval
Approved
Location
14-09-074-11W6
03-16-074-11W6
Less detail

Decision 2009-21

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision4343
Applicant
TAQA North Limited
Application Number
1568184
Title
Decision 2009-021: TAQA North Ltd. application for pool delineation Wilson Creek Field
Date
2009
Title
Decision 2009-021: TAQA North Ltd. application for pool delineation Wilson Creek Field
Date
2009
Applicant
TAQA North Limited
Application Number
1568184
Hearing Panel
Eynon G
Langlo CA
Warren WA
Hearing Type
Board
No Hearing
Category
Enhanced recovery
Descriptors
Banff FM
NTS 83B
Pool designation
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S33
ERCB Rules of Practice S21
Interveners
Nexxtep Resources Ltd
Approval
Approved
Location
04-25-042-05W5
01-25-042-05W5
Less detail

Decision 2009-22

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision4344
Applicant
ARC Resources Limited
Application Number
1579701
1579704
Title
Decision 2009-022: ARC Resources Ltd. applications for two pipeline licences Pembina Field
Date
2009
Title
Decision 2009-022: ARC Resources Ltd. applications for two pipeline licences Pembina Field
Date
2009
Applicant
ARC Resources Limited
Application Number
1579701
1579704
Hearing Panel
Bruni MJ
Hearing Type
Board
No Hearing
Category
Pipelines
Descriptors
Pipeline licence
Pembina Field
Dispute resolution
NTS 83G
Legal References
Pipeline Act Part 4
Interveners
Robb R
Approval
Approved
Location
05-28-049-06W5
09-28-049-06W5
08-32-049-06W5
Less detail

Decision 2009-23

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision4345
Applicant
Bearspaw Petroleum Limited
Application Number
1462817
1462821
1451117
1457452
Title
Decision 2009-023: Bearspaw Petroleum Ltd. application for two well licences and two pipeline licence Crossfield field (and errata)
Date
2009
Title
Decision 2009-023: Bearspaw Petroleum Ltd. application for two well licences and two pipeline licence Crossfield field (and errata)
Date
2009
Applicant
Bearspaw Petroleum Limited
Application Number
1462817
1462821
1451117
1457452
Hearing Panel
Bruni MJ
Langlo CA
Rahnama F
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Pipelines
Well licence
Descriptors
Pipeline route
Safety
Emergency response plan
Environmental impact
Crossfield field
NTS 82I
Well licence
Pipeline licence
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S2.020
Pipeline Act Part 4
Interveners
Forster SH
Forster AC
Forster MS
Worthen VL
Meier D
Meier M
Young and Kalef Landowners
Blanchard R
Clarke G
Clarke K
Hawkins LJ
Hawlkins MS
Warrack KL
Hurst C
Scott MB
Scott EH
Deniger B
Deniger C
Mikkelsen W
Approval
Approved with conditions
Conditions
APPENDIX 2 SUMMARY OF COMMITMENTS The Board notes throughout the decision report that Bearspaw Petroleum Ltd. has undertaken to conduct certain activities in connection with its operations that are not strictly required by the ERCB’s regulations. These undertakings are described as commitments and are summarized below. It is the Board’s view that when a company makes commitments of this nature, it has satisfied itself that these activities will benefit both the project and the public, and the Board takes these commitments into account when arriving at its decision. The Board expects the applicant, having made the commitments, to fully carry out the undertaking or advise the ERCB if, for whatever reasons, it cannot fulfill a commitment. The ERCB would then assess whether the circumstances regarding the failed commitment warrant a review of the original approval. The Board notes that the affected parties also have the right to request a review of the original approval if commitments made by the applicant remain unfulfilled. COMMITMENTS BY BEARSPAW PETROLEUM LTD.
To work with all parties affected by the development, to minimize any impacts to the extent possible, and to keep affected parties informed of the progress on the project.
To work with EnCana Corporation (EnCana) should EnCana choose to exercise its mineral interests at Section 35-23-28W4M and with the Forsters to minimize any effects should additional drilling need to take place on the Forsters’ lands.
To conduct further soil and groundwater studies to evaluate the potential for the pipeline to shift and to determine appropriate mitigation measures if necessary.
To use best practices with respect to the design, construction, and operation of the pipelines and to comply with all requirements. This would include, but not be limited to, compliance with all applicable regulations, as well as ERCB guidelines and directives.
To engage the necessary consultants, including soils and wetland experts, and if these consultants reasonably determined that certain investigations and measures were required, to adhere to such recommendations.
To conduct a full-scale ERP exercise prior to the pipelines going on production.
Location
16-35-023-28W4
09-02-024-28W4
07-33-023-28W4
Less detail

Decision 2009-24

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision4347
Applicant
Canadian Natural Resources Limited
Application Number
1576629
Title
Decision 2009-024 : Canadian natural resources limited pool delineation and gas shut-in application Athabasca Wabiskaw-McMurray
Date
2009
Title
Decision 2009-024 : Canadian natural resources limited pool delineation and gas shut-in application Athabasca Wabiskaw-McMurray
Date
2009
Applicant
Canadian Natural Resources Limited
Application Number
1576629
Hearing Panel
Bruni MJ
Eynon G
Willard RJ
Hearing Type
Board
No Hearing
Category
Pool designation
Descriptors
NTS 73M
Upper Mannville FM
Shutin
Pressure measuring
Pool designation
Interveners
Enerplus
Approval
Approved
Location
12-28-073-08W4
Less detail

Decision 2009-25

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision4348
Applicant
West Energy Limited
Application Number
1547037
Title
Decision 2009-025: West Energy Limited application for a well licence Pembina Field
Date
2009
Title
Decision 2009-025: West Energy Limited application for a well licence Pembina Field
Date
2009
Applicant
West Energy Limited
Application Number
1547037
Hearing Panel
Bruni MJ
Ebbels JD
Eynon G
Hearing Type
Board
No Hearing
Category
Well licence
Descriptors
Pembina Field
NTS 83G
Well licence
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S2.020
ERCB Rules of Practice S21
Interveners
Parkland County
West Parkland Liaison Committee Members
Parkland School Division No. 70
Losey Dr. T
Kerpan C
Approval
Withdrawn
Location
14-35-050-06W5
Less detail

Decision 2009-26

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision4349
Applicant
Canyon Oil and Gas Corporation
Application Number
1548019
Title
Decision 2009-026 : Examiner report respecting Canyon Oil and Gas Corp. application for a well licence Pembina Field
Date
2009
Title
Decision 2009-026 : Examiner report respecting Canyon Oil and Gas Corp. application for a well licence Pembina Field
Date
2009
Applicant
Canyon Oil and Gas Corporation
Application Number
1548019
Hearing Panel
Knox HW
Touchette LP
Longworth HL
Hearing Type
Examiners
No Hearing
Category
Well licence
Descriptors
Weed control
Land use
Pembina Field
NTS 83G
Well licence
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S2.020
Interveners
Young A
Young E
Approval
Approved
Location
08-05-050-05W5
Less detail

Decision 2009-27

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision4350
Applicant
Pennine Petroleum Corporation
Application Number
1571005
Title
Decision 2009-027 : Pennine Petroleum Corp. application for a pipeline licences Pincher Creek Field
Date
2009
Title
Decision 2009-027 : Pennine Petroleum Corp. application for a pipeline licences Pincher Creek Field
Date
2009
Applicant
Pennine Petroleum Corporation
Application Number
1571005
Hearing Panel
Miller GJ
Watson TL
Clark RC
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Pipelines
Descriptors
Pipeline
Land use
Pipeline licence
Pincher Creek Field
NTS 82H
Legal References
Pipeline Act Part 4
Interveners
Butte Ranches Ltd.
Approval
Approved
Location
02-11-004-29W4
Less detail

Decision 2009-28

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision4351
Applicant
Husky Oil Operations Limited
Application Number
1578849
1578921
1579343
1580132
1580133
1603471
1603396
1603462
1603447
1603382
Title
Decision 2009-028: Examiner report respecting Husky Oil Operations Limited applications for five well licences and five facility licences Marwayne and Lloyd Fields
Date
2009
Title
Decision 2009-028: Examiner report respecting Husky Oil Operations Limited applications for five well licences and five facility licences Marwayne and Lloyd Fields
Date
2009
Applicant
Husky Oil Operations Limited
Application Number
1578849
1578921
1579343
1580132
1580133
1603471
1603396
1603462
1603447
1603382
Hearing Panel
Knox HW
Eastlick BK
Smandych A
Hearing Type
Examiner Report
Category
Well licence
Descriptors
Position (location)
NTS 73E
Well licence
Facility licence
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S2.020
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S7
Interveners
Scriber Farms Ltd.
Approval
Approved
Location
04-04-053-01W4
Less detail

Decision 2009-29

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision4352
Applicant
CCS Corporation
Application Number
1553726
Title
Decision 2009-029 : CCS Corporation section 40 review and variance of application no. 1515213, class Ib waste disposal scheme, well 00/09-01-048-14W5M Brazeau River
Date
2009
Title
Decision 2009-029 : CCS Corporation section 40 review and variance of application no. 1515213, class Ib waste disposal scheme, well 00/09-01-048-14W5M Brazeau River
Date
2009
Applicant
CCS Corporation
Application Number
1553726
Hearing Panel
Bruni MJ
Watson TL
Willard RJ
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Environment/Pollution
Descriptors
Groundwater
Cementing
Underground storage facility
Data recording
NTS 83H
Waste disposal
Review and variance
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S39
Energy Resources Conservation Act S40
Energy Resources Conservation Act S3
Interveners
Keyera Energy
Approval
Approved with conditions
Conditions
APPENDIX 2 SUMMARY OF CONDITIONS Conditions generally are requirements in addition to or otherwise expanding upon existing regulations and guidelines. An applicant must comply with conditions or it is in breach of its approval and subject to enforcement action by the ERCB. Enforcement of an approval includes enforcement of the conditions attached to that approval. Sanctions imposed for the breach of such conditions may include the suspension of the approval, resulting in the shut-in of a facility. The conditions imposed on the waste disposal approval are summarized below. Logging CCS is required to run the following logs in the 09-01 well, in accordance with the logging requirements of Directive 051 and as discussed in Section 7.3.
Cementing top location: A cement top locating log must be run if the production casing is not cemented to surface or cement returns to surface were not obtained and maintained during setting.
Hydraulic isolation: The minimum logging requirements for a Class Ib well to evaluate hydraulic isolation of the disposal or injection include running a temperature survey and one of the following: radioactive tracer survey, oxygen activation log, or cement integrity log. All required logs must be submitted, accompanied by a detailed interpretation of the log against its specific objective.
Casing integrity: A full-length casing inspection log must be run on any existing well being converted to injection or disposal service. When a casing inspection log is used to assess the casing integrity and condition, the maximum burst resistance, based on the least wall thickness and minimal yield strength of the casing, must be greater than 1.3 times the maximum allowable wellhead injection pressure (see Section 1.0 of Directive 051). CCS is encouraged to run exterior corrosion logs to optimize its evaluation of the wellbore condition. Monitoring Program The CCS monitoring program must consist of the following:
Continuously monitoring the tubing-production casing and production-intermediate casing annuli. This includes monitoring any pressure change of both annuli 24 hours a day, seven days a week, 365 days a year. The pressure transmission of both these annuli would be relayed back to the facility SCADA screen. If an alarm condition is triggered, it would activate a call-out system. The monitoring program would be able to signal a process alarm to the operator on shift and at the same time close in a master block valve that would stop injection should the automation detect a pressure change. At that time, CCS would assess and find the reason for the alarm.
Maintain a positive pressure on the annuli between the tubing-production casing and production-intermediate casing. This includes alarming on high and low pressures to be determined by operating performance and switch performance.
CCS must work with ERCB staff to initiate a compliance assurance program with respect to its proposed monitoring program of the 09-01 well.
Location
09-01-048-14W5
Less detail

93 records – page 1 of 5.